Aster DM Quality Care logo

Aster DM Quality Care MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: ASTERDMBSE: 540975Healthcare ServicesMid Cap

Formerly Aster DM Healthcare
Last close ₹644.75down ₹9.95 (1.52%)BSE ₹645.00

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹654.70.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹519.10Low, 4 Feb 2026₹891.30High, 10 Aug 2026
Market cap
₹56,201 Cr244th largest listed
P/E
176.4
P/E without one-offs
121.8
P/B
Shares changed
Dividend yield
0.47%
ROE
8.0%
ROE without one-offs
11.5%
ROCE
12.4%
Debt to equity
0.15
Volume, NSE
6,45,62453.1% delivered

Aster DM Quality Care board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • ChairpersonMANDAYAPURATH AZAD MOOPEN
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerHemish Purushottam

10 directors5 independent2 executive3 non-executive

  • MANDAYAPURATH AZAD MOOPEN · ChairpersonExecutive · joined Dec 2014 · reappointed Apr 2026 · 1 listed board
  • ALISHA MOOPENExecutive · joined Aug 2019 · reappointed Aug 2024 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • THADATHIL JOSEPH WILSONNon-executive · joined Apr 2009 · 1 listed board · 2 committee seats
  • SHAMSUDHEEN BIN MOHIDEEN MAMMU HAJINon-executive · joined Sep 2015 · 1 listed board
  • JAMES MATHEWIndependent · joined Jun 2020 · reappointed Jun 2023 · 72 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 2 as chair
  • SUNIL THECKATH VASUDEVANIndependent · joined Jul 2024 · reappointed Jul 2024 · 23 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat
  • CHENAYAPPILLIL JOHN GEORGEIndependent · joined Apr 2020 · reappointed Apr 2023 · 74 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat
  • PURANA HOUSDURGAMVIJAYA DEEPTIIndependent · joined Mar 2023 · reappointed Mar 2023 · 39 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
  • MANIEDATH MADHAVAN NAMBIARIndependent · joined Jul 2024 · reappointed Jul 2024 · 23 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
  • ZEBA AZAD MOOPENNon-executive · joined Jul 2024 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

2 directors who left
  • EMMANUEL DAVID GOOTAM, left 9 Nov 2025: Tenure Completion
  • ANOOP MOOPEN, left 6 Nov 2025: Others

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 25 Jun 20268 of 10 present5 independent · 55 days in between
    • 30 Apr 202610 of 10 present5 independent
    • 26 Mar 202610 of 10 present5 independent · 15 days in between
    • 10 Mar 20269 of 10 present4 independent · 38 days in between
    1 earlier meeting
    • 30 Jan 202610 of 10 present5 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair JAMES MATHEW

    ALISHA MOOPEN, SUNIL THECKATH VASUDEVAN

    • 25 Jun 20262 of 3 present2 independent · 56 days in between
    • 29 Apr 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 33 days in between
    • 26 Mar 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 15 days in between
    • 10 Mar 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 39 days in between
    1 earlier meeting
    • 29 Jan 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair SUNIL THECKATH VASUDEVAN

    PURANA HOUSDURGAMVIJAYA DEEPTI, MANIEDATH MADHAVAN NAMBIAR, THADATHIL JOSEPH WILSON

    • 25 Jun 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 40 days in between
    • 15 May 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 15 days in between
    • 29 Apr 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 55 days in between
    • 4 Mar 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 33 days in between
    1 earlier meeting
    • 29 Jan 20264 of 4 present3 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair JAMES MATHEW

    THADATHIL JOSEPH WILSON, CHENAYAPPILLIL JOHN GEORGE

    No meeting listed in the filing.

  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair PURANA HOUSDURGAMVIJAYA DEEPTI

    THADATHIL JOSEPH WILSON, JAMES MATHEW, ALISHA MOOPEN, ZEBA AZAD MOOPEN

    • 30 Mar 20263 of 5 present2 independent · 61 days in between
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair MANDAYAPURATH AZAD MOOPEN

    SHAMSUDHEEN BIN MOHIDEEN MAMMU HAJI, PURANA HOUSDURGAMVIJAYA DEEPTI, ZEBA AZAD MOOPEN, MANIEDATH MADHAVAN NAMBIAR

    • 27 Jan 20264 of 5 present2 independent

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • M/S Deloitte Haskins & SellsPeer-review certificate valid to Apr 2028

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Aster DM Quality Care AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Aster DM Quality Care dividend history

Annual general meeting, 28 Sep 2026

1,37,676 shareholders on the register on 21 Sep 2026; present: 3 promoters and 80 others; votes counted by Rajiv Balakrishnan / Rajiv.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March, 2026, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereonMoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 89.73% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.78% · other public 48.03%

  2. To appoint a director in place of Mr. T J Wilson (DIN: 02135108), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    Ordinary
    94.95% for5.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 15.10% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.85% · other public 48.03%

  3. To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year ending 31 March 2027
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.01% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.84% · other public 48.03%

  4. To increase the limits of the Company under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013
    Special
    94.19% for5.81% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.36% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.85% · other public 48.03%

  5. To increase the limits of the Company under Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013
    Special
    94.20% for5.80% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.32% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.85% · other public 48.03%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 25 Sep 2026, 10 resolutions

1,36,553 shareholders on the register on 20 Aug 2026; votes counted by Rajiv Balakrishnan / Rajiv.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To approve the appointment of Mr. Varun Shadilal Khanna (DIN: 03584124) as the Managing Director and Group CEO of the Company and remuneration thereof
    Ordinary
    99.27% for0.73% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.24% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 91.61% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.43% · other public 66.59%

  2. To approve appointment of Ms. Ayshwarya Ravi Vikram (DIN: 08153649) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director
    Ordinary
    99.72% for0.28% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.86% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

  3. To approve appointment of Mr. Ganesh Mani (DIN: 08385423) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director
    Ordinary
    99.89% for0.11% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.34% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

  4. To approve the appointment of Mr. Neeraj Jain (DIN: 00348591) as a Non-Executive Independent Director
    Special
    99.33% for0.67% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.06% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

  5. To approve the appointment of Mr. Kewal Kundanlal Handa (DIN: 00056826) as a Non-Executive Independent Director
    Special
    99.09% for0.91% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.79% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

  6. To approve the appointment of Mr. Valayil Korath Mathews (DIN: 00049414) as a Non-Executive Independent Director
    Special
    99.68% for0.32% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.97% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 91.64% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.56%

  7. To approve revision in Managerial Remuneration of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403), Executive Chairman
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    99.69% for0.31% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.95% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 91.51% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.13% · other public 66.59%

  8. To approve change in designation of Ms. Alisha Moopen (DIN: 02432525) to Executive Director and revision in Managerial Remuneration
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    94.87% for5.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 15.82% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

  9. To approve Aster DM Quality Care Limited Employee Stock Option Scheme - 2026
    Special
    88.75% for11.25% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 34.69% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

  10. To approve for extension of benefits under the Aster DM Quality Care Limited Employees Stock Option Scheme – 2026 and grant of options to the employees of the subsidiary company(ies), in India or outside India, whose equity shares are not listed on a recognized stock exchangeMoreLess
    Special
    88.75% for11.25% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 34.69% · other public 0.04%

    Turnout: all 91.65% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.52% · other public 66.59%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 12 Apr 2026, 2 resolutions

1,39,303 shareholders on the register on 6 Mar 2026; votes counted by Rajiv Balakrishnan / Rajiv.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Approval for appointment of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403) as Executive Director of the Company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    99.84% for0.16% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.42% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 91.63% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.16% · other public 73.25%

  2. Approval for granting loans, giving guarantees or providing securities under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013
    Special
    75.57% for24.43% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 64.22% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 91.64% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.18% · other public 73.25%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Meeting called by the tribunal, 10 Mar 2026, 2 resolutions

1,40,379 shareholders on the register on 3 Mar 2026; present: 5 promoters and 59 others; votes counted by Aishwarya Rajasree Nandiwada / Aishwarya Rajasree Nandiwada.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation amongst Quality Care India Limited and Aster DM Healthcare Limited and their respective shareholders and creditors under Sections 230 to 232 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013MoreLess
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    96.68% for3.32% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 7.24% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 93.00% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 95.46% · other public 66.72%

  2. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation amongst Quality Care India Limited and Aster DM Healthcare Limited and their respective shareholders and creditors under Sections 230 to 232 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013MoreLess
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    94.13% for5.87% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 7.24% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 88.25% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 95.46% · other public 66.72%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 4 Sep 2025, 6 resolutions

1,54,038 shareholders on the register on 28 Aug 2025; present: 1 promoter and 76 others; votes counted by Rajiv Balakrishnan / Beyond Compliance Corporate Services Private Limited.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2025, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.04% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.15% · other public 59.19%

  2. To confirm the payment of Interim Dividends (including a special dividend on equity share) and to declare a Final Dividend of INR 1/- per equity share of INR 10/- each for the financial year ended March 31, 2025.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.11% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.31% · other public 59.19%

  3. To appoint a Director in the place of Mr. Shamsudheen Bin Mohideen Mammu Haji (DIN: 02007279), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    Ordinary
    99.80% for0.20% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.44% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.28% · other public 59.19%

  4. To reappoint M/s. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Chartered Accountants, as Statutory Auditors for a second consecutive term of five years
    Ordinary
    95.02% for4.98% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 10.93% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.28% · other public 59.19%

  5. To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year 2025-2026
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.28% · other public 59.19%

  6. To appoint M/s. S Sandeep & Associates, Practising Company Secretaries, as the Secretarial Auditors of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 90.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.28% · other public 59.19%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 29 Dec 2024, 2 resolutions

