Sammaan Capital CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 10 Aug 2026, 7 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

• Appointment of Mr. Alwyn Dinesh Crasta (DIN: 06993693) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company.

  7 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Oct 2025, 33 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

• Issuance of Equity Shares and Warrants by way of a Preferential Issue on a Private Placement basis.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundCompany has not explained why warrants are the preferred instrument for fund raising. Further, the warrants have been priced on par with equity without a fair premium despite warrants offering benefits such as deferred payment and potential upside over the conversion period.
  • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: While the value in having an investor cum Promoter like IHC is noted, the Company has not explained why warrants are the preferred instrument for fund raising. Further, the warrants have been priced on par with equity without a fair premium despite warrants offering benefits such as deferred payment and potential upside over the conversion period
  • HSBC Mutual FundThe authority could cause dilution for existing shareholders.
  • PPFAS Mutual FundWarrants are priced at par with equity without a fair premium.

  24 for8 against
• Amendment to the Articles of Association of the Company and grant of Special Right of Pre-Emption to identified shareholder of the Company.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, quant Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundPreferential treatment preventing dilution of promoter shareholding. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Preferential treatment preventing dilution of promoter shareholding. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted
  • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe amendment shall grant Avenir Investment RSC Ltd the right of first offer on all future security issuances while it remains a promoter. This amendment shall lead to preferential treatment preventing dilution of promoter shareholding. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
  • PPFAS Mutual FundAnti-dilution rights granted to only select shareholder; Concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • quant Mutual FundCompliant with the law. Governance concern: Preferential treatment preventing dilution of promoter shareholding. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.

  24 for9 against
• Amendment to the Articles of Association of the Company and grant of Special Right regarding Directors Nomination to identified shareholder of the Company.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, quant Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual Fund, WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundThe right to nominate directors / maintain board control are linked to promoter status and not proportionate shareholding; the right to recommend independent directors raises question over the selection process and independence of the potential candidates, such special nomination rights proposed without adequate safeguards undermine the role of NRC; discrepancy in rights; board composition driven by shareholder needs.
  • Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual FundThe proposed insertion allows the Investor to appoint a minimum of three directors on a seven-member board as long as it is promoter. In case the board size expands, Avenir Investment will have the right to nominate the majority of directors on the board. These rights will be in existence, till Avenir Investment is classified as promoter – independent of the shareholding. Therefore, in case Avenir Investment’s shareholding reduces – either through sale or dilution – it will continue to hold these board nomination rights. We believe board nomination rights must be linked to a shareholding threshold: we support board nomination rights in the ratio of shareholding, with a baseline shareholding of at least 10%. Further, Independent Directors are to be selected from a pool of candidates recommended Avenir Investment: we believe the selection and appointment of Independent Directors is the board / NRC’s prerogative. We do not support the resolution.
  • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundComplaint with law. Governance Concern: The right to nominate directors / maintain board control are linked to promoter status and not proportionate shareholding; the right to recommend independent directors raises question over the selection process and independence of the potential candidates, such special nomination rights proposed without adequate safeguards undermine the role of NRC; inconsistency identified in the rights proposed as on one hand right to nominate 3 Directors is sought when the Board Strength would be 7 whereas in other situations a right is sought to nominate the majority of the directors to the Board. Further, a right is sought to adjust board size to maintain board control in all situations that may lead to board structuring as per select shareholder needs and not company or governance needs. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted because: • The investor's board nomination right is not subject to a minimum threshold shareholding requirement, below which such right would cease to exist. • There is scope to provide further clarity on the investor's exact board nomination rights. • The proposal allows for a disproportionate degree of influence and control by the investor over the company's board, which may not be aligned with the investor's shareholding.
  • HDFC Mutual FundThe proposed insertion allows the Investor to appoint a minimum of three directors on a seven-member board as long as it is promoter. In case the board size expands, Avenir Investment will have the right to nominate the majority of directors on the board. These rights will be in existence, till Avenir Investment is classified as promoter – independent of the shareholding. Therefore, in case Avenir Investment’s shareholding reduces – either through sale or dilution – it will continue to hold these board nomination rights. We believe board nomination rights must be linked to a shareholding threshold. We do not support the resolution.
  • HSBC Mutual FundWe are concerned about potential negative impact on shareholder value/rights.
  • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe proposed amendment allows the Investor to appoint a minimum of three directors on a seven-member board as long as it is promoter, independent of the shareholding. Therefore, in case Avenir Investment’s shareholding reduces –it will continue to hold these board nomination rights. We believe board nomination rights must be linked to a shareholding threshold. Hence, the AMC has voted against th resolution.
  • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundPost the proposed capital infusion from Avenir Investment RSC Ltd, the company has proposed amendment of AoA to grant board nomination rights to Avenir Investment RSC Ltd till it is classified as promoter. The proposed insertion allows the Investor to appoint a minimum of three directors on a seven-member board as long as it is promoter. In case the board size expands, Avenir Investment will have the right to nominate the majority of directors on the board. These rights will be in existence, till Avenir Investment is classified as promoter independent of the shareholding. Therefore, in case Avenir Investment s shareholding reduces either through sale or dilution it will continue to hold these board nomination rights. We believe board nomination rights must be linked to a shareholding threshold: we support board nomination rights in the ratio of shareholding, with some baseline shareholding. Further, Independent Directors are to be selected from a pool of candidates recommended Avenir Investment: we believe the selection and appointment of Independent Directors is the board / NRC s prerogative. Hence we do not support the resolution.
  • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
  • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Promoter-tied nomination/board control (not proportionate to shareholding) breaches Companies Act Section 2(69) & SEBI equitable governance; bypasses NRC for promoter IDs (SEBI LODR Reg. 19); inconsistent quotas/adjustable board size favor select shareholders; lacks dilution safeguards.
  • PPFAS Mutual FundRights not fairly linked to shareholding; IDs to be recommended by select shareholder; NRC role undermined; discrepancy in rights; board composition driven by shareholder needs; Concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • quant Mutual FundComplaint with the law. Governance concern: The right to nominate directors/ maintain board control are linked to promoter status and not proportionate shareholding; the right to recommend independent directors raises question over the selection process and independence of the potential candidates, such special nomination rights proposed without adequate safeguards undermine the role of NRC; inconsistency identified in the rights proposed as on one hand right to nominate 3 Directors is sought when the Board Strength would be 7 whereas in other situations a right is sought to nominate the majority of the directors to the Board. Further, a right is sought to adjust board size to maintain board control in all situations that may lead to board structuring as per select shareholder needs and not company or governance needs. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • WhiteOak Capital Mutual FundThe proposed insertion allows the Investor to appoint a minimum of three directors on a seven-member board as long as it is promoter. We believe the selection and appointment of Independent Directors is the board / NRC’s prerogative. We do not support the resolution.

