Hemisphere Properties India MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 28 Sep 2026, 1 fund house so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

• 1 - To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended on March 31, 2026 and the Reports of the Board of Directors, the Statutory Auditors and the Comments of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG) thereon.MoreLess

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Non-Compliant Audit Committee at time of approval of financials. Absence of a compliant Audit Committee casts serious doubts over the integrity/ accuracy of the financial statements.

  0 for1 against
• 2 - To appoint a Director in place of Shri Ravi Kumar Arora Director (Non-Executive) DIN: 09217881, who retires by rotation at and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Board is non-compliant with the requirement of requisite number of Independent Directors and woman Independent Director; Low attendance at Board meetings. The Director is serving as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee & Nomination & Remuneration Committee. However, being a Non-Executive Nominee Director, the Director is not eligible to chair the Audit Committee & Nomination & Remuneration Committee.

  0 for1 against
• 3 - To fix the remuneration of Statutory Auditors for the financial year 2026-27.

  1 for0 against
• 4 - Appointment of Shri Pradeep Kumar Jha (DIN : 07640619) as Director.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Board is non-compliant with the requirement of requisite number of Independent Directors and woman Independent Director; Holds 2 full time positions.

  0 for1 against
• 5 - Appointment of Shri Shyam Lal Poonia (DIN : 07554713 ) as Director.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Board is non-compliant with the requirement of requisite number of Independent Directors and woman Independent Director.

  0 for1 against
• 6 - Appointment of Shri Suchit Goyal (DIN : 11053229) as Director.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Board is non-compliant with the requirement of requisite number of Independent Directors and woman Independent Director.

  0 for1 against
• 7 - Appointment of Shri Amit Kumar Agarwal (DIN: 05333909 ), as a Non-official Independent Director.

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Term of appointment is ambiguous and against spirit of the law

  0 for1 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Jun 2026, 5 fund houses

• To Approve Material Related Party Transaction with Hypervault AI Data Center Limited

  ›Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund

  • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency Concern: The Company has not provided a valuation report for the Transaction; however, the reserve price for bidding was determined based on an independent valuation report. Without the disclosure of this valuation report, shareholders are unable to independently evaluate the basis, assumptions, and methodologies employed in arriving at the reserve price of ₹ 600 crore. Currently, there are no independent directors on the Company's Board. Additionally, the Audit Committee, which is not compliant, has approved the related party transactions.Furthermore, the Company has not adequately disclosed the funding sources or financing arrangements available to the related party for fulfilling its obligations under the proposed transaction. Clarity is needed on whether the related party will be able to meet these obligations.
  • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency Concern: The Company has not provided a valuation report for the Transaction; however, the reserve price for bidding was determined based on an independent valuation report. Without the disclosure of this valuation report, shareholders are unable to independently evaluate the basis, assumptions, and methodologies employed in arriving at the reserve price of ? 600 crore. Currently, there are no independent directors on the Company's Board. Additionally, the Audit Committee, which is not compliant, has approved the related party transactions. The proposed transaction value is substantial compared to the financial position of the related party, representing approximately 16 times its profit after tax and 2.31 times its net worth. Furthermore, the Company has not adequately disclosed the funding sources or financing arrangements available to the related party for fulfilling its obligations under the proposed transaction. Clarity is needed on whether the related party will be able to meet these obligations.

  2 for3 against

• Fine or penaltyNational Stock Exchange of India LimitedSince 27 May 2026

  Fines Imposed

  Non-Compliance with regard to Regulation 17 (1), Reg. 18(1) and Reg. 19(1)/ 19(2) due to non-appointment of requisite number of Independnent Directors on the Board of Company and on Committee(s)thereonMoreLess
• Fine or penaltyBSE LimitedSince 27 May 2026