1,65,317 shareholders on the register on 22 Nov 2024; votes counted by RAJIV BALAKRISHNAN / Beyond Compliance Corporate Services Private Limited.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Approval for issuance of 1,86,07,969 (One crore eighty six lakhs seven thousand nine hundred and sixty nine) equity shares of the company on preferential basis for consideration other than cash
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 91.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.15% · other public 47.98%

  2. To approve the shifting of the registered office of the Company from Bengaluru (State of Karnataka) to Hyderabad (State of Telangana) and consequent amendment to the memorandum of association.
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 91.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.15% · other public 47.93%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 29 Aug 2024, 11 resolutions

Present: 2 promoters and 90 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company including the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2024, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.01% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 90.15% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.46% · other public 42.08%

  2. To declare a final Dividend of Rs. 2 /- per Equity Share of Rs.10/- each for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  3. To appoint a Director in the place of Mr. T J Wilson (DIN: 02135108), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    Ordinary
    90.29% for9.71% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 20.71% · other public 0.06%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  4. To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year 2024-2025.
    Ordinary
    99.99% for0.01% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.09%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  5. To approve revision in the remuneration of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403), as Managing Director of the Company with effect from April 01, 2024 till the end of his current tenure i.e. upto April 14th 2026.MoreLess
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    99.27% for0.73% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.54% · other public 0.10%

    Turnout: all 89.79% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 95.65% · other public 42.08%

  6. To approve re-appointment of Ms. Alisha Moopen (DIN: 02432525), as Deputy Managing Director of the Company for a term of five years with effect from August 07, 2024.
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    91.89% for8.11% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.30% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  7. To approve for payment of Commission to Independent Directors.
    Special
    99.92% for0.08% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.17% · other public 0.10%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  8. To appoint Mr. Maniedath Madhavan Nambiar (DIN: 01122411) as an Independent Director of the Company with effect from July 31, 2024 till the conclusion of 19th Annual General Meeting of the Company.
    Special
    99.67% for0.34% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.71% · other public 0.06%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  9. To appoint Mr. Sunil Theckath Vasudevan (DIN: 00294130) as an Independent Director of the Company with effect from July 31, 2024 till the conclusion of 19th Annual General meeting of the Company.
    Special
    99.74% for0.26% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.55% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  10. To appoint Mr. Anoop Moopen (DIN: 02301362) as a Non- Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    97.68% for2.32% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.94% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

  11. To appoint Dr. Zeba Azad Moopen (DIN: 03604401) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    97.70% for2.30% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.91% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 90.17% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 96.50% · other public 42.08%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 22 Jan 2024, 2 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To approve: (a) a material related party transaction, being the sale by Affinity Holdings Private Limited, a wholly owned material subsidiary of the Company, of its entire ownership of the shares in entities conducting business in the GCC region, including Aster DM Healthcare FZC, i.e., a material subsidiary of the Company to Alpha GCC Holdings Limited in terms of Regulation 23 and other applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), as amended from time to time, read with Company’s ‘Policy on Material Subsidiaries’ and ‘Related Party Transaction Policy’ and Section 2(76), Section 188 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) read with the rules framed thereunder (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment(s) thereof for the time being in force) and other applicable laws / statutory provisions, if any, (b) a consequential transaction being ‘Non-Compete and Brand Co-existence Agreement’, with Affinity Holdings Private Limited, Aster DM Healthcare FZC, Alpha GCC Holdings Limited and Dr. Azad Moopen, and Ms. Alisha Moopen, being the promoters of the Company, and (c) consequential arrangement being ‘MVT' (Medical Value Travel) with Aster DM Healthcare FZC 23 and other applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), as amended from time to time, read with Company’s ‘Policy on Material Subsidiaries’ and ‘Related Party Transaction Policy’ and Section 2(76), Section 188 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) read with the rules framed thereunder (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment(s) thereof for the time being in force) and other applicable laws / statutory provisions, if any, (b) a consequential transaction being ‘Non-Compete and Brand Co-existence Agreement’, with Affinity Holdings Private Limited, Aster DM Healthcare FZC, Alpha GCC Holdings Limited and Dr. Azad Moopen, and Ms. Alisha Moopen, being the promoters of the Company, and (c) consequential arrangement being ‘MVT' (Medical Value Travel) with Aster DM Healthcare FZCMoreLess
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.86% for0.14% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.20% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 21.75% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 31.15% · other public 67.78%

