Emcure Pharmaceuticals logo

Emcure Pharmaceuticals CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: EMCUREBSE: 544210Pharmaceuticals & BiotechnologySmall Cap

Last close ₹1,770.40down ₹12.20 (0.68%)BSE ₹1,768.35

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹1,782.60.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹1,306.50Low, 4 Nov 2025₹2,100.70High, 18 Sep 2026
Market cap
₹33,586 Cr266th largest listed
P/E
33.2
P/B
6.8
Dividend yield
0.20%
ROE
21.5%
ROCE
25.2%
Debt to equity
0.24
Volume, NSE
1,41,41252.9% delivered

Emcure Pharmaceuticals board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • ChairpersonBerjis Minoo Desai
  • Managing director and CEOSatish Ramanlal Mehta
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerAmruta Yangalwar

11 directors5 independent5 executive1 non-executive

  • Berjis Minoo Desai · ChairpersonNon-executive · joined Apr 1997 · reappointed Jul 2022 · 4 listed boards · 4 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Satish Ramanlal Mehta · Managing director and CEOExecutive · joined Apr 1981 · reappointed Apr 2022 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • Sunil Rajanikant MehtaExecutive · joined Jun 2013 · reappointed Jun 2023 · 1 listed board
  • Namita Vikas ThaparExecutive · joined Jul 2014 · reappointed Jul 2024 · 2 listed boards · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat
  • Samit Satish MehtaExecutive · joined Jul 2022 · reappointed Jul 2022 · 1 listed board
  • Mukund Keshao GurjarExecutive · joined Jul 2001 · reappointed Aug 2025 · 1 listed board
  • Palamadai Sundararajan JayakumarIndependent · joined Jul 2020 · reappointed Jul 2023 · 71 months as independent · 7 listed boards · 7 as independent · 7 committee seats, 3 as chair
  • Vijay Keshav GokhaleIndependent · joined Apr 2021 · reappointed Apr 2026 · 62 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 3 committee seats
  • Vidya Rajiv YeravdekarIndependent · joined Apr 2021 · reappointed Apr 2026 · 62 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 2 committee seats
  • Shailesh Kripalu AyyangarIndependent · joined Jun 2023 · reappointed Jun 2026 · 36 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 4 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Chinnadharavaram Sundaresan MuralidharanIndependent · joined Apr 2026 · reappointed Apr 2026 · 3 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

1 director who left
  • Samonnoi Sajani Banerjee, left 23 Nov 2024: Others

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 13 May 20267 of 11 present4 independent · 7 days in between
    • 5 May 202611 of 11 present5 independent · 56 days in between
    • 9 Mar 20269 of 10 present4 independent · 32 days in between
    • 4 Feb 20268 of 10 present2 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair Palamadai Sundararajan Jayakumar

    Berjis Minoo Desai, Vijay Keshav Gokhale, Chinnadharavaram Sundaresan Muralidharan

    • 13 May 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 7 days in between
    • 5 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 89 days in between
    • 4 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Vijay Keshav Gokhale

    Palamadai Sundararajan Jayakumar, Berjis Minoo Desai

    • 5 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 56 days in between
    • 9 Mar 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 32 days in between
    • 4 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair Berjis Minoo Desai

    Satish Ramanlal Mehta, Vijay Keshav Gokhale

    • 5 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent
  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair Shailesh Kripalu Ayyangar

    Palamadai Sundararajan Jayakumar, Vijay Keshav Gokhale, Sunil Rajanikant Mehta

    • 26 Jun 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 51 days in between
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Sunil Rajanikant Mehta

    Samit Satish Mehta, Vijay Keshav Gokhale

    • 5 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 89 days in between
    • 4 Feb 20263 of 3 present1 independent

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Mar 2026.

