Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals logo

Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: CROMPTONBSE: 539876Consumer DurablesSmall Cap

Last close ₹195.18down ₹6.23 (3.09%)BSE ₹195.45

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹201.41.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹192.02Low, 23 Oct 2026₹310.50High, 15 May 2026
Market cap
₹12,568 Cr392nd largest listed
P/E
Lossover the last 12 months
P/B
4.1
Dividend yield
1.54%
ROE
−5.5%
ROE without one-offs
17.4%
ROCE
20.4%
Debt to equity
0.00
Volume, NSE
66,18,35049.3% delivered

Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • Managing director and CEOPromeet Ghosh
  • ChairpersonSUNDARAM DAMODARANNAIR

7 directors5 independent1 executive1 non-executive

  • Promeet Ghosh · Managing director and CEOExecutive · joined Aug 2016 · reappointed May 2023 · 2 listed boards · 3 committee seats
  • SUNDARAM DAMODARANNAIR · ChairpersonNon-executive · joined Sep 2025 · reappointed Sep 2025 · 3 listed boards · 2 as independent · 9 committee seats, 3 as chair
  • Prathivadibhayankara Rajagopalan RameshIndependent · joined May 2021 · reappointed Mar 2026 · 61 months as independent · 6 listed boards · 6 as independent · 8 committee seats, 5 as chair
  • Anil ChaudhryIndependent · joined Oct 2023 · reappointed Oct 2023 · 32 months as independent · 4 listed boards · 4 as independent · 4 committee seats
  • Sanjiv KakkarIndependent · joined Oct 2023 · reappointed Oct 2023 · 32 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 1 committee seat, 1 as chair
  • Hiroo MirchandaniIndependent · joined Jan 2022 · reappointed Jan 2022 · 53 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 4 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Smita AnandIndependent · joined Dec 2018 · reappointed Dec 2023 · 90 months as independent · 3 listed boards · 3 as independent · 2 committee seats

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

2 directors who left
  • Shantanu Khosla, left 31 Dec 2025: Tenure Completion
  • P M Murty, left 24 Jul 2025: Tenure Completion

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 13 May 20266 of 7 present4 independent · 57 days in between
    • 16 Mar 20267 of 7 present5 independent · 37 days in between
    • 6 Feb 20267 of 7 present5 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair Sanjiv Kakkar

    P R Ramesh, D Sundaram

    • 12 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 95 days in between
    • 5 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Smita Anand

    D Sundaram, Anil Chaudhry

    • 12 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 95 days in between
    • 5 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair D Sundaram

    Hiroo Mirchandani, Promeet Ghosh

    • 5 Feb 20263 of 3 present1 independent
  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair P R Ramesh

    D Sundaram, Anil Chaudhry

    • 25 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 19 days in between
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Hiroo Mirchandani

    D Sundaram, Promeet Ghosh, Smita Anand

    • 5 Feb 20264 of 4 present2 independent

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Sep 2026.

  • M S K A & Associates LLP (formerly known as M S K A & Associates)Peer-review certificate valid to Jul 2027
3 earlier auditors
  • M/s. M S K A & Associates LLP (formerly known as M S K A & Associates)Named in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026
  • M/s MSKA Associates & LLPNamed in the filing for the quarter to Mar 2026
  • MSKA & Associates, Chartered AccountantsNamed in filings from Mar 2025 to Sep 2025

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals dividend history

Annual general meeting, 7 Aug 2026

3,11,858 shareholders on the register on 31 Jul 2026; present: 0 promoters and 71 others; votes counted by Alifya Sapatwala / Mehta & Mehta, Company Secretaries.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Adoption of Financial Statements
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.60%

    Turnout: all 73.77% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.69% · other public 0.19%

  2. Declaration of Divided
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.56%

    Turnout: all 73.77% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.70% · other public 0.19%

  3. Appointment of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as a director liable to retire by rotation
    Ordinary
    99.99% for0.01% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.01% · other public 2.00%

    Turnout: all 73.77% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.70% · other public 0.19%

  4. Re-appointment of M/s M S K A & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants (formerly known as M/s M S K A & Associates, Chartered Accountants) as Statutory Auditors of the Company and to fix remuneration
    Ordinary
    99.21% for0.79% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.79% · other public 1.80%

    Turnout: all 73.77% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.70% · other public 0.19%

  5. Ratification of remuneration payable to M/s. Ashwin Solanki & Associates, Cost Auditors of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 1.88%

