Swan Corp logo

Swan Corp MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: SWANCORPBSE: 503310Chemicals & PetrochemicalsSmall Cap

Formerly Swan Energy
Last close ₹239.85down ₹4.50 (1.84%)BSE ₹239.20

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹244.35.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹230.10Low, 23 Oct 2026₹493.60High, 29 Dec 2025
Market cap
₹7,518 Cr517th largest listed
P/E
33.6
P/B
1.0
Dividend yield
0.06%
ROE
3.0%
ROCE
−3.2%
Debt to equity
0.23
Volume, NSE
11,84,80928.5% delivered

Swan Corp board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • ChairpersonNavinbhai C DaveRelated to the promoter
  • Managing directorNikhil V Merchant
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerMr. Saptarshi Ganguly

10 directors5 independent4 executive1 non-executive

  • Navinbhai C Dave · ChairpersonNon-executive · joined Nov 1998 · reappointed Sep 2022 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat, 1 as chair
  • Nikhil V Merchant · Managing directorExecutive · joined Mar 1992 · reappointed Sep 2024 · 2 listed boards
  • Paresh V MerchantExecutive · joined Nov 1998 · reappointed Sep 2024 · 3 listed boards · 4 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Sugavanam PadmanabhanExecutive · joined Sep 2010 · reappointed Sep 2023 · 1 listed board
  • Chetan Kannaiyalal SelarkaExecutive · joined Aug 2024 · 1 listed board
  • Prabhakar Reddy PatilIndependent · joined Aug 2024 · 22 months as independent · 4 listed boards · 4 as independent · 5 committee seats, 2 as chair
  • Jayaramakrishnan KannanIndependent · joined Dec 2024 · 18 months as independent · 5 listed boards · 5 as independent · 4 committee seats, 2 as chair
  • Rohinton Eruch ShroffIndependent · joined Aug 2022 · reappointed Sep 2022 · 46 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 4 committee seats, 3 as chair
  • Ashish ChhabriaIndependent · joined Mar 2026 · 3 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
  • Bhagwati SharmaIndependent · joined Mar 2026 · 3 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

3 directors who left
  • Ashishkumar Bairagra, left 20 Feb 2026: Others
  • Shanaya Manish Munot, left 16 Dec 2025: Others
  • Surekha Oak, left 11 Mar 2025: Others

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 29 May 202610 of 10 present5 independent · 111 days in between
    • 6 Feb 20269 of 9 present4 independent · 9 days in between
    • 27 Jan 20269 of 9 present4 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair Rohinton Eruch Shroff

    Paresh V Merchant, Jayaramakrishnan Kannan

    • 29 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 111 days in between
    • 6 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 9 days in between
    • 27 Jan 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Prabhakar Reddy Patil

    Rohinton Eruch Shroff, Navinbhai C Dave

    • 29 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 111 days in between
    • 6 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair Navinbhai C Dave

    Paresh V Merchant, Rohinton Eruch Shroff

    No meeting listed in the filing.

  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair Paresh V Merchant

    Rohinton Eruch Shroff, Chetan Kannaiyalal Selarka

    No meeting listed in the filing.

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Paresh V Merchant

    Rohinton Eruch Shroff, Chetan Kannaiyalal Selarka

    • 29 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 111 days in between
    • 6 Feb 20263 of 3 present1 independent

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Mar 2026.

  • N. N. Jambusaria & CO.Peer-review certificate valid to Jul 2026

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Swan Corp AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Swan Corp dividend history

Annual general meeting, 4 Sep 2026

1,39,813 shareholders on the register on 28 Aug 2026; present: 14 promoters and 47 others; votes counted by Jignesh M Pandya / M/s. Jignesh Pandya & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Adoption of IND AS compliant Audited Standalone and Consolidated Financial Statements for the Financial Year 2025-26
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 72.06% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.81%

  2. Declaration of Dividend of ₹ 0.15 per Equity Share of face value of ₹ 1/- each for the Financial Year 2025-26.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 72.06% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  3. Re-appointment of Mr. Navinbhai Dave (DIN: 01787259) as a Director, who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    Ordinary
    99.62% for0.38% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.60% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 72.06% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  4. Re-appointment of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as a Director, who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    Ordinary
    99.92% for0.08% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.32% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 72.06% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  5. Ratification of Cost Auditor's Remuneration
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 72.06% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  6. Re-appointment of Mr. Sugavanam Padmanabhan (DIN: 03229120) as Whole-Time Director of the Company
    Special
    99.95% for0.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.21% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 72.06% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  7. Approval for material related party transactions of the Company
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    62.78% for37.22% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 39.19% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 18.11% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  8. Approval for material related party transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    62.78% for37.22% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 39.19% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 18.11% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