  2. To approve the sale by Affinity Holdings Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, of its entire ownership of the shares in entities conducting business in the GCC region, including Aster DM Healthcare FZC, i.e., a material subsidiary of the Company, to Alpha GCC Holdings Limited, in terms of Regulations 16(1)(c), 24(5) and other applicable regulations of the SEBI Listing Regulations, as amended from time to time, read with Company’s ‘Policy on Material Subsidiaries’ and other applicable provisions of the Act, read with the rules framed thereunder (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment(s) thereof for the time being in force) and other applicable laws / statutory provisions, if anyMoreLess
    Special
    99.96% for0.04% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.08% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 83.76% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 72.42% · other public 70.34%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 28 Sep 2026, 14 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March, 2026, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereonMoreLess
    14 for0 against
  • To appoint a director in place of Mr. T J Wilson (DIN: 02135108), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency Concern: Lack of clarity on whether Mr. Wilson holds full-time position in the Company, while serving as a Non-Executive Director on the Board. If yes, holding both positions as Non-Executive Director and full-time employee of the Company is non-compliant with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNo concern identified with regard to merit and profile of the proposed appointee. Transparency Concern: Lack of clarity on whether Mr. Wilson holds full-time position in the Company, while serving as a Non-Executive Director on the Board. If yes, holding both positions as NED and full-time employee of the Company is non-compliant with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
    9 for5 against
  • To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year ending 31 March 2027
    14 for0 against
  • To increase the limits of the Company under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the resolution is warranted because the company has not provided a compelling rationale justifying the substantial increase in limits.
    4 for1 against
  • To increase the limits of the Company under Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency Concern: The Company has proposed to increase the limits under Section 186 which is significantly higher when compared to the net-worth of the Company, however, inadequate disclosures have been provided with regards to the particulars of the proposed loans/ investments/ guarantees/ securities to be undertaken by the Company i.e. Blanket approval without adequate disclosures.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance & Transparency Concern: The Company has proposed to increase the limits under Section 186 which is significantly higher when compared to the net-worth of the Company, however, inadequate disclosures have been provided w.r.t. the particulars of the proposed loans/ investments/ guarantees/ securities to be undertaken by the Company i.e. Blanket approval without adequate disclosures.
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the resolution is warranted because the company has not provided a compelling rationale justifying the substantial increase in limits.
    8 for6 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
  • To advance any loan, including any loan represented by book debt, and/or provide any guarantee and/or any security in connection with any loan availed by any subsidiary of the Company or any joint venture of the Company and in which any director of the Company may be deemed interested within the meaning of Section 185(2) of the Act, provided that the aggregate outstanding amount of all such loans, guarantees and securities shall not exceed INR 7,500 Crores at any point in time.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of full particulars as required under Section 185(2) of Companies Act, 2013. Governance & Transparency Concern: The Company has sought to increase the existing limit by 5x times, however, the manner in which proposed limits will be utilized and material terms of financial assistance have not been provided; blanket approval sought.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNon-compliant with the Companies Act: Non-disclosure of full particulars as required under Section 185(2) of Companies Act, 2013. Governance & Transparency Concern: The Company has sought to increase the existing limit by 5x times, however, the manner in which proposed limits will be utilized and material terms of financial assistance have not been provided; blanket approval sought.
    4 for5 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 25 Sep 2026, 14 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To approve the appointment of Mr. Varun Shadilal Khanna (DIN: 03584124) as the Managing Director and Group CEO of the Company and remuneration thereof
    Against DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund
    • DSP Mutual FundVarun Khanna, 51, served as Group Managing Director of Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) before its amalgamation with Aster DM Healthcare. Prior to joining QCIL, he served as Managing Director of Siloam Hospitals, Indonesia. He has over 28 years of diverse experience across the healthcare, med-tech, retail and telecommunications sectors. The company proposes to appoint him as Managing Director and Group CEO of Aster DM Quality Care Ltd for five years from 1 July 2026 and fix his remuneration. We estimate Varun Khanna’s remuneration at Rs. 554.9 mn, assuming the maximum permissible grant of 4,358,362 stock options under ESOP Scheme 2026, with the fair value spread over his five-year term. As per ESOP Scheme 2026, at least 50% of the options granted to the MD & CEO must vest against company performance, measured on operating revenue and/or operating EBITDA. Individual performance applies to the entire grant: no option vests unless the option holder achieves a rating of 'meets expectations', or 3 out of 5. The company has clarified that the individual performance rating is based on a balanced scorecard involving a mix of organisational key performance indicators (e.g. achievement of annual budget), role-specific key performance indicators (e.g. greenfield/brownfield project delivery), clinical excellence and patient experience and has at least 50% weightage to financial performance of the company for the MD & Group CEO. While we support his appointment, given the lack of clarity on the actual quantum of options proposed to be granted and our view on resolution #9, we do not support the resolution.
    • Jio BlackRock Mutual FundVarun Khanna, 51, served as Group Managing Director of Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) before its amalgamation with Aster DM Healthcare. Prior to joining QCIL, he served as Managing Director of Siloam Hospitals, Indonesia. He has over 28 years of diverse experience across the healthcare, med-tech, retail and telecommunications sectors. The company proposes to appoint him as Managing Director and Group CEO of Aster DM Quality Care Ltd for five years from 1 July 2026 and fix his remuneration. We estimate Varun Khanna’s remuneration at Rs. 554.9 mn, assuming the maximum permissible grant of 4,358,362 stock options under ESOP Scheme 2026, with the fair value spread over his five-year term. Given the lack of clarity on the actual quantum of options proposed to be granted, we have assumed the maximum permissible grant under the ESOP Scheme 2026. As per ESOP Scheme 2026, at least 50% of the options granted to the MD & CEO must vest against company performance, measured on operating revenue and/or operating EBITDA. Individual performance applies to the entire grant: no option vests unless the option holder achieves a rating of 'meets expectations', or 3 out of 5. The company has clarified that the individual performance rating is based on a balanced scorecard involving a mix of organisational key performance indicators (e.g. achievement of annual budget), role-specific key performance indicators (e.g. greenfield/brownfield project delivery), clinical excellence and patient experience and has at least 50% weightage to financial performance of the company for the MD & Group CEO. While we support his appointment, the estimated remuneration of Rs. 554.9 mn, based on the maximum permissible grant, is high compared to peers. We expect the company to disclose the quantum of stock options proposed to be granted to him during his tenure. We do not support the resolution.
    12 for2 against
  • To approve appointment of Ms. Ayshwarya Ravi Vikram (DIN: 08153649) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director
    14 for0 against
  • To approve appointment of Mr. Ganesh Mani (DIN: 08385423) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director
    14 for0 against
  • To approve the appointment of Mr. Neeraj Jain (DIN: 00348591) as a Non-Executive Independent Director
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed Independent Director. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed Independent Directors are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and hence recommended for appointment?
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified on the merit of proposed appointees. Governance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed ID. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed IDs are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the NRC and hence recommended for appointment?
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified on the merit of proposed appointees. Governance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed ID. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed IDs are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the NRC and hence recommended for appointment
    9 for5 against
  • To approve the appointment of Mr. Kewal Kundanlal Handa (DIN: 00056826) as a Non-Executive Independent Director
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed Independent Director. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed Independent Directors are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and hence recommended for appointment?
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified on the merit of proposed appointees. Governance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed ID. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed IDs are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the NRC and hence recommended for appointment?
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified on the merit of proposed appointees. Governance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed ID. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed IDs are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the NRC and hence recommended for appointment
    9 for5 against
  • To approve the appointment of Mr. Valayil Korath Mathews (DIN: 00049414) as a Non-Executive Independent Director
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed Independent Director. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed Independent Directors are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and hence recommended for appointment?
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified on the merit of proposed appointees. Governance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed ID. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed IDs are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the NRC and hence recommended for appointment?
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern identified on the merit of proposed appointees. Governance Concern: The Aster Promoters and the new Promoters viz. BCP have been given Right to jointly recommend Independent Directors on the Board. Such rights to the Promoters may raise questions on the selection process and independence of the proposed ID. Hence, there is no clarity on whether the proposed IDs are being appointed pursuant to the Right prescribed under the amended AOA or whether they have been independently assessed by the NRC and hence recommended for appointment
    9 for5 against
  • To approve revision in Managerial Remuneration of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403), Executive Chairman
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen is the Chairperson of the Board and has missed more than 1 AGMs held in last 3 FYs and no justification has been provided for such leave of absence.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern on merit & profile of director. Governance Concern: Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen is the Chairperson of the Board and has missed more than 1 AGMs held in last 3 FYs and no justification has been provided for such leave of absence.
    9 for5 against
  • To approve change in designation of Ms. Alisha Moopen (DIN: 02432525) to Executive Director and revision in Managerial Remuneration
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted because: • Shareholders may question the basis for the special incentive of INR 10 million awarded to her during FY26 and the rationale for not seeking separate shareholder approval at the time the incentive was granted. • She also serves as the Managing Director and Group CEO of Aster GCC, a promoter entity, and the remuneration received from such entity may raise concerns regarding the alignment of priorities between the two companies.
    13 for1 against
  • To approve Aster DM Quality Care Limited Employee Stock Option Scheme - 2026
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency concern: The Nomination and Remuneration Committee has been given discretion to determine Exercise Period as set out in ESOP Plan 2026; however, the plan has not been disclosed for shareholders’ perusal. Hence it may result in situations where the exercise period for vested options may be less than 3 months i.e. unreasonably short period and/ or may differ from employee-to-employee; hence Exercise Period has been inadequately defined. Further, the proposed limit of maximum options per employee indicates a potential for excessive benefits to a single employee under the Scheme.
    • DSP Mutual FundIn March 2026, shareholders approved the merger with Quality Care India Limited (QCIL), which became effective from 1 July 2026. As stated in the notice, the Shareholders’ Agreement, entered into with BCP envisaged a long-term incentive plan as a key element of the merger. Accordingly, the company seeks approval for the ESOP Scheme 2026, under which 15,254,268 stock options may be granted resulting in ~1.75% dilution of the post-merger paid-up capital. Options granted within 90 days of the scheme becoming effective, will have an exercise price of Rs. 319.40 per share, representing a 30% discount on the Rs. 456.33 per share value used for the merger share swap and a discount of ~58% to the closing market price of Rs. 760.4 as on 18 September 2026. Thereafter, the exercise price may be at up to a 20% discount to the 60-day VWAP. Vesting will depend on company and individual performance. Company performance will be linked to revenue and/or EBITDA, while all employees must achieve at least a ‘meets expectations’ rating of 3 out of 5. For the MD/CEO, CFO and senior management, at least 50% of options will be linked to company performance. Unvested options may vest subsequently if cumulative targets are achieved. The Committee will set the detailed performance criteria, and the company will disclose the relevant targets and achievement levels in its annual report. The vesting of options under the scheme is performance-based. All options are subject to individual performance criteria, with at least 50% of the options granted to the MD/CEO, CFO and senior management additionally subject to company performance criteria linked to operating revenue and/or operating EBITDA. The company has confirmed that a score of “meets expectations” denotes at least 90% achievement of an individual’s respective financial budget (where applicable) and an individual performance rating has at least 40% weightage to the financial performance of the company or their respective business. Further, while the company has confirmed that the NRC’s discretion will operate within these defined parameters and does not extend to diluting or removing the mandatory performance conditions, the exercise price of INR 319.4 is at substantial discount (30% on share price used for merger share swap and 58% to closing market price). Therefore, we do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance and Transparency concern: The NRC has been given discretion to determine Exercise Period as set out in ESOP Plan 2026; however, the plan has not been disclosed for shareholders’ perusal. Hence it may result in situations where the exercise period for vested options may be less than 3 months i.e. unreasonably short period and/ or may differ from employee-toemployee; hence Exercise Period has been inadequately defined. Further, the proposed limit of maximum options per employee indicates a potential for excessive benefits to a single employee under the Scheme.
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance and Transparency concern: The NRC has been given discretion to determine Exercise Period as set out in ESOP Plan 2026; however, the plan has not been disclosed for shareholders perusal. Hence it may result in situations where the exercise period for vested options may be less than 3 months i.e. unreasonably short period and/ or may differ from employee-toemployee; hence Exercise Period has been inadequately defined. Further, the proposed limit of maximum options per employee indicates a potential for excessive benefits to a single employee under the Scheme.
    8 for6 against
  • To approve for extension of benefits under the Aster DM Quality Care Limited Employees Stock Option Scheme – 2026 and grant of options to the employees of the subsidiary company(ies), in India or outside India, whose equity shares are not listed on a recognized stock exchangeMoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency concern: The Nomination and Remuneration Committee has been given discretion to determine Exercise Period as set out in ESOP Plan 2026; however, the plan has not been disclosed for shareholders’ perusal. Hence it may result in situations where the exercise period for vested options may be less than 3 months i.e. unreasonably short period and/ or may differ from employee-to-employee; hence Exercise Period has been inadequately defined. Further, the proposed limit of maximum options per employee indicates a potential for excessive benefits to a single employee under the Scheme.
    • DSP Mutual FundThrough resolution #10, the company proposes to extend ESOP Scheme 2026 to eligible employees of its unlisted subsidiary companies, within or outside India. The maximum available options that can be granted to the eligible employees of an unlisted subsidiary company shall not exceed 50% of the ESOP ceiling i.e., 7,627,134 options. Our recommendation is linked to our view on resolution #9. We do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNo concern identified with regard to extension of benefits to employees of subsidiary companies per se. Interlinked with resolution #9. Governance and Transparency concern: The NRC has been given discretion to determine Exercise Period as set out in ESOP Plan 2026; however, the plan has not been disclosed for shareholders’ perusal. Hence it may result in situations where the exercise period for vested options may be less than 3 months i.e. unreasonably short period and/ or may differ from employee-to-employee; hence Exercise Period has been inadequately defined. Further, the proposed limit of maximum options per employee indicates a potential for excessive benefits to a single employee under the Scheme.
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNo concern identified with regard to extension of benefits to employees of subsidiary companies per se. Interlinked with resolution #9. Governance and Transparency concern: The NRC has been given discretion to determine Exercise Period as set out in ESOP Plan 2026; however, the plan has not been disclosed for shareholders perusal. Hence it may result in situations where the exercise period for vested options may be less than 3 months i.e. unreasonably short period and/ or may differ from employee-to-employee; hence Exercise Period has been inadequately defined. Further, the proposed limit of maximum options per employee indicates a potential for excessive benefits to a single employee under the Scheme.
    7 for6 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
  • Approve grant of 7,627,134 stock options under the ESOP Scheme 2026 to employees of unlisted subsidiary companies, both in India and outside India
    1 for0 against
6 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 12 Apr 2026, 29 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Approval for appointment of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403) as Executive Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency concern: Proposed appointee is holding a combined position of Executive Chairman.The remuneration payment practices of the Company appears gender bias, in absence of proper justification.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance and Transparency concern: Proposed appointee is holding a combined position of Executive Chairman. The remuneration payment practices of the Company appears gender bias, in absence of proper justification.
    24 for5 against
  • Approval for granting loans, giving guarantees or providing securities under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted due to lack of information.
    • Jio BlackRock Mutual FundConsidering the company’s business model, which involves operating through subsidiaries and associates, it is necessary for the company to invest in and provide loans and guarantees to these entities. Approval granted under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows the company to extend loans, guarantees, or securities to any company in which its directors have an interest, including promoter‑group companies.The proposed approval is enabling in nature, and we understand that the aggregate amount is capped, and approval is being sought considering the changes in the organizational structure of the company pursuant to its amalgamation with Quality Care India.However, the scope of the current approval allows the company to extend loans/guarantees/provide securities to any entity, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details, including the names of the entities, the nature and scale of their operations, and the terms of support, including the quantum for each entity, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we do not support the resolution.
    • Sundaram Mutual FundConsidering the company’s business model, which involves operating through subsidiaries and associates, it is necessary for the company to invest in and provide loans and guarantees to these entities. Approval granted under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows the company to extend loans, guarantees, or securities to any company in which its directors have an interest, including promoter‑group companies. The proposed approval is enabling in nature, and we understand that the aggregate amount is capped, and approval is being sought considering the changes in the organizational structure of the company pursuant to its amalgamation with Quality Care India. However, the scope of the current approval allows the company to extend loans/guarantees/provide securities to any entity, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details, including the names of the entities, the nature and scale of their operations, and the terms of support, including the quantum for each entity, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we do not support the resolution.
    4 for3 against
2 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 2. To give loan including any loan represented by a book debt, or give any guarantee or provide any security in connection with any loan taken by any entity which is a subsidiary or associate or joint venture or group entity of the Company in which any director is deemed to be interested as specified in the explanation to sub-section 2 of Section 185 of the Act up to a sum not exceeding INR 1,500 Crores at any point in time.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • To give loan including any loan represented by a book debt, or give any guarantee or provide any security in connection with any loan taken by any entity which is a subsidiary or associate or joint venture or group entity of the Company in which any director is deemed to be interested as specified in the explanation to sub-section 2 of Section 185 of the Act up to a sum not exceeding INR 1,500 Crores at any point in time.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosures. Transparency concern: No clarity whether the Company will undertake guarantee/charge obligations in proportion with ownership rights.
    • Axis Mutual FundConsidering the company’s business model, which involves operating through subsidiaries and associates, it is necessary for the company to invest in and provide loans and guarantees to these entities. Approval granted under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows the company to extend loans, guarantees, or securities to any company in which its directors have an interest, including promoter‑group companies. The proposed approval is enabling in nature, and we understand that the aggregate amount is capped, and approval is being sought considering the changes in the organizational structure of the company pursuant to its amalgamation with Quality Care India. However, the scope of the current approval allows the company to extend loans/guarantees/provide securities to any entity, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details, including the names of the entities, the nature and scale of their operations, and the terms of support, including the quantum for each entity, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Section 185 of the Companies Act: Inadequate disclosures w.r.t. the particulars mandated u/s 185 of Companies Act, 2013. Transparency concern: No clarity whether the Company will undertake guarantee/charge obligations in proportion with ownership rights.
    • Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundCompany has disclosed that this will be used towards principal business activities of the recipient entity and would be at an arm's length distance and commercial terms. Due to the quantum of approval amount and limited particulars regarding the recipients and nature of grants, we do not support this resolution.
    • HDFC Mutual FundConsidering the company’s business model, which involves operating through subsidiaries and associates, it is necessary for the company to invest in and provide loans and guarantees to these entities. Approval granted under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows the company to extend loans, guarantees, or securities to any company in which its directors have an interest, including promoter-group companies. The proposed approval is enabling in nature, and we understand that the aggregate amount is capped, and approval is being sought considering the changes in the organizational structure of the company pursuant to its amalgamation with Quality Care India. However, the scope of the current approval allows the company to extend loans/guarantees/provide securities to any entity, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details, including the names of the entities, the nature and scale of their operations, and the terms of support, including the quantum for each entity, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe scope of the current approval allows the company to extend loans/guarantees/provide securities to entities. The company must disclose granular details, including the names of the entities, the nature and scale of their operations, and the terms of support, including the quantum for each entity, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, the AMC had voted against the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundConsidering the company’s business model, which involves operating through subsidiaries and associates, it is necessary for the company to invest in and provide loans and guarantees to these entities. Approval granted under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows the company to extend loans, guarantees, or securities to any company in which its directors have an interest, including promoter‑group companies. The proposed approval is enabling in nature, and we understand that the aggregate amount is capped, and approval is being sought considering the changes in the organizational structure of the company pursuant to its amalgamation with Quality Care India. However, the scope of the current approval allows the company to extend loans/guarantees/provide securities to any entity, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details, including the names of the entities, the nature and scale of their operations, and the terms of support, including the quantum for each entity, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we do not support the resolution
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundConsidering the company s business model, which involves operating through subsidiaries and associates, it is necessary for the company to invest in and provide loans and guarantees to these entities. Approval granted under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows the company to extend loans, guarantees, or securities to any company in which its directors have an interest, including promoter group companies. We have no clarity on the exact rate of interest for the loan given by the company. Further, company has not disclosed the tenure of the loan and which of the subsidiary/ associate would be getting it. In the absence of clarity, we don t support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundClear guidelines for grant of loans not mentioned
    • Nippon India Mutual FundTransparency Concern: No clarity as to whether the company will undertake guarantee/charge obligations in proportion with ownership rights.
    3 for18 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 10 Mar 2026, 28 fund houses

