Simplex Castings logo

Simplex Castings CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

BSE: 513472Industrial ProductsSmall Cap

Last close ₹118.85down ₹2.25 (1.86%)

Share price at the BSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹121.10.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹80.08Low, 27 Jan 2026₹146.50High, 23 Sep 2026
Market cap
₹487 Cr2,019th largest listed
P/E
20.8
P/B
4.3
Dividend yield
Nonein the last 12 months
ROE
27.5%
ROCE
22.0%
Debt to equity
0.44
Volume, BSE
1,74,155

Simplex Castings board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Sep 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • Chairperson and chief executiveKETAN MOOLCHAND SHAH
  • Managing directorSANGEETA KETAN SHAH

8 directors4 independent4 executive

  • KETAN MOOLCHAND SHAH · Chairperson and chief executiveExecutive · joined Mar 1993 · reappointed Jul 2025 · 1 listed board
  • SANGEETA KETAN SHAH · Managing directorExecutive · joined Oct 2014 · reappointed Oct 2024 · 1 listed board
  • SAJAL KUMAR GHOSHExecutive · joined Feb 2023 · 1 listed board
  • AVINASH HARIHARNOExecutive · joined May 2026 · 1 listed board
  • INDU NAGARIndependent · joined Oct 2024 · 24 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • PALASH SINGHANIAIndependent · joined May 2026 · 4 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats
  • SMITA THAKURIndependent · joined Jun 2026 · 4 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • URLAM JAYA MANMADHA RAOIndependent · joined Sep 2026 · 1 month as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

2 directors who left
  • CHAMPAK KALYANJI DEDHIA, left 31 Jul 2026: Tenure Completion
  • SHAILESH JAIN, left 5 Jun 2026: Others

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 23 Sep 20267 of 7 present3 independent · 39 days in between
    • 14 Aug 20267 of 7 present3 independent · 77 days in between
    • 28 May 20266 of 6 present3 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair SMITA THAKUR

    INDU NAGAR, PALASH SINGHANIA, URLAM JAYA MANMADHA RAO

    • 23 Sep 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 39 days in between
    • 14 Aug 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 77 days in between
    • 28 May 20263 of 3 present3 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair INDU NAGAR

    PALASH SINGHANIA, SMITA THAKUR, URLAM JAYA MANMADHA RAO

    • 23 Sep 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 39 days in between
    • 14 Aug 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 77 days in between
    • 28 May 20263 of 3 present3 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair INDU NAGAR

    PALASH SINGHANIA, SMITA THAKUR, URLAM JAYA MANMADHA RAO

    No meeting listed in the filing.

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair INDU NAGAR

    SANGEETA KETAN SHAH, KETAN MOOLCHAND SHAH

    • 14 Aug 20263 of 3 present3 independent

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Mar 2026.

  • HARSH JAIN AND ASSOCIATESPeer-review certificate valid to Mar 2029
1 earlier auditor
  • HARSH JAIN & ASSOCIATESNamed in the filing for the quarter to Mar 2025

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Simplex Castings AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Simplex Castings dividend history

Extraordinary general meeting, 15 Oct 2026

8,285 shareholders on the register on 8 Oct 2026; present: 4 promoters and 36 others; votes counted by MEENA NAIDU / MEENA NAIDU & ASSOCIATES.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Increase in Authorised Share Capital of the company and consequent amendment in the Memorandum of Association.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  2. Issue of 44,90,791 (Forty-Four Lakhs Ninety Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-One) equity shares on preferential basis to the persons belonging to the non-promoter category.
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  3. Issue of 50,05,195 warrants, convertible into equity shares on preferential basis to the persons belonging to the promoter and non-promoter category.
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  4. To approve the appointment of Mr. Urlam Jaya Manmadha Rao (DIN-09242890) as an independent director of the company for a term of five consecutive years w.e.f. 23rd September 2026.
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 16 Sep 2026, 6 resolutions

7,321 shareholders on the register on 9 Sep 2026; present: 3 promoters and 38 others; votes counted by MEENA NAIDU / MEENA NAIDU & ASSOCIATES.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the audited financial statements for the financial year ended 31st March 2026
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  2. To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Sajal Kumar Ghosh (DIN: 10045814) who retires by rotation and being eligible offer himself for re-appointment.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  3. Appointment of Statutory Auditor to fill casual vacancy
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  4. Appointment of Statutory Auditor for five year.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  5. Ratification of Remuneration to Cost Auditor
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

  6. Appointment of Mrs Smita Thakur (DIN: 11771223) as an Independent Director of the company
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 2.08%

    Turnout: all 49.95% · promoters 99.07% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.14%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Tax disputes

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Sep 2026.

