Pine Labs logo

Pine Labs CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: PINELABSBSE: 544606Financial Technology (Fintech)Small Cap

Last close ₹154.57down ₹7.01 (4.34%)BSE ₹154.55

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹161.58.

Range of traded prices from listing on 14 Nov 2025 to 23 Oct 2026
₹134.73Low, 27 May 2026₹284.00High, 14 Nov 2025
Market cap
₹17,849 Cr332nd largest listed
P/E
140.2
P/B
3.0
Dividend yield
Nonesince listing in Nov 2025
ROE
2.2%
ROCE
2.1%
Debt to equity
0.05
Volume, NSE
1,01,17,52133.0% delivered

Pine Labs board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • Chairperson and managing director and CEOBairavarasu Amrish Rau
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerNEERAV MEHTA

6 directors3 independent2 executive1 non-executive

  • Bairavarasu Amrish Rau · Chairperson and managing director and CEOExecutive · joined Mar 2025 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • Kush MehraExecutive · joined May 2025 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • Maninder Singh JunejaIndependent · joined Mar 2025 · 15 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Amrita GangotraIndependent · joined Mar 2025 · 15 months as independent · 6 listed boards · 6 as independent · 9 committee seats, 3 as chair
  • Smita Chandramani kumarIndependent · joined Mar 2025 · 15 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat, 1 as chair
  • Shailendra Jit SinghNon-executive · joined Jun 2025 · 1 listed board

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 25 May 20264 of 6 present2 independent · 29 days in between
    • 25 Apr 20265 of 6 present3 independent · 28 days in between
    • 27 Mar 20265 of 6 present3 independent · 57 days in between
    • 28 Jan 20266 of 6 present3 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair Smita Chandramani kumar

    Maninder Singh Juneja, Amrita Gangotra

    • 25 May 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 116 days in between
    • 28 Jan 20263 of 3 present3 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Maninder Singh Juneja

    Shailendra Jit Singh, Amrita Gangotra

    • 19 Jun 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 37 days in between
    • 12 May 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 70 days in between
    • 2 Mar 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 32 days in between
    • 28 Jan 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair Maninder Singh Juneja

    Bairavarasu Amrish Rau, Kush Mehra

    • 27 Jan 20263 of 3 present1 independent
  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair Smita Chandramani kumar

    Maninder Singh Juneja, Bairavarasu Amrish Rau

    • 23 May 20262 of 3 present1 independent · 56 days in between
    • 27 Mar 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 58 days in between
    • 27 Jan 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Bairavarasu Amrish Rau

    Kush Mehra, Amrita Gangotra

    • 27 Jan 20263 of 3 present1 independent
  • INFORMATION SECURITY COMMITTEE

    Chair Amrita Gangotra

    Smita Chandramani kumar, Bairavarasu Amrish Rau

    • 24 Jun 20262 of 3 present1 independent · 29 days in between
    • 25 May 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 67 days in between
    • 18 Mar 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 49 days in between

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • B S R & Co. LLPPeer-review certificate valid to Jul 2028

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Pine Labs AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Pine Labs share news and announcements

Annual general meeting, 16 Sep 2026

2,37,635 shareholders on the register on 9 Sep 2026; present: 0 promoters and 101 others; votes counted by Ritu Mahajan / Ritu Mahajan & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the audited standalone and consolidated financial statements of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the reports of the board of directors and auditors’ thereonMoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 72.44% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.57% · other public 26.86%

  2. To consider and re-appoint Mr. Kush Mehra (DIN: 08154941), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    Ordinary
    99.92% for0.08% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.08% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 72.44% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.57% · other public 26.86%

  3. To consider and re-appoint M/s B S R & Co. LLP, Chartered Accountants as the Statutory Auditors and to fix their remuneration
    Ordinary
    99.97% for0.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.03% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 72.44% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.57% · other public 26.86%

  4. To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Mr. Kush Mehra, Whole-Time Director of the Company
    Special
    88.89% for11.11% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 11.98% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 72.44% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.57% · other public 26.86%

  5. To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Ms. Amrita Gangotra, Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    98.36% for1.64% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.58% · other public 2.40%

    Turnout: all 69.27% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 79.62% · other public 26.86%