  9. Approval for payment of remuneration to Mr. Bhavik Merchant, Mr. Vivek Merchant and Ms. Vinita Naman Patel for holding office or place of profit in the Company
    OrdinaryNot passedPromoters have an interest in it
    38.18% for61.82% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 65.10% · other public 0.30%

    Turnout: all 18.11% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 78.42% · other public 3.79%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 19 May 2026, 2 resolutions

1,39,349 shareholders on the register on 10 Apr 2026; votes counted by Jignesh M Pandya / M/s. Jignesh Pandya & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Appointment of Ms. Bhagwati Sharma (DIN: 09632127) as Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    99.99% for0.01% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.70%

    Turnout: all 74.61% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.39% · other public 2.38%

  2. Appointment of Mr. Ashish Chhabria (DIN:11564611) as Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    96.77% for3.23% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 11.98% · other public 0.68%

    Turnout: all 74.61% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.39% · other public 2.39%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 2 Mar 2026, 1 resolution

1,45,592 shareholders on the register on 23 Jan 2026; votes counted by Jignesh M Pandya / M/s Jignesh Pandya & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Related Party Transaction with Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHI)
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.71% for0.29% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.29% · other public 0.22%

    Turnout: all 18.07% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 80.97% · other public 2.31%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 29 Sep 2025, 6 resolutions

1,65,263 shareholders on the register on 22 Sep 2025; present: 14 promoters and 70 others; votes counted by Jignesh Pandya / M/s Jignesh Pandya and Company.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the Audited Standalone & Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025, together with the Independent Auditors Report and the Directors Report thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    99.94% for0.06% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.23% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 74.63% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.67% · other public 7.88%

  2. To declare Final Dividend for the FY 2024-25 @ 10%, i.e., Re. 0.10 for every share of face value of Re. 1/‐ each
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 74.63% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.67% · other public 7.88%

  3. To consider and approve the re-appointment of Mr. Paresh Merchant (DIN: 00660027) as a Director of the Company, who retires by rotation and being eligible offers himself for re-appointment.
    Ordinary
    95.33% for4.67% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 18.66% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 74.63% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.67% · other public 7.88%

  4. Ratification of the Remuneration of Rs. 75,000/-to be paid to the Cost Auditor of the company for FY 2025-26.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 74.63% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.67% · other public 7.88%

  5. Appointment of M/s. SKJP & Associates, PCS as the Secretarial Auditor of the Company for the 1st term of 5 consecutive financial years, from FY 2025-26 to FY 2029-30
    Ordinary
    99.94% for0.06% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.23% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 74.63% · promoters 99.97% · institutions 91.67% · other public 7.88%

  6. Approval of Limits and Terms & conditions of transactions to be entered into with Material Related Parties.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    51.12% for48.88% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 54.18% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 20.69% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.67% · other public 7.88%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 4 Sep 2026, 7 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