  • Tax disputeINCOME TAX AUTHORITYSince 6 Apr 2023
    Assessment u/s 147 of IT Act 1961 has been completed for AY 2018-19 in FY 2022-23 with an addition of Rs. 1499.76 Lakhs and a demand of Rs. 1857.36 Lakhs (PY- 1857.36 Lakhs) against which company has preferred an appeal with CIT(A) Mumbai and has also applied for stay of demand till disposal of appealMoreLess
  • Tax disputeEmployee Provident Fund OrganisationSince 31 Mar 2021
    Disputed liability of Employee Provident Fund Organisation has raised demand of Rs. 6.50 Lacs (PY- 6.50 Lakhs ) for the period from Jan'2018 to Jan'2020. Company has filed an appeal at Central Govt Industrial Tribunal cum Labour court against the said demandMoreLess
  • Tax disputeOFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER APPEALS, GST & CENTRAL EXCISE TIKRAPARA, RAIPURSince 18 Oct 2023
    An Appeal dated 18.10.2023 had been filed by the company against order dated 28.07.2023 before Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Central Excise, Raipur (CG) in the matter of CENVAT Credit of Service tax availed and utilised for FY 2015-16 to 2017-18 (up to June 2017). Total amount involved in original order was Service Tax Rs.3,70,899/-, Applicable Interest under Rule 14(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Penalty of Rs. 3,70,899/-. In this matter Company has filed appeal before the CESTAT & the hearing is fixed on 29.07.2025, New Delhi.MoreLess
    At the filing before: An Appeal dated 18.10.2023 had been filed by the company against order dated 28.07.2023 before Commissioner (Appeals) CGST & Central Excise, Raipur (CG) in the matter of CENVAT Credit of Service tax availed and utilised for FY 2015-16 to 2017-18 (up to June 2017). Total amount involved in original order was Service Tax Rs.3,70,899/-, Applicable Interest under Rule 14(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Penalty of Rs. 3,70,899/-. In this matter Company has filed appeal before the CESTAT & the hearing is fixed on 29.07.2025, New DelhiMoreLess
  • Tax disputeCGST & Central Excise, Mumbai WestSince 29 May 2025
    An Appeal filed by the company on 29.05.2025 against GST order dated 03.02.2025 issued by Joint Commisioner (CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai West)- Brief facts – For Tax Period July 2017 to March 2019- For Wrong Availment & utilization of ITC for total ITC of Rs. 13,78,29,799/- (CGST+SGST) and Penalty of Rs. 13,78,29,799/-, Total amount including penalty Rs. 27,56,59,598/-. In this matter the department not disputed the GST amount paid by the company on outward supply. However, department disputed the ITC amount which is further used in the supply of goods. Hence, allegation of the department for wrongly availment and utilization of ITC is prima-facie is legally not correct.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeCGST & Central Excise, Palahar CommissionerateSince 26 Feb 2025
    Appeal filed by the company on 26.02.2025 against GST order - 92/PLG/ADC/PKK/DGGI/CGST/AIPL/2024-25 dated 04.02.2025 issued by Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Palahar Commissionerate – Brief Facts – For Tax period July 2017 to March 2018- Availment , Utilization and Passing of Ineligible ITC – Amount involved Penalty of Rs. 1,58,69,814/- (CGST+SGST) u/s 122 of CGST Act, 2017. In this matter also department not disputed the payment of GST by the company on supply of goods. Hence allegation of department that company wrongly availed and utilized the ITC is legally not correct. Further all the allegation of the department is based on third party investigations.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeCGST & Central Excise, Thane CommissionerateSince 7 Mar 2025
    Appeal filed by the company on 07.03.2025 against GST order – 91/AKS-73/DGGI/TH-CGST/2024-25 dated 04.02.2025 issued by Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Thane Commissionerate – Brief Facts – For Tax period July 2017 to March 2018 – Availment, Utilization and Passing of Ineligible ITC – Amount involved Penalty of Rs. 8,79,60,254/-(CGST+SGST) u/s 122 of CGST Act, 2017. The allegation of the department is based on third party investigation and without disputing the transactions recorded in the books of accounts of the company. Company comply the provisions which are require for availment of ITC and Utilization of ITC. Hence the allegation of the department is prima –facie not correct.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeCGST & Central Excise, Palahar CommissionerateSince 26 Feb 2025
    Appeal filed by the company on 26.02.2025 against GST order – No.91//PLG/ADC/VRR/DGGI/CGST/TWINSTAR/2024-25 dated 04.02.2025 issued by Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Palahar Commissionerate – Brief Facts – For Tax period July 2017 to March 2018– Availment, Utilization and Passing of Ineligible ITC – Amount involved Penalty of Rs. 11,70,610/-(CGST+SGST) u/s 122 of CGST Act, 2017. All the transaction related to availment of ITC duly recorded in the books of account of the company and allegation of department is based on third party investigation. Department not disputed the GST paid by the company of outward supply. Therefore, the allegation of department for wrongly availment and utilization of ITC is legally not correct.MoreLess
  • Tax disputeCGST & Central Excise, Palahar CommissionerateSince 21 Feb 2025
    Appeal filed by the company on 21.02.2025 against GST order dated 15.01.2025 issued by Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Palahar Commissionerate – Brief Facts – For Tax period July 2017 to March 2018– Availment, Utilization and Passing of Ineligible ITC – Amount involved Penalty of Rs. 31,68,59,485/-(CGST+SGST) u/s 122 of CGST Act, 2017. In this matter also the allegation of department is based on third party investigation. The department not disputed the GST paid by the company on outward supply. Hence the allegation of wrongly availment of ITC on inward supply of goods is legally not correct.MoreLess

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
No
The chair is related to the managing director
Yes
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
No
The filing has a part on tax disputes
Yes
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.

How money raised was used

Reported for the quarter to Jun 2026. A preferential issue sells new shares to chosen investors rather than to the public. A warrant or partly paid issue plans the whole issue while the money comes in over time, so the amount set aside can be more than raised so far.

RaisedAmount raisedForSet asideSpentSpent elsewhere
Preferential IssuesMar 202620.75Working Capital requirement to cater to casted Railway Bogies and long term Power Sector Fabrication Work20.7520.75No
Preferential IssuesMar 20260.25Working Capital requirement to cater to casted Railway Bogies and long term Power Sector Fabrication Work0.250.25No
₹ crore. Checked by is the agency appointed to monitor how the money is used. The reason and the comments are the company's, its audit committee's and its auditors' own words.