  Fines Imposed

  Non-Compliance with regard to Regulation 17 (1), Reg. 18(1) and Reg. 19(1)/ 19(2) due to non-appointment of requisite number of Independnent Directors on the Board of Company and on Committee(s)thereonMoreLess
• Tax disputeW.P.(C) 6477/2026- Arun Verma vs. Hemisphere Properties India Limited & Ors.– Delhi High CourtSince 5 May 2026
  The next date in the matter is 30.07.2026.
  At the filing before: This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking directions to HPIL, inter-alia, to repair, reconstruct and restore the collapsed boundary wall situated as Block-R, GK-I, New Delhi. Notice in the matter was issued on 12.05.2026 wherein the Hon’ble Court directed HPIL to file its status report. The said status report has been filed and the matter is now listed on 30.07.2026.MoreLess
• Tax disputeSLP(C) No.-013010 – 2020 - Tata Communications Limited Vs. Union of India & Ors. Registered as : Civil Appeal No. 3401/2023 [Supreme Court]Since 2 Mar 2020
  An application seeking early hearing was filed by the Tata Communications Limited. The same was dismissed vide order dated 24.02.2026. The matter is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Next date has not been notified by the registry of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.MoreLess
  At the filing before: TCL filed a writ petition before Delhi High Court challenging the acquisition of 10489.18 sq. mtrs of land situated at G.K-1 along Outer Ring Road, near Savitri Cinema, New Delhi belonging to TCL including the award dated 30 December 2013 for Rs. 188, 80,168/- as compensation for acquisition. This writ petition got dismissed vide judgment dated 25.11.2019. The present SLP has been filed challenging the judgment dated 25.11.2019. Application seeking impleadment on behalf of HPIL has been allowed by Supreme Court vide order dated 01.05.2023. An application seeking early hearing was filed by the Tata Communications Limited. The same was dismissed vide order dated 24.02.2026.MoreLess
• Tax disputeTCL VS UOI – LAC NO. 14/2014 New Numbers: - Tata Communications Ltd. v. Union of India, LAC 24 / 2016 [DISTRICT COURT, SAKET]Since 8 Feb 2014
  The next date in the matter is 05.08.2026.
  At the filing before: This is Reference Petition has been filed by TCL under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 for enhancement of compensation vide award dated 30 December 2013 for Rs. 188, 80,168/-. HPIL has been added as party vide order dated 12 March 2024. The petition seeks enhancement of compensation i.e. higher damages, alternate plot, increased market value based solatium, cost of trees etc wrt to the Award dated 13.12.2013. Benefit of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act) has also been effectively sought. This matter was last listed on 15.05.2026 wherein TCL had filed an Application Order VII Rule 14 (3) CPC along with documents. The Petitioner-TCL has also filed its Affidavit in Evidence of PW 1 in the matter. The next date in the matter is 05.08.2026.MoreLess
• Tax disputeSLP (C) 13478 of 2019 now converted to Civil Appeal 5090 of 2019 - TCL Vs. GNCTD & ORS. [SUPREME COURT]Since 30 May 2019
  The matter is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Next date has not been notified by the registry of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
  At the filing before: This petition has been filed by TCL being aggrieved by the Order dated 27.05.2019 passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in LPA No. 371 of 2019. The Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 11.06.2019 observed as under: - “Prima facie, it appears that recourse has not been taken to the acquisition proceedings in accordance with law in respect of the land of the petitioner in question. Status quo with regard to the land in question be maintained by the parties for a period of eight weeks from date or until further orders whichever is earlier. The status quo granted by this Court will not stand in the way of demarcation in accordance with law upon notice to the appellant. Liberty is also granted to apply for extension of status quo, upon notice to the respondents, if necessary.” The next date in the matter is yet to be notified by the Supreme Court.MoreLess
• Tax disputeKaushalya Mahadev Choudhary & Ors. Vs. TCL Writ Petition No. 9163/2009 [Bombay High Court]Since 26 Oct 2009
  This matter was last listed on 15.06.2026 wherein the Hon’ble High Court granted time to HPIL to file its reply in amended Writ Petition Nos. 9163 of 2009 and 4744 of 2016. The matter has now been directed to be listed for 10.07.2026 for further directions.MoreLess
  At the filing before: A PIL No. 109/2008 titled Santosh Walke VS. TCL was filed challenging the acquisition proceedings of various Survey Nos. mentioned in Notification dated 10.08.1925. In the said PIL, an interim order dated 20.01.2010 was passed restraining the authorities from carrying on any construction over the portions of land to which no compensation has been given to the landowners / tenants. TCL filed an SLP against the said order. The Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 15.11.2010 has limited the reliefs to compensation. The aforesaid PIL came to be disposed off vide order dated 20.02.2023 granting liberty to the petitioners to file separate writ petitions. In so far as the present petition is concerned, the same has been filed inter-alia challenging the acquisition proceedings of 27 Acres 31 R at Survey No. 51, 33 Acres 37R Portkharaba 6.6 Aakar 26.40 paise at Survey No. 51, 15 Acres 7 R at Survey No. 52, 17 Acres 27R Portkharaba 2.20 R Aakar 12.60 paise at Survey No. 52, all at Village Kalas, Taluka Haveli, Distt. Pune. Amended WP has been received in this matter to which HPIL has filed an affidavit in reply.MoreLess
• Tax disputeMadhav Mhaske vs. UOI & Ors. Writ Petition No. 612/2016 [Bombay High Court]Since 17 Oct 2015
  The matter is pending before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay and next date is not available on the website.
  At the filing before: This petition has been filed challenging acquisition of 27 acres 33 Gunthas out of Sr. No. 51 and 17 acres out of Sr. No. 52 situated at Village Kalas Dist. Pune. This matter was last listed on 31.01.2025. The next date is not available on the website of the Bombay High Court. Amended WP has been received in this matter to which HPIL has filed an affidavit in reply.MoreLess

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

The board is made up as the listing rules require

No

The board has a regular chairperson

Yes

The company has a risk management committee

Yes

The chair is related to the managing director

Yes

The filing has a part on fines and penalties

Yes

The filing has a part on tax disputes

Yes

There was a cyber security incident in the quarter

No

The company's own answers in its filing.