  • Adoption of IND AS compliant Audited Standalone and Consolidated Financial Statements for the Financial Year 2025-26
    7 for0 against
  • Declaration of Dividend of ₹ 0.15 per Equity Share of face value of ₹ 1/- each for the Financial Year 2025-26.
    7 for0 against
  • Re-appointment of Mr. Navinbhai Dave (DIN: 01787259) as a Director, who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundContinuation of directorship beyond 75 years of age and approval for re-appointment sought via Ordinary resolution instead of Special resolution as required under law. Governance Concern: Skewed Remuneration practice observed among Executive Directors of the Company in favour of promoter Executive Directors, which is unfavourable to a non-promoter Executive Director. Further, the director is the Board Chairperson and related to the Managing Director of the Company, such relationship may blur the demarcation between the board and management. The proposed director is also a Nomination and Remuneration Committee member, hence should be held accountable for failure to ensure fair remuneration practices among the Executive Directors.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNo concern on the merits of proposed appointee. Non-Compliant with Regulation 17(1A) of SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015: Continuation of directorship beyond 75 years of age and approval for re-appointment sought via Ordinary resolution instead of Special resolution as required under law. Governance Concern: Skewed Remuneration practice observed among EDs of the Company in favour of promoter EDs, which is unfavourable to a non-promoter ED. Further, the director is the Board Chairperson and related to the Managing Director of the Company, such relationship may blur the demarcation between the board and management. The proposed director is also a NRC member, hence should be held accountable for failure to ensure fair remuneration practices among the EDs.
    4 for3 against
  • Re-appointment of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as a Director, who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    7 for0 against
  • Ratification of Cost Auditor's Remuneration
    7 for0 against
  • Re-appointment of Mr. Sugavanam Padmanabhan (DIN: 03229120) as Whole-Time Director of the Company
    7 for0 against
  • Approval for material related party transactions of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of information as required to be disclosed in the Notice, as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance and Transparency concern: The Company has not adequately disclosed the basis of arriving at ‘arms’ length’ pricing for certain transactions; hence pricing fairness of the proposed transactions cannot be ascertained. Further, there is significant shift between quantum of previous year’s Related Party Transactions and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification has been provided for the same. There’s no clarity on how the proposed Related Party Transaction limits will be utilized by SLPL and whether SLPL’s other shareholders proportionately contribute in financial assistance.
    • DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual FundThe company seeks approval to enter into material related party transactions with Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL), a subsidiary and with Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHI), a step-down subsidiary. Swan Corp Limited (SCL) holds 63.0% stake in SLPL and holds 99.0% stake in Hazel Infra Limited (HIL), which holds 89.9% stake in SDHI.The transactions with SLPL include loans and advances or inter-corporate deposits to be given and repayment up to Rs. 31.0 bn and; borrowings by SCL and repayment thereof up to Rs. 31.0 bn for FY27. The transactions with SDHI include guarantee, surety, indemnity or comfort letter to be given up to Rs. 40.0 bn; loans and advances or inter-corporate deposits to be given up to Rs. 5.0 bn and; sale, purchase or supply of goods and services or any other similar business transaction up to Rs. 1.0 bn for FY27.As per the company, the transactions are intended to meet working capital requirements, which is expected to benefit the group on a consolidated basis. However, the company has not disclosed the terms of the financial assistance, including the interest rate, maturity, repayment terms, whether the loans will be secured or unsecured, and applicable security or covenants. Also, it is unclear if the financial assistance will be in proportion to the company’s economic interest, for entities which are not wholly owned subsidiaries of SCL. Further, the company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Non-disclosure of information as required to be disclosed in the Notice, as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance and Transparency concern: The Company has not adequately disclosed the basis of arriving at ‘arms’ length’ pricing for certain transactions; hence pricing fairness of the proposed transactions cannot be ascertained. Further, there is significant shift between quantum of previous year’s RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification has been provided for the same. There’s no clarity on how the proposed RPT limits will be utilized by SLPL and whether SLPL’s other shareholders proportionately contribute in financial assistance.