Reliance Industries logo

Reliance Industries MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: RELIANCEBSE: 500325Petroleum ProductsLarge Cap

Last close ₹1,190.00up ₹5.50 (0.46%)BSE ₹1,190.00

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹1,184.50.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹1,152.20Low, 13 Oct 2026₹1,611.80High, 5 Jan 2026
Market cap
₹16,10,372 Cr1st largest listed
P/E
21.6
P/B
1.8
Dividend yield
0.50%
ROE
8.6%
ROCE
8.5%
Debt to equity
0.34
Volume, NSE
1,49,05,64151.2% delivered

Reliance Industries board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • Chairperson and managing directorMukesh Dhirubhai AmbaniRelated to the promoter
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerSavithri Parekh

14 directors7 independent5 executive2 non-executive

  • Mukesh Dhirubhai Ambani · Chairperson and managing directorExecutive · joined Apr 1977 · reappointed Apr 2024 · 1 listed board
  • Shumeet BanerjiIndependent · joined Jul 2017 · reappointed Jul 2022 · 107 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat, 1 as chair
  • Arundhati BhattacharyaIndependent · joined Oct 2018 · reappointed Oct 2023 · 92 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat
  • His Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al RumayyanIndependent · joined Jul 2021 · reappointed Jul 2024 · 59 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
  • Veerayya Chowdary KosarajuIndependent · joined Jul 2022 · reappointed Jul 2022 · 47 months as independent · 5 listed boards · 5 as independent · 10 committee seats, 5 as chair
  • K V KamathIndependent · joined Jan 2023 · reappointed Jan 2023 · 41 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 1 committee seat, 1 as chair
  • Haigreve KhaitanIndependent · joined Apr 2024 · reappointed Apr 2024 · 27 months as independent · 4 listed boards · 4 as independent · 5 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Dinesh Hasmukhrai KanabarIndependent · joined Jun 2025 · reappointed Jun 2025 · 12 months as independent · 3 listed boards · 3 as independent · 4 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Isha M AmbaniNon-executive · joined Oct 2023 · reappointed Oct 2023 · 2 listed boards
  • Akash M AmbaniNon-executive · joined Oct 2023 · reappointed Oct 2023 · 1 listed board
  • Nikhil Rasiklal MeswaniExecutive · joined Jun 1986 · reappointed Jul 2023 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
  • Hital Rasiklal MeswaniExecutive · joined Aug 1995 · reappointed Aug 2025 · 1 listed board · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Madhusudana Sivaprasad PandaExecutive · joined Aug 2009 · reappointed Aug 2024 · 2 listed boards · 1 committee seat
  • Anant Mukesh AmbaniExecutive · joined Oct 2023 · reappointed May 2025 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat, 1 as chair

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

1 director who left
  • Raminder Singh Gujral, left 11 Jun 2025: Tenure Completion

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 27 May 202611 of 14 present4 independent · 32 days in between
    • 24 Apr 202614 of 14 present7 independent · 97 days in between
    • 16 Jan 202614 of 14 present7 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair K V Kamath

    Veerayya Chowdary Kosaraju, Haigreve Khaitan

    • 18 Jun 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 54 days in between
    • 24 Apr 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 9 days in between
    • 14 Apr 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 17 days in between
    • 27 Mar 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 30 days in between
    4 earlier meetings
    • 24 Feb 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 26 days in between
    • 28 Jan 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 11 days in between
    • 16 Jan 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 6 days in between
    • 9 Jan 20263 of 3 present3 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Shumeet Banerji

    Veerayya Chowdary Kosaraju, Arundhati Bhattacharya

    • 24 Apr 20263 of 3 present3 independent · 35 days in between
    • 19 Mar 20262 of 3 present2 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair Veerayya Chowdary Kosaraju

    Arundhati Bhattacharya, Nikhil Rasiklal Meswani, Hital Rasiklal Meswani

    • 15 Apr 20263 of 4 present2 independent · 96 days in between
    • 8 Jan 20263 of 4 present2 independent
  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair Shumeet Banerji

    Veerayya Chowdary Kosaraju, Hital Rasiklal Meswani, Madhusudana Sivaprasad Panda, Srikanth Venkatachari

    • 2 Apr 20263 of 4 present2 independent · 20 days in between
    • 12 Mar 20263 of 4 present2 independent
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Shumeet Banerji

    Veerayya Chowdary Kosaraju, Nikhil Rasiklal Meswani

    • 22 Apr 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 97 days in between
    • 14 Jan 20263 of 3 present2 independent

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditors

Named in the results for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLPPeer-review certificate valid to Jul 2027
  • Chaturvedi & Shah LLPPeer-review certificate valid to Jun 2029

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Reliance Industries AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Reliance Industries dividend history

Postal ballot, 20 Aug 2026

47,11,877 shareholders on the register on 17 Jul 2026; votes counted by Sunil Khandelwal / Khandelwal & Mehta LLP.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Ordinary
    99.21% for0.79% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.81% · other public 0.36%

    Turnout: all 37.09% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 92.45% · other public 16.39%

  2. Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    Ordinary
    99.21% for0.79% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.81% · other public 0.36%

    Turnout: all 37.09% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 92.45% · other public 16.39%

  3. Alteration of the Objects Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.09%

    Turnout: all 86.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.53% · other public 17.48%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 19 Jun 2026, 8 resolutions

45,67,805 shareholders on the register on 12 Jun 2026; present: 47 promoters and 2,650 others; votes counted by Sunil Khandelwal / Khandelwal & Mehta LLP.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon
    Ordinary
    99.85% for0.15% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.38% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 86.43% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.23% · other public 17.44%

  2. To consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026 and the report of Auditors thereon
    Ordinary
    99.24% for0.76% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.91% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 86.43% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.22% · other public 17.44%

  3. To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2026
    Ordinary
    99.98% for0.02% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.04% · other public 0.01%

    Turnout: all 86.79% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.17% · other public 17.44%

  4. To appoint Shri Akash M. Ambani (DIN: 06984194), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    Ordinary
    93.43% for6.57% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 16.31% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 86.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.08% · other public 17.44%