  • 1) Approve scheme of arrangement for merger of Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) into Aster DM Healthcare Ltd (Aster).
    1 for0 against
  • 1. To approve Scheme of Amalgamation amongst Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) and Aster DM Healthcare Limited (Aster) and their Respective Shareholders and Creditors (Scheme).
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Scheme of Amalgamation
    2 for0 against
  • Approve scheme of arrangement for merger of Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) into Aster DM Healthcare Ltd (Aster)
    Against Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund
    • Jio BlackRock Mutual FundThrough the proposed scheme of arrangement, QCIL will merge into Aster DM Healthcare Limited, creating a combined entity that shall operate 38 hospitals with over 10,150 beds across nine states in South and Central India. The merged listed entity will be renamed Aster DM Quality Care Limited. Post-merger, Aster’s promoters (Moopen Family) and QCIL’s promoter (Blackstone) will hold 24.0% and 30.7%, respectively in the merged entity. As an initial step, Aster acquired a 5% equity stake in QCIL via preferential allotment in November 2024. QCIL shareholders will receive 977 Aster DM shares for every 1,000 QCIL shares. The scheme also provides for granting certain special rights to the promoter groups, amendments to the articles of association, and company name change to Aster DM Quality Care Limited. Further, Blackstone will pay incentives to select QCIL employees without any financial impact on QCIL, Aster, or the merged entity. We recognize the merger has the potential to create a large hospital network and that the valuation is reasonable. Notwithstanding, we do not support the resolution due to special rights extended to Aster Promoters and Blackstone. The scheme grants board and committee nomination and quorum rights, subject to minimum shareholding thresholds. Blackstone retains special rights until its shareholding in the merged entity falls below 10% (with a right to nominate one director till its shareholding is 7.5%), while Aster Promoters’ rights terminate below 5%. We generally support board nomination rights only where a minimum 10% shareholding threshold is met, consistent with the threshold for public shareholders to propose resolutions. The thresholds here are lower. We do not support committee nomination rights, as committee composition is the board’s prerogative. The amended articles also allow Aster Promoters and Blackstone to jointly recommend Independent Directors to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC), which we believe is the NRC’s prerogative. Further, the proposed scheme also embeds quorum requirements to mandate the presence of one nominee director, each from Aster Promoters and Blackstone in board and committee meetings. We believe such quorum rights could be used as a tactic to delay or obstruct critical meetings. We do not support the resolution.
    3 for1 against
  • Scheme of Amalgamation amongst Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) and Aster DM Healthcare Limited (Aster) and their Respective Shareholders and Creditors (Scheme).
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: AoA contains a provision that gives the right to nominate the Board Chairperson, and the AoA also contains a provision with regards to appointment of the Executive Chairman. Provision for appointment of an alternate director in the proposed amended part of the AoA. Special Rights to Promoters in the nature of Nomination of Directors on the Board appear to be excessive with regards to the proposed minimum shareholding thresholds. The reserved matters rights provided to Aster promoters appear excessive against their minimum shareholding requirement.
    • Axis Mutual FundThrough the proposed scheme of arrangement, QCIL will merge into Aster DM Healthcare Limited, creating a combined entity that shall operate 38 hospitals with over 10,150 beds across nine states in South and Central India. The merged listed entity will be renamed Aster DM Quality Care Limited. Post-merger, Aster’s promoters (Moopen Family) and QCIL’s promoter (Blackstone) will hold 24.0% and 30.7%, respectively in the merged entity. As an initial step, Aster acquired a 5% equity stake in QCIL via preferential allotment in November 2024. QCIL shareholders will receive 977 Aster DM shares for every 1,000 QCIL shares. The scheme also provides for granting certain special rights to the promoter groups, amendments to the articles of association, and company name change to Aster DM Quality Care Limited. Further, Blackstone will pay incentives to select QCIL employees without any financial impact on QCIL, Aster, or the merged entity. We recognize the merger has the potential to create a large hospital network and that the valuation is reasonable. Notwithstanding, we do not support the resolution due to special rights extended to Aster Promoters and Blackstone. The scheme grants board and committee nomination and quorum rights, subject to minimum shareholding thresholds. Blackstone retains special rights until its shareholding in the merged entity falls below 10% (with a right to nominate one director till its shareholding is 7.5%), while Aster Promoters’ rights terminate below 5%. We generally support board nomination rights only where a minimum 10% shareholding threshold is met, consistent with the threshold for public shareholders to propose resolutions. The thresholds here are lower. We do not support committee nomination rights, as committee composition is the board’s prerogative. The amended articles also allow Aster Promoters and Blackstone to jointly recommend Independent Directors to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC), which we believe is the NRC’s prerogative. Further, the proposed scheme also embeds quorum requirements to mandate the presence of one nominee director, each from Aster Promoters and Blackstone in board and committee meetings. We believe such quorum rights could be used as a tactic to delay or obstruct critical meetings. We do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundCompliant with law, no issues on merger/ acquisition proposal. Governance Concern: AoA contains a provision that gives the right to nominate the Board Chairperson, and the AoA also contains a provision w.r.t. appointment of the Executive Chairman. Provision for appointment of an alternate director in the proposed amended part of the AoA. Special Rights to Promoters in the nature of Nomination of Directors on the Board appear to be excessive w.r.t. the proposed minimum shareholding thresholds.
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundCompliant with law, no issues on merger/ acquisition proposal. Governance Concern: AoA contains a provision that gives the right to nominate the Board Chairperson, and the AoA also contains a provision w.r.t. appointment of the Executive Chairman. Provision for appointment of an alternate director in the proposed amended part of the AoA. Special Rights to Promoters in the nature of Nomination of Directors on the Board appear to be excessive w.r.t. the proposed minimum shareholding thresholds. The reserved matters rights provided to Aster promoters appear excessive against their minimum shareholding requirement.
    • Invesco Mutual FundThrough the proposed scheme of arrangement, QCIL will merge into Aster DM Healthcare Limited, creating a combined entity that shall operate 38 hospitals with over 10,150 beds across nine states in South and Central India. The merged listed entity will be renamed Aster DM Quality Care Limited. Post-merger, Aster’s promoters (Moopen Family) and QCIL’s promoter (Blackstone) will hold 24.0% and 30.7%, respectively in the merged entity. As an initial step, Aster acquired a 5% equity stake in QCIL via preferential allotment in November 2024. QCIL shareholders will receive 977 Aster DM shares for every 1,000 QCIL shares. The scheme also provides for granting certain special rights to the promoter groups, amendments to the articles of association, and company name change to Aster DM Quality Care Limited. Further, Blackstone will pay incentives to select QCIL employees without any financial impact on QCIL, Aster, or the merged entity. We recognize the merger has the potential to create a large hospital network and that the valuation is reasonable. Notwithstanding, we do not support the resolution due to special rights extended to Aster Promoters and Blackstone. The scheme grants board and committee nomination and quorum rights, subject to minimum shareholding thresholds. Blackstone retains special rights until its shareholding in the merged entity falls below 10% (with a right to nominate one director till its shareholding is 7.5%), while Aster Promoters’ rights terminate below 5%. We generally support board nomination rights only where a minimum 10% shareholding threshold is met, consistent with the threshold for public shareholders to propose resolutions. The thresholds here are lower. We do not support committee nomination rights, as committee composition is the board’s prerogative. The amended articles also allow Aster Promoters and Blackstone to jointly recommend Independent Directors to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC), which we believe is the NRC’s prerogative. Further, the proposed scheme also embeds quorum requirements to mandate the presence of one nominee director, each from Aster Promoters and Blackstone in board and committee meetings. We believe such quorum rights could be used as a tactic to delay or obstruct critical meetings. We do not support the resolution
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The AoA grants Promoters excessive special rights, including nomination of Board Chairperson, appointment of Executive Chairman, and alternate directors, disproportionate to the proposed minimum shareholding thresholds
    10 for10 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 4 Sep 2025, 28 fund houses