    Turnout: all 73.77% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.70% · other public 0.19%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 14 Mar 2026, 1 resolution

3,24,836 shareholders on the register on 6 Feb 2026; votes counted by Alifya Sapatwala / Mehta & Mehta.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Re-appointment of Mr. P R Ramesh (DIN: 01915274) as Non-Executive, Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    90.86% for9.14% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 9.15% · other public 4.24%

    Turnout: all 75.58% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 87.50% · other public 0.42%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 19 Oct 2025, 1 resolution

2,79,886 shareholders on the register on 12 Sep 2025; votes counted by Alifya Sapatwala / Mehta & Mehta.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Appointment of Mr. Sundaram Damodarannair (DIN: 00016304) as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company
    Ordinary
    97.79% for2.21% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.23% · other public 0.21%

    Turnout: all 78.02% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.35% · other public 5.95%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 12 Sep 2025, 1 resolution

2,73,501 shareholders on the register on 8 Aug 2025; votes counted by Alifya Sapatwala / Mehta & Mehta.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Alteration of the Object Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 2.44%

    Turnout: all 77.56% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.28% · other public 0.72%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 8 Aug 2025, 5 resolutions

2,72,943 shareholders on the register on 1 Aug 2025; present: 0 promoters and 68 others; votes counted by Alifya Sapatwala / Mehta & Mehta, Company Secretaries.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Adoption of Financial Statements
    Ordinary
    99.95% for0.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.05% · other public 0.11%

    Turnout: all 77.87% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 1.95%

  2. Declaration of Dividend
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.10%

    Turnout: all 77.87% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 1.95%

  3. Appointment of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as a Director liable to retire by rotation
    Ordinary
    99.95% for0.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.05% · other public 0.68%

    Turnout: all 77.87% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 1.95%

  4. Ratification of remuneration payable to Ms. Ashwin Solanki and Associates, Cost Auditors of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.68%

    Turnout: all 77.87% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 1.95%

  5. Appointment of Parikh & Associates, Practicing Company Secretaries (ICSI Unique Code P1988MH009800) as Secretarial Auditors of the Company and to fix remuneration
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.63%

    Turnout: all 77.86% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 88.45% · other public 1.95%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 10 Nov 2024, 5 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To approve Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (hereinafter referred to as “Share Plan- 2024/ PSU -2024”)
    Special
    56.36% for43.64% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 41.71% · other public 83.41%

    Turnout: all 77.95% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 86.07% · other public 26.51%

  2. To grant Stock Units to the employees of the Subsidiary Company(ies) (at present and/ or in the future) under the Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (hereinafter referred to as “Share Plan- 2024 /PSU -2024”)MoreLess
    Special
    56.47% for43.53% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 41.59% · other public 83.41%

    Turnout: all 77.95% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 86.07% · other public 26.50%

  3. To consider the amendment to the terms of remuneration of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN:05307658), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (“MD & CEO”)
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    64.52% for35.48% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 33.09% · other public 84.67%

    Turnout: all 77.95% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 86.07% · other public 26.50%

  4. To consider the amendment to the terms of remuneration of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN:05307658), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (“MD & CEO”) to
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    54.83% for45.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 43.26% · other public 84.67%

    Turnout: all 77.95% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 86.07% · other public 26.50%

  5. To approve increase in Authorised Share Capital and consequential alteration of the Capital Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 78.10% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 86.25% · other public 26.50%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 26 Jul 2024, 4 resolutions

Present: 0 promoters and 0 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Adoption of Financial Statements
    Ordinary
    99.71% for0.29% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.29% · other public 0.06%

    Turnout: all 73.97% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.40% · other public 2.27%

  2. Declaration of Dividend
    Ordinary
    99.43% for0.57% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.57% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 73.99% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.42% · other public 2.27%

  3. Appointment of Mr. Shantanu Khosla (DIN: 00059877) as a Director liable to retire by rotation
    Ordinary
    98.96% for1.04% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.04% · other public 0.13%

    Turnout: all 73.97% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.40% · other public 2.27%

  4. Ratification of remuneration payable to M/s. Ashwin Solanki & Associates, Cost Auditors of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.12%

    Turnout: all 73.97% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.40% · other public 2.27%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 19 Dec 2023, 2 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Appointment of Mr. Anil Chaudhry (DIN: 03213517) as an Independent Director
    Special
    99.85% for0.15% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.15% · other public 0.31%