  5. To appoint Shri Anant M. Ambani (DIN: 07945702), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    Ordinary
    93.87% for6.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 15.24% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 86.64% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.77% · other public 17.44%

  6. To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year ending March 31, 2027
    Ordinary
    99.96% for0.04% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.10% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 86.78% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.17% · other public 17.43%

  7. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Ordinary
    99.35% for0.65% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.69% · other public 0.06%

    Turnout: all 36.99% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 92.09% · other public 16.28%

  8. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    Ordinary
    99.35% for0.65% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.69% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 36.99% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 92.09% · other public 16.28%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 29 Aug 2025, 9 resolutions

44,72,711 shareholders on the register on 22 Aug 2025; present: 46 promoters and 2,460 others; votes counted by Sunil Khandelwal / Khandelwal & Mehta LLP.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2025 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon
    Ordinary
    99.79% for0.22% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.53% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 86.43% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.22% · other public 18.81%

  2. To consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2025 and the report of Auditors thereon
    Ordinary
    99.97% for0.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.08% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 86.51% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.44% · other public 18.81%

  3. To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2025
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 86.84% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.29% · other public 18.81%

  4. To appoint Shri Nikhil R. Meswani (DIN: 00001620), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    Ordinary
    92.68% for7.32% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.98% · other public 0.04%

    Turnout: all 86.83% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.27% · other public 18.81%

  5. To appoint Ms. Isha M. Ambani (DIN: 06984175), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    Ordinary
    92.37% for7.63% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 18.75% · other public 0.04%

    Turnout: all 86.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.19% · other public 18.80%

  6. To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year ending March 31, 2026
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 86.83% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.26% · other public 18.80%

  7. To appoint Secretarial Auditor
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.01% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 86.84% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.29% · other public 18.80%

  8. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Ordinary
    99.38% for0.62% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.65% · other public 0.09%

    Turnout: all 37.58% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 92.29% · other public 17.64%

  9. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    Ordinary
    99.58% for0.42% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.45% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 37.56% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 92.23% · other public 17.64%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 29 Jul 2025, 3 resolutions

44,48,593 shareholders on the register on 27 Jun 2025; votes counted by Sunil Khandelwal / Khandelwal & Mehta LLP.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To approve the appointment of Shri Anant M. Ambani (DIN: 07945702) as a Whole-time Director, designated as an Executive Director
    Ordinary
    94.41% for5.59% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 13.80% · other public 0.12%

    Turnout: all 86.63% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.53% · other public 19.41%

  2. To re-appoint Shri Hital R. Meswani (DIN: 00001623) as a Whole-time Director, designated as an Executive Director
    Ordinary
    94.29% for5.71% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 14.07% · other public 0.09%

    Turnout: all 86.70% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.69% · other public 19.41%

  3. To approve the appointment of Shri Dinesh Kanabar (DIN:00003252) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    91.51% for8.50% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 20.97% · other public 0.10%

    Turnout: all 86.64% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.53% · other public 19.41%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 15 Oct 2024, 2 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Issue of Bonus Shares
    Ordinary
    99.93% for0.07% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.18% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 87.06% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.13% · other public 21.66%

  2. Increase in Authorised Share Capital and consequent alteration to the Capital Clause of the Memorandum of Association
    Ordinary
    98.96% for1.04% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.56% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 87.06% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 92.13% · other public 21.66%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 29 Aug 2024, 7 resolutions

Present: 47 promoters and 2,996 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To consider and adopt the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon
    Ordinary
    99.86% for0.14% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.34% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 86.73% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 90.65% · other public 22.12%

  2. To consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 and the report of Auditors thereon
    Ordinary
    99.91% for0.09% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.21% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 86.73% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 90.65% · other public 22.12%

  3. To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2024
    Ordinary
    99.94% for0.06% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.14% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 87.16% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.76% · other public 22.12%

  4. To appoint Shri Hital R. Meswani (DIN: 00001623), who retires by rotation as a Director
    Ordinary
    93.63% for6.37% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 15.71% · other public 0.04%

    Turnout: all 87.04% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.75% · other public 21.22%

  5. To appoint Shri P.M.S. Prasad (DIN: 00012144), who retires by rotation as a Director
    Ordinary
    90.44% for9.56% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 23.61% · other public 0.04%

    Turnout: all 87.14% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.72% · other public 22.04%

  6. To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors
    Ordinary
    96.83% for3.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 7.82% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 87.13% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.69% · other public 22.12%

  7. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.04%

    Turnout: all 37.91% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.74% · other public 21.05%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 20 Jun 2024, 5 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Appointment of Shri Haigreve Khaitan (DIN: 00005290) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    87.16% for12.85% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 32.01% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 86.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.07% · other public 22.63%

  2. Re-appointment of His Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al Rumayyan (DIN: 09245977) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Special
    83.97% for16.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 39.91% · other public 0.06%

    Turnout: all 86.84% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.16% · other public 22.63%

  3. Re-appointment of Shri P.M.S. Prasad (DIN: 00012144) as a Whole-time Director designated as an Executive Director
    Special
    93.69% for6.31% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 15.68% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 86.90% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 91.37% · other public 22.48%

  4. Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.06%

    Turnout: all 37.67% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.33% · other public 21.73%

  5. Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of subsidiaries of the Company
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.05%

    Turnout: all 37.67% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.33% · other public 21.73%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 26 Oct 2023, 3 resolutions

The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. Appointment of Ms. Isha M. Ambani (DIN: 06984175) as a Non-Executive Director of the Company
    Ordinary
    98.21% for1.79% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.52% · other public 0.07%

    Turnout: all 85.24% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.74% · other public 19.22%

  2. Appointment of Shri Akash M. Ambani (DIN: 06984194) as a Non-Executive Director of the Company
    Ordinary
    98.06% for1.94% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.91% · other public 0.07%

    Turnout: all 85.24% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 88.74% · other public 19.22%

  3. Appointment of Shri Anant M. Ambani (DIN: 07945702) as a Non-Executive Director of the Company
    Ordinary
    92.76% for7.24% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 18.49% · other public 0.11%