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundDue to a) inadequate disclosures regarding terms of the financial assistance, and b) because it is unclear if the financial assistance will be in proportion to the company’s economic interest, for entities which are not wholly owned subsidiaries of SCL, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • SBI Mutual FundThe company seeks approval to enter into material related party transactions with Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL), a subsidiary and with Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHI), a step-down subsidiary. Swan Corp Limited (SCL) holds 63.0% stake in SLPL and holds 99.0% stake in Hazel Infra Limited (HIL), which holds 89.9% stake in SDHI. The transactions with SLPL include loans and advances or inter-corporate deposits to be given and repayment up to Rs. 31.0 bn and; borrowings by SCL and repayment thereof up to Rs. 31.0 bn for FY27. The transactions with SDHI include guarantee, surety, indemnity or comfort letter to be given up to Rs. 40.0 bn; loans and advances or inter-corporate deposits to be given up to Rs. 5.0 bn and; sale, purchase or supply of goods and services or any other similar business transaction up to Rs. 1.0 bn for FY27. As per the company, the transactions are intended to meet working capital requirements, which is expected to benefit the group on a consolidated basis. However, the company has not disclosed the terms of the financial assistance, including the interest rate, maturity, repayment terms, whether the loans will be secured or unsecured, and applicable security or covenants. Also, it is unclear if the financial assistance will be in proportion to the company’s economic interest, for entities which are not wholly owned subsidiaries of SCL. Further, the company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution.
    0 for7 against
  • Approval for material related party transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of information as required to be disclosed in the Notice, as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance and Transparency concern: The Company not adequately disclosed the basis of arriving at ‘arms’ length’ pricing for certain transactions; hence pricing fairness of the proposed transactions cannot be ascertained. Further, there is significant shift between quantum of previous year’s Related Party Transactions and the proposed limit, however, without specific for the same. There’s no clarity on whether SLPL’s other shareholders will proportionately contribute in financial assistance.
    • DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual FundThe company seeks approval for related party transactions between subsidiaries aggregating to Rs. 36.0 bn for FY27. The proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and investments between subsidiaries. As per the company, the transactions are intended to meet working capital requirements, which is expected to benefit the group on a consolidated basis. However, the company has not disclosed the terms of the financial assistance, including the interest rate, maturity, repayment terms, whether the loans will be secured or unsecured, and applicable security or covenants. Also, it is unclear if the financial assistance will be in proportion to the company’s economic interest, for entities which are not wholly owned subsidiaries of SCL. Further, the company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Non-disclosure of information as required to be disclosed in the Notice, as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance and Transparency concern: The Company not adequately disclosed the basis of arriving at ‘arms’ length’ pricing for certain transactions; hence pricing fairness of the proposed transactions cannot be ascertained. Further, there is significant shift between quantum of previous year’s RPTs and the proposed limit, however, without specific for the same. There’s no clarity on whether SLPL’s other shareholders will proportionately contribute in financial assistance.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundDue to a) inadequate disclosures regarding terms of the financial assistance, and b) because it is unclear if the financial assistance will be in proportion to the company’s economic interest, for entities which are not wholly owned subsidiaries of SCL, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    0 for7 against
  • Approval for payment of remuneration to Mr. Bhavik Merchant, Mr. Vivek Merchant and Ms. Vinita Naman Patel for holding office or place of profit in the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, DSP Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundThe Company is not seeking prior shareholders’ approval, as required under law. Governance and Transparency Concern: Since the basis of arriving at remuneration not disclosed, fairness of proposed remuneration cannot be ascertained; further, there is no clarity on whether prior shareholders’ approval was sought for transactions entered during the previous FYs.
    • DSP Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual FundBhavik Merchant, 33, serves as a Director of Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHI) and is the son of Nikhil Merchant, Promoter and Managing Director. Vivek Merchant, 33, serves as a Director of SDHI and is the son of Paresh Merchant, Whole-time Director. Ms. Vinita Naman Patel serves as a Director of Swan LNG Private Limited and is the daughter of Nikhil Merchant. The company seeks approval to pay each of them remuneration of up to Rs. 6.0 mn for FY27. The company has not disclosed the detailed remuneration structure or explained how the proposed remuneration has been internally benchmarked. Further, the company should provide a detailed profile of Vinita Naman Patel, including her age, qualifications, experience, and current responsibilities, for shareholders to make an informed decision. We note that the proposed remuneration is higher than the Rs. 3.5 mn paid to Sugavanam Padmanabhan, Whole-time Director, who has over five decades of experience. In addition, the company should have presented separate resolutions for each transaction to allow shareholders to evaluate and vote on them individually. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Section 188 and applicable Rules under Companies Act, 2013: The Company is not seeking prior shareholders’ approval, as required under law. Governance and Transparency Concern: Since the basis of arriving at remuneration not disclosed, fairness of proposed remuneration cannot be ascertained; further, there is no clarity on whether prior shareholders’ approval was sought for transactions entered during the previous FYs.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundDue to inadequate disclosures, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    0 for7 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 19 May 2026, 18 fund houses