  • B S R & Co. LLPPeer-review certificate valid to Jul 2028

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Emcure Pharmaceuticals AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Emcure Pharmaceuticals dividend history

Annual general meeting, 21 Sep 2026

1,29,686 shareholders on the register on 14 Sep 2026; present: 5 promoters and 41 others; votes counted by ASHWINI INAMDAR / M/S. MEHTA AND MEHTA.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. 1 - To receive, consider and adopt: a) the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon; and b) the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    99.93% for0.07% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.57% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 88.99% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 78.71% · other public 10.29%

  2. To declare Final Dividend of Rs. 3.60/- (Rupees Three and Sixty Paise only) per Equity Share of Face Value of Rs. 10/- each (Rupees Ten only) for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2026.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 89.00% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 78.79% · other public 10.29%

  3. To appoint Mrs. Namita Thapar (DIN: 05318899) as a Director who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers herself for re-appointment.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.13% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 89.00% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 78.79% · other public 10.29%

  4. To consider retirement of Mr. Berjis Desai (DIN: 00153675), Chairman and Non-Executive Non-Independent Director.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 89.00% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 78.79% · other public 10.29%

  5. To ratify remuneration payable to the Cost Auditor for the Financial Year 2026-27.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 89.00% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 78.79% · other public 10.29%

  6. To re-appoint Dr. Mukund Gurjar (DIN: 00026843) as a Whole-time Director of the Company.
    Special
    98.50% for1.50% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 12.68% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 89.00% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 78.78% · other public 10.29%

  7. To re-appoint Mr. Satish Mehta (DIN: 00118691) as a Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    94.06% for5.94% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 51.09% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 88.77% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 77.13% · other public 10.29%

  8. To appoint Mr. Raghu Kumar (DIN: 01983106) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    Special
    99.97% for0.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.28% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 54.12% · promoters 99.64% · institutions 13.55% · other public 10.29%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 24 Apr 2026, 1 resolution

1,22,018 shareholders on the register on 20 Mar 2026; votes counted by ASHWINI INAMDAR / MEHTA & MEHTA.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Appointment of Mr. C S Muralidharan (DIN: 00014740) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 74.78% · promoters 86.39% · institutions 73.23% · other public 4.41%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 20 Mar 2026, 3 resolutions

1,17,430 shareholders on the register on 13 Feb 2026; votes counted by ASHWINI INAMDAR / MEHTA & MEHTA.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Re-appointment of Mr. Vijay Keshav Gokhale (DIN: 09134089) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.10% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 82.03% · promoters 95.83% · institutions 69.85% · other public 5.95%

  2. Re-appointment of Dr. Vidya Rajiv Yeravdekar (DIN: 02183179) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    Special
    93.90% for6.10% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 77.73% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 81.80% · promoters 95.83% · institutions 67.41% · other public 5.95%

  3. Re-appointment of Dr. Shailesh Kripalu Ayyangar (DIN: 00268076) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    97.06% for2.94% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 37.42% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 81.80% · promoters 95.83% · institutions 67.41% · other public 5.95%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 28 Aug 2025, 12 resolutions

1,29,650 shareholders on the register on 21 Aug 2025; present: 8 promoters and 54 others; votes counted by Ashwini Inamdar / Mehta & Mehta.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To receive, consider and adopt: a) the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2025, together with the Report of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon; and b) the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2025, together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  2. To declare Final Dividend of Rs. 3/- (Rupees Three only) per Equity Share of Face Value of Rs. 10/- each (Rupees Ten only) for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2025.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  3. To appoint Mr. Sunil Mehta (DIN: 00118469) as a Director who retires by rotation, and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.97% for0.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.56% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  4. To appoint Mr. Samit Mehta (DIN: 00332562) as a Director who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.97% for0.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.56% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  5. To ratify remuneration payable to the Cost Auditor for the Financial Year 2025-26
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  6. To re-appoint Dr. Mukund Gurjar (DIN: 00026843) as a Whole-time Director of the Company
    Special
    99.97% for0.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.50% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.55% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 13.13%