    Turnout: all 84.84% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 87.68% · other public 19.22%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.Funds that hold it

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 20 Aug 2026, 19 fund houses so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Old Bridge Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus approval sought for more than 1 year; Inadequate disclosure on basis of arm’s length pricing.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Old Bridge Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Regulation 23 of SEBI LODR Regulations: The proposed RPTs involve investments in securities/debt instruments and/or provision of loans/advances. While these transactions may broadly be characterised as financial assistance, the underlying transactions are distinct in nature, including in terms of their form, return profile and impact on the capital structure. The transaction specific consideration limits have not been disclosed. Since complete details are not available, the RPTs should qualify for omnibus approval which legally can remain valid for a maximum period of one year. Since the Company has proposed the RPTs for a period exceeding one year, the proposed approval is not compliant with the applicable provisions of SEBI LODR. Governance and Transparency Concern: The Company has mentioned that the interest charged is / will be based on MCLR or similar benchmark and in compliance with the provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. While MCLR represents the minimum lending benchmark for banks, Section 186 requires the interest rate on loans to be not lower than the prevailing yield of Government securities of comparable tenor. However, these rates may not necessarily reflect the prevailing market or fair market rate. Accordingly, it is not clear whether the proposed interest rates will be aligned with prevailing market rates and, if not, on what basis the Company considers such rates to be at arm’s length. With regard to investment related RPTs, the Company should provide an assurance that an appropriate, objective and independent valuation process will be followed for each investment undertaken during the validity period of the approval.
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Regulation 23 of SEBI LODR Regulations: The proposed RPTs involve investments in securities/debt instruments and/or provision of loans/advances. While these transactions may broadly be characterised as financial assistance, the underlying transactions are distinct in nature, including in terms of their form, return profile and impact on the capital structure. The transaction specific consideration limits have not been disclosed. Since complete details are not available, the RPTs should qualify for omnibus approval which legally can remain valid for a maximum period of one year. Since the Company has proposed the RPTs for a period exceeding one year, the proposed approval is not compliant with the applicable provisions of SEBI LODR. Governance and Transparency Concern: The Company has mentioned that the interest charged is / will be based on MCLR or similar benchmark and in compliance with the provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. While MCLR represents the minimum lending benchmark for banks, Section 186 requires the interest rate on loans to be not lower than the prevailing yield of Government securities of comparable tenor. However, these rates may not necessarily reflect the prevailing market or fair market rate. Accordingly, it is not clear whether the proposed interest rates will be aligned with prevailing market rates and, if not, on what basis the Company considers such rates to be at arm s length. With regard to investment related RPTs, the Company should provide an assurance that an appropriate, objective and independent valuation process will be followed for each investment undertaken during the validity period of the approval.
    • Quantum Mutual FundThe company seeks shareholders’ approval for related party transactions with Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL an 83.56% subsidiary) for transfer of resources by way of investments in securities / debt instruments / loans / advances / guarantees upto Rs. 250.0 bn outstanding at any point in time from FY27 to FY29. Shareholders approved limit of Rs. 100 bn in AGM 2025. As of June 2026, the company has utilized Rs. 56.0 bn of this limit. The proposed RPT limits of upto Rs. 250.0 bn to be valid until FY 2028-29 is significantly higher than the existing utilization level. Further it is unclear whether the remaining owners are extending any support to the subsidiaries in proportion to their ownership. Based on the above concerns, we do not favor the resolution.
    8 for7 against
  • Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Old Bridge Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus approval sought for more than 1 year; Inadequate disclosure on basis of arm’s length pricing.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Old Bridge Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Regulation 23 of SEBI LODR Regulations: The proposed RPTs involve investments in securities/debt instruments and/or provision of loans/advances. While these transactions may broadly be characterised as financial assistance, the underlying transactions are distinct in nature, including in terms of their form, return profile and impact on the capital structure. The transaction specific consideration limits have not been disclosed. Since complete details are not available, the RPTs should qualify for omnibus approval which legally can remain valid for a maximum period of one year. Since the Company has proposed the RPTs for a period exceeding one year, the proposed approval is not compliant with the applicable provisions of SEBI LODR. Governance and Transparency Concern: The Company has mentioned that the interest charged is / will be based on MCLR or similar benchmark and in compliance with the provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. While MCLR represents the minimum lending benchmark for banks, Section 186 requires the interest rate on loans to be not lower than the prevailing yield of Government securities of comparable tenor. However, these rates may not necessarily reflect the prevailing market or fair market rate. Accordingly, it is not clear whether the proposed interest rates will be aligned with prevailing market rates and, if not, on what basis the Company considers such rates to be at arm’s length. With regard to investment related RPTs, the Company should provide an assurance that an appropriate, objective and independent valuation process will be followed for each investment undertaken during the validity period of the approval.
    • LIC Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Regulation 23 of SEBI LODR Regulations: The proposed RPTs involve investments in securities/debt instruments and/or provision of loans/advances. While these transactions may broadly be characterised as financial assistance, the underlying transactions are distinct in nature, including in terms of their form, return profile and impact on the capital structure. The transaction specific consideration limits have not been disclosed. Since complete details are not available, the RPTs should qualify for omnibus approval which legally can remain valid for a maximum period of one year. Since the Company has proposed the RPTs for a period exceeding one year, the proposed approval is not compliant with the applicable provisions of SEBI LODR. Governance and Transparency Concern: The Company has mentioned that the interest charged is / will be based on MCLR or similar benchmark and in compliance with the provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013. While MCLR represents the minimum lending benchmark for banks, Section 186 requires the interest rate on loans to be not lower than the prevailing yield of Government securities of comparable tenor. However, these rates may not necessarily reflect the prevailing market or fair market rate. Accordingly, it is not clear whether the proposed interest rates will be aligned with prevailing market rates and, if not, on what basis the Company considers such rates to be at arm s length. With regard to investment related RPTs, the Company should provide an assurance that an appropriate, objective and independent valuation process will be followed for each investment undertaken during the validity period of the approval.
    • Quantum Mutual FundThe company seeks shareholders’ approval for related party transactions between Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL an 83.56% subsidiary) and Reliance Retail Limited (RRL – wholly owned subsidiary of RRVL) for transfer of resources by way of investments in securities / debt instruments / loans / advances / guarantees upto Rs. 1,200.0 bn outstanding at any point in time from FY27 to FY32. Shareholders approved limit of Rs. 900 bn in AGM 2023. As of June 2026, the company has utilized Rs. 360.6 bn of this limit. The proposed RPT limits of upto Rs. 1,200.0 bn to be valid until FY32 is significantly higher than the existing utilization level. Further it is unclear whether the remaining owners are extending any support to the subsidiaries in proportion to their ownership. Based on the above concerns, we do not favor the resolution.
    8 for7 against
  • Alteration of the Objects Clause of the Memorandum of Association of the Company
    19 for0 against
4 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • 1) Approve material related party transactions of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) or its successor entity with Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL) or its successor entity for transfer of resources by way of investments in securities / debt instruments / loans / advances / guarantees upto Rs. 250.0 bn outstanding at any point in time from FY27 to FY29MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • 2) Approve material related party transactions between Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL) or its successor entity and Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) or its successor entity for transfer of resources by way of investments in securities / debt instruments / loans / advances / guarantees upto Rs. 1,200.0 bn outstanding at any point in time from FY27 to FY32MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • Approve material related party transactions between Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL) or its successor entity and Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) or its successor entity for transfer of resources by way of investments in securities / debt instruments / loans / advances / guarantees upto Rs. 1,200.0 bn outstanding at any point in time from FY27 to FY32MoreLess