  • Appointment of Ms. Bhagwati Sharma (DIN: 09632127) as Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    18 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Ashish Chhabria (DIN:11564611) as Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual FundAshish Chhabria, 61, is a businessman with over three decades of industry experience and holds a bachelor’s degree. There are inadequate disclosure on his profile and work experience. The company should have disclosed granular details of his previous work experience, in the absence of which we are unable to determine his suitability to be an Independent Director on the board of the company. We do not support the resolution.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundAshish Chhabria, 61, is a businessman with over three decades of industry experience and holds a bachelor s degree. There are inadequate disclosure on his profile and work experience. The company should have disclosed granular details of his previous work experience, in the absence of which we are unable to determine his suitability to be an Independent Director on the board of the company. Hence, we do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    12 for6 against
6 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 2 Mar 2026, 17 fund houses

  • Related Party Transaction with Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHI)
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Inadequate disclosures with respect to the Basis for Arm’s Length pricing.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: As per the RPT Industry Standards prescribed pursuant to the regulatory framework of Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), in cases where material Related Party Transactions (RPTs) or material modifications thereto are proposed for shareholders’ approval, the Company is required to provide specific disclosures in the explanatory statement annexed to the Notice of the general meeting. However, the Company has failed to disclose whether the Audit Committee has reviewed the certificates provided by the CEO / Managing Director / Whole-Time Director / Manager and the Chief Financial Officer as mandated under the RPT Industry Standards. Governance concern: The Company has not provided the disclosures with respect to the basis of arm’s length pricing. This information enables shareholders to assess the fairness of the proposed transaction.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe company seeks shareholders approval to enter into material related party transactions with Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHI) (formerly Reliance Naval and Engineering Limited), a listed entity and a step-down subsidiary of the company. SDHI was acquired pursuant to an NCLT-approved resolution plan under the (IBC) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with the acquisition implemented through Hazel Infra Limited (HIL). HIL, the immediate parent and promoter of SDHI, holds 94.91% of SDHI s equity share capital, while Swan Corp Limited (SCL) and Hazel Mercantile Limited hold 99% and 1% stake respectively, in HIL. The proposed transactions include sale/purchase/supply of goods or services, trade advances, loans and advances (including inter-corporate deposits), investments, guarantees (including performance guarantees and other non-fund-based support), and borrowings. The approval is sought for a period of one year (27 January 2026 to 26 January 2027) with an aggregate transaction value of up to Rs. 35.0 bn. The approval sought is enabling in nature and covers a broad range of transactions without upfront disclosure of transaction-wise caps or commercial terms. Given that the proposal includes financial assistance, the company should provide greater disclosure on the detailed terms of the financial support proposed to be extended. The Company has not disclosed whether Audit Committee has reviewed the certificates provided by the CEO/ Managing Director/ Whole Time Director/ Manager and CFO under the RPT Industry standards, hence, the proposed resolution is non-compliant w.r.t. provisions of law. Hence, basis the above reasons we do not support the resolution.
    9 for8 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Sep 2025, 17 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To consider and adopt the Audited Standalone & Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025, together with the Independent Auditors Report and the Directors Report thereon.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundThe Company has not disclosed financials of all its subsidiaries on its website.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundUnqualified Financial Statements (except few non-material remarks on CARO). Non-Compliant with Companies Act, 2013 & Regulation 46(2)(s) of SEBI LODR: The Company has not disclosed financials of all its subsidiaries for FY 2024-25 on its website.
    11 for6 against
  • To declare Final Dividend for the FY 2024-25 @ 10%, i.e., Re. 0.10 for every share of face value of Re. 1/‐ each
    17 for0 against
  • To consider and approve the re-appointment of Mr. Paresh Merchant (DIN: 00660027) as a Director of the Company, who retires by rotation and being eligible offers himself for re-appointment.
    17 for0 against
  • Ratification of the Remuneration of Rs. 75,000/-to be paid to the Cost Auditor of the company for FY 2025-26.
    17 for0 against
  • Appointment of M/s. SKJP & Associates, PCS as the Secretarial Auditor of the Company for the 1st term of 5 consecutive financial years, from FY 2025-26 to FY 2029-30
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundProposed audit fee payable to Secretarial Auditors not disclosed. Transparency concern: The Company neither disclosed the Audit Fee paid to Outgoing Secretarial Auditor nor any material change in the proposed audit fee.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundNo issues on merits of the proposed Secretarial Auditors. Non-Compliant with Regulation 36(5) of SEBI LODR: Proposed audit fee payable to Secretarial Auditors not disclosed. Transparency concern: The Company neither disclosed the Audit Fee paid to Outgoing Secretarial Auditor nor any material change in the proposed audit fee.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundCompany has not disclosed the proposed audit fees for the Appointment of M/s. SKJP and Associates, Company Secretaries (Peer reviewed certificate no. 6740/2025) as the Secretarial Auditor of the Company for the 1st term of five (5) consecutive financial years, commencing from Financial Year 2025-26 to Financial Year 2029-30. In the absence of audit fees, we cannot favour the resolution.
    10 for7 against
4 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 6. Approval for material related party transactions with Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL) value of the transactions Rs. 1,000, Hazel Infra Limited (HIL) value of the transactions Rs. 2,000, Veritas (India) Limited (VIL) value of the transactions Rs. 1,000 and 1,000, Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) value of the transactions Rs. 600 and Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) value of the transactions Rs. 2,000 for Sale / Purchase of Goods and Services Providing of Loan and/ or Inter Corporate Deposit and/or Advance and/ or Investment.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • 6) Approve related party transactions between Swan Corp Limited (SCL) and Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL), Hazel Infra Limited (HIL), Veritas (India) Limited (VIL) and Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) and also between Hazel Infra Limited (HIL) and Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) for FY26.MoreLess
    Against SBI Mutual Fund
    • SBI Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SCL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, the company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval for material related party transactions with Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL) value of the transactions Rs. 1,000, Hazel Infra Limited (HIL) value of the transactions Rs. 2,000, Veritas (India) Limited (VIL) value of the transactions Rs. 1,000 and 1,000, Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) value of the transactions Rs. 600 and Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) value of the transactions Rs. 2,000 for Sale / Purchase of Goods and Services Providing of Loan and/ or Inter Corporate Deposit and/or Advance and/ or Investment.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency concern: Inadequate disclosure regarding the justification for entering into the Related Party Transactions with the proposed counter parties. Inadequate disclosure regarding the arm's-length pricing.
    • Axis Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SCL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, the company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual FundCompliant with Law. Governance and Transparency concern: Inadequate disclosure regarding the justification for entering into the RPTs with the proposed counter parties. Inadequate disclosure regarding the arm's-length pricing.
    • HDFC Mutual FundThe company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. We do not support the resolution.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe company has not disclosed whether the support extended, or the investment made will be in the proportion of SCL’s shareholding. It has also not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Furthermore, the transactions with each entity should have been brought separately by the company for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically. Thus, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SCL s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. In the absence of Inadequate disclosure regarding the arm's-length pricing, we have no clarity about this transaction Therefore, we do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundCompliant with Law. Transparency concern: Contribution by other shareholders not disclosed.
    • Nippon India Mutual FundTransparency concern: Contribution by other shareholders not disclosed.
    0 for14 against
  • Approve related party transactions between Swan Corp Limited (SCL) and Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL), Hazel Infra Limited (HIL), Veritas (India) Limited (VIL) and Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) and also between Hazel Infra Limited (HIL) and Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Limited (SDHIL) for FY26MoreLess
    Against Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund
    • Jio BlackRock Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SCL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, the company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    0 for1 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 16 Jul 2025, 16 fund houses