  7. To appoint M/s. SVD & Associates, Company Secretaries as the Secretarial Auditors of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  8. To approve payment of remuneration to Mr. Satish Mehta (DIN: 00118691), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    95.20% for4.80% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 43.68% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 44.92% · promoters 48.70% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  9. To approve payment of remuneration to Mr. Sunil Mehta (DIN: 00118469), Whole-time Director of the Company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    97.89% for2.11% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 32.01% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 75.03% · promoters 87.35% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  10. To approve payment of remuneration to Mrs. Namita Thapar (DIN: 05318899), Whole-time Director of the Company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    98.11% for1.89% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 31.43% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 82.03% · promoters 96.34% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  11. To approve payment of remuneration to Mr. Samit Mehta (DIN: 00332562), Whole-time Director of the Company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    98.01% for1.99% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 31.21% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 77.56% · promoters 90.60% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

  12. To approve payment of Commission to the Non-Executive Directors
    Ordinary
    97.60% for2.40% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 41.25% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 84.71% · promoters 99.77% · institutions 63.82% · other public 14.21%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 23 Dec 2024, 2 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. AMENDMENT AND RATIFICATION OF EMCURE - EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION SCHEME 2013 OF THE COMPANY
    Special
    96.70% for3.30% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 73.10% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 92.09% · promoters 99.49% · institutions 59.69% · other public 68.51%

  2. RATIFICATION OF EXTENSION OF BENEFITS UNDER EMCURE- EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION SCHEME 2013 OF THE COMPANY TO THE EMPLOYEES OF A GROUP COMPANY INCLUDING A SUBSIDIARY OR ASSOCIATE COMPANY OF THE COMPANY, IN INDIA OR OUTSIDE INDIAMoreLess
    Special
    96.59% for3.41% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 75.62% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 92.09% · promoters 99.49% · institutions 59.69% · other public 68.51%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 21 Sep 2026, 10 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

  • 1 - To receive, consider and adopt: a) the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon; and b) the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of the audited financial statements of few Subsidiaries on the website of the Company.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundUnqualified financial statements (except minor observation in CARO Report). Non-Compliant with Companies Act, 2013 and Regulation 46(2)(s) of SEBI LODR: Non-disclosure of the audited financial statements of few Subsidiaries on the website of the Company.
    7 for3 against
  • To declare Final Dividend of Rs. 3.60/- (Rupees Three and Sixty Paise only) per Equity Share of Face Value of Rs. 10/- each (Rupees Ten only) for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2026.
    10 for0 against
  • To appoint Mrs. Namita Thapar (DIN: 05318899) as a Director who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers herself for re-appointment.
    10 for0 against
  • To consider retirement of Mr. Berjis Desai (DIN: 00153675), Chairman and Non-Executive Non-Independent Director.
    10 for0 against
  • To ratify remuneration payable to the Cost Auditor for the Financial Year 2026-27.
    10 for0 against
  • To re-appoint Dr. Mukund Gurjar (DIN: 00026843) as a Whole-time Director of the Company.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundPrior approval of shareholders not obtained for the continuation of the Executive Director beyond the age of 70 years. Governance Concern: Appointment proposed for a term of only 1 year, which may impact the leadership duties and no specific justification has been provided in the notice.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNo concern identified w.r.t. the merits of the Director. Non-Compliance with Section 196 of the Companies Act, 2013: Prior approval of shareholders not obtained for the continuation of the Executive Director beyond the age of 70 years. Governance Concern: Appointment proposed for a term of only 1 year, which may impact the leadership duties and no specific justification has been provided in the notice.
    7 for3 against
  • To re-appoint Mr. Satish Mehta (DIN: 00118691) as a Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency concern: No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration. Skewed/Excessive remuneration towards proposed promoter director and Inadequate justification & disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits.
    • DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundSatish Mehta, 73, is Founder, Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer and part of promoter family. The company also proposes to appoint him as Executive Chairperson from conclusion of FY26 AGM. He attended all six (100%) board meetings held in FY26. In FY26, he received remuneration of Rs. 324.0 mn. We estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 580.1 mn, which is high compared to scale of company’s operations and industry peers. His remuneration structure is open-ended with no absolute cap on commission. The company must disclose the performance metrics and set performance threshold, achievement of which should trigger commission payout.Further, the aggregate remuneration to promoters for FY26 was Rs. 474.6 mn, which is high. While we support his appointment as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, given the concerns on his remuneration, we do not support this resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified w.r.t. the merits of the Director. Governance & Transparency concern: No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration. Skewed/Excessive remuneration towards proposed promoter director and Inadequate justification & disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundSatish Mehta, 73, is Founder, Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer and part of promoter family. The company also proposes to appoint him as Executive Chairperson from conclusion of FY26 AGM. He attended all six (100%) board meetings held in FY26. In FY26, he received remuneration of Rs. 324.0 mn. His annual remuneration is estimated at Rs. 580.1 mn, which is high compared to scale of company’s operations and industry peers. His remuneration structure is open-ended with no absolute cap on commission. The company must disclose the performance metrics and set performance threshold, achievement of which should trigger commission payout. Further, the aggregate remuneration to promoters for FY26 was Rs. 474.6 mn, which is high.Given the concerns on his remuneration, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • Quantum Mutual FundThe company seeks shareholders’ approval to reappoint Satish Mehta as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer for five years from 1 April 2027 and fix his remuneration in excess of regulatory thresholds, not exceeding 15% of net profits for all executive directors and 16% for all directors. The company also proposes to appoint him as Executive Chairperson from conclusion of FY26 AGM. We are of the view that a clubbed position of Chairman & MD – CEO may lead to concentration of power. Therefore, we do not favor his reappointment and resolution.
    3 for7 against
  • To appoint Mr. Raghu Kumar (DIN: 01983106) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    10 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 24 Apr 2026, 20 fund houses

