Transformers and Rectifiers (India) logo

Transformers and Rectifiers (India) CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: TARILBSE: 532928Electrical EquipmentSmall Cap

Last close ₹303.90down ₹10.60 (3.37%)BSE ₹303.90

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹314.50.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹224.05Low, 2 Feb 2026₹488.00High, 23 Oct 2025
Market cap
₹9,122 Cr586th largest listed
P/E
29.1
P/B
5.5
Dividend yield
0.08%
ROE
20.9%
ROCE
19.3%
Debt to equity
0.34
Volume, NSE
33,74,51732.2% delivered

Transformers and Rectifiers (India) board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Sep 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • ChairpersonJitendra Mamtora
  • Managing director and CEOSatyen Jitendra Mamtora
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerRakesh Kiri

6 directors3 independent3 executive

  • Jitendra Mamtora · ChairpersonExecutive · joined Jul 1994 · reappointed Jan 2026 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • Karunaben Jitendra MamtoraExecutive · joined Jul 1994 · reappointed Apr 2023 · 1 listed board
  • Satyen Jitendra Mamtora · Managing director and CEOExecutive · joined Jul 1994 · reappointed Apr 2025 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • Subir Kumar DasIndependent · joined Nov 2018 · reappointed Nov 2023 · 94 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 3 committee seats, 2 as chair
  • Shah Rajendra ShantilalIndependent · joined May 2021 · reappointed May 2026 · 64 months as independent · 4 listed boards · 3 as independent · 3 committee seats
  • Tanvi Vishal RangwalaIndependent · joined Jan 2024 · reappointed Jan 2024 · 32 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 1 committee seat

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 27 Aug 20266 of 6 present3 independent · 37 days in between
    • 20 Jul 20266 of 6 present3 independent · 89 days in between
    • 21 Apr 20266 of 6 present3 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair Subir Kumar Das

    Jitendra Mamtora, Shah Rajendra Shantilal, Tanvi Vishal Rangwala

    • 21 Aug 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 31 days in between
    • 20 Jul 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 89 days in between
    • 21 Apr 20264 of 4 present3 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Subir Kumar Das

    Shah Rajendra Shantilal, Tanvi Vishal Rangwala

    • 21 Apr 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 46 days in between
    • 5 Mar 20263 of 3 present3 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair Subir Kumar Das

    Shah Rajendra Shantilal, Satyen Jitendra Mamtora

    • 20 Jul 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 89 days in between
    • 21 Apr 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair Subir Kumar Das

    Satyen Jitendra Mamtora, Jitendra Mamtora, Mehul Shah

    • 20 Jul 20264 of 4 present1 independent · 192 days in between
    • 8 Jan 20264 of 4 present1 independent
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Karunaben Jitendra Mamtora

    Jitendra Mamtora, Subir Kumar Das

    No meeting listed in the filing.

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Mar 2026.

  • M/s Manubhai & Shah LLPPeer-review certificate valid to Feb 2028

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Transformers and Rectifiers (India) AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Transformers and Rectifiers (India) dividend history

Postal ballot, 28 Sep 2026

2,29,464 shareholders on the register on 21 Aug 2026; votes counted by Tapan Shah / Tapan Shah.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To approve the variation/reallocation in utilisation of the proceeds of the Qualified Institutions Placement (QIP) and revision in utilisation timeline
    Special
    99.99% for0.01% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 3.94%

    Turnout: all 71.83% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.78% · other public 0.55%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 21 Sep 2026, 4 resolutions

2,29,839 shareholders on the register on 14 Sep 2026; present: 5 promoters and 74 others; votes counted by Tapan Shah / Tapan Shah.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt: (a) the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026, the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon; and (b) the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026 and the report of Auditors thereonMoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 1.15%

    Turnout: all 71.79% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 0.18%

  2. To declare a dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.54%

    Turnout: all 71.79% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 0.18%

  3. Appointment of Mr. Satyen J. Mamtora (DIN: 00139984), Director retiring by rotation
    Ordinary
    98.08% for1.92% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 18.60% · other public 5.71%