  8 for25 against
• Amendment to the Articles of Association of the Company regarding Board process.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, quant Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundThe removal of the casting vote is a part of a broader framework that considerably increases the influence of the select investor on the Board; no justification is provided on why the casting vote is being removed from the articles. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: The removal of the casting vote is a part of a broader framework that considerably increases the influence of the select investor on the Board; no justification is provided on why the casting vote is being removed from the articles. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted
  • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe proposed amendment requires Board decisions to be by majority vote; Chairman to be an independent director and will not have a casting vote. No justification is provided on why the casting vote is being removed from the articles. Hence, the AMC has voted against th resolution.
  • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundPost the proposed capital infusion from Avenir Investment RSC Ltd, the company has proposed amendment of AoA to remove casting vote rights for the Chairperson. The proposed insertion requires Board decisions to be by majority vote; Chairman to be an independent director and will not have a casting vote. Although, these changes foster a more participative and democratic board environment, in the current context the Resolution#3 empowers Avenir Investment RSC Ltd to appoint the majority of the Board, while Resolution #4 proposes that Board decisions be determined by majority votes. Taken together, these provisions do not enhance balanced governance but rather consolidate control in the hands of a single shareholder. Hence we do not support the resolution.
  • PPFAS Mutual FundPart of a broader framework that increases the influence of the select investor on the Board; Concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • quant Mutual FundCompliant with the law. Governance concern: The removal of the casting vote is a part of a broader framework that considerably increases the influence of the select investor on the Board; no justification is provided on why the casting vote is being removed from the articles. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.