  • Appointment of Mr. C S Muralidharan (DIN: 00014740) as an Independent Director of the Company
    20 for0 against
3 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 20 Mar 2026, 20 fund houses

  • Re-appointment of Mr. Vijay Keshav Gokhale (DIN: 09134089) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Nomination & Remuneration Committee Chairman and Excessive Remuneration to Promoter Executive Directors and past commission distribution to Non-Executive Directors has not been adequately justified. Nomination & Remuneration Committee members should be held accountable for such unfair remuneration practices in the Company, as it’s the Nomination & Remuneration Committee’s responsibility to ensure the remuneration being paid is in a fair and reasonable manner
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: NRC Chairman and Excessive Remuneration to Promoter EDs and past commission distribution to NEDs has not been adequately justified. NRC members should be held accountable for such unfair remuneration practices in the Company, as it’s the NRC’s responsibility to ensure the remuneration being paid is in a fair and reasonable manner
    15 for5 against
  • Re-appointment of Dr. Vidya Rajiv Yeravdekar (DIN: 02183179) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    Against Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund, Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual Fund, WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund
    • Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual FundDr. (Ms.) Vidya Yeravdekar, 61, is the Principal Director of Symbiosis Society and the Pro-Chancellor of Symbiosis International University. She previously served as the Joint Director of Symbiosis Society and Director of the Symbiosis Centre of Health Care. She has been on the board of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited since 16 April 2021. She attended three out of seven (43%) board meetings in FY25 and 58% of board meetings held in the last three years. Her FY26 board meeting attendance is also low: she attended two out of five (40%) board meetings in FY26 till the date of the shareholder notice. We expect directors to attend all board meetings and, at a minimum, 75% of board meetings over a three-year period prior to their reappointment. Given her low board meeting attendance, we are unable to support her reappointment. We do not support the resolution.
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Low attendance in Board meetings.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Low attendance in Board meetings. Consistent participation at Board meetings is a fundamental responsibility of directors. His attendance record indicates that he may not have been able to devote adequate time and attention to the Company’s affairs.
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because:• Vidya Rajiv Yeravdekar has failed to attend at least 75 percent of board and committee meetings in the most recent fiscal year, without a satisfactory explanation
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has decided to vote against the resolution because of Dr Vidya’s low attendance in board meetings
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisor recommendations (passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Consistent Board meeting attendance is a fundamental director responsibility. His poor attendance record suggests an inability to devote adequate time and attention to the Company's affairs.
    • UTI Mutual FundDr. (Ms.) Vidya Yeravdekar, 61, is the Principal Director of Symbiosis Society and the Pro-Chancellor of Symbiosis International University. She previously served as the Joint Director of Symbiosis Society and Director of the Symbiosis Centre of Health Care. She has been on the board of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited since 16 April 2021. She attended three out of seven (43%) board meetings in FY25 and 58% of board meetings held in the last three years. Her FY26 board meeting attendance is also low: she attended two out of five (40%) board meetings in FY26 till the date of the shareholder notice. Given her low board meeting attendance, we are unable to support her reappointment. We do not support the resolution.
    • WhiteOak Capital Mutual FundDr. (Ms.) Vidya Yeravdekar, 61, is the Principal Director of Symbiosis Society and the Pro-Chancellor of Symbiosis International University. She attended three out of seven (43%) board meetings in FY25 and 58% of board meetings held in the last three years. Her FY26 board meeting attendance is also low: she attended two out of five (40%) board meetings in FY26 till the date of the shareholder notice. Given her low board meeting attendance, we are unable to support her reappointment. We do not support the resolution.
    4 for16 against
  • Re-appointment of Dr. Shailesh Kripalu Ayyangar (DIN: 00268076) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Cooling off period of 3 years not served at the time of transition from Non-Executive Director to Independent Director.Proposed term will lead to prolonged association with the Company.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundShailesh Ayyangar, 71, is the former Managing Director of Sanofi India Limited. Public sources suggest that he is a Value Accelerator Sector Advisor (Healthcare) at Goldman Sachs Asset Management. He attended all seven (100%) board meetings held in FY25. He will attain 75 years of age during the proposed term and, therefore, his continuation beyond 75 years of age requires shareholder approval. He served as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited from 16 April 2021 till 1 June 2023 and was appointed as an Independent Director from 2 June 2023. The company now proposes to reappoint him as an Independent Director for five years from 2 June 2026 (till 1 June 2031). His overall tenure on the board will exceed the ten-year threshold during the proposed term. Thus, while his reappointment is in line with statutory requirements, we do not support his reappointment.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Cooling off period of 3 years not served at the time of transition from NED to ID. Proposed term will lead to prolonged association with the Company.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundAlthough legally compliant, the director served as NED non-ID for 2 years and then transitioned to ID without serving a cooling off period.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has decided to vote against the resolution because cooling off period of 3 years not served at the time of transition from NED to ID. Proposed term will lead to prolonged association with the Company.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundShailesh Ayyangar, 71, is the former Managing Director of Sanofi India Limited. He attended all seven (100%) board meetings held in FY25. He served as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited from 16 April 2021 till 1 June 2023 and was appointed as an Independent Director from 2 June 2023. The company now proposes to reappoint him as an Independent Director for five years from 2 June 2026 (till 1 June 2031). His overall tenure on the board will exceed the ten-year threshold during the proposed term in the company. Thus, while his reappointment is in line with statutory requirements, we do not support his reappointment.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisor recommendations (passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Prolonged association with the group. Cooling off period of 3 years not served at the time of transition from NED to ID
    7 for13 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 28 Aug 2025, 18 fund houses