    Turnout: all 71.79% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 0.18%

  4. Ratification of remuneration payable to Cost Auditor for the financial year ending 31st March, 2027
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 1.15%

    Turnout: all 71.79% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.46% · other public 0.18%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 22 May 2026, 1 resolution

2,18,163 shareholders on the register on 17 Apr 2026; votes counted by Tapan Shah / Tapan Shah.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Re-appointment of Mr. Rajendra S. Shah (DIN: 00061922) as an Independent Director of the Company for a second term of 5 years from 25th May, 2026 till 24th May, 2031
    Special
    92.61% for7.39% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 70.62% · other public 0.07%

    Turnout: all 72.01% · promoters 85.24% · institutions 83.99% · other public 36.05%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 13 May 2025, 11 resolutions

1,24,100 shareholders on the register on 6 May 2025; present: 4 promoters and 73 others; votes counted by Tapan Shah / Tapan Shah.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt: a) the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025, the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon; and b) the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025 and the report of Auditors thereonMoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 79.47% · promoters 85.24% · institutions 88.95% · other public 51.14%

  2. To Declare Dividend @ 20% (i.e. Rs. 0.20/- per equity share) on Equity Shares of Re. 1/- each fully paid equity shareholder of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 79.54% · promoters 85.24% · institutions 89.38% · other public 51.14%

  3. To appoint a Director in place of Mrs. Karuna J. Mamtora (DIN: 00253549) who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers herself for re-appointment.
    Ordinary
    99.08% for0.92% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.29% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 70.03% · promoters 70.48% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  4. Appointment of Secretarial Auditor M/s Shah & Shah Associates, Company Secretaries.
    Ordinary
    98.80% for1.20% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 6.36% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 79.46% · promoters 85.24% · institutions 88.85% · other public 51.14%

  5. To revise the terms of remuneration of Mr. Jitendra U. Mamtora (DIN: 00139911) as Chairman and Whole-time Director w.e.f. 01st April, 2025.
    Special
    97.76% for2.24% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 6.77% · other public 0.60%

    Turnout: all 48.22% · promoters 36.60% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  6. To reappoint Mr. Jitendra U. Mamtora (DIN: 00139911) as Chairman and Whole-time Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st January, 2026.
    Special
    88.99% for11.01% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 35.22% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 48.22% · promoters 36.60% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  7. To revise the terms of Remuneration of Mrs. Karuna J. Mamtora (DIN: 00253549) as an Executive Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st April, 2025.
    Special
    99.11% for0.89% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 3.75% · other public 0.60%

    Turnout: all 70.03% · promoters 70.48% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  8. To re-appoint Mrs. Karuna J. Mamtora (DIN: 00253549) as an Executive Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st April, 2026.
    Special
    99.18% for0.82% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 3.83% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 70.03% · promoters 70.48% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  9. To revise the terms of remuneration of Mr. Satyen J. Mamtora (DIN: 00139984) as a Managing Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st April, 2025.
    Special
    99.54% for0.46% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.76% · other public 0.60%

    Turnout: all 70.03% · promoters 70.48% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  10. Approval to advance any loan/give guarantee/provide security u/s 185 of the Companies Act, 2013.
    Special
    88.67% for11.33% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 59.37% · other public 0.60%

    Turnout: all 79.53% · promoters 85.24% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

  11. Ratification of remuneration payable to Cost Auditor for the financial year ending 31st March 2026.
    Ordinary
    99.62% for0.38% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.99% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 79.53% · promoters 85.24% · institutions 89.28% · other public 51.14%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Extraordinary general meeting, 3 Feb 2025, 4 resolutions

1,17,448 shareholders on the register on 27 Jan 2025; present: 3 promoters and 67 others; votes counted by Tapan Shah / Tapan Shah.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Increase in Authorised Share Capital and consequent alteration to the Capital Clause of the Memorandum of Association.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 3.37%