  6. To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Mr. Maninder Singh Juneja, Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    98.36% for1.64% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.58% · other public 2.40%

    Turnout: all 69.27% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 79.62% · other public 26.86%

  7. To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Ms. Smita Chandramani Kumar, Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    98.36% for1.64% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.58% · other public 2.40%

    Turnout: all 69.27% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 79.62% · other public 26.86%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 13 Feb 2026, 4 resolutions

1,24,949 shareholders on the register on 9 Jan 2026; votes counted by Ritu Mahajan / Ritu Mahajan & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Ratification and Amendment of the Pine Labs Employee Stock Option Plan 2025 (“ESOP Scheme”) of the Company
    Special
    87.40% for12.60% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 26.83% · other public 9.89%

    Turnout: all 87.00% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.82% · other public 87.63%

  2. Ratification of the extension of the benefits of Pine Labs Employee Stock Option Plan 2025 (ESOP Scheme) to the employees of subsidiary companies of the Company
    Special
    87.41% for12.59% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 26.75% · other public 9.89%

    Turnout: all 87.04% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 84.08% · other public 87.63%

  3. Appointment of Secretarial Auditor
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 87.06% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 84.08% · other public 87.66%

  4. Creation of charges, mortgages, hypothecation on the immovable and movable properties of the Company under Section 180(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 87.05% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 84.08% · other public 87.65%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 16 Sep 2026, 11 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

  • To consider and adopt the audited standalone and consolidated financial statements of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the reports of the board of directors and auditors’ thereonMoreLess
    11 for0 against
  • To consider and re-appoint Mr. Kush Mehra (DIN: 08154941), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    11 for0 against
  • To consider and re-appoint M/s B S R & Co. LLP, Chartered Accountants as the Statutory Auditors and to fix their remuneration
    11 for0 against
  • To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Mr. Kush Mehra, Whole-Time Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundAbsence of disclosure of the potential ESOP benefit that may accrue to proposed appointee.
    • DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundKush Mehra, 45, is Executive Director, President and Chief Business Officer – Digital Infrastructure and Transaction Platform. In FY26, he received remuneration of Rs. 129.3 mn (including fair value of stock options) and Rs. 22.98 mn in FY25. We estimate his FY27 remuneration at Rs. 391.3 mn (including fair value of stock options), which is high compared to the size of the business and not commensurate with peers. We expect the company to disclose the quantum of stock options that will be granted to him during his tenure. The company also states that he will be entitled to an increment of upto 20% every financial year. Given these concerns, we do not support this resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern on the merits of the appointee. Transparency concern: No absolute cap on the potential ESOP benefits. Lack of clarity regarding overall remuneration payable to the proposed director.
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the executive remuneration is warranted because: The Executive will be paid the proposed remuneration irrespective of the company's financial performance during his tenure. There are no disclosures on the performance metrics and (threshold and target) performance that Executive needs to achieve based on which payouts under variable pay element will be made. The company has not provided information on the quantum of stock options to be granted during the term or overall fair value of such grants for each year. Nominee's pay can be considered to be open-ended and may lead to discretionary payouts. The proposed salary increment of 20% per annum is deemed to be high as compared to market practices.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has voted against the resolution, due to absence of disclosure of the potential ESOP benefit that may accrue to proposed appointee
    2 for9 against
  • To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Ms. Amrita Gangotra, Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Excessive time-commitment and Pre-fixed or Pre-determined remuneration to an Independent Director.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern has been identified regarding profile and attendance. Governance Concern: Excessive timecommitment and Pre-fixed or Pre-determined remuneration to an ID.
    7 for4 against
  • To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Mr. Maninder Singh Juneja, Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Pre-fixed or Pre-determined remuneration to an Independent Director.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern has been identified regarding profile, time commitment and attendance. Governance Concern: Pre-fixed or Pre-determined remuneration to an ID.
    7 for4 against
  • To consider and approve revision in remuneration payable to Ms. Smita Chandramani Kumar, Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Pre-fixed or Pre-determined remuneration to an Independent Director.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern has been identified regarding profile, time commitment and attendance. Governance Concern: Pre-fixed or Pre-determined remuneration to an ID.
    7 for4 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 13 Feb 2026, 12 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Ratification and Amendment of the Pine Labs Employee Stock Option Plan 2025 (“ESOP Scheme”) of the Company
    Against Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual FundESOP 2025 has a pool size of 102.1 mn options, of which 15.8 mn options are available for further grants. Once these options are granted, it will lead to a dilution of 1.3% on the current expanded capital base. The proposed amendments cover changes relating to definitions, employee eligibility, grant and acceptance processes, vesting and exercise provisions, extension of exercise periods for certain employees, and alignment with the company’s clawback policy.The scheme does not specify the vesting conditions, which will be specified in the grant letter. The maximum vesting period of ten years appears longer than typical market practice and may increase the likelihood of options being in the money. Further, the exercise price is not defined and will be set in the grant letter. Thus, the options could be granted at a significant discount to the market price. Where the exercise price is at a significant discount to the market price, we expect companies to provide granular clarity on performance criteria along with the associated targets, or, at a minimum, a commitment to disclose such targets in the annual report after vesting. In the current case, there is no clarity on whether the vesting is linked to performance criteria. In the absence of clarity and disclosures, we do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNon-Compliant under SEBI SBEB Regulations: Absolute Discretion to NRC to determine Exercise Price. Governance Concern: Potential maximum benefit that may be granted to a single employee appears to be excessive.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundThe proposed resolution is related to approval of company's Employee Stock Option Plan 2025 (ESOP Scheme). The scheme seeks absolute discretion to the Board/ NRC to modify, alter, vary the ESOP scheme's exercise price, which is not viewed as a good governance practice. It is expected that the Company makes objective disclosure on the ESOP scheme, as required by SEBI regulations.
    6 for6 against
  • Ratification of the extension of the benefits of Pine Labs Employee Stock Option Plan 2025 (ESOP Scheme) to the employees of subsidiary companies of the Company
    Against Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual FundThrough resolution #2, the company seeks shareholder approval to extend the benefits of ESOP 2025 to employees of subsidiary companies. Our view is linked to resolution #1. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNon-Compliant with SEBI (SBEB & SE) Regulations 2021: Interlinked with Resolution #1.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundThis resolution is linked to the other resolution from the company on Employee Stock Option Plan 2025 (ESOP Scheme). As we do not support the scheme, this resolution is also not supported.
    6 for6 against
  • Appointment of Secretarial Auditor
    12 for0 against
  • Creation of charges, mortgages, hypothecation on the immovable and movable properties of the Company under Section 180(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013
    8 for0 against
3 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 4) Approve creation of charge on company’s assets for borrowings upto Rs. 15.0 bn.
    1 for0 against
  • Approve creation of charge on company’s assets for borrowings upto Rs. 15.0 bn
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Pledging of Assets for Debt
    2 for0 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Tax disputes and stakes in unlisted companies