  • To receive, consider and adopt: a) the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2025, together with the Report of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon; and b) the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2025, together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    18 for0 against
  • To declare Final Dividend of Rs. 3/- (Rupees Three only) per Equity Share of Face Value of Rs. 10/- each (Rupees Ten only) for the Financial Year ended on March 31, 2025.
    18 for0 against
  • To appoint Mr. Sunil Mehta (DIN: 00118469) as a Director who retires by rotation, and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    18 for0 against
  • To appoint Mr. Samit Mehta (DIN: 00332562) as a Director who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    18 for0 against
  • To ratify remuneration payable to the Cost Auditor for the Financial Year 2025-26
    18 for0 against
  • To re-appoint Dr. Mukund Gurjar (DIN: 00026843) as a Whole-time Director of the Company
    18 for0 against
  • To appoint M/s. SVD & Associates, Company Secretaries as the Secretarial Auditors of the Company
    18 for0 against
  • To approve payment of remuneration to Mr. Satish Mehta (DIN: 00118691), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundSatish Mehta, 74, is the promoter, Managing Director and CEO of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. His FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 256.2 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending March 2027. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for fixed pay of up to Rs. 330.0 mn and an additional commission of 1% of net profits, which is very high for the company’s scale of operations.The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and is comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. While we recognize Satish Mehta’s role as promoter in driving the strategic direction of the company, we believe overall executive compensation is excessive. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Satish Mehta, 74, is the promoter, Managing Director and CEO of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. His proposed remuneration is not commensurate with the size and scale of the business. We do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has decided to vote against as overall executive compensation is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 77.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY2025, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY2025. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundSatish Mehta, 74, is the promoter, Managing Director and CEO of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. His FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 256.2 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending March 2027. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for fixed pay of up to Rs. 330.0 mn and an additional commission of 1% of net profits, which is very high for the company s scale of operations. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company s size and is comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. The company is seeking approval to pay remuneration to all the EDs but capped at 15% of net profits which is exceeding the statutory limits. We do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisory recommendation (passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits;
    • SBI Mutual FundSatish Mehta, 74, is the promoter, Managing Director and CEO of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. His FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 256.2 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending March 2027. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for fixed pay of up to Rs. 330.0 mn and an additional commission of 1% of net profits, which is very high for the company’s scale of operations. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and is comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. While we recognize Satish Mehta’s role as promoter in driving the strategic direction of the company, we believe overall executive compensation is excessive. We do not support the resolution.
    4 for14 against
  • To approve payment of remuneration to Mr. Sunil Mehta (DIN: 00118469), Whole-time Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundSunil Mehta, 62, is part of the promoter family and serves as Wholetime Director – Projects of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Sunil Mehta’s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.3 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending June 2028. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 77.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Sunil Mehta, 62, is part of the promoter family and serves as Wholetime Director – Projects of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. His proposed remuneration is not commensurate with the size and scale of the business. We do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has decided to vote against as overall executive compensation is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 77.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY2025, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY2025.Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundSunil Mehta, 62, is part of the promoter family and serves as Wholetime Director Projects of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Sunil Mehta s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.3 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending June 2028. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 77.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. The company is seeking approval to pay remuneration to all the EDs but capped at 15% of net profits which is exceeding the statutory limits. We do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisory recommendation (passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits;
    • UTI Mutual FundSunil Mehta, 62, is part of the promoter family and serves as Wholetime Director – Projects of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Sunil Mehta’s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.3 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending June 2028. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. We do not support the resolution.
    4 for14 against