  • 1) Approve change of name to Swan Corp Limited and consequent amendment to Memorandum and Articles of Association
    1 for0 against
  • 1. Change in the name of the Company from Swan Energy Limited to Swan Corp Limited.
    1 for0 against
  • Change in the name of the Company from Swan Energy Limited to Swan Corp Limited.
    14 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 17 Mar 2025, 15 fund houses

  • 1) Appoint Jayaramakrishnan Kannan (DIN: 06551104) as Independent Director for five years from 17 December 2024 and approve his continuation on the board post attainment of 75 years of age.
    1 for0 against
  • 1. Appointment of Mr. Jayaramakrishnan Kannan (DIN:06551104) as an Independent Director of the Company, not liable to retire by rotation, for a term of 5 (five) years from December 17, 2024 to December 16, 2029.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Jayaramakrishnan Kannan (DIN:06551104) as an Independent Director of the Company, not liable to retire by rotation, for a term of 5 (five) years from December 17, 2024 to December 16, 2029.MoreLess
    Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNo concern on the merit of proposed appointee. Non-Compliant with Companies Act, 2013: Terms and Conditions of appointment of proposed appointee not disclosed on the website of the Company.
    • Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundJayaramakrishnan Kannan, 70, is the Managing Director of MITRAA, a management, tax and financial advisory services provider, as per public sources. He has more than four decades of experience in the IT industry. No concern has been identified with regard to profile, time commitment and independence of Mr. Jayaramakrishnan Kannan. However, since the company has not disclosed the Terms and Conditions of ID on the website which is non-compliant as per Regulation 46(2)(b) of SEBI LODR, 2015 and Schedule IV of the Companies Act, 2013. We are voting against the resolution.
    • Nippon India Mutual FundProfile of the Candidate
    7 for5 against
  • To approve, the appointment of Mr. Jayaramakrishnan Kannan (DIN:06551104) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    Against Edelweiss Mutual Fund
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundTerms and Conditions of ID not disclosed on the website;
    0 for1 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 26 Sep 2024, 15 fund houses