  • To consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2025, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    28 for0 against
  • To confirm the payment of Interim Dividends (including a special dividend on equity share) and to declare a Final Dividend of INR 1/- per equity share of INR 10/- each for the financial year ended March 31, 2025.MoreLess
    28 for0 against
  • To appoint a Director in the place of Mr. Shamsudheen Bin Mohideen Mammu Haji (DIN: 02007279), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    28 for0 against
  • To reappoint M/s. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Chartered Accountants, as Statutory Auditors for a second consecutive term of five years
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Capitalmind Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundProposed audit fee payable to Statutory Auditors not disclosed.
    • Capitalmind Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNo issues on merits of the proposed Statutory Auditors. Non-Compliant with Regulation 36(5) of SEBI LODR: Proposed audit fee payable to Statutory Auditors not disclosed
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe company has not disclosed the proposed remuneration to be paid to the statutory auditors, which is a regulatory requirement. We do not support the resolution.
    21 for7 against
  • To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year 2025-2026
    28 for0 against
  • To appoint M/s. S Sandeep & Associates, Practising Company Secretaries, as the Secretarial Auditors of the Company
    28 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Dec 2024, 19 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Approval for issuance of 1,86,07,969 (One crore eighty six lakhs seven thousand nine hundred and sixty nine) equity shares of the company on preferential basis for consideration other than cash
    15 for0 against
  • To approve the shifting of the registered office of the Company from Bengaluru (State of Karnataka) to Hyderabad (State of Telangana) and consequent amendment to the memorandum of association.
    18 for0 against
3 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 1) Approve issuance of 18,607,969 equity shares on a preferential basis to BCP Asia II Topco IV Pte. Ltd. (Blackstone) and Centella Mauritius (TPG) for acquisition of 5.0% equity in Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) from Blackstone and TPG.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • 1. Special Resolution: Approval for issuance of 1,86,07,969 (One Crore Eighty Six Lakhs Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty Nine) Equity shares of the Company on Preferential basis for consideration other than cash. 2. Special Resolution: To Approve the shifting of the Registered Office of the Company from Bengaluru (State of Karnataka) to Hyderabad (State of Telangana) and consequent amendment to the Memorandum of Association.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • Approve issuance of 18,607,969 equity shares on a preferential basis to BCP Asia II Topco IV Pte. Ltd. (Blackstone) and Centella Mauritius (TPG) for acquisition of 5.0% equity in Quality Care India Limited (QCIL) from Blackstone and TPGMoreLess
    2 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Aug 2024, 15 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company including the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2024, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    14 for0 against
  • To declare a final Dividend of Rs. 2 /- per Equity Share of Rs.10/- each for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024.
    14 for0 against
  • To appoint a Director in the place of Mr. T J Wilson (DIN: 02135108), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    Against Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because Thadathil Joseph Wilson is an executive director serving on the nomination and remuneration committee.
    13 for1 against
  • To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year 2024-2025.
    14 for0 against
  • To approve revision in the remuneration of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403), as Managing Director of the Company with effect from April 01, 2024 till the end of his current tenure i.e. upto April 14th 2026.MoreLess
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Executive Chairperson; Transparency concern: No compelling and specific justification for the significant increase in proposed and the significant gap between the payments proposed to the executive directors.
    12 for2 against
  • To approve re-appointment of Ms. Alisha Moopen (DIN: 02432525), as Deputy Managing Director of the Company for a term of five years with effect from August 07, 2024.
    Against Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted in view of the following concerns: • Alisha Moopen also serves as the Managing Director of Aster GCC, which is not a subsidiary of the company. This could raise concerns with regard to her time commitments. • Alisha Moopen's remuneration structure may create conflicts of interest as she may be receiving remuneration from her position in Aster GCC which is a promoter group entity.
    13 for1 against
  • To approve for payment of Commission to Independent Directors.
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency concern: Proposed limit of ? 10 Lakhs per annum appears to be vague; lack of clarity regarding whether the limit is for each Independent Directors or collective limit for all Independent Directors.
    12 for2 against
  • To appoint Mr. Maniedath Madhavan Nambiar (DIN: 01122411) as an Independent Director of the Company with effect from July 31, 2024 till the conclusion of 19th Annual General Meeting of the Company.
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundAppointment compliant with law. Governance Concern: Previous professional association with the internal auditors of the Company.
    12 for2 against
  • To appoint Mr. Sunil Theckath Vasudevan (DIN: 00294130) as an Independent Director of the Company with effect from July 31, 2024 till the conclusion of 19th Annual General meeting of the Company.
    14 for0 against
  • To appoint Mr. Anoop Moopen (DIN: 02301362) as a Non- Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company.
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundAnoop Moopen, 47, is part of the promoter family (son-in-law of Dr. Azad Moopen). Public sources suggest that he is Chairperson and MD of Aztec Middle East Contracting LLC which is engaged in civil construction, electro-mechanical services, interior decoration and joinery and facility management services. The shareholder notice states that he is Managing Director of twelve companies and serves as MD of Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, India (WIMS). He is liable to retire by rotation and his appointment is in line with statutory requirements. We do not support Anoop Moopen’s appointment since there are excessive number of promoter family members on the board: four members from the promoter family and one employee from Aster’s GCC business. With the divestment of the GCC operations in April 2024, the company’s revenue has dropped to less than half of the pre-divestment business. With the reduced size of the company’s operations, we do not support an increase in promoter representation. This practice deters the company from attracting the right professional talent. We do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundHolding too many directorships
    • Sundaram Mutual Fund"Anoop Moopen, 47, is part of the promoter family (son-in-law of Dr. Azad Moopen). Public sources suggest that he is Chairperson and MD of Aztec Middle East Contracting LLC which is engaged in civil construction, electro-mechanical services, interior decoration and joinery and facility management services. The shareholder notice states that he is Managing Director of twelve companies and serves as MD of Wayanad Institute of Medical Sciences, India (WIMS). He is liable to retire by rotation and his appointment is in line with statutory requirements. We do not support Anoop Moopen’s appointment since there are excessive number of promoter family members on the board: four members from the promoter family and one employee from Aster’s GCC business. With the divestment of the GCC operations in April 2024, the company’s revenue has dropped to less than half of the pre-divestment business. With the reduced size of the company’s operations, we do not support an increase in promoter representation. This practice deters the company from attracting the right professional talent. We do not support the resolution."
    11 for3 against
  • To appoint Dr. Zeba Azad Moopen (DIN: 03604401) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company.
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundDr. (Ms.) Zeba Azad Moopen, 33, is part of the promoter family (daughter of Dr. Azad Moopen). She joined Aster DM Healthcare Ltd. in 2017 and oversaw the orthopedic operations at Medcare, UAE. She was involved in establishing Aster Volunteers, the group’s CSR initiative, and in the growth of Dr. Moopen’s Medical College. From 2020 to 2022, she contributed in setting up Aster Digital Health – Aster’s technology platform and led the incorporation of Wellth by Medcare, a centre for integrative medicine in UAE. She is liable to retire by rotation and her appointment is in line with statutory requirements. We raise concern that there is lack of clarity on her current role with the group. We are unable to support her appointment since there are an excessive number of promoter family members on the board: four members from the promoter family and one employee from Aster’s GCC business. With the divestment of the GCC operations in April 2024, the company’s revenue has dropped to less than half of the pre-divestment business. With the reduced size of the company’s operations, we do not support an increase in promoter representation. This practice deters the company from attracting the right professional talent.
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundHolding too many directorships
    • Sundaram Mutual Fund"Dr. (Ms.) Zeba Azad Moopen, 33, is part of the promoter family (daughter of Dr. Azad Moopen). She joined Aster DM Healthcare Ltd. in 2017 and oversaw the orthopedic operations at Medcare, UAE. She was involved in establishing Aster Volunteers, the group’s CSR initiative, and in the growth of Dr. Moopen’s Medical College. From 2020 to 2022, she contributed in setting up Aster Digital Health – Aster’s technology platform and led the incorporation of Wellth by Medcare, a centre for integrative medicine in UAE. She is liable to retire by rotation and her appointment is in line with statutory requirements. We raise concern that there is lack of clarity on her current role with the group. We are unable to support her appointment since there are an excessive number of promoter family members on the board: four members from the promoter family and one employee from Aster’s GCC business. With the divestment of the GCC operations in April 2024, the company’s revenue has dropped to less than half of the pre-divestment business. With the reduced size of the company’s operations, we do not support an increase in promoter representation. This practice deters the company from attracting the right professional talent."
    11 for3 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
  • 1. Ordinary Resolution: To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company including the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2024, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon. 2. Ordinary Resolution: To declare a final Dividend of Rs. 2 /- per Equity Share of Rs.10/- each for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024. 3. Ordinary Resolution: To appoint a Director in the place of Mr. T J Wilson (DIN:02135108), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment. 4. Ordinary Resolution: To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditors for the financial year 2024-2025. 5. Special Resolution: To approve revision in the remuneration of Dr. Mandayapurath Azad Moopen (DIN: 00159403), as Managing Director of the Company till the end of his current tenure i.e. upto April 14th 2026. 6. Special Resolution: To approve re-appointment of Ms. Alisha Moopen (DIN:02432525), as Deputy Managing Director of the Company for a term of five years with effect from August 07, 2024. 7. Special Resolution: To approve for payment of Commission to Independent Directors. 8. Special Resolution: To appoint Mr. Maniedath Madhavan Nambiar (DIN:01122411) as an Independent Director of the Company with effect from July 31, 2024 till the conclusion of 19th Annual General Meeting of the Company. 9. Special Resolution: To appoint Mr. Sunil Theckath Vasudevan (DIN: 00294130) as an Independent Director of the Company with effect from July 31, 2024 till the conclusion of 19th Annual General meeting of the Company. 10. Ordinary Resolution: To appoint Mr. Anoop Moopen (DIN: 02301362) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company. 11. Ordinary Resolution: To appoint Dr. Zeba Azad Moopen (DIN: 03604401) as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the Company.MoreLess
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 22 Jan 2024, 11 fund houses