    Turnout: all 71.40% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 84.90% · other public 3.70%

  2. Appointment of Mr. Sanjiv Kakkar (DIN: 00591027) as an Independent Director
    Special
    99.85% for0.15% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.15% · other public 0.33%

    Turnout: all 71.40% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 84.90% · other public 3.70%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 7 Aug 2026, 16 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Adoption of Financial Statements
    16 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as a director liable to retire by rotation
    16 for0 against
  • Re-appointment of M/s M S K A & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants (formerly known as M/s M S K A & Associates, Chartered Accountants) as Statutory Auditors of the Company and to fix remuneration
    Against Navi Mutual Fund
    • Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern on the merits of Statutory Auditors. Governance concern: No justification for the material change in proposed Audit fee in case of re-appointment as proposed audit fee is 114% higher comparative to the fees paid to auditor previously.
    15 for1 against
  • Ratification of remuneration payable to M/s. Ashwin Solanki & Associates, Cost Auditors of the Company
    16 for0 against
4 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 2) Declare final dividend of Rs. 3.0 per equity share (face value of Rs. 2.0) for FY26
    1 for0 against
  • Declare Dividend
    1 for0 against
  • Declare final dividend of Rs. 3.0 per equity share (face value of Rs. 2.0) for FY26
    2 for0 against
  • To declare a dividend of Rs. 3 per equity share of the face value of Rs. 2 each for the financial year ended March 31, 2026.
    12 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 14 Mar 2026, 36 fund houses

  • Re-appointment of Mr. P R Ramesh (DIN: 01915274) as Non-Executive, Independent Director of the Company
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because:• Prathivadibhayankara Rajagopalan Ramesh serves on a total of more than six public company boards, which could potentially compromise his ability to commit sufficient time to his role in the company.
    • NJ Mutual FundP R Ramesh, 71, was Director of Deloitte & Touche Assurance & Enterprise Risk Services India Private Limited and served as a member of the Deloitte Global Board and the Deloitte Asia Pacific Board. He has served on the board of the company as an Independent Director since 21 May 2021 and attended all eight board meetings (100%) held in FY25 and six out of six board meetings held in FY26 till 6 February 2026. The re- appointment is in line with statutory requirements. We support the resolution
    34 for2 against
6 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 19 Oct 2025, 36 fund houses

  • Appointment of Mr. Sundaram Damodarannair (DIN: 00016304) as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: No cooling-off period has been served by the proposed appointee before the appointment as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director post completion of two terms as an Independent Director – it raises question on his independence during his tenure as an Independent Director.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundNo concern on the profile and merit of the proposed Appointee. Governance Concern: No cooling-off period has been served by the proposed appointee before the appointment as NE-NID post completion of two terms as an ID – it raises question on his independence during his tenure as an ID.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundCooling-off period not served for appointment as NE-NID post completion of term as an ID.
    29 for7 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 12 Sep 2025, 35 fund houses

  • Alteration of the Object Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company
    35 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 8 Aug 2025, 33 fund houses

