Sonu Infratech logo

Sonu Infratech MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: SONUINFRAConstruction

Last close ₹41.50up ₹0.45 (1.10%)

Share price at the NSE close on 21 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹41.05.

52-week range of traded prices to 21 Oct 2026
₹33.30Low, 28 Aug 2026₹106.90High, 29 Oct 2025
Market cap
₹53 Cr
P/E
No recent results
P/B
No recent results
Dividend yield
Nonein the last 12 months
Volume, NSE
1,500100.0% delivered

Sonu Infratech board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

    An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

    Statutory auditor

    Named in the results for the quarter to Mar 2026.

    • Raichura & Co.Peer-review certificate valid to Jun 2027

    A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

    Sonu Infratech AGM and shareholder votes

    Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Sonu Infratech share news and announcements

    Annual general meeting, 25 Sep 2026

    544 shareholders on the register on 18 Sep 2026; present: 6 promoters and 6 others; votes counted by Anjali Sangtani / SCS and CO LLP.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

    1. To Receive, Consider and Adopt: a) The Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the reports of the board of directors and Auditors thereon; AND b) The Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026 and The Report of Auditors thereon and in this regard.MoreLess
      Ordinary
      100.00% for0.00% against

      Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

      Turnout: all 54.85% · promoters 98.23% · institutions 0.00% · other public 6.68%

    2. TO APPOINT A DIRECTOR IN PLACE OF MR. ARPITKUMAR PANDEY (DIN: 08043237) WHO RETIRES BY ROTATION AND BEING ELIGIBLE, OFFERS HIMSELF FOR RE-APPOINTMENT
      Ordinary
      99.95% for0.05% against

      Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.83%

      Turnout: all 54.85% · promoters 98.23% · institutions 0.00% · other public 6.68%

    3. TO RE-APPOINT M/S RAICHURA & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, (FRN: 126105W), AS STATUTORY AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR SECOND TERM OF FIVE YEARS
      Ordinary
      99.95% for0.05% against

      Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.83%

      Turnout: all 54.85% · promoters 98.23% · institutions 0.00% · other public 6.68%

    4. TO APPROVE THE RE-APPOINTMENT OF MR. RAMJI SHRINARAYAN PANDEY (DIN: 02815473) AS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY
      Special
      99.95% for0.05% against

      Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.83%

      Turnout: all 54.85% · promoters 98.23% · institutions 0.00% · other public 6.68%

    5. TO APPROVE THE RE-APPOINTMENT OF MRS. SEEMA PANDEY (DIN: 02815113) AS WHOLE TIME DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY
      Special
      100.00% for0.00% against

      Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

      Turnout: all 54.85% · promoters 98.23% · institutions 0.00% · other public 6.68%

    6. TO APPROVE THE RE-APPOINTMENT OF MR. KETAN VALLABHDAS MODI (DIN: 07810879) AS WHOLE TIME DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY
      Special
      99.95% for0.05% against

      Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.83%

      Turnout: all 54.85% · promoters 98.23% · institutions 0.00% · other public 6.68%

    For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

    Tax disputes

    Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

    • Tax disputeThe State tax officer (Ghatak 98) Range- 24 (Jamnagar) Division 11 of Goods and services Tax DepartmentSince 9 Jan 2024
      The filed appeal against GST Order as per previous disclosure and the appeal is pending before the appellate Authority.
      At the filing before: The appeal is pending before the appellate Authority for Incorrect admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid of Rupees 2,74,432
    • Tax disputeThe State tax officer (Ghatak 98) Range- 24 (Jamnagar) Division 11 of Goods and services Tax DepartmentSince 22 Dec 2023
      The filed appeal against GST Order as per previous disclosure and the appeal is pending before the appellate Authority.
      At the filing before: The appeal is pending before the appellate Authority for Incorrect admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid of Rupees 24,37,758
    • Tax disputeSuperintendent, CGST Range-I, Central GST & C. Ex. Division-I, JamnagarSince 9 Apr 2025
      The filed appeal against GST Order as per previous disclosure and the appeal is pending before the appellate Authority.
      At the filing before: The inadmissible ITC was availed on the strength of fake invoices of Taxable Value of Rs. 4,68,750/- issued by M/s Chaniyara E-Commerce Limited (GSTIN:24AAHCC2366B1Z4) without receipt of corresponding goods during the period May-2019. Taxpayer has not violated or contravened section 16 of the CGST Act 2017. Taxpayer has claimed ITC in compliance with the section 16. We have submitted documentary evidence in support of our claim of ITC.MoreLess
    • Tax disputeOffice of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax Jurisdiction : AMRAVATI_604, AMRAVATI, Nagpur, Maharashtra, State/UT : MaharashtraSince 11 Sep 2025
      The filed appeal against GST Order as per previous disclosure and the appeal is pending before the appellate Authority.
      At the filing before: The appeal is pending before the appellate Authority for Incorrect Determation of the liability to Pay tax on Goods or Service both paid or deemed to have been paid of Rupees 14,08,152
    • Tax disputeOffice of the Pr. Commissioner, Central GST Audit; RajkotSince 30 Dec 2025
      The Company has submitted its response to the Show Cause Notice to the office of the CGST. Pending before the adjudicating Authority
      At the filing before: Pursuant to a GST audit conducted for the period April 2020 to March 2024, the Company received a Show Cause Notice for Disputed amounting to ₹1,49,87,132, arising from certain vendor invoices wherein the suppliers’ GST registrations were subsequently cancelled by the authorities.MoreLess
    • Tax disputeSUPERINTENDENT CGST, RANGE-I, DIVISION-I JAMNAGARSince 23 Apr 2026
      The Company has submitted its response to the Show Cause Notice to the office of the CGST. Pending before the adjudicating Authority
      At the filing before: The inadmissible ITC was availed on the transactions made after the date of cancellation supplier’s GST registration (Suo-moto cancellation). Taxpayer has claimed ITC in compliance with the section 16. We have submitted documentary evidence in support of our claim of ITC. Dispute amounting to Rs 14,10,242/-MoreLess
    • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner CGST, RANGE-I, DIVISION-I JAMNAGARSince 18 May 2026
      The Company has submitted its response to the Show Cause Notice to the office of the CGST. Pending before the Adjucating Authority
      At the filing before: The inadmissible ITC was availed on the transactions made after the date of cancellation supplier’s GST registration (Suo-moto cancellation). Taxpayer has claimed ITC in compliance with the section 16. We have submitted documentary evidence in support of our claim of ITC. Dispute amounting to Rs 3,17,63,632/-MoreLess
    • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner CGST, RANGE-I, DIVISION-I JAMNAGARSince 20 Apr 2026
      The Company has submitted its response to the Show Cause Notice to the office of the CGST. Pending before the Adjucating Authority
      At the filing before: The inadmissible ITC was availed on the transactions made after the date of cancellation supplier’s GST registration (Suo-moto cancellation). Taxpayer has claimed ITC in compliance with the section 16. We have submitted documentary evidence in support of our claim of ITC. Dispute amounting to Rs 3,95,15,932/-MoreLess
    3 more
    • Tax disputeDeputy Commissioner CGST, RANGE-I, DIVISION-I JAMNAGARSince 20 Apr 2026
      The Company has submitted its response to the Show Cause Notice to the office of the CGST. Pending before the Adjucating Authority
      At the filing before: The inadmissible ITC was availed on the transactions made after the date of cancellation supplier’s GST registration (Suo-moto cancellation). Taxpayer has claimed ITC in compliance with the section 16. We have submitted documentary evidence in support of our claim of ITC. Disputate amounting to Rs 1,61,51,196/-MoreLess
    • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner, Dimapur Audit Circle, Central Goods & Services TaxSince 12 May 2026
      The Company has submitted its response to the Show Cause Notice to the office of the CGST. Pending before the Adjucating Authority
      At the filing before: Pursuant to a GST audit conducted for the period April 2020 to March 2024, the Company received a Show Cause Notice issued for Disputed amounting to Rs 55,05,732/-
    • Tax disputeAssistant Commissioner of State Tax Amravati, MaharastraSince 18 Mar 2026
      The filed appeal against GST Order as per previous disclosure and the appeal is pending before the appellate Authority.
      At the filing before: The inadmissible ITC was availed on the transactions made after the date of cancellation supplier’s GST registration (Suo-moto cancellation). Taxpayer has claimed ITC in compliance with the section 16. We have submitted documentary evidence in support of our claim of ITC. Dispute amounting to Rs 3,00,21,836/-MoreLess

    In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

    Investor complaints and compliance

    Quarter by quarter.

    Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

    • Received
    • Resolved

    Open at the quarter's end

    None open at any quarter's end.
    The filing has a part on fines and penalties
    No
    The filing has a part on tax disputes
    Yes

    The company's own answers in its filing.

    How money raised was used

    Reported for the quarter to Dec 2025. The company's results filing for the quarter to Mar 2026 says no statement of how money raised was used applies to it. A preferential issue sells new shares to chosen investors rather than to the public. A warrant or partly paid issue plans the whole issue while the money comes in over time, so the amount set aside can be more than raised so far.

    RaisedAmount raisedForSet asideSpentSpent elsewhere
    Preferential IssuesDec 20257.96Prepayment of borrowings of the Company, to make requisite investments in subsidiaries/ associates/ joint ventures, working capital requirements, to fund the bidding process for work orders from NHAI and other authorities, and other general corporate purposes of the Company7.967.96No
    ₹ crore. Checked by is the agency appointed to monitor how the money is used. The reason and the comments are the company's, its audit committee's and its auditors' own words.