    Turnout: all 75.03% · promoters 92.93% · institutions 81.09% · other public 0.40%

  2. Approval for issue of Bonus Shares to the Shareholders of the Company.
    Ordinary
    99.04% for0.96% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.76% · other public 0.47%

    Turnout: all 75.03% · promoters 92.93% · institutions 81.09% · other public 0.40%

  3. To Issue of Equity Shares by way of private placement to Qualified Institutional Buyers.
    Special
    99.23% for0.77% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 3.79% · other public 3.37%

    Turnout: all 75.03% · promoters 92.93% · institutions 81.09% · other public 0.40%

  4. Alteration of Articles of Association with respect to removal of common seal clause.
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 5.59%

    Turnout: all 75.01% · promoters 92.93% · institutions 81.09% · other public 0.26%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 28 Sep 2026, 7 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

  • To approve the variation/reallocation in utilisation of the proceeds of the Qualified Institutions Placement (QIP) and revision in utilisation timeline
    7 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 21 Sep 2026, 7 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To consider and adopt: (a) the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026, the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon; and (b) the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026 and the report of Auditors thereonMoreLess
    7 for0 against
  • To declare a dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026
    7 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Satyen J. Mamtora (DIN: 00139984), Director retiring by rotation
    7 for0 against
  • Ratification of remuneration payable to Cost Auditor for the financial year ending 31st March, 2027
    4 for0 against
2 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 4) Approve remuneration of Rs. 125,000 to Ankit Kushal & Associates as cost auditors for FY27
    1 for0 against
  • Approve remuneration of Rs. 125,000 to Ankit Kushal & Associates as cost auditors for FY27
    2 for0 against
5 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 22 May 2026, 17 fund houses