  • Adoption of Financial Statements
    33 for0 against
  • Declaration of Dividend
    33 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as a Director liable to retire by rotation
    33 for0 against
  • Ratification of remuneration payable to Ms. Ashwin Solanki and Associates, Cost Auditors of the Company
    33 for0 against
  • Appointment of Parikh & Associates, Practicing Company Secretaries (ICSI Unique Code P1988MH009800) as Secretarial Auditors of the Company and to fix remuneration
    33 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 10 Nov 2024, 25 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To approve Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (hereinafter referred to as “Share Plan- 2024/ PSU -2024”)
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundPSU 2024 will lead to a dilution of 1.0% on the expanded capital base. The exercise price under PSU 2024 will be the face value of equity shares (Rs. 2.0 each). This represents a discount of ~99.5% to the current market price. We do not favour stock option schemes where options are granted at a significant discount (>20%) to market price since stock options are ‘pay at risk’ options that employees accept at the time of grant. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees. We make an exception in cases where the vesting of such options is mandatorily linked to performance parameters, which must be clearly disclosed in the shareholder notice and must align with shareholder interests. The company must also disclose specific pre-defined performance targets for such parameters. In the current case, the company has disclosed that the vesting will be linked to company performance (total revenue growth, EBITDA, free cash flow compared to annual performance targets and competitors’ performance, relative total shareholder return (R-TSR), and other parameters determined by the NRC) and individual performance (based on a rating of 1 to 5). The company has given a broad range of weights for the four company performance parameters. However, the list of company performance parameters is not exhaustive, and the NRC may determine inclusion of additional parameters as vesting criteria. Given the enabling nature of the flexibility extended to the NRC to determine such parameters, we are unable to support the resolution.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundThe exercise price is at face value of the stock, which is at a significant discount to the market price. The objective of ESOP is to align the interest of employees with the minority shareholders, which is defeated by allotting ESOP/RSU at exercise price of face value.
    • DSP Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual FundPSU 2024 will lead to a dilution of 1.0% on the expanded capital base. The exercise price under PSU 2024 will be the face value of equity shares (Rs. 2.0 each). This represents a discount of ~99.5% to the current market price. We do not favour stock option schemes where options are granted at a significant discount (>20%) to market price since stock options are ‘pay at risk’ options that employees accept at the time of grant. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees. We make an exception in cases where the vesting of such options is mandatorily linked to performance parameters, which must be disclosed in the shareholder notice and must align with shareholder interests. The company must also disclose specific pre-defined performance targets for such parameters. In the current case, the company has disclosed that the vesting will be linked to company performance (total revenue growth, EBITDA, free cash flow compared to annual performance targets and competitors’ performance, relative total shareholder return (R-TSR), and other parameters determined by the NRC) and individual performance (based on a rating of 1 to 5). The list of company performance parameters is not exhaustive, and the NRC may determine additional parameters. Further, the company has not disclosed the actual targets set for the company performance parameters. In the absence of clarity on such targets, we are unable to support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fundpossibility of Potential excessive benefits to single employee
    • HDFC Mutual FundThe exercise price of ESOPs is equal to the face value of the equity shares. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundPSU 2024 will lead to a dilution of 1.0% on the expanded capital base. The exercise price under PSU 2024 will be the face value of equity shares (Rs. 2.0 each). This represents a discount of ~99.5% to the current market price. We do not favour stock option schemes where options are granted at a significant discount to market price. The company has not disclosed the actual targets set for the company performance parameters. In the absence of clarity on such targets, we are unable to support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundRSU pricing at significant discount to market price (high discount implies non-alignment of potential future growth for shareholder and RSU holders)
    16 for8 against
  • To grant Stock Units to the employees of the Subsidiary Company(ies) (at present and/ or in the future) under the Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (hereinafter referred to as “Share Plan- 2024 /PSU -2024”)MoreLess
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundThrough resolution #2, the company seeks shareholder approval to extend the benefits of PSU 2024 to employees of subsidiary companies (current/ future). Our view is linked to resolution #1. Further, we do not support the extension of PSU 2024 to employees of listed subsidiaries. PSU 2024 may be extended to the employees of Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd., a listed 75.0% subsidiary - the company has stated that the shares of Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Ltd. are more liquid. We also do not support such the enabling approval to support the extension of ESOP scheme to any future subsidiaries, in the absence of any details of such subsidiaries.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundThe exercise price is at face value of the stock, which is at a significant discount to the market price. The objective of ESOP is to align the interest of employees with the minority shareholders, which is defeated by allotting ESOP/RSU at exercise price of face value.
    • DSP Mutual FundThrough resolution #2, the company seeks shareholder approval to extend the benefits of PSU 2024 to employees of subsidiary companies (current/ future). Our view is linked to resolution #1. Further, we do not support the extension of PSU 2024 to employees of listed subsidiaries. It is unclear if PSU 2024 will be extended to the employees of Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd., a listed 75.0% subsidiary. We also do not support such the enabling approval to support the extension of ESOP scheme to any future subsidiaries, in the absence of any details of such subsidiaries.
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundExtension of Scheme benefits to “Holding Company” without disclosures on cost_x0002_reimbursements, if any.
    • HDFC Mutual FundThe exercise price of ESOPs is equal to the face value of the equity shares. In the case of deeply discounted options, there is no alignment between the interests of investors and those of employees.
    • Invesco Mutual FundThrough this resolution , the company seeks shareholder approval to extend the benefits of PSU 2024 to employees of subsidiary companies (current/ future). We do not support the extension of PSU 2024 to employees of listed subsidiaries. It is likely that PSU 2024 will be extended to the employees of Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd., a listed 75.0% subsidiary. We also do not support such the enabling approval to support the extension of ESOP scheme to any future subsidiaries, in the absence of any details of such subsidiaries.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThrough resolution #2, the company seeks shareholder approval to extend the benefits of PSU 2024 to employees of subsidiary companies (current/ future). Our view is linked to resolution #1.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundRSU pricing at significant discount to market price (high discount implies non-alignment of potential future growth for shareholder and RSU holders)
    16 for8 against