  22 for11 against
• Amendment to the Articles of Association of the Company and grant of Special Right regarding Committees to identified shareholder of the Company.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, quant Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual Fund, WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundPosition in committee should be determined considering the role of the committee and the expertise of the Director and not on the basis of any special rights. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual FundThe amendment allows Avenir Investment, as long as it is classified as promoter, to appoint nominees on the audit committee and the nomination and remuneration committee and appoint either a majority of the directors or the chairperson of the stakeholder relationship committee and the risk management committee. We do not support committee nomination rights – since the determination of committee composition is the board’s prerogative and must be decided by the board independently. We do not support the resolution.
  • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Position in committee should be determined considering the role of the committee and the expertise of the Director and not on the basis of any special rights. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted
  • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe amendment allows Avenir Investment, as long as it is classified as promoter, to appoint nominees on the audit committee and the nomination and remuneration committee and appoint either a majority of the directors or the chairperson of the stakeholder relationship committee and the risk management committee. We do not support committee nomination rights – since the determination of committee composition must be decided by the board independently. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
  • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe amendment allows Avenir Investment, as long as it is classified as promoter, to appoint nominees on the audit committee and the nomination and remuneration committee and appoint either a majority of the directors or the chairperson of the stakeholder relationship committee and the risk management committee. We do not support committee nomination rights since the determination of committee composition is the board s prerogative and must be decided by the board independently. Hence we do not support the resolution.
  • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
  • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Special rights override NRC charters/best practices prioritizing committee needs & director expertise for assignments; underpinning warrants lack dilution safeguards
  • PPFAS Mutual FundCommittee positions linked to special rights and not committee needs; Concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • quant Mutual FundCompliant with the law. Governance concern: Position in committee should be determined considering the role of the committee and the expertise of the Director and not on the basis of any special rights. Also, concerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • WhiteOak Capital Mutual FundThe amendment allows Avenir Investment to appoint nominees on the audit committee and the nomination and remuneration committee and appoint either a majority of the directors or the chairperson of the stakeholder relationship committee and the risk management committee. We do not support committee nomination rights – since the determination of committee composition is the board’s prerogative and must be decided by the board independently. We do not support the resolution.

  11 for22 against
• Amendment to the Articles of Association of the Company and grant of Special Right to information to identified shareholder of the Company.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, quant Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns are identified with regard to the underlying warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted, the legitimacy of the right itself becomes questionable.
  • Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual FundThe proposed clause enables the investor to access and disseminate information it receives as promoter across its affiliates. Such information shared may not be available with all shareholders. While the sharing of information will be according to applicable laws, it is unclear how the dissemination of unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) will be curtailed, controlled, and documented. It is unclear if there are any safeguards in place with respect to the sharing of such information with affiliates. We do not support the resolution.
  • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: No concern identified with regard to the rights proposed per-se. However, since concerns are identified with regard to the underlying warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted, the legitimacy of the right itself becomes questionable
  • PPFAS Mutual FundConcerns identified with warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted.
  • quant Mutual FundCompliant with the law. Governance concern: No concern identified with regard to the rights proposed per-se. However, since concerns are identified with regard to the underlying warrants issuance which forms part of the total shareholding based on which the proposed rights are being granted, the legitimacy of the right itself becomes questionable.

  22 for11 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Sep 2025, 27 fund houses

• Adoption of the Audited Standalone and Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as at March 31, 2025 and Reports of the Board of Director’s and Auditors’ thereon

  27 for0 against
• Re-appointment of Mr. Gagan Banga (DIN: 00010894), a Whole Time Director & Key Managerial Personnel, designated as Managing Director & CEO, liable to retire by rotation and, being eligible has offered himself for re-appointment.MoreLess

  27 for0 against
• Approval for renewal of limit to issue debentures on private placement basis by the Board, not in the nature of equity shares, of the Company, upto ₹ 30,000 Crores

  27 for0 against
• Approval for appointment of M/s. Neelam Gupta & Associates, Company Secretaries in Practice having Unique Code: S2006UP86800, as the Secretarial Auditors of the Company

  27 for0 against
• Approval for the payment of remuneration / commission/ incentives to Non-Executive Directors