  • Re-appointment of Mr. Rajendra S. Shah (DIN: 00061922) as an Independent Director of the Company for a second term of 5 years from 25th May, 2026 till 24th May, 2031
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Prolonged Association as an Independent Director with the group for more than 10 years, independence may get vitiated owing to such prolonged association. Transparency Concern: The Company has entered into Related Party Transactions where the proposed appointed is the Promoter Executive Director and Chairman; such relationship may result in conflict of interest situations and vitiate the independence of the proposed Independent Director.
    • Axis Mutual FundRajendra Shah, 78, is the promoter Chairperson and Whole‑time Director of Harsha Engineers International Limited (HEIL). He has over three decades of experience in the precision‑engineering business. As he has attained the age of seventy‑five, his reappointment requires approval by a special resolution, in line with regulatory requirements. He attended all four board meetings in FY25 (100%) and five board meetings in FY26. He served on the board of the company from 25 August 2005 until his resignation as an Independent Director on 12 September 2018. Subsequently, he was appointed as an Independent Director from 25 May 2021. We note that he did not complete a three‑year cooling‑off period through complete disassociation from the company prior to his appointment as an Independent Director in May 2021. We therefore consider his overall association with the company, which exceeds ten years, while assessing his independence. Accordingly, we do not consider him to be an Independent Director. We do not support the resolution..
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundNo concern identified w.r.t the merits of proposed appointee. Governance Concern: Prolonged Association as an Independent Director with the group for more than 10 years, independence may get vitiated owing to such prolonged association. Transparency Concern: The Company has entered into Related Party Transactions where the proposed appointed is the Promoter ED and Chairman; such relationship may result in conflict of interest situations and vitiate the independence of the proposed ID.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Rajendra S. Shah did not complete a three?year cooling?off period through complete disassociation from the company prior to his appointment as an Independent Director in May 2021. We do not consider him independent due to prolonged association with the company. We do not support his reappointment as Independent Director.
    • Invesco Mutual FundRajendra Shah, 78, is the promoter Chairperson and Whole‑time Director of Harsha Engineers International Limited (HEIL). He has over three decades of experience in the precision‑engineering business. As he has attained the age of seventy‑five, his reappointment requires approval by a special resolution, in line with regulatory requirements. He attended all four board meetings in FY25 (100%) and five board meetings in FY26. He served on the board of the company from 25 August 2005 until his resignation as an Independent Director on 12 September 2018. Subsequently, he was appointed as an Independent Director from 25 May 2021. We note that he did not complete a three‑year cooling‑off period through complete disassociation from the company prior to his appointment as an Independent Director in May 2021. We therefore consider his overall association with the company, which exceeds ten years, while assessing his independence. Accordingly, we do not consider him to be an Independent Director. We do not support the resolution.
    • Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, UTI Mutual FundRajendra Shah, 78, is the promoter Chairperson and Whole‑time Director of Harsha Engineers International Limited (HEIL). He has over three decades of experience in the precision‑engineering business. As he has attained the age of seventy‑five, his reappointment requires approval by a special resolution, in line with regulatory requirements.He attended all four board meetings in FY25 (100%) and five board meetings in FY26. He served on the board of the company from 25 August 2005 until his resignation as an Independent Director on 12 September 2018. Subsequently, he was appointed as an Independent Director from 25 May 2021. We note that he did not complete a three‑year cooling‑off period through complete disassociation from the company prior to his appointment as an Independent Director in May 2021. We therefore consider his overall association with the company, which exceeds ten years, while assessing his independence. Accordingly, we do not consider him to be an Independent Director. We do not support the resolution..
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundHe is an experienced entrepreneur with several years of experience in precision engineering and auto-component manufacturing. He has been associated since incorporation of Harsha Engineering Limited and is currently responsible for quality, marketing, logistics, production, maintenance and technology functions. He has 35 years of experience in the precision engineering and auto-component manufacturing sector. His overall association with the group is more than 10 years but not with the company. The resolution is compliant under law. However, the appointee is the promoter and Executive Chairman of Harsha Engineers International Ltd. Harsha engineers International ltd is involved in transactional relationship with Transformers and Rectifiers (India) ltd. In such case, where the appointee has financial interest in RPT, we cannot consider him as an Independent Director. Hence, we do not favour the resolution.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundProlonged Association with the Company; RPT entered with entities where the director is a Promoter ED.
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Prolonged association as an Independent Director for over 10 years may vitiate independence. Further, the Company's involvement in Related Party Transactions, where the proposed appointee serves as Promoter, ED, and Chairman, raises conflict of interest concerns and compromises transparency and independence.
    3 for14 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 13 May 2025, 18 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To consider and adopt: a) the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025, the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon; and b) the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025 and the report of Auditors thereonMoreLess
    18 for0 against
  • To Declare Dividend @ 20% (i.e. Rs. 0.20/- per equity share) on Equity Shares of Re. 1/- each fully paid equity shareholder of the Company
    18 for0 against