  • Item 1, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 2, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 3, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 4, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 5, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 6, as a fund house numbered it
    Against Taurus Mutual Fund
    • Taurus Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SEL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, The company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    0 for1 against
  • Item 7, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 8, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 9, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 10, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 11, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • 1) A) Adoption of Audited Standalone Financial Statements for the year ended March 31, 2024 and the reports of the Directors and Auditors thereon. B) Adoption of Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended March 31, 2024 and Auditors report thereon.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • 10) Appoint Ashish Bairagra (DIN: 00049591) as Independent Director for five years from 14 August 2024.
    1 for0 against
  • 11) Appoint Prabhakar Reddy Patil (DIN: 00377406) as Independent Director for five years from 14 August 2024.
    1 for0 against
  • 2) Declare final dividend of Rs. 0.10 per equity share (face value Re. 1.0) for FY24.
    1 for0 against
  • 3) Reappoint Nikhil Merchant (DIN: 00614790), as Director, liable to retire by rotation.
    1 for0 against
  • 4) Ratify remuneration of Rs. 75,000 for Nisha Patel & Associates as cost auditors for FY25.
    1 for0 against
  • 5) Approve related party transactions between Swan Energy Limited (SEL) and Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL), Triumph Offshore Private Limited (TOPL) , Hazel Infra Limited (HIL), Veritas (India) Limited (VIL) and Reliance Naval and Engineering Limited (RNEL) and also between Hazel Infra Limited (HIL) and Reliance Naval and Engineering Limited (RNEL) for FY25.MoreLess
    Against SBI Mutual Fund
    • SBI Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SEL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, The company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    0 for1 against
  • 6) Reappoint Nikhil Merchant (DIN: 00614790) as Managing Director for a period of 3 years from 01 September 2024 and fix his remuneration as minimum remuneration.
    1 for0 against
  • 7) Reappoint Paresh V. Merchant (DIN: 00660027) as Whole-Time Director for a period of 3 years from 01 September 2024 and fix his remuneration as minimum remuneration.
    1 for0 against
  • 8) Appoint Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as Director from 14 August 2024, liable to retire by rotation.
    1 for0 against
  • 9) Appoint Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as Whole Time Director and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for three years from 14 August 2024 and fix his remuneration as minimum remuneration.
    1 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Ashish Bairagra (DIN: 00049591) as an Independent Director of the Company, not liable to retire by rotation, for a term of 5 (five) years from 14th August 2024 to 13th August 2029.
    12 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as a Director and the period of his office shall be liable to determination by retirement of directors by rotation.
    12 for0 against
  • Appointment of Mr. Prabhakar Reddy Patil (DIN: 00377406) as an Independent Director of the Company, not liable to retire by rotation, for a term of 5 (five) years from 14th August 2024 to 13th August 2029.MoreLess
    12 for0 against
  • Approval for material related party transactions with Swan LNG Private Limited (SLPL) value of the transactions Rs. 2000 Crore, Triumph Offshore Private Limited (TOPL) value of the transactions Rs. 2000 Crore, Hazel Infra Limited (HIL) value of the transactions Rs. 2000 Crore, Veritas (India) Limited (VIL) value of the transactions Rs. 1000 Crore, Reliance Naval and Engineering Limited (RNEL) value of the transactions Rs. 600 Crore and transactions of Hazel Infra Limited, Subsidiary of listed entity with Reliance Naval and Engineering Limited (RNEL) value of the transactions Rs. 2000 Crore for Sale / Purchase of Goods and Services and Providing of Loan and/or Inter-Corporate Deposit and/ or Advance and/ or Investment.MoreLess
    Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Axis Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SEL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, The company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance & Transparency Concern: Inadequate disclosures w.r.t. Basis for Arm’s Length pricing; generalized justification for entering into the proposed RPTs.
    • Bank of India Mutual FundThe proposed transactions pertain to extension of financial support and / or investments, however, no disclosures have been made on whether support extended, or investment made will be in the proportion of SEL’s shareholding. The company has not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Therefore, we do not support the resolution. Furthermore, The company should have brought the transactions with each entity separately for approval, to enableshareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically.
    • ICICI Prudential Mutual FundThe company has not disclosed whether the support extended, or the investment made will be in the proportion of SEL’s shareholding. It has also not disclosed the terms related to the inter-corporate deposits as required under the SEBI circular for shareholder approval of related party transactions. Furthermore, the transactions with each entity should have been brought separately by the company for approval, to enable shareholders to cast their votes for each transaction specifically. Due to lack of adequate disclosures, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
    • LIC Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance & Transparency Concern: Inadequate disclosures w.r.t. Basis for Arm s Length pricing; generalized justification for entering into the proposed RPTs.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    4 for8 against
  • Designation of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037), as Whole Time Director and Chief Financial Officer for a term of three years effective from 14th August 2024 and including remuneration.
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundAppointment compliant with law. Transparency Concern: Date of appointment is uncertain.
    9 for3 against
  • Ratification of remuneration of Rs. 75,000/- plus applicable taxes and reimbursement of out- of- pocket expenses, payable to M/s Nisha Patel and Associates, Cost Accountants (Firm Registration No. 102667), appointed as Cost Auditors of the Company for the Financial Year 2024 - 2025.MoreLess
    12 for0 against
  • Re-appointment of Mr. Nikhil V. Merchant (DIN: 00614790) as the Managing Director of the Company, for a further period of three years with effect from 1st September 2024 and including remuneration.
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundRe-appointment compliant with law. Governance Concern – Director holds 2 full-time position in un-related businesses; Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    • LIC Mutual FundRe-appointment compliant with law. Governance Concern Director holds 2 full-time position in un-related businesses; Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    9 for3 against
  • Re-appointment of Mr. Paresh V. Merchant (DIN: 00660027) as the Whole Time Director of the Company, for a further period of three years with effect from 1st September 2024 and including remuneration.
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundRe-appointment compliant with law. Governance Concern: Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    9 for3 against
  • To appoint Mr. Nikhil Merchant (DIN: 00614790), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundRe-appointment compliant with law. Governance Concern – Director holds 2 full-time position in un-related businesses; Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    • LIC Mutual FundRe-appointment compliant with law. Governance Concern Director holds 2 full-time position in un-related businesses; Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    9 for3 against
  • To approve,Appointment of Mr. Ashish Bairagra (DIN: 00049591) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    1 for0 against
  • To approve, Appointment of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN:03224037) as a Director of the Company.
    1 for0 against
  • To approve,Appointment of Mr. Prabhakar Reddy Patil (DIN: 00377406) as an Independent Director of the Company.
    1 for0 against
  • To approve,Designation of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as Whole Time Director (Key Managerial Personnel) and Chief Financial Officer of the company.
    Against Edelweiss Mutual Fund
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundDate of appointment is uncertain.
    0 for1 against
  • To approve, material-related party transactions.
    1 for0 against
  • To approve, Mr. Nikhil Merchant (DIN: 00614790), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment, be and is hereby re-appointed as a Director of the Company.
    Against Edelweiss Mutual Fund
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundDirector holds 2 full-time position in un-related businesses; Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    0 for1 against
  • To approve, Ratification of Cost Auditor’s Remuneration.
    1 for0 against
  • To approve, Re-appointment of Mr. Nikhil V. Merchant (DIN: 00614790) as Managing Director of the Company and to fix his remuneration.
    Against Edelweiss Mutual Fund
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundDirector holds 2 full-time position in un-related businesses; Skewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    0 for1 against
  • To approve, Re-appointment of Mr. Paresh V. Merchant (DIN: 00660027) as Whole Time Director & Key Managerial Personnel of the Company and to fix his remuneration.
    Against Edelweiss Mutual Fund
    • Edelweiss Mutual FundSkewed Remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay or total remuneration per Director.
    0 for1 against
  • To consider, approve and adopt: a) the Standalone Audited Financial statements (Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, Statement of changes in equity, Cash Flow Statement) for the year ended 31st March 2024, together with Reports of the Board of Directors and the Auditors thereon. b) the Consolidated Audited Financial statements (Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, Statement of changes in equity, Cash Flow Statement) for the year ended 31st March 2024, together with Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    12 for0 against
  • To declare a dividend for the Financial Year 2023 - 2024 @ 10%, i.e., Re. 0.10 for every equity share of face value of Rs. 1/- each on 31,34,56,886 equity share of Rs. 1/- each, amounting to Rs. 3,13,45,689/- as recommended by the Board of Directors be declared and that the said Dividend be distributed out of the Profits for the year ended on 31st March 2024.MoreLess
    12 for0 against
  • To declared and that the said Dividend be distributed out of the Profits for the year ended on 31st March 2024.
    1 for0 against
  • To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone and Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024 including Audited Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 and the Statement of Profit and Loss, Cash Flow Statement and Statement of Changes in Equity for the financial year ended on that date and the reports of the Board of Directors (“the Board”) and Statutory Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 25 Sep 2024, 1 fund house