  • To approve: (a) a material related party transaction, being the sale by Affinity Holdings Private Limited, a wholly owned material subsidiary of the Company, of its entire ownership of the shares in entities conducting business in the GCC region, including Aster DM Healthcare FZC, i.e., a material subsidiary of the Company to Alpha GCC Holdings Limited in terms of Regulation 23 and other applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), as amended from time to time, read with Company’s ‘Policy on Material Subsidiaries’ and ‘Related Party Transaction Policy’ and Section 2(76), Section 188 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) read with the rules framed thereunder (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment(s) thereof for the time being in force) and other applicable laws / statutory provisions, if any, (b) a consequential transaction being ‘Non-Compete and Brand Co-existence Agreement’, with Affinity Holdings Private Limited, Aster DM Healthcare FZC, Alpha GCC Holdings Limited and Dr. Azad Moopen, and Ms. Alisha Moopen, being the promoters of the Company, and (c) consequential arrangement being ‘MVT' (Medical Value Travel) with Aster DM Healthcare FZC 23 and other applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), as amended from time to time, read with Company’s ‘Policy on Material Subsidiaries’ and ‘Related Party Transaction Policy’ and Section 2(76), Section 188 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) read with the rules framed thereunder (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment(s) thereof for the time being in force) and other applicable laws / statutory provisions, if any, (b) a consequential transaction being ‘Non-Compete and Brand Co-existence Agreement’, with Affinity Holdings Private Limited, Aster DM Healthcare FZC, Alpha GCC Holdings Limited and Dr. Azad Moopen, and Ms. Alisha Moopen, being the promoters of the Company, and (c) consequential arrangement being ‘MVT' (Medical Value Travel) with Aster DM Healthcare FZCMoreLess
    11 for0 against
  • To approve the sale by Affinity Holdings Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, of its entire ownership of the shares in entities conducting business in the GCC region, including Aster DM Healthcare FZC, i.e., a material subsidiary of the Company, to Alpha GCC Holdings Limited, in terms of Regulations 16(1)(c), 24(5) and other applicable regulations of the SEBI Listing Regulations, as amended from time to time, read with Company’s ‘Policy on Material Subsidiaries’ and other applicable provisions of the Act, read with the rules framed thereunder (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment(s) thereof for the time being in force) and other applicable laws / statutory provisions, if anyMoreLess
    10 for0 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Fines, tax disputes and stakes in unlisted companies

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Unlisted stake boughtMalabar Institute of Medical Sciences LimitedSince 6 Jun 2026

    1.54% bought in the quarter; holding 81.29%, from 79.75%

  • Unlisted stake heldAster DM Super-Specialty Hospital (Sarjapur) Private LimitedSince 18 Jun 2026

    0.00% bought in the quarter; holding 100.00%, from 100.00%

  • Unlisted stake heldAlfaone Medicals Private LimitedSince 29 Jun 2026

    0.00% bought in the quarter; holding 100.00%, from 100.00%

  • Fine or penaltyAssistant Commissioner of Commercial TaxesSince 22 May 2026

    Form GST DRC-07 under 75(12) of the GST Act.

    FY 22-23 Form GST DRC-07 under 75(12) of the GST Act: The compnay have received demand order from the department stated that GSTR 3B return for the Month of April and Sep 22 has been filed after the due date and accoridngly interest to be discharged of Rs. 8712. The company have filed the response stating that due date for filing return of April and Sep 22 has been extended by the departmant and the same has been filed within the extended due date. Hence, the company have requested department to drop the interest liability raised.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of Income TaxSince 27 Dec 2019
    The matter is currently under appeal with CIT(A), which is pending disposal
    At the filing before: AY 2012-13 The department issued a notice under sections 143(3) and 147 of the Income Tax Act, disallowing legal and professional fees and business promotion expenses of INR 6,63,07,001, citing no business nexus with operational income. The company appealed, arguing: Re-assessment was invalid as all material facts were disclosed. The reassessment was a change of opinion, supported by a Supreme Court ruling. 10% of expenses had already been disallowed. Company has filed appeal against Commissioner of Income Tax(CIT) citing above reason. Further, penalty is initiated u/s 271(1)(c) initiated for concealment of income/furnishing inaccurate particulars of income on dated 27th Dec 2019. Management has responded against the penalty notice on dated 20th Jan 2020 stated to keep the penalty hearing pending till the disposal of appeal preferred against CIT(A).MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 29 Dec 2016
    The matter is currently under appeal with CIT(A), which is pending disposal
    At the filing before: AY 2014-15 The company received an assessment order on 29th Dec 2016, stating that FTC is not available for dividend received from Affinity Mauritius. However, the company follows the India-Mauritius tax treaty (Article 23), allowing FTC for Mauritian tax paid on dividends if the Indian company holds at least 10% of the Mauritian company’s shares. The company has obtained a legal opinion supporting this view. Department has disallowance the expenditure incurred to INR 1,33,53,573 on account of 14A, 43B of income tax etc. An appeal was filed on 27th Jan 2017, stating that the entire Mauritian tax payable should be eligible for FTC.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 21 Dec 2017
    The matter is currently under appeal with CIT(A), which is pending disposal
    At the filing before: AY 2015-16 The company received an assessment order on 21st Dec 2017, stating that FTC is not available for dividend received from Affinity Mauritius. However, the company follows the India-Mauritius tax treaty (Article 23), allowing FTC for Mauritian tax paid on dividends if the Indian company holds at least 10% of the Mauritian company’s shares. The company has obtained a legal opinion supporting this view. Department has disallowance the expenditure incurred to INR 1,86,53,445 on account of 14A, 43A, mismatch in 26AS etc. An appeal was filed against the CIT(A) on 25th Jan 2018, stating that the entire Mauritian tax payable should be eligible for FTC.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 9 Mar 2021
    The matter is currently under appeal with CIT(A), which is pending disposal
    At the filing before: AY 2016-17 The company received an assessment order on 9th March 2022 disallowing the expenditure such as ESOP expenses, deduction u/s 35AD, Expenditure in relation to exempt income, Foreign exchange fluctuation loss and income in relation to unbilled revenue which has already been taxed earlier result in double taxation on the same income in different assessment years. Company had filed appeal against the said disallowance at CIT(A) on 27th April 2022.MoreLess
24 more
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 30 Dec 2019
    After filing the response to the penalty Show cause notice, no further update response from the department.
    At the filing before: AY 2017-18 The company received the order u/s 143(3) on 30th Dec 2019 making disallowance under Section 14A,. 35AD and 36(1)(va). The Company filed appeal against the said disallowance with CIT(A) on 21st Jan 2020 stating that company has already considered all the proposed disallowance. Disallowing the same again will result in double tax impact. The Assessment order was set aside by PCIT pursuant to order u/s 263 and accordingly CIT(A) stated that the appeal also stands null and void and accordingly dismissed the appeal Recently, Company received the Show cause Notice dated 18th March 2026 initiating penalty against the assessment order passed on 30th Dec 2019. The Company filed a detailed reply on 1st April 2026 stating that the assessment order has been set aside by PCIT and appeal has been disposed of as null and void and therefore the penalty proceedings against the assessment order dated 30th Dec 2019 is infructuous and has to be dropped.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 13 Mar 2023
    The matter is currently under appeal with CIT(A), which is pending disposal
    At the filing before: AY 2017-18 The company has received the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of Income tax Act on 13th March 2023 stated that payment related to EPF and PF amounting to INR 62,68,644 made after due date as specified under labour Acts. The Company has filed appeal against the said disallowance on 31st March 23 stated that delay in contribution is account of technical difficulties in the portal on account of ESI and EPF portal migration and there was no intention to make the remittance after the due date.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant/Additional/Joint/Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 24 Mar 2021
    After filing the response to the penalty Show cause notice, no further update response from the department.
    At the filing before: AY 2018-19 The company received notice u/s 143(3) on 24th March 2021 stating that Company has not disallowed the expenditure incurred for earning exempt income u/s 14A amounting to INR 5,84,34,120 and accordingly, the same was disallowed in the order Company filed the appeal against the disallowance with CIT(Appeal) stating that the disallowance made is not appropriate as company has Suo moto disallowed the expense under section 14A r.w.r 8D. The Assessment order was set aside by PCIT pursuant to order u/s 263 and accordingly CIT(A) stated that the appeal also stands null and void and accordingly dismissed the appeal Recently, the company received a show cause notice under Section 270A for AY 2018–19 on 10th Feb 2026 initiating penalty against the assessment order dated 24th March 2021. The Company filed a detailed reply on 12th Feb 2026 stating that the assessment order has been set aside by PCIT and appeal has been disposed of as null and void and therefore the penalty proceedings against the assessment order dated 24th Mar 2021 is infructuous and has to be dropped.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 30 Mar 2024
    After due consideration of the merits and materiality, the Company elected not to file further appeal. The matter has attained finality.
    At the filing before: AY 2018-19 The company has received order u/s 143(3) on 30th March 24 which states that IPO proceeds are not utilised for the purpose for which it raised and hence share issue expense shall be disallowed. The Company is of the view that, even though IPO proceeds were utilised for repayment of loan, the end utilisation of the loan was towards expansion of Hospitals. Company has filed the appeal against the disallowance made at CIT(Appeal) authority level on 15th April 24 stated that the loan taken by the Company was towards expansion of the aforesaid hospitals. Further, CIT has passed order on 30th Jan 2026 in the favour of the department.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 26 Sep 2023
    The matter is currently under appeal with CIT(A), which is pending disposal
    At the filing before: AY 2020-21 The company received multiple notices (u/s 142(1) and 143(2)) between June 2021 and July 2023 requesting documents for the return of income, which were submitted. On 26th Sep 2023, an order u/s 143(3) was issued disallowing INR 5,79,46,823 under section 14A against which company appealed on 10th Oct 2023, stating that the disallowance was unnecessary as it had already Suo-motu disallowed the expense under section 14A r.w.r 8D. Notice issued personal hearing notice dated 26th December 2025 required company to represent before the department on 7th January 2026 in person or via authorised representative in relation to Sec 14A disallowance etc. which was attended personally scheduled at Kochi DGGI office on 7th January 2026 by Company's Tax consultant. Further, CIT(A) has passed order against the company stating that expenditure cannot be claimed on 12th August 2025 against which company was suppose to file the appeal However that is not required now since the PCIT vide order dated 5/3/2026 has set aside the assessment order for AY 2020-21 and therefore the appellate order against which we had planned to go on appeal itself becomes infructuous. Further, department has issued penalty notice dated 18th March 2026 having a demand of INR 1.06 Crores against the assessement order passed on dated 26th Sep 2023. However, on 5/3/2026 the PCIT has invoked his powers u/s 263 and set aside the assessment order dated 26/9/2023. As a result, this penalty order u/s 270A has become infructuous and therefore the penalty order is not tenable in law. Accordingly company have filed the rectification applicaiton u/s 154 before the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer requesting the cancelation of this penalty order consequent to the PCIT involving Section 263 to set aside the assessment order itself. The Company has also filed appeal with CIT(A) against the said penalty order. Further, the rectification appeal is rejected by the department but since the appeal is already filed at CIT(A), no action to be taken on the same.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 8 May 2024
    After submitting the response, no communication received from the department.
    At the filing before: AY 2018-19 The department has issued penalty show cause notice stated that company has not disallowed the Share issues expenses incurred on account of IPO issued. Management has filed the response against the said SCN on 22nd May 2024 stated that expenditure incurred by the Company are in the nature of underwriting commission, brokerage and charges for drafting, typing, printing and advertisement of the prospectus which qualify to claim u/s 35AD. Hence, penalty proceeding shall not be initiated till the disposal of appeal preferred against CIT(Appeal).MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssessment Unit/Verification Unit/Technical Unit/Review Unit of Income Tax departmentSince 20 Dec 2024
    Since the order is favourable, no further action required from Company's side.
    At the filing before: AY 2023-24 Notice issued for Sec. 142(1) dated 20th Dec 2024 to produce certain books of account. Company has submitted the required set of documents as asked in Income Tax portal on 6th Jan 2025. The Department issued Assessment order u/s 143(3) on 18th March 2025 and no adjustments were proposedMoreLess
  • Tax disputeIncome Tax AuthoritySince 5 Jun 2025
    Company is contemplating to file offline rectification against TDS mismatch
    At the filing before: AY 2024-25 Company has received intimation u/s 143(1) on 5th June 2025 where department is of the contention that there is difference in TDS credit available as per 26AS and TDS credit availed while filing ITR for FY 23-24. An online rectification was filed on 12th May 2026 by the Company for the said mismatch, however the same was rejected without mentioning any reasonMoreLess
  • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxSince 8 Oct 2025
    Further notice awaited from the department
    At the filing before: AY 2017-18 Department has issued SCN to initiate the penalty Company responded stating that since the appeal has been filed for subsequent proceeding and order passed u/s 263 hence appeal filed against penalty proceeding shall stand void.MoreLess
  • Tax disputePrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT)Since 26 Dec 2025
    Reassessment proceedings yet to be started by AO
    At the filing before: AY 2022-23 Notice issued u/s 263 dated 26th December 2025 required company to represent before the department on 7th January 2026 in person or via authorised representative in relation to ICDS disclosure, Sec 43B, and Sec 40A(7) The PCIT issud final order dated 6th March 2026 stating that assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) be set aside and reinitiated by AOMoreLess
  • Tax disputeOffice of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax(DCIT)Since 13 Mar 2026
    Company have submitted the required details on 23rd June 2026 & sought additional time for balance information