    3 for0 against
  • Approve material related party transactions of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) or its successor entity with Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL) or its successor entity for transfer of resources by way of investments in securities / debt instruments / loans / advances / guarantees upto Rs. 250.0 bn outstanding at any point in time from FY27 to FY29MoreLess
    3 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 19 Jun 2026, 47 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To consider and adopt the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon
    46 for0 against
  • To consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026 and the report of Auditors thereon
    45 for0 against
  • To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2026
    45 for0 against
  • To appoint Shri Akash M. Ambani (DIN: 06984194), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    Against Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted because the board independence norms are not met and Akash M. Ambani is non-independent director nominee.
    47 for1 against
  • To appoint Shri Anant M. Ambani (DIN: 07945702), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    Against Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Old Bridge Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST this resolution is warranted because the board independence norms are not met and Anant M. Ambani is non-independent director nominee.
    • Invesco Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 31, is an Executive Director and part of the promoter group. He has attended all five board meetings (100%) held in FY26. With less than ten years of relevant post-qualification work experience and 31 years of age, Anant Ambani’s reappointment as Director is not in line with our voting guidelines. Thus, we do not support the resolution
    • Old Bridge Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 31, is an Executive Director and part of the promoter group. He has attended all five board meetings (100%) held in FY26. With less than ten years of relevant post-qualification work experience and 31 years of age, Anant Ambani’s reappointment as Director is not in line with our voting guidelines. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    • Quantum Mutual FundAs per Quantum, the role of Executive Director in a listed company warrants significantly greater relevant work experience. We do not favour his reappointment.
    42 for5 against
  • To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year ending March 31, 2027
    Against Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNo justification for significant shift in limits of RPTs proposed.
    44 for1 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Choice Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year Related Party Transactions and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • Choice Mutual FundInadequate justification for why the proposed RPT is in the best interests of the Company; Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Inadequate justification for why the proposed RPT is in the best interests of the Company; Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • LIC Mutual FundGovernance concern: Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNo justification for significant shift in limits of RPTs proposed.
    • Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundNo justification for significant shift in limits of RPTs proposed
    • Quantum Mutual FundThe company is proposing a material increase in the limits without a proper justification for the same. Additionally, the transaction includes a transfer of resources, in respect of which the details are inadequate.
    32 for12 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    12 for0 against
13 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • Item 2, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 4, as a fund house numbered it
    Against Taurus Mutual Fund
    • Taurus Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 31, is an Executive Director and part of the promoter group. He has attended all five board meetings (100%) held in FY26. With less than ten years of relevant post-qualification work experience and 31 years of age, Anant Ambani’s reappointment as Director is not in line with our voting guidelines. Thus, we do not support the resolution.
    0 for1 against
  • Item 5, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 6, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • 1a
    1 for0 against
  • 1b
    1 for0 against
  • 2) Declare dividend of Rs. 6.0 per equity share of face value Rs. 10.0 each for FY26.
    1 for0 against
  • 5) Approve payment of aggregate remuneration of Rs. 10,670,000 to cost auditors for FY27.
    1 for0 against
  • 6) Approve material related party transactions between Reliance Industries Limited and its related parties (or their successor entities).
    1 for0 against
  • 8. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company with Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL), Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Neolync Solutions Private Limited (Neolync), Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL), Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL) and Jio Platforms Limited (JPL) and Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) exceed the amount of Rs. 5,000 crore during the period from FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • Approve material related party transactions between Reliance Industries Limited and its related parties (or their successor entities)
    1 for0 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company with India Gas Solutions Private Limited (IGSPL), Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL), Reliance BP Mobility Limited (RBML), Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL) and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL) exceed the amount of Rs. 5,000 crore during the period from FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32.MoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company with Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL), Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Neolync Solutions Private Limited (Neolync), Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL), Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) and Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL) and Jio Platforms Limited (JPL) and Reliance Retail Limited (RRL) exceed the amount of Rs. 5,000 crore during the period from FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Choice Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, LIC Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year Related Party Transactions and the proposed limit,however, no specific justification for the same.
    • Choice Mutual FundSignificant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, The Wealth Company Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • LIC Mutual FundGovernance concern: Significant Shift between the quantum of previous year RPTs and the proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNo justification for significant shift in limits of RPTs proposed.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundNo justification for significant shift in limits of RPTs proposed
    • Quantum Mutual FundThe company is proposing a material increase in the limits without a proper justification for the same. Additionally, the transaction includes a transfer of resources, in respect of which the details are inadequate.
    22 for12 against
6 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Aug 2025, 42 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To consider and adopt the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2025 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon
    39 for0 against
  • To consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2025 and the report of Auditors thereon
    35 for0 against
  • To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2025
    40 for0 against
  • To appoint Shri Nikhil R. Meswani (DIN: 00001620), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    42 for0 against
  • To appoint Ms. Isha M. Ambani (DIN: 06984175), who retires by rotation, as a Director
    42 for0 against
  • To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year ending March 31, 2026
    40 for0 against
  • To appoint Secretarial Auditor
    42 for0 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    Against 360 One Mutual Fund, Angel One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • 360 One Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundNon-compliant with SEBI Circular: Omnibus approval sought for more than 1 year; Governance Concern: Basis for Arm’s Length pricing not disclosed for one of the transactions proposed.
    • Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus approval sought for more than one year; Governance Concern: Basis for Arm’s Length pricing not disclosed for one of the transactions proposed.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-compliant with SEBI Circular: Omnibus approval sought for more than 1 year.
    • PGIM India Mutual FundNon-compliant with SEBI Circular: Omnibus approval sought for more than 1 year; Governance Concern: Basis for Arm s Length pricing not disclosed for one of the transactions proposed.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundOmnibus approval sought for more than 1 year; Basis for Arm’s Length not disclosed for all RPTs
    30 for10 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of Subsidiaries of the Company
    42 for0 against
9 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • Item 2, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 5, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 7, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • 1a
    1 for0 against
  • 1b
    1 for0 against
  • 2) Declare dividend of Rs. 5.5 per equity share of face value Rs. 10.0 each for FY25.
    1 for0 against
  • 5) Approve payment of aggregate remuneration of Rs. 9,795,000 to cost auditors for FY26.
    1 for0 against
  • 7) Approve material related party transactions of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) with Reliance Consumer Products Limited (or its successor entity).
    1 for0 against
  • Accept Financial Statements and Statutory Reports
    2 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Jul 2025, 42 fund houses