  • 1. Adoption of IND AS compliant Financial Statements (Standalone & Consolidated). 2. To consider and if thought fit, to pass, with or without modifications(s), the following resolution as an Ordinary Resolution: “RESOLVED THAT in terms of Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013,dividend for the Financial Year 2023-2024 @ 10%, i.e., Re. 0.10 for every equity share of face value of Re. 1/- each on 31,34,56,886 equity share of Re. 1/- each, amounting to Rs. 3,13,45,689/- (Rupees Three Crore Thirteen Lakh Forty-Five Thousand Six Hundred Eighty-Nine only) as recommended by the Board of Directors be declared and that the said Dividend be distributed out of the Profits for the year ended on 31st March 2024." 3. Re-appointment of Director retiring by rotation To consider and if thought fit, to pass, with or without modifications(s), the following resolution as an Ordinary Resolution: “RESOLVED THAT Mr. Nikhil Merchant (DIN: 00614790), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment, be and is hereby re-appointed as a Director of the Company in terms of Section 152 of the Companies Act, 2013.” 4. Ratification of Cost Auditor’s Remuneration 5. Approval for material related party transactions 6. Re-appointment of Mr. Nikhil V. Merchant (DIN: 00614790) as Managing Director of the Company and to fix his remuneration 7. Re-appointment of Mr. Paresh V. Merchant (DIN: 00660027) as Whole Time Director & Key Managerial Personnel of the Company and to fix his remuneration 8. Appointment of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN:03224037) as a Director of the Company 9. Designation of Mr. Chetan Selarka (DIN: 03224037) as Whole Time Director (Key Managerial Personnel) and Chief Financial Officer of the company 10. Appointment of Mr. Ashish Bairagra (DIN: 00049591) as an Independent Director of the Company 11. Appointment of Mr. Prabhakar Reddy Patil (DIN: 00377406) as an Independent Director of the CompanyMoreLess
    1 for0 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Tax disputes

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Tax disputeCIT V/s Swan Energy Ltd (IT Appeal No. 235/2011)Since 5 Jan 2011
    Admitted by the High Court
  • Tax disputeCIT V/s Swan Energy Ltd (IT Appeal No. 4266/2009)Since 9 Feb 2009
    Admitted by the High Court
  • Tax disputeCIT V/s. Swan Energy Ltd (IT Appeal No. 593/ 2010)Since 15 Mar 2010
    Admitted by the High Court

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
Yes
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
No
The filing has a part on tax disputes
Yes
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.