  • To approve payment of remuneration to Mrs. Namita Thapar (DIN: 05318899), Whole-time Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundMs. Namita Thapar, 48, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Ms. Namita Thapar’s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.3 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve her remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of her term ending July 2029. As per the prospectus, she is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 110.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMs. Namita Thapar, 48, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Her proposed remuneration is not commensurate with the size and scale of the business. We do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has decided to vote against as overall executive compensation is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 77.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY2025, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY2025.Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundMs. Namita Thapar, 48, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Ms. Namita Thapar s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.3 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve her remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of her term ending July 2029. As per the prospectus, she is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 110.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. The company is seeking approval to pay remuneration to all the EDs but capped at 15% of net profits which is exceeding the statutory limits. We do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisory recommendation (passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits;
    • SBI Mutual FundMs. Namita Thapar, 48, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. The overall promoter representation on the board is high – there are five executive directors, including four from the promoter family, which is high for the company’s size. Ms. Namita Thapar’s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.3 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve her remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of her term ending July 2029. As per the prospectus, she is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 110.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. We do not support the resolution.
    4 for14 against
  • To approve payment of remuneration to Mr. Samit Mehta (DIN: 00332562), Whole-time Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundSamit Mehta, 45, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director – Operations of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Samit Mehta’s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.5 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. This also includes remuneration of Rs. 14.2 mn from subsidiaries. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending July 2027. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 70.0 mn. However, this does not include his pay from group companies – the company has stated that his pay from subsidiaries is capped at Rs. 21.0 mn till July 2026. However, there is still no cap on his remaining term after July 2026. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits; especially when the Company’s past remuneration payment has been significant and not adequately justified.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Samit Mehta, 45, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director – Operations of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. His proposed remuneration is not commensurate with the size and scale of the business. We do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has decided to vote against as overall executive compensation is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 77.0 mn. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY2025, which is disproportionate to the company’s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY2025.Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundSamit Mehta, 45, is part of the promoter family and serves as Whole-time Director Operations of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited. Samit Mehta s FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 48.5 mn, paid in excess of regulatory thresholds. This also includes remuneration of Rs. 14.2 mn from subsidiaries. The company seeks approval to waive recovery of this excess pay and to approve his remuneration, in excess of regulatory limits, for the remainder of his term ending July 2027. As per the prospectus, he is eligible for a maximum pay of Rs. 70.0 mn. However, this might not include his pay from group companies, and thus, we are unable to estimate his maximum pay. The overall pay to executive directors aggregated Rs. 463.5 mn in FY25, which is disproportionate to the company s size and comparable to significantly larger peers. The total pay to the promoter family (including members not on the board) was also high at Rs. 504.9 mn in FY25. The company is seeking approval to pay remuneration to all the EDs but capped at 15% of net profits which is exceeding the statutory limits. We do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisory recommendation (passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundTransparency & Governance Concern: Inadequate justification and disclosures in the notice for payment of remuneration in excess of legal limits and no absolute cap on proposed aggregated and individual remuneration limits;
    5 for13 against
  • To approve payment of Commission to the Non-Executive Directors
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Approval proposed for perpetuity without specifying any term/tenure and there is no absolute cap on commission payable; and past commission distribution has not been adequately justified.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe aggregate commission to Non-Executive Directors was Rs. 20.6 mn, which stood at 0.5% of standalone PBT. The proposed commission to Non-Executive Directors is in line with market practice. However, the company has not defined a term for the validity of the resolution and thus, it is effectively valid in perpetuity. The company should have also capped such remuneration in absolute terms. We believe shareholders must be able to periodically review such resolutions and, therefore, do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Approval proposed for perpetuity without specifying any term/tenure and there is no absolute cap on commission payable; and past commission distribution has not been adequately justified.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe AMC has voted against the resolution because the company has not defined a term for the validity of the resolution and thus, it is effectively valid in perpetuity. The company should have also capped such remuneration in absolute terms.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundIn line with advisory recommendation (passive holding)
    6 for12 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 23 Dec 2024, 17 fund houses