  • To approve the appointment of Shri Anant M. Ambani (DIN: 07945702) as a Whole-time Director, designated as an Executive Director
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Canara Robeco Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency concern: However, the proposed annual salary, perquisites, and allowances are higher than or on par with those of other Executive Directors who have significantly more Board and industry experience. The Company should clarify the reasoning behind the remuneration terms. In the absence of such an explanation, the proposed terms appear unjustified.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundAppointment compliant with law. No concerns regarding his profile or the transition from a Non-Executive to an Executive role. Governance & Transparency concern: However, the proposed annual salary, perquisites, and allowances are higher than or on par with those of other Executive Directors who have significantly more Board and industry experience. The Company should clarify the reasoning behind the remuneration terms. In the absence of such an explanation, the proposed terms appear unjustified.
    • Canara Robeco Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 30, is the son of Mukesh Ambani- promoter and CMD. He has a bachelor’s degree from Brown University, USA. He was appointed as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the company from 27 October 2023. The company proposed to appoint him as Whole-time Director for five years from 1 May 2025. Anant Ambani is responsible for RIL’s Capital Projects Execution and is closely involved in the planning, execution, and monitoring of ongoing O2C projects in the vinyl chain and speciality polyesters as well as the New Energy Gigafactories. With less than ten years of relevant post-qualification work experience and at 30 years of age, Anant Ambani’s appointment as Whole-time Director is not in line with our voting guidelines. The remuneration terms include share of net profits as determined by RIL’s HRNR committee. Given the lack of clarity and no caps on the absolute level of compensation, we are unable to estimate the overall remuneration for the proposed tenure. The company has not disclosed the performance metrics which will determine the variable payout. The company has not disclosed how it has benchmarked the remuneration. The remuneration terms include reimbursement of expenses incurred for travelling, boarding and lodging including for Anant Ambani’s spouse and attendants during business trips. We believe such expenses are personal in nature and should be borne by the director himself. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution. As good practice, we recommend companies build malus and clawback clauses into remuneration agreements for executive directors.
    • Invesco Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 30, is the son of Mukesh Ambani- promoter and CMD. He has a bachelor’s degree from Brown University, USA. He was appointed as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director of the company from 27 October 2023. The company proposed to appoint him as Whole-time Director for five years from 1 May 2025. Anant Ambani is responsible for RIL’s Capital Projects Execution and is closely involved in the planning, execution, and monitoring of ongoing O2C projects in the vinyl chain and speciality polyesters as well as the New Energy Gigafactories. With less than ten years of relevant post-qualification work experience and at 30 years of age, Anant Ambani’s appointment as Whole-time Director is not in line with our voting guidelines. The remuneration terms include share of net profits as determined by RIL’s HRNR committee. Given the lack of clarity and no caps on the absolute level of compensation, we are unable to estimate the overall remuneration for the proposed tenure. The company has not disclosed the performance metrics which will determine the variable payout. The company has not disclosed how it has benchmarked the remuneration. The remuneration terms include reimbursement of expenses incurred for travelling, boarding and lodging including for Anant Ambani’s spouse and attendants during business trips. We believe such expenses are personal in nature and should be borne by the director himself. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution. As good practice, we recommend companies build malus and clawback clauses into remuneration agreements for executive directors
    • NJ Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 30, is the son of Mukesh Ambani- promoter and CMD. He has a bachelor’s degree from Brown University, USA. He was appointed as Non-Executive Non- Independent Director of the company from 27 October 2023. The company proposed to appoint him as Whole-time Director for five years from 1 May 2025. Anant Ambani is responsible for RIL’s Capital Projects Execution and is closely involved in the planning, execution, and monitoring of ongoing O2C projects in the vinyl chain and speciality polyesters as well as the New Energy Gigafactories. With less than ten years of relevant post-qualification work experience and at 30 years of age, Anant Ambani’s appointment as Whole-time Director is not in line with our voting guidelines. The remuneration terms include share of net profits as determined by RIL’s HRNR committee. Given the lack of clarity and no caps on the absolute level of compensation, we are unable to estimate the overall remuneration for the proposed tenure. The company has not disclosed the performance metrics which will determine the variable payout. The company has not disclosed how it has benchmarked the remuneration. The remuneration terms include reimbursement of expenses incurred for travelling, boarding and lodging including for Anant Ambani’s spouse and attendants during business trips. We believe such expenses are personal in nature and should be borne by the director himself. Given these concerns, we do not support the resolution. As good practice, we recommend companies build malus and clawback clauses into remuneration agreements for executive directors.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundRemuneration at par /higher than what is proposed to other Executive Directors
    • Quantum Mutual FundWe do not have any concern on the profile, time commitments and attendance of Mr. Anant Ambani. However, we take note that the proposed remuneration includes “Expenses incurred for travelling, boarding and lodging including for Shri Anant Ambani’s spouse and attendant(s) during business trips and provision of car(s) for use on Company’s business and communication expenses”. We are of the view that as a good governance practice, the personal expenses should not be included in the remuneration package of the director. Therefore, we do not favour the resolution.
    24 for18 against
  • To re-appoint Shri Hital R. Meswani (DIN: 00001623) as a Whole-time Director, designated as an Executive Director
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Canara Robeco Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency concern raised on account of ESOPs proposed to Mr. Hital Meswani, a Promoter-related Director, without an absolute cap on potential ESOPs when there is potential for influence arising from his association with the Promoter Group.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundAppointment compliant with law. No concern on profile and merit of Mr. Hital R. Meswani. Governance & Transparency concern raised on account of ESOPs proposed to Mr. Hital Meswani, a Promoter-related Director, without an absolute cap on potential ESOPs when there is potential for influence arising from his association with the Promoter Group.
    • Canara Robeco Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual FundHital Meswani, 57, is Executive Director of Reliance Industries Limited. His overall responsibility includes the petroleum refining and marketing business, petrochemicals manufacturing, and several corporate functions of the company, including information technology and research and technology. He has been on board since 3 August 1995. He has attended all six board meetings held in FY25. His FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 250 mn. While we support Hital Meswani’s reappointment as Whole-time Director, we do not support the resolution because the terms of his proposed remuneration are unclear. We are unable to estimate the level of his proposed remuneration because there is no clarity on the stock option grants that he is likely to receive during the proposed terms. We expect companies to disclose a maximum cap on the proposed remuneration, which would enable us to make a more informed decision with respect to the proposed remuneration. We do not support the resolution. As good practice, we recommend companies build malus and clawback clauses into remuneration agreements for executive directors.