  • To appoint a Director in place of Mrs. Karuna J. Mamtora (DIN: 00253549) who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers herself for re-appointment.
    17 for0 against
  • Appointment of Secretarial Auditor M/s Shah & Shah Associates, Company Secretaries.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundNon-Disclosure of Audit Fee and Basis of Recommendation/ Credentials of proposed Auditor.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNo concern on the merits of the proposed Auditors. Non-Compliant with Reg. 36 of SEBI (LODR) 2015: Non-Disclosure of Audit Fee and Basis of Recommendation/ Credentials of proposed Auditor.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundNon-Compliant as per Reg. 36(5) of LODR; Audit fee payable & Credentials not disclosed.Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe company proposes to appoint Shah & Shah Associates as secretarial auditors for five years from FY25, on payment of such remuneration as may be mutually agreed between the Board of Directors and the Secretarial Auditors. However, the company has not disclosed full particulars of the loans given, or guarantee given or security provided and the purpose for which the loan or guarantee or security is proposed to be utilised by the recipient of the loan which a regulatory requirement under Section 185(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. Based on lack of clarification and disclosure, voting against.
    • Nippon India Mutual FundNon-Compliant:Non-Disclosure of Audit Fee
    9 for9 against
  • To revise the terms of remuneration of Mr. Jitendra U. Mamtora (DIN: 00139911) as Chairman and Whole-time Director w.e.f. 01st April, 2025.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Combined position of Chairman & Whole-time Director Combining the position of Chairman with executive positions may lead to concentration of power. Therefore,the Company should segregate the position of Chairman from the Executive position.
    • Axis Mutual FundJitendra Mamtora, 78, is the founder and promoter of the company. (1) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by his spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundCompliant with law. No major concern identified w.r.t. the merits of the proposed appointee. Governance Concern: Combined position of Chairman & Whole-time Director.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Jitendra Mamtora, 78, is the founder and promoter of the company. The proposed remuneration is high considering the size and scale of business. We do not support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundJitendra Mamtora, 78, is the founder and promoter of the company. We raise several concerns regarding his proposed remuneration terms: (i) Jitendra Mamtora was paid Rs. 49.0 mn as remuneration in FY25, which was high at 8.2% of consolidated employee benefit expenses. The company should also explain the discrepancy in reporting his remuneration for FY25 across the annual report. (ii) He is eligible for performance incentive at 1.5% of net profits. We do not encourage such flat profit-linked commission structures; we believe the company must set an absolute cap on commission. (iii) We estimate his FY26 remuneration at Rs. 65.1 mn, which is high for the size of business and not in line with peers. (iv) Further, the aggregate promoter remuneration for FY26 is expected to be high for the size of business since all executive directors will be eligible for flat profit-linked commission structures. (v) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by his spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Candidate Holds Combined position
    6 for12 against
  • To reappoint Mr. Jitendra U. Mamtora (DIN: 00139911) as Chairman and Whole-time Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st January, 2026.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Combined position of Chairman & Whole-time Director Combining the position of Chairman with executive positions may lead to concentration of power. Therefore,the Company should segregate the position of Chairman from the Executive position.
    • Axis Mutual FundJitendra Mamtora, 78, is the founder and promoter of the company. (1) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by his spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundCompliant with law. No major concern identified w.r.t. the merits of the proposed appointee. Governance Concern: Combined position of Chairman & Whole-time Director.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Jitendra Mamtora, 78, is the founder and promoter of the company. The proposed remuneration is high considering the size and scale of business. We do not support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundJitendra Mamtora is the founder and promoter of the company. While we support his reappointment as Chairperson and Whole-time Director, we raise several concerns regarding his proposed remuneration terms: (i) Jitendra Mamtora was paid Rs. 49.0 mn as remuneration in FY25, which was high at 8.2% of consolidated employee benefit expenses. The company should also explain the discrepancy in reporting his remuneration for FY25 across the annual report. (ii) He is eligible for performance incentive at 1.5% of net profits. We do not encourage such flat profit-linked commission structures; we believe the company must set an absolute cap on commission. (iii) We estimate his FY26 remuneration at Rs. 65.1 mn, which is high for the size of business and not in line with peers. (iv) Further, the aggregate promoter remuneration for FY26 is expected to be high for the size of business since all executive directors will be eligible for flat profit-linked commission structures. (v) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by his spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Candidate Holds Combined position
    6 for12 against
  • To revise the terms of Remuneration of Mrs. Karuna J. Mamtora (DIN: 00253549) as an Executive Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st April, 2025.
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundMs. Karuna Mamtora, 74, is the promoter of the company. (1) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by her spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMs. Karuna Mamtora, 74, is the promoter of the company. The proposed remuneration is high considering the size and scale of business. We do not support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundMs. Karuna Mamtora, 74, is the promoter of the company. We raise several concerns regarding his proposed remuneration terms: (i) She is eligible for performance incentive at 1.5% of net profits. We do not encourage such flat profit-linked commission structures; we believe the company must set an absolute cap on commission. (ii) We estimate her FY26 remuneration at Rs. 57.0 mn, which is high for the size of business and not in line with peers. (iii) Further, the aggregate promoter remuneration for FY26 is expected to be high for the size of business since all executive directors will be eligible for flat profit-linked commission structures. (iv) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by her spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    14 for4 against