  • AMENDMENT AND RATIFICATION OF EMCURE - EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION SCHEME 2013 OF THE COMPANY
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Mahindra Manulife Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Mahindra Manulife Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundThe company has not listed all the amendments covered – however, these include deletion of pre-IPO terms and conditions and increase in the pool size of ESOS 2013 to 9,454,917 options. As per the offer documents, 510,000 options were exercised/ settled from FY22 till the time of the prospectus. If only 510,000 options are exercised till date, the scheme will lead to a dilution of ~4.5% on the expanded capital base. For options granted between FY22 and FY24, the exercise price was equivalent to market price. As per the current notice, the exercise price will be the higher of closing market price or book value. However, the scheme gives the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) the discretion to determine the exercise price - this could result in options being granted at a significant discount to market price. We do not favour ESOP schemes where options are granted at a significant discount to market price since stock options are ‘pay at risk’ options that employees accept at the time of grant. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees. We make an exception in cases where the vesting of such options is mandatorily linked to pre-defined performance parameters and the company has disclosed the targets for such parameters. In the current case, the vesting is linked to continued employment. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-compliant with SEBI (SBEB & SE) Regulations: NRC being given the discretion to determine the exercise price which can be other than what would have been derived from the given formula. Governance Concern: Constraints in computing the maximum potential benefits that can be given to a single employee. Lack of clarity regarding the manner in which the scheme will be adjusted, at employee level and scheme level, in cases of corporate actions.
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted because: • Nomination and remuneration committee retains the discretion to determine the exercise price over the stated methodology of higher than the market price or book value on date of grant. • The proposal includes grant of units to employees of associate companies without a compelling rationale.
    • HDFC Mutual FundThe scheme gives the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) the discretion to determine the exercise price - this could result in options being granted at a significant discount to market price. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundLack of clarity
    6 for11 against
  • RATIFICATION OF EXTENSION OF BENEFITS UNDER EMCURE- EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION SCHEME 2013 OF THE COMPANY TO THE EMPLOYEES OF A GROUP COMPANY INCLUDING A SUBSIDIARY OR ASSOCIATE COMPANY OF THE COMPANY, IN INDIA OR OUTSIDE INDIAMoreLess
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mahindra Manulife Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Mahindra Manulife Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundThrough resolution #2, the company seeks shareholder approval to extend the benefits of ESOS 2013 to employees to group companies, including associate companies. Our view is linked to resolution #1. Further, we do not support extension of ESOP schemes to associate companies. The company must specifically list the type of group companies covered. We do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-compliant with SEBI (SBEB & SE) Regulations: NRC being given the discretion to determine the exercise price which can be other than what would have been derived from the given formula. Governance Concern: Constraints in computing the maximum potential benefits that can be given to a single employee. Lack of clarity regarding the manner in which the scheme will be adjusted, at employee level and scheme level, in cases of corporate actions. Benefits proposed to be extended to Group Companies other than Subsidiary Companies without compelling justification or cost reimbursement provision
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted because: • Nomination and remuneration committee retains the discretion to determine the exercise price over the stated methodology of higher than the market price or book value on date of grant. • The proposal includes grant of units to employees of associate companies without a compelling rationale.
    • HDFC Mutual FundThe scheme gives the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) the discretion to determine the exercise price - this could result in options being granted at a significant discount to market price. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundWhile we support the extension of stock options to employees of subsidiaries, we do not support these to be extended to employees of group companies, associate companies and/or holding company. Hence voting against.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundLack of clarity
    5 for12 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Tax disputes