    • Invesco Mutual FundHital Meswani, 57, is Executive Director of Reliance Industries Limited. His overall responsibility includes the petroleum refining and marketing business, petrochemicals manufacturing, and several corporate functions of the company, including information technology and research and technology. He has been on board since 3 August 1995. He has attended all six board meetings held in FY25. His FY25 remuneration aggregated Rs. 250 mn. While we support Hital Meswani’s reappointment as Whole-time Director, we do not support the resolution because the terms of his proposed remuneration are unclear. We are unable to estimate the level of his proposed remuneration because there is no clarity on the stock option grants that he is likely to receive during the proposed terms. We expect companies to disclose a maximum cap on the proposed remuneration, which would enable us to make a more informed decision with respect to the proposed remuneration. We do not support the resolution. As good practice, we recommend companies build malus and clawback clauses into remuneration agreements for executive directors. We do not support the resolution.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundESOPs proposed to Promoter Related Director without absolute cap
    • Quantum Mutual FundWe do not have any concern on the profile, time commitments and attendance of Mr. Hital R. Meswani. However, we take note that the proposed remuneration includes “Expenses incurred for travelling, boarding and lodging including for Mr. Hital R. Meswani’s spouse and attendant(s) during business trips and provision of car(s) for use on Company’s business and communication expenses”. We are of the view that as a good governance practice, the personal expenses should not be included in the remuneration package of the director. We also take note that the remuneration package entitles Mr. Meswani to ESOPs. Mr. Hital Meswani is the son of Mr. Rasiklal Meswani, one of the Founder Directors of the Company, as well as the first cousin of Mr. Mukesh Ambani. We, therefore, classify Mr. Meswani as a promoter. As per SEBI regulation, promoters and their immediate relatives cannot be issued ESOPs. In view of the concerns, we do not favour the resolution.
    25 for17 against
  • To approve the appointment of Shri Dinesh Kanabar (DIN:00003252) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Canara Robeco Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency concern:Pecuniary Relationship with the Company - Mr. Dinesh Kanabar serves as the CEO and Partner of Dhruva Advisory LLP. Although amount not material, however, the Company enters into transactions on a continuous basis with Dhruva Advisors LLP and additionally, there is no clarity or cap on the quantum of future RPTs and also, on the quantum of RPT entered at the subsidiary level. Hence, governance and transparency concerns are identified.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual FundAppointment compliant with law. Governance & Transparency concern: Although amount not material, however, the Company enters into transactions on a continuous basis with Dhruva Advisors LLP and additionally, there is no clarity or cap on the quantum of future RPTs and also, on the quantum of RPT entered at the subsidiary level. Hence, governance and transparency concerns are identified.
    • Canara Robeco Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Unifi Mutual FundDinesh Kanabar, 66, is the Founder and CEO, Dhruva Advisors LLP, a tax and regulatory advisory firm in India. He has experience in India’s tax and regulatory landscape. He previously served as deputy Chief Executive Officer of KPMG India, Chairperson of the Tax Practice at PwC India and Deputy Managing Partner of RSM & Co. He has been an Independent Director on the board of Jio Platforms Limited, a subsidiary, since July 2020. We will consider his overall association with the group while computing his tenure. RIL engages with Dhruva Advisors LLP, among various Indian and international consultancy firms, depending upon subject matter and expertise of the firm. While the company has stated that fees paid to Dhruva Advisors LLP by RIL and its subsidiaries form a very small part of the revenue of the firm, given the conflict of interest caused by existing business relationships, we do not support Dinesh Kanabar’s appointment as Independent Director. The company must consider appointing him as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director. We do not support the resolution.
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the nominee is warranted because Dinesh Kanabar is Founder and CEO of Dhruva Advisors LLP, which renders professional services to the company. Such transactions may compromise director's ability to impartially and independently scrutinize board decisions, and he has been re-classified as non-independent.
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the nominee is warranted because:_x000D_ • Dinesh Kanabar is Founder and CEO of Dhruva Advisors LLP, which renders professional services to the company. Such transactions may compromise director's ability to impartially and independently scrutinize board decisions, and he has been re-classified as non-independent.
    • Invesco Mutual FundDinesh Kanabar, 66, is the Founder and CEO, Dhruva Advisors LLP, a tax and regulatory advisory firm in India. He has experience in India’s tax and regulatory landscape. He previously served as deputy Chief Executive Officer of KPMG India, Chairperson of the Tax Practice at PwC India and Deputy Managing Partner of RSM & Co. He has been an Independent Director on the board of Jio Platforms Limited, a subsidiary, since July 2020. We will consider his overall association with the group while computing his tenure. RIL engages with Dhruva Advisors LLP, among various Indian and international consultancy firms, depending upon subject matter and expertise of the firm. While the company has stated that fees paid to Dhruva Advisors LLP by RIL and its subsidiaries form a very small part of the revenue of the firm, given the conflict of interest caused by existing business relationships, we do not support Dinesh Kanabar’s appointment as Independent Director. The company must consider appointing him as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director. We do not support the resolution
    • NJ Mutual FundDinesh Kanabar, 66, is the Founder and CEO, Dhruva Advisors LLP, a tax and regulatory advisory firm in India. He has experience in India’s tax and regulatory landscape. He previously served as deputy Chief Executive Officer of KPMG India, Chairperson of the Tax Practice at PwC India and Deputy Managing Partner of RSM & Co. He has been an Independent Director on the board of Jio Platforms Limited, a subsidiary, since July 2020. We will consider his overall association with the group while computing his tenure. RIL engages with Dhruva Advisors LLP, among various Indian and international consultancy firms, depending upon subject matter and expertise of the firm. While the company has stated that fees paid to Dhruva Advisors LLP by RIL and its subsidiaries form a very small part of the revenue of the firm, given the conflict of interest caused by existing business relationships, we do not support Dinesh Kanabar’s appointment as Independent Director. The company must consider appointing him as a Non-Executive Non- Independent Director. We do not support the resolution.
    • PPFAS Mutual FundPecuniary relationship on a continuous basis, no clarity regarding future quantum of fee and no disclosure regarding RPT quantum at subsidiary level
    • Quantum Mutual FundWe take note that Mr. Dinesh Kanabar is the Founder CEO and Partner of Dhruva Advisors LLP. The company has regularly entered into transaction with the firm. The payment made to Dhruva Advisors LLP was Rs. 2.2 bn in FY’25. We are of the view that there exists a pecuniary relationship between Mr. Dinesh Kanabar and the company. Therefore, we do not favour his appointment.
    22 for20 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 15 Oct 2024, 38 fund houses

  • Issue of Bonus Shares
    37 for0 against
  • Increase in Authorised Share Capital and consequent alteration to the Capital Clause of the Memorandum of Association
    38 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Aug 2024, 36 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • To consider and adopt the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon
    31 for0 against
  • To consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 and the report of Auditors thereon
    33 for0 against
  • To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2024
    33 for0 against
  • To appoint Shri Hital R. Meswani (DIN: 00001623), who retires by rotation as a Director
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundWe have concerns about insufficient independence on the board.
    33 for1 against
  • To appoint Shri P.M.S. Prasad (DIN: 00012144), who retires by rotation as a Director
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundWe have concerns about insufficient independence on the board.
    33 for1 against
  • To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors
    31 for0 against
  • To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    34 for0 against
12 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • Item 1, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 2, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 3, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 4, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 5, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 6, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 7, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • 1. To consider and adopt : (a) the audited financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon; and (b) the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 and the report of Auditors thereon 2. To declare dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2024 3. To appoint Shri Hital R. Meswani (DIN: 00001623), who retires by rotation as a Director 4. To appoint Shri P.M.S. Prasad (DIN: 00012144), who retires by rotation as a Director 5. To ratify the remuneration of Cost Auditors 6. To approve Material Related Party Transactions of the CompanyMoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • 2) Declare dividend of Rs. 10.0 per equity share of face value Rs. 10.0 each for FY24.
    1 for0 against
  • 5) Approve payment of aggregate remuneration of Rs. 9,355,000 to cost auditors for FY25 and Rs. 181,000 to Shome & Banerjee (for Digital EPC & Infrastructure business) for FY24.
    1 for0 against
  • Approve payment of aggregate remuneration of Rs. 9,355,000 to cost auditors for FY25 and Rs. 181,000 to Shome & Banerjee (for Digital EPC & Infrastructure business) for FY24
    1 for0 against
  • Ratification of remuneration, a) to be paid to the Cost Auditors appointed by the Board of Directors, to conduct the audit of cost records of the Company for the financial year ending March 31, 2025 and b) to be paid to Shome and Banerjee, Cost Accountants (FRN: 000001), the Cost Auditors appointed by the Board of Directors, to conduct the audit of cost records of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2024.MoreLess
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 20 Jun 2024, 38 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Appointment of Shri Haigreve Khaitan (DIN: 00005290) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Against 360 One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, JM Financial Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • 360 One Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual FundHaigreve Khaitan, 53, is a Senior Partner at Khaitan & Co. He heads the Corporate, M&A and Private Equity practice for the firm. He has been a director on the board of Jio Platforms Limited, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), since July 2020. We will consider his overall association with the RIL group while computing his tenure. Haigreve Khaitan has represented and advised RIL on internal restructuring and multiple large acquisitions. RIL engages with Khaitan & Co, among various Indian and international law firms, depending upon subject matter and expertise of the law firm. While the company has stated that fees paid to Khaitan & Co by RIL and its subsidiaries form a very small part of the revenue of Khaitan & Co, given the conflict of interest caused by existing business relationships, we do not support the resolution. Further, Haigreve Khaitan serves as Independent Director on the boards of seven listed companies (including RIL). Given their full-time responsibilities, regulations allow whole-time directors of listed companies to be independent directors in a maximum of three listed companies. We believe that as Senior Partner of Khaitan & Co., his responsibilities are equivalent to a whole-time directorship. Therefore, his high number of directorships on listed companies is not in keeping with the spirit of the regulation.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, JM Financial Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundAppointment is compliant with law. Governance Concern: Excessive time commitments. Transparency Concern: Details of pecuniary relationship between firm and Company not provided in the notice.
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because: • Haigreve Khaitan serves on a total of more than six public company boards, which could potentially compromise his ability to commit sufficient time to his role in the company. • Haigreve Khaitan is Partner of Khaitan & Co., Solicitors & Advocates, which renders professional services to the company. Such transactions may compromise director's ability to impartially and independently scrutinize board decisions.
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because: Haigreve Khaitan serves on a total of more than six public company boards, which could potentially compromise his ability to commit sufficient time to his role in the company. Haigreve Khaitan is Partner of Khaitan & Co., Solicitors & Advocates, which renders professional services to the company. Such transactions may compromise director's ability to impartially and independently scrutinize board decisions.
    • Invesco Mutual FundMr. Khaitan, is a Senior Partner at Khaitan & Co. He heads the Corporate, M&A and Private Equity practice for the firm. He has been a director on the board of Jio Platforms Limited, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), since July 2020. Haigreve Khaitan has represented and advised RIL on internal restructuring and multiple large acquisitions. RIL engages with Khaitan & Co, among various Indian and international law firms, depending upon subject matter and expertise of the law firm. While the company has stated that fees paid to Khaitan & Co by RIL and its subsidiaries form a very small part of the revenue of Khaitan & Co, given the conflict of interest caused by existing business relationships, we do not support the resolution. Company may consider appointing him as non-independent director.
    • Nippon India Mutual FundPecuniary relation not disclosed
    • PPFAS Mutual FundExcessive time commitments; Details of pecuniary relation not disclosed
    • Zerodha Mutual FundExcessive time commitments; Details of pecuniary relation not disclosed.
    18 for18 against
  • Re-appointment of His Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al Rumayyan (DIN: 09245977) as an Independent Director of the Company
    Against 360 One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, HSBC Mutual Fund, Invesco Mutual Fund, JM Financial Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, PPFAS Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual Fund, Zerodha Mutual Fund
    • 360 One Mutual Fund, Bank of India Mutual Fund, Navi Mutual Fund, NJ Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, Taurus Mutual FundHis Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al Rumayyan, 54, is the Governor and Board Member of Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia (PIF). He is also the Non-Executive Chairperson of Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Aramco). He has over 25 years of work experience across financial institutions of Saudi Arabia. He has been on the board of Reliance Industries Limited since 19 July 2021. He has attended 71% (5 out of 7) board meetings held in FY24 and 76% (13 out of 17) board meetings held in the last three years. We expect directors to attend all board meetings or atleast 75% board meetings over a three-year period. We note that in FY21, PIF invested Rs. 113.7 bn in Jio Platforms Limited for a 2.32% stake and invested Rs. 95.6 bn for a 2.04% stake (on a fully diluted basis) in Reliance Retail Ventures Limited. We understand that His Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al Rumayyan is accomplished in his own right, and brings experience and skills that are beneficial for RIL, particularly in the New Energy and Materials business. His reappointment is compliant with the Companies Act and SEBI LODR. However, given the association of PIF with RIL, we believe he must be reappointed as a non-independent non-executive director.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Helios Mutual Fund, PGIM India Mutual Fund, Quantum Mutual Fund, Trust Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concerns on merit, qualifications, experience and suitability of appointee. Governance Concern: De-Facto nominee of Investor Companies cannot be ID.
    • Franklin Templeton Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because: • His Excellency Yasir Othman Al-Rumayyan has failed to attend at least 75 percent of board meetings in the most recent fiscal year, without a satisfactory explanation. • He is the Governor of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia, which has economic interest upto 2% or higher in company's material subsidiaries. Therefore, he has been re-classified as non_x0002_independent given the potential conflict of interest.
    • HSBC Mutual FundWe have concerns about insufficient independence on the board.We have concerns about the director's attendance at board meetings.
    • Invesco Mutual FundHis Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al Rumayyan, is the Governor and Board Member of Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia (PIF). He is also the Non-Executive Chairperson of Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Aramco). He has over 25 years of work experience across financial institutions of Saudi Arabia. He has been on the board of Reliance Industries Limited since 19 July 2021. He has attended 71% (5 out of 7) board meetings held in FY24 and 76% (13 out of 17) board meetings held in the last three years. We expect directors to attend all board meetings or atleast 75% board meetings over a three-year period. We note that in FY21, PIF invested Rs. 113.7 bn in Jio Platforms Limited for a 2.32% stake and invested Rs. 95.6 bn for a 2.04% stake (on a fully diluted basis) in Reliance Retail Ventures Limited. We understand that His Excellency Yasir Othman H. Al Rumayyan is accomplished in his own right, and brings experience and skills that are beneficial for RIL, particularly in the New Energy and Materials business. His reappointment is compliant with the Companies Act and SEBI LODR. However, given the association of PIF with RIL, we believe he must be reappointed as a non-independent non-executive director.
    • JM Financial Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concerns on merit, qualifications, experience and suitability of appointee. Governance Concern: De-Facto nominee of Investor Companies cannot be Independent Director.
    • Nippon India Mutual FundDe-facto nominee director
    • PPFAS Mutual FundAppears to be de-facto nominee director
    • Zerodha Mutual FundAppears to be de-facto nominee director.
    19 for19 against
  • Re-appointment of Shri P.M.S. Prasad (DIN: 00012144) as a Whole-time Director designated as an Executive Director
    Against HSBC Mutual Fund
    • HSBC Mutual FundA vote AGAINST the following nominee is warranted because: The board independence norms are not met based on our reclassification and PMS Prasad is a non-independent director nominee.
    35 for1 against
  • Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of the Company
    35 for0 against
  • Approval of Material Related Party Transactions of subsidiaries of the Company
    35 for0 against
6 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • Item 1, as a fund house numbered it
    Against Taurus Mutual Fund
    • Taurus Mutual FundHaigreve Khaitan, 53, is a Senior Partner at Khaitan & Co. He heads the Corporate, M&A and Private Equity practice for the firm. He has been a director