  ›Against Axis Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund

  • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual FundThe shareholders approved an incentive of up to 1% of its net profits to Non-Executive Directors for three years in the 2022 AGM. The approval was valid from 1 April 2023 up to 31 March 2026. The company proposes to continue the payment of commission at 1% of profits for three years from 1 April 26 in addition to the sitting fees for attending board and committee meetings. In the past three years, the company has paid commission ranging from 0.3% to 0.4% of standalone PBT, which aggregated Rs. 41.0 mn in absolute terms for all three years. Even so, there has been a skew in the level of payouts with the Chairperson of the board and the Chairperson of the Audit Committee getting outsized commission – comparable to the commission paid by NIFTY 50 companies. The board must articulate a cogent rationale for the differential payouts and how it has benchmarked the compensation. We do not support the resolution.
  • Invesco Mutual FundThe shareholders approved an incentive of up to 1% of its net profits to Non-Executive Directors for three years in the 2022 AGM. The approval was valid from 1 April 2023 up to 31 March 2026. The company proposes to continue the payment of commission at 1% of profits for three years from 1 April 26 in addition to the sitting fees for attending board and committee meetings. In the past three years, the company has paid commission ranging from 0.3% to 0.4% of standalone PBT, which aggregated Rs. 41.0 mn in absolute terms for all three years. Even so, there has been a skew in the level of payouts with the Chairperson of the board and the Chairperson of the Audit Committee getting outsized commission – comparable to the commission paid by NIFTY 50 companies. The board must articulate a cogent rationale for the differential payouts and how it has benchmarked the compensation. We do not support the resolution
  • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
  • Nippon India Mutual FundProfile of the candidate

  21 for6 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 10 Jun 2025, 14 fund houses

• Approval of Scheme of Arrangement amongst Sammaan Collection Agency Limited (formerly known as Indiabulls Collection Agency Limited) (Amalgamating / Transferor Company 1) and Sammaan Sales Limited (formerly known as Ibulls Sales Limited) (Amalgamating / Transferor Company 2) and Sammaan Investmart Services Limited (formerly known as Nilgiri Investmart Services Limited) (Amalgamating / Transferor Company 3) and Indiabulls Capital Services Limited (Amalgamating / Transferor Company 4) and Sammaan Advisory Services Limited (formerly known as Indiabulls Advisory Services Limited) (Amalgamating / Transferor Company 5) and Sammaan Insurance Advisors Limited (formerly known as Indiabulls Insurance Advisors Limited) (Amalgamating / Transferor Company 6) and Sammaan Capital Limited (formerly known as Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited) (Amalgamated / Transferee Company) and their respective shareholders and creditors (“Scheme”).MoreLess

  14 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 3 Jan 2025, 11 fund houses

• Issuance of equity shares of the Company, by way of qualified institutions placement(s), aggregating up to ₹2,500 Crore (or equivalent USD or any other foreign currency), provided that the Equity Shares under the proposed QIP shall not be priced below ₹150, such that the maximum dilution pursuant to the QIP(s) shall not exceed 19% of the existing share capital of the Company as on the date of this shareholders’ resolutionMoreLess

  11 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 27 Sep 2024, 10 fund houses

• Adoption of the Audited Standalone and Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as at March 31, 2024 and Reports of the Board’s and Auditors thereon.

  10 for0 against
• Re-appointment of Mr. Sachin Chaudhary (DIN: 02016992), a Whole Time Director & Key Managerial Personnel, designated as Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer, liable to retire by rotation and, being eligible has offered himself for re-appointment.MoreLess

  10 for0 against
• To declare Final Dividend of Rs.2 per Fully Paid-up Equity Shares and a pro-rata dividend on the Partly Paid-up Equity Shares of the Company, for the financial year 2023-24.

  10 for0 against
• Appointment of M/s. Nangia & Co. LLP, Chartered Accountants (ICAI Firm Registration No. 002391C/N500069) as one of the Joint Statutory Auditors of the Company and to fix their remuneration and in this regard.MoreLess

  ›Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund

  • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern on the merits and eligibility of the Auditors. Governance & Transparency concern: Significant disparity in proposed audit fee of two Joint Auditors; Scope of audit not disclosed in the Notice.

  5 for5 against
• Appointment of M/s. M Verma & Associates, Chartered Accountants (ICAI Firm Registration No. 501433C) as one of the Joint Statutory Auditors of the Company and to fix their remuneration and in this regard.MoreLess

  ›Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund

  • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern on the merits and eligibility of the Auditors. Governance & Transparency concern: Significant disparity in proposed audit fee of two Joint Auditors; Scope of audit not disclosed in the Notice.

  5 for5 against
• Issue debentures on private placement basis by the Board, not in the nature of equity shares, of the Company, upto Rs. 30,000 Crores.

  10 for0 against
• Approval for Sammaan Capital Limited - Employee Stock Benefit Scheme 2024 and grant of Employee Stock Options to the employees/directors of the Company.

  10 for0 against
• To extend the benefits of Sammaan Capital Limited - Employee Stock Benefit Scheme 2024 to the employees and directors of the wholly owned subsidiary company(ies), if any, of the Company.

  10 for0 against