  • To consider the amendment to the terms of remuneration of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN:05307658), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (“MD & CEO”)
    Against 360 One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
    • 360 One Mutual FundAlthough the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration.
    • Axis Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn, his overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a contraction in EBITDA margins. We are unable to support the resolution.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundThe exercise price is at face value of the stock, which is at a significant discount to the market price. The objective of ESOP is to align the interest of employees with the minority shareholders, which is defeated by allotting ESOP/RSU at exercise price of face value.
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundNo clarity on conditionally cancelling ESOP Scheme 2019
    • HDFC Mutual FundHis overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a contraction in EBITDA margins. We are unable to support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn, his overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC has benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a reduction in EBITDA margins and absolute levels of EBITDA and profits. We are unable to support the resolution
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (where the exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. We do not favour stock option schemes where options are granted at a significant discount to market price
    11 for7 against
  • To consider the amendment to the terms of remuneration of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN:05307658), Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (“MD & CEO”) to
    Against 360 One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
    • 360 One Mutual FundAlthough the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration.
    • Axis Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn, his overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a contraction in EBITDA margins. We are unable to support the resolution.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundThe exercise price is at face value of the stock, which is at a significant discount to the market price. The objective of ESOP is to align the interest of employees with the minority shareholders, which is defeated by allotting ESOP/RSU at exercise price of face value.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fundpossibility of Potential excessive benefits to single employee
    • HDFC Mutual FundHis overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a contraction in EBITDA margins. We are unable to support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn, his overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a reduction in EBITDA margins and absolute levels of EBITDA and profits. We are unable to support the resolution
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. We do not favour stock option schemes where options are granted at a significant discount to market price
    11 for7 against
  • To approve increase in Authorised Share Capital and consequential alteration of the Capital Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company
    24 for0 against
8 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 3) Approve amendment to the remuneration terms of Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as Managing Director and CEO for grant of additional 950,000 options under Employee Stock Option Plan 2019 (ESOP 2019).
    Against SBI Mutual Fund
    • SBI Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a contraction in EBITDA margins. On the SBIMF internal framework, we observe that his salary growth is not in line with the sales and PAT growth of the company. Moreover, his salary growth is not in line with the peers. His salary as % of annual sales and ratio of the salary to the median employee is not in line with its peers. Hence, we do not support the resolution.
    0 for1 against
  • 4) Approve amendment to the remuneration terms of Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as Managing Director and CEO for grant of 500,000 units under Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024).MoreLess
    Against SBI Mutual Fund
    • SBI Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a contraction in EBITDA margins. On the SBIMF internal framework, we observe that his salary growth is not in line with the sales and PAT growth of the company. Moreover, his salary growth is not in line with the peers. His salary as % of annual sales and ratio of the salary to the median employee is not in line with its peers. Hence, we do not support the resolution.
    0 for1 against
  • Approve amendment to the remuneration terms of Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as Managing Director and CEO for grant of 500,000 units under Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024)MoreLess
    Against DSP Mutual Fund
    • DSP Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn, his overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a reduction in EBITDA margins and absolute levels of EBITDA and profits. We are unable to support the resolution.
    1 for1 against
  • Approve amendment to the remuneration terms of Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658) as Managing Director and CEO for grant of additional 950,000 options under Employee Stock Option Plan 2019 (ESOP 2019)
    Against DSP Mutual Fund
    • DSP Mutual FundPromeet Ghosh’s FY24 remuneration aggregated Rs. 133.2 mn, including fair value of stock options. The company proposes to revise his remuneration terms for an additional grant of 950,000 ESOPs under ESOP 2019 and upto 500,000 stock units (exercise price = face value) under the proposed Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024 (PSU - 2024). Of the proposed grant of 500,000 stock units, 178,500 units will be granted in the future if the company significantly exceeds certain achievement targets. The vesting of stock units under PSU – 2024 is linked to achievement of certain company performance and individual performance targets. Based on his proposed terms, we estimate his maximum FY25 remuneration at Rs. 247.6 mn. At Rs. 247.6 mn, his overall pay is high for the current scale of operations and is not commensurate with the industry peers. The company needs to clarify how the NRC has benchmarked his remuneration against similarly sized industry peers. The proposal to increase his compensation comes less than two years into his tenure as Managing Director. Although the company has undertaken various sustainability initiatives and cost-saving measures, there has not yet been a sustained improvement in overall performance to justify a doubling of his remuneration. In FY24, he received 100% of his target variable cash compensation even while there was a reduction in EBITDA margins and absolute levels of EBITDA and profits. We are unable to support the resolution.
    1 for1 against
  • Approve Amendment to the Terms of Remuneration of Promeet Ghosh as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer to Grant Employee Stock Options Under the Crompton Employee Stock Option Plan 2019 (ESOP 2019)MoreLess
    2 for0 against
  • Approve Amendment to the Terms of Remuneration of Promeet Ghosh as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer to Grant Units under Performance based Restricted Stock Units Plan 2024
    2 for0 against
  • To consider the amendment to the terms of remuneration of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658), the MD and CEO of the Company, to enable grant of 9,50,000 employee stock options which shall vest under the ESOP 2019 and as defined by Nomination and Remuneration Committee from time to time.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • To consider the amendment to the terms of remuneration of Mr. Promeet Ghosh (DIN: 05307658), the MD and CEO of the Company, to enable grant of up to 5,00,000 units (in one or multiple tranches, as the case may be) under the Share Plan 2024 and as defined by Nomination and Remuneration Committee from time to time.MoreLess
    Against Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundRSU pricing at significant discount to market price (high discount implies non-alignment of potential future growth for shareholder and RSU holders)
    0 for1 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 26 Jul 2024, 29 fund houses

  • Adoption of Financial Statements
    29 for0 against
  • Declaration of Dividend
    29 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Shantanu Khosla (DIN: 00059877) as a Director liable to retire by rotation
    29 for0 against
  • Ratification of remuneration payable to M/s. Ashwin Solanki & Associates, Cost Auditors of the Company
    29 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 19 Dec 2023, 26 fund houses

  • Appointment of Mr. Anil Chaudhry (DIN: 03213517) as an Independent Director
    26 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Sanjiv Kakkar (DIN: 00591027) as an Independent Director
    26 for0 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Fines and tax disputes

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Fine or penaltyXXXV Metropolitan Magistrate Court (FTCII), Egmore at Allikulam, ChennaiSince 9 Apr 2026

    The Hon’ble Court found all the accused are not found guilty under Sec.138 of NI Act and hence acquitted them.

    CGCEL initiated proceedings against Variety Agency and two of its Partners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, the Hon’ble Court acquitted the accused in connection with cheque bearing No.407640, dated 29.01.2025 for a sum of ₹ 6,54,276/- leading to a financial loss for the Company.MoreLess
  • Fine or penaltyDistrict Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rewari, HaryanaSince 6 May 2026

    1. To replace the defective fan with new one of same model/ brand/ price within 45 days from date of order 2. Payment of ₹ 11,000/- (as lumpsum compensation on account of mental agony and harassment)

    The consumer claimed that he had purchased a Crompton Ceiling Fan on 16.05.2022, with 5 years warranty, which from the time of installation started malfunctioning, Hence the consumer filed consumer complaint.MoreLess
  • Fine or penaltyHon’ble High Court of DelhiSince 14 May 2026

    The Hon’ble Court passed an interim injunction order , with respect to the one model grace fan

    The allegation pertains to similarity in overall visual appearance and essential design features.
  • Fine or penaltyDistrict Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rewari, HaryanaSince 23 May 2026

    Payment of 60% of the product value amounting to ₹6,600/- (against product value of ₹11,000/-) within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. Payment of ₹11,000/- towards compensation

    Consumer complaint filed seeking compensation with respect to Product not functioning well.
  • Fine or penaltyCommissioner (Appeals)Since 15 Jun 2026

    The Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order passed by the Office of the Assistant Commissioner for the financial year 2019-20

    Demand has been raised on account of alleged excess ITC claimed in GSTR 3B as compared to the GSTR 2A, short payment of tax as compared to E waybill records and ineligible ITC appearing in Table 8A of GSTR 9.MoreLess
  • Fine or penaltyCommissioner (Appeals)Since 24 Jun 2026

    The Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order passed by the Office of The Deputy Commissioner of state Tax for the financial year 2017-18

    Demand has been raised on account of disallowance of transitional credit claimed by Company.
  • Fine or penaltyCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals Centre, DelhiSince 31 Mar 2026

    CIT(A) order under Section 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961

    Demand has been raised on account of disallowance of provision for warranty and after sales services
  • Fine or penaltyCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals Centre, DelhiSince 31 Mar 2026

    CIT(A) order under Section 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961

    Demand on account of disallowance of provision forwarranty and after sales services, depreciation onintangible assets and ESOP expenses.
9 more
  • Fine or penaltyCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals Centre, DelhiSince 31 Mar 2026

    CIT(A) order under Section 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961

    Demand has been raised on account of disallowance of provision for warranty and after sales services, expenditure incurred for earning exempt income, education cess claimed and reduction in amount claimed under section 80ICMoreLess
  • Fine or penaltyCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals Centre, DelhiSince 1 Apr 2026

    CIT(A) order under Section 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961

    Demand on account of disallowance of provision for warranty and after sales services, depreciation on intangible assets and ESOP expenses
  • Tax disputeCommercial Tax Officer, Panaji- Ward, GoaSince 23 May 2019
    Status quo remains the same as per last disclosure.
    At the filing before: On February 3, 2026, the hearing with the assessing authority regarding the revision of the VAT assessment for the financial year 2015-16 was completed, with the order reserved. The excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) identified by the assessing officer was validated. The AO considered the opening ITC and the ITC utilized for Central Sales Tax (CST) payments, in alignment with the appellate authority's order. A request was made to the Appellate Authority to remand the entry tax matter to the assessing authority for consideration of excess VAT ITC against the entry tax demand for 2015-16. Following the resolution of these issues, pending assessments for 2016-17 and 2017-18 will be taken up based on the remand order.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner (MUM-VAT-E-620) MumbaiSince 15 Mar 2021
    Status quo remains the same as per last disclosure.
    At the filing before: No change in the status post receipt of stay order. Matter is pending before The Joint Commissioner Appeals, Mumbai for hearing. Status quo remains the same as per last disclosure.
  • Tax disputeExcise & Taxation Officer, Ambala Ward, HaryanaSince 30 Mar 2024
    Status quo remains the same as per last disclosure.
    At the filing before: Based on the merits of the matter, prevailing law and advice of the consultant, the Company is planning to appeal against this order before the Commissioner (Appeals). Status quo remains the same as per last disclosure.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAsst. Commissioner of Income Tax, 5(1)(1) Circle, MumbaiSince 31 Jul 2022
    There is no further development in the matter during the period April to June'26
    At the filing before: The income tax department has filed an appeal before the Hon. SC against the order of Hon. HC. The Hon. SC has passed the order in favour of the income tax department and set aside the respective HC order to extent of applicability of time for issuance of reassessment notice. No other grounds are taken into the consideration by the Hon. SC. The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) is to issue notices to give effect to SC decision. Presently, the Company has not received any notice from the income tax department pursuant to the order passed by the Hon. SC. There is no further development in the matter during the period April'26 to June'26MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssessment Unit, Income Tax Department (Intimation dated: March 21, 2024)Since 20 Mar 2024
    The company has filed an appeal before Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 20 May 2026 disputing additions made by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department.
    At the filing before: CIT(A), NFAC has passed an order dated 31 March 2026 rejecting contentions of Company. Company is of view that it has strong case on merits and will be filing appeal before Honourable Income Tax Appellate against the order passed by Hon. CIT(A)MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssessment Unit, Income Tax Department (Intimation dated: March 25, 2025)Since 24 Mar 2025
    The company has filed an appeal before Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 20 May 2026 disputing additions made by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department.
    At the filing before: CIT(A), NFAC has passed an order dated 31 March 2026 rejecting contentions of Company. Company is of view that it has strong case on merits and will be filing appeal before Honourable Income Tax Appellate against the order passed by Hon. CIT(A)MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssessment Unit, Income Tax Department (Intimation dated: March 27, 2026)Since 27 Mar 2026
    The company has filed an appeal before National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) on 24 April 2026 disputing additions made by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department.
    At the filing before: Company is of view that it has strong case on merits and will be filing appeal before National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) against the order passed by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

At most 283 complaints open, quarter to Sep 2025.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
No
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
Yes
The filing has a part on tax disputes
Yes
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.