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income tax, Central Circle 2 (1)- PuneSince 27 Dec 2023
    The revised notices of demand giving effect to the CIT(A) orders for Financial Years 2014-15 to 2020-21 are yet to be received from the Assessing Officer. Further, with respect to the disallowances sustained by the CIT(A) in these years, the Company has filed appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which are currently pending adjudication. In respect of Financial Years 2021-22 to 2022-23, the status of proceedings remain unchanged.MoreLess
    At the filing before: The Company has received assessment orders u/s 143(3) rws 144C(3) and r.w.s 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2014-15 until Financial Year 2020-21 (Assessment Year 2015-16 to Assessment Year 2021-22) for an aggregate demand of Rs. 1,828.15 million and order u/s 143(3) for Financial Year 2021-22 to Financial Year 2022-23 (Assessment Year 2022-23 to Assessment Year 2023-24) for demand of Rs. 45.77 million payable on account of disallowance of certain advertisement and promotional expenses and transfer pricing adjustments made. The Company has filed appeals in relation to such orders with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).The cases are pending for disposal with Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Company has received orders dated 31-03-2026, passed by the CIT(A), in respect of appeals filed against the orders u/s. 153A of the Act for the Financial Year 2014-15 until Financial Year 2020-21 (Assessment Year 2015-16 to Assessment Year 2021-22), wherein partial relief has been granted by deleting or reducing certain additions made by the Assessing Officer.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income tax, Central Circle 2 (1)- PuneSince 22 Oct 2022
    The cases are pending for disposal with Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
    At the filing before: Subsidiary of Company, Zuventus Healthcare Limited (Zuventus) has received assessment orders u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Financial Year 2014-15 until Financial Year 2020-21 (Assessment Year 2015-16 to Assessment Year 2021-22) for an aggregate demand of Rs. 1,098.07 million and order u/s 143(3) for Financial Year 2021-22 to Financial Year 2023-24 (Assessment Year 2022-23 to 2024-25) for demand of Rs. 38.71 million payable on account of disallowances of certain advertisement and promotional expenses. Zuventus has filed appeals in relation to such orders with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The cases are pending for disposal with Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).MoreLess

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
No
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
No
The filing has a part on tax disputes
Yes
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.

How money raised was used

The company's results filing for the quarter to Jun 2026 says no statement of how money raised was used applies to it.