  • To re-appoint Mrs. Karuna J. Mamtora (DIN: 00253549) as an Executive Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st April, 2026.
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundMs. Karuna Mamtora, 74, is the promoter of the company. (1) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by her spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMs. Karuna Mamtora, 74, is the promoter of the company. The proposed remuneration is high considering the size and scale of business. We do not support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundMs. Karuna Mamtora is the promoter of the company. While we support her reappointment as Executive Director, we raise several concerns regarding her proposed remuneration terms: (i) She is eligible for performance incentive at 1.5% of net profits. We do not encourage such flat profit-linked commission structures; we believe the company must set an absolute cap on commission. (ii) We estimate her FY26 remuneration at Rs. 57.0 mn, which is high for the size of business and not in line with peers. (iii) Further, the aggregate promoter remuneration for FY26 is expected to be high for the size of business since all executive directors will be eligible for flat profit-linked commission structures. (iv) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by her spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    13 for4 against
  • To revise the terms of remuneration of Mr. Satyen J. Mamtora (DIN: 00139984) as a Managing Director of the Company w.e.f. 01st April, 2025.
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundSatyen Mamtora, 50, is co-founder and promoter of the company. (1) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by his spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • HDFC Mutual FundMr. Satyen Mamtora, 50, is co-founder and promoter of the company. The proposed remuneration is high considering the size and scale of business. We do not support the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual FundSatyen Mamtora, 50, is co-founder and promoter of the company. We raise several concerns regarding his proposed remuneration terms: (i) Satyen Mamtora was paid Rs. 50.0 mn as remuneration in FY25, which was high at 8.3% of consolidated employee benefit expenses. The company should also explain the discrepancy in reporting his remuneration for FY25 across the annual report. (ii) He is eligible for performance incentive at 1.5% of net profits. We do not encourage such flat profit-linked commission structures; we believe the company must set an absolute cap on commission. (iii) We estimate his FY26 remuneration at Rs. 81.3 mn, which is high for the size of business and not in line with peers. (iv) Further, the aggregate promoter remuneration for FY26 is expected to be high for the size of business since all executive directors will be eligible for flat profit-linked commission structures. (v) The remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of expenses incurred by his spouse and attendant during business trips to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. Thus, we do not support the resolution
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    14 for4 against
  • Approval to advance any loan/give guarantee/provide security u/s 185 of the Companies Act, 2013.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosures regarding the particulars mandated u/s 185 of Companies Act, 2013.
    • Axis Mutual FundThe approval is enabling in nature, and it could allow the company to give loans / guarantees / provide securities to any company in which directors are interested, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details including names of these companies and entities, the nature and size of their operations and terms of support, and rationale, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we are unable to support the resolution.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundNon-compliance & Transparency concern: Inadequate disclosures regarding the particulars mandated u/s 185 of Companies Act, 2013.
    • HDFC Mutual FundLack of clarity regarding the names of the entities, the nature and size of their operations, terms of support and rationale for related party transaction. We do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundInadequate disclosure u/s 185 of the Companies Act, 2013.Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • Invesco Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe approval is enabling in nature, and it could allow the company to give loans / guarantees / provide securities to any company in which directors are interested, including promoter companies. The company must disclose granular details including names of these companies and entities, the nature and size of their operations and terms of support, and rationale, to enable shareholders to make an informed decision. Given the lack of clarity, we are unable to support the resolution
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Nippon India Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Inadequate disclosure
    4 for14 against
  • Ratification of remuneration payable to Cost Auditor for the financial year ending 31st March 2026.
    18 for0 against
2 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • Approve Reappointment and Remuneration of Karuna J. Mamtora as Executive Director
    1 for0 against
  • Elect Karuna J. Mamtora as Director
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 3 Feb 2025, 5 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Increase in Authorised Share Capital and consequent alteration to the Capital Clause of the Memorandum of Association.
    5 for0 against
  • Approval for issue of Bonus Shares to the Shareholders of the Company.
    5 for0 against
  • To Issue of Equity Shares by way of private placement to Qualified Institutional Buyers.
    Against Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Excessive dilution (Combined with past issue); no justification for not opting for Rights Issue. There doesn’t appear to be any urgent need of funds.
    3 for1 against
  • Alteration of Articles of Association with respect to removal of common seal clause.
    5 for0 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
  • Approve Issuance of Equity or Equity-Linked Securities without Preemptive Rights
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 13 May 2024, 1 fund house