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Unlisted stake boughtShopflo Technologies Private LimitedSince 10 Jun 2026

    100.00% bought in the quarter; holding 100.00%, from 0.00%

  • Tax disputeThe Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals)-4, BengaluruSince 8 Nov 2022
    Appeal has been filed with GSTAT on 29.06.2026. Matter is not listed yet
    At the filing before: The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals)-4, Bengaluru has passed an order dated 28.01.2026 providing the partial relief and confirming the balance issues with demand of INR 37,33,38,297/- (incl interest and penalty). Below is the summary: Tax - INR 14,89,36,336/- Interest - INR 20,95,08,327/- Penalty - INR 1,48,93,634/- We are in the process to file the appeal before GSTAT against the order. Due date to file the appeal is 30.06.2026.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeThe Goods & Services State Tax Officer, MaharashtraSince 27 Feb 2025
    There is no change from the last quarter.
    At the filing before: Office of the State Tax Officer, Mumbai has passed an order dated 20/08/2025 confirming the balance demand of INR 49,33,847/- (incl interest and penalty). Below is the summary: Tax - INR 28,99,427/- Interest - INR 17,39,656/- Penalty - INR 2,94,764/- The company has filed an appeal to Appellate Authority (GST Appeal) on 15.01.2026. The matter is not listed yet. There is no material impact on financials, operations or other activities of the Company on account of the said order.MoreLess

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
Yes
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
No
The filing has a part on tax disputes
Yes
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.

How money raised was used

The company's results filing for the quarter to Jun 2026 says no statement of how money raised was used applies to it.