    At the filing before: AY 2024-25 Notice issued u/s 92CA(2) dated 13th March 2026 required the company to produce details related to international transaction such as TPO order, Form 3CEB etc. against which the Company has filed the response on 9th April 2026. The Department, vide its letter dated 29 June 2026, has informed the Company that the earlier transfer pricing proceedings have been transferred to another Assessing Officer. The Department has also asked the company to submit further additional information/documents in support of its case. The Company have submitted the initial set of documents on 23rd June 2026. Considering that the data requires collation from multiple sources, the Company has requested an extension of 30 days to furnish the remaining documents.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of Income TaxSince 9 Mar 2021
    Department has dropped the demand for AY 2018-19 to 2021-22.
    At the filing before: AY 2016-17 (09th March 2021), AY 2017-18 (25th July 2023), AY 2018-19 (19th January 2024), AY 2019-20 (19th March 2024), AY 2020-21 (12th June 2024), AY 2021-22 (26th July 2024) The Company has adopted a view that payment to doctors is liable to TDS under section 194J of the Act on account of the following : a) No employment contract with the Doctors b) Doctors are not entitled to employee benefits as per contract and expressly mentioned in the agreement that there is no employer employee relationship c) No prohibition/ bar on the doctors to be associated with other hospitals. d) No restriction on the nature of work that doctors perform in Aster DM e) Aster DM exercises no disciplinary control over doctors f) Contract with doctors is a Contract for service and not contract of service In a similar case in Manipal Health Systems Ltd vs CIT (Karnataka High Court (2015) reported in ITANO.747/2009 c/w ITA NO. 746/2009, the Karnataka High Court observed that contract between the Assessee and doctors was not a Contract of Service but Contract for service and therefore the payments made to doctors by the hospital are covered under section 194J. Given the above and review of submissions filed supported by multiple judicial precedents, a view may be adopted that the Company shall deduct TDS on payment to doctors under section 194J of the Act considering that primarily, there is no employer-employee relationship along with other grounds as given by the Company. Further company has filed appeal with the CIT(A) with respect to the said demand raised and paid 20% of the demand amount as we want to obtained LDC and department insisted us to pay that amount in order to provide LDC. Further, company has received favourable order from CIT(A) for AY 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 on 24th Dec 2024 stating that TDS deducted u/s 194J is appropriate and raised demand has been dropped. Accordingly company is eligible for refund amount for the amount which they already paid. Further, Company has received notice from the ITAT where they required management to appear for personal hearing at Kochi office. The hearing was attended by Mr. Krishnan (Senior Partner) of Rangamani & Co.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of Income TaxSince 18 Jun 2025
    After submitting the response, no communication received from the department.
    At the filing before: AY 2018-19 The Income Tax Department issued a notice to the company on 18th June 2025, stating that the Company had reported 242 payments in the Tax Audit Report for FY 2018–19, wherein TDS amounting to INR 82.13 lakhs was not deducted. The Department has sought clarification on whether such payments were subsequently made or reversed in the following year which has been provide by the company.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeCommercial tax officerSince 21 Jun 2024
    After submitting the response, no communication received from the department.
    At the filing before: FY 2022-23 ASMT-10 and DRC-01A issued with respect to difference in output tax liability declared in GSTR 1 and 3B return amounting to INR 19,09,920 The notices enquired about the reason for difference in output tax liability between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns for the period FY 2022-23. Reply to the SCN filed by the Company online along with supporting documents on 18th July 2024 stated that there is only shortfall of INR 36,000 which has been paid along with interest amounting to INR 8,007 as applicable.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeThe Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGISince 1 Feb 2024
    After submission of the response, we understand that department has dropped the proceedings. However, we are awaiting the final order copy.
    At the filing before: FY 2017-18 to 2023-24 Summon issued under section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 - GST on Corporate Guarantee: The department has issued summon requiring personal attendance and requested to submit the certain set of document required as stated in the notice. The Company represented itself before the Department and have submitted preliminary information with respect to GST paid on Corporate Guarantee.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAdditional Director of Central Goods and Service TaxSince 16 Jun 2024
    Company has filed the appeal against the Assistant Commissioner order on 14th June 2025. After filing the appeal, no further communication from the department.
    At the filing before: March 2021 to April 2023 SCN issued under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017- GST on Covid vaccination The SCN enquired about non-payment of GST for covid vaccination. The SCN was issued to the Company as a whole (including Kerala registration). The company has filed response stated that we are not paying the amount since it is considered as healthcare service and should be treated as a composite supply to healthcare services. Further company has asked for personal hearing for issue and sent response on 8th of August 2024 via post. Further, company has received demand order on 19th March 2025 amounting to INR 1.08 Crores along with penalty amounting to 100%. Company has filed the appeal against the said demand on 14th June 2025 stating the facts to the GST Authority and paid 10% pre-deposit amount of demand raised to file the appeal to the Appellate authority. Also, the response has been filed offline at the GST office, Koramangala.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDepartment of commercial taxesSince 25 Nov 2024
    After the document provided by the company, there has been no further communication from the department.
    At the filing before: FY 2020-21 to FY 2024-25 Summon issued by Tax authority on dated 25.11.2024 : Department has issued summon seeking information//documents/clarifications like sales and purchase register, GSTR 9 and 9C working, reconciliation of 1 vs 3b etc. for period between FY 2020-21 till FY 24-25. Company has represented before the tax authority physically on dated 30.11.2024 and provided the documents as required.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeDepartment of commercial taxesSince 15 Mar 2025
    After submission of the response, no further communication received from the department.
    At the filing before: FY 2023-24 ASMT-10 issued with respect to difference in ITC claimed in GSTR 3B and ITC available in GSTR 2A: The notices enquired about the reason for difference in ITC claimed in GSTR 3B and ITC available in GSTR 2A for the period FY 2023-24 against which company have filed the responses.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAdditional Director of Central Goods and Service TaxSince 3 Jan 2024
    After filing the appeal and personally attending the hearing, no further update received from the concerned authority.
    At the filing before: July 2017 to March 2023 Show Cause Notice issued by DGGI - GST on Accommodation provided to Bystanders: SCN alleges that Aster has not paid taxes on accommodation services provided to bystanders and outpatients in their guest accommodation 'Aster Suites'. The department alleged that accommodation services provided at Aster Suites is similar to accommodation at hotels and hence they are taxable. However, the Company has taken the position that accommodation services is part of composite supply of healthcare services wherein bystander accommodation is ancillary or integral to the healthcare services being rendered. However, department has issued the order on 26th Dec 2024 which is not in the favour of Company and raised demand amounting to INR 2.91 Crores along with penalty of 100%. Company has filed the appeal against the said demand on 24th March 2025 stating the facts to the GST Authority and paid 10% pre-deposit amount of demand raised to file the appeal to the Appellate authority. Recently, department has issued notice on 18th May 2026 required the Company representative to attend the personal hearing on the stated amtter on 29th May 2026 which was attended by Mr. Ganesh Ranmgamani and company have submitted their submission on GST Portgal also on 28th May 2026. The GST officer have intimated during personal hearing that he will go throught the detailed response shared over the GST portal and will take the further necessary action.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of Commercial TaxesSince 15 Mar 2025
    Company has submitted the documents on 23rd May 2025 over the portal.
    At the filing before: FY 23-24 ASMT-10 issued with respect to difference in ITC claimed in GSTR 3B and ITC available in GSTR 2A: The notices enquired about the reason for difference in ITC claimed in GSTR 3B and ITC available in GSTR 2A for the period FY 2023-24.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of Commercial TaxesSince 31 May 2025
    Currently the case is pending with department for further proceedings for FY 23-24.
    At the filing before: FY 21-22 and 23-24 Form GST ADT - 01 notice issued for conducting department audit under Section 65 of CGST Act, 2017 : The department has issued notice to produce certain document for initiation of Department audit like GSTR return working, RCM register etc. Company has submitted the initial set of documents via portal on 15th June 2025. Company has taken two month of adjournment for submitting the pending details. Further company has submitted the remaining documents on 23rd August 2025. Post submission of details, department has issued audit observation letter for FY 21-22 where they have identified certain discrepancies on 11th Sep 2025. Management has provided the relevant details on 18th September 2025. Post submission of clarification for audit observation, department has dropped the proceeding for FY 21-22 on 26th Sep 2025. Recently department requested the company representative for meeting which was attended by Mr. Mandeep. The department have analyses the details ashare dfor FY 23-24 GST audit and convey his observaiton. Later, department has also issued GST enquiry observation letter on 27th May 2026 for which department has given 10 days time limit to file the response against which company have filed the response. Further, Management visit the department and officer has sought certain clarification which the company have also submitted.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Director of Commercial taxesSince 29 Sep 2025
    After filing the appeal, no update communication from the department.
    At the filing before: FY 2019-20 to FY 2023-24 GST Show cause notice and demand order issued for Aster DM Kerela GST registration under section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017: The department has issued notice to the company requiring the reason to state that why the GST has not been paid on insurance processing fees collected from patient from FY 2019-20 to 2023-24. The company submitted its response on the portal on 29th October 2025. Subsequently, the department issued a demand order dated 24th March 2026, holding the company liable to pay GST on insurance processing fees. A demand of INR 0.36 crore has been raised along with a 100% penalty. The company have filed the appeal on 20th June 2026 over the portal after pre deposit 10% of tax demand amount.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Director of Commercial taxesSince 6 Oct 2025
    After filing the response against audit observation letter, no further update received from the department.
    At the filing before: FY 2022-23 Notice for conducting department audit under Section 65 of CGST Act, 2017: Notice for conducting department audit under Section 65 of CGST Act, 2017 for the FY 2022-23 issued. Company have submitted the required details to the department over the mail. Post submision, department has issued GST audit observation letter against which company have filed the response.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of Commercial TaxesSince 22 May 2026
    After filing the response, no further update received from the department.
    At the filing before: FY 22-23 Form GST DRC-07 under 75(12) of the Act: The compnay have received demand order from the department stated that GSTR 3B return for the Month of April and Sep 22 has been filed after the due date and accoridngly interest to be discharged of Rs. 8712 The company have filed the response stating that due date for filing return of April and Sep 22 has been extended by the departmant and the same has been filed within the extended due date. Hence, the company have requested department to drop the interest liability raised.MoreLess

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
No
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
Yes
The filing has a part on tax disputes
Yes
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.