  • Accept Financial Statements and Statutory Reports
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Dividend
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Issuance of Equity or Equity-Linked Securities without Preemptive Rights
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Reappointment and Remuneration of Satyen J. Mamtora as Managing Director
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Remuneration of Cost Auditors
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Revision of Remuneration of Jitendra U. Mamtora as Chairman and Whole-Time Director
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Revision of Remuneration of Karuna J. Mamtora as Executive Director
    1 for0 against
  • Approve Revision of Remuneration of Satyen J. Mamtora as Managing Director
    1 for0 against
  • Approve TRIL-Employee Stock Option Plan 2024
    1 for0 against
  • Reelect Satyen J. Mamtora as Director
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 2 Apr 2024, 1 fund house

  • Elect Tanvi Rangwala as Director
    1 for0 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

At most 1 complaint open, quarter to Jun 2025.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
Yes
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
No
The filing has a part on tax disputes
No
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.

How money raised was used

Reported for the quarter to Sep 2026.

RaisedAmount raisedForSet asideSpentSpent elsewhereReason and comments
QIPJun 2024, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited500.00Company’s growth and business expansion through funding of capital expenditure requirements161.6325.98Yes
The proposed revision aligns QIP utilisation with business requirements and Monitoring Agency observations, while retaining the aggregate proceeds at Rs. 5,000.00 million and extending the utilisation timeline to 31st March, 2027.MoreLess
Audit committee: Audit Committee reviewd and approved the report given by Monitoring Agency
QIPJun 2024, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited500.00Funding the working capital requirements of the Company125.00124.11Yes
The proposed revision aligns QIP utilisation with business requirements and Monitoring Agency observations, while retaining the aggregate proceeds at Rs. 5,000.00 million and extending the utilisation timeline to 31st March, 2027.MoreLess
Audit committee: Audit Committee reviewd and approved the report given by Monitoring Agency
QIPJun 2024, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited500.00Repayment and/or pre-payment, in full or in part, of certain outstanding borrowings61.3860.02Yes
The proposed revision aligns QIP utilisation with business requirements and Monitoring Agency observations, while retaining the aggregate proceeds at Rs. 5,000.00 million and extending the utilisation timeline to 31st March, 2027.MoreLess
Audit committee: Audit Committee reviewd and approved the report given by Monitoring Agency
QIPJun 2024, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited500.00Funding inorganic growth and general corporate purposes137.81137.81Yes
The proposed revision aligns QIP utilisation with business requirements and Monitoring Agency observations, while retaining the aggregate proceeds at Rs. 5,000.00 million and extending the utilisation timeline to 31st March, 2027.MoreLess
Audit committee: Audit Committee reviewd and approved the report given by Monitoring Agency
QIPJun 2024, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited500.00QIP related issue expenses14.1814.18Yes
The proposed revision aligns QIP utilisation with business requirements and Monitoring Agency observations, while retaining the aggregate proceeds at Rs. 5,000.00 million and extending the utilisation timeline to 31st March, 2027.MoreLess
Audit committee: Audit Committee reviewd and approved the report given by Monitoring Agency
₹ crore. Checked by is the agency appointed to monitor how the money is used. The reason and the comments are the company's, its audit committee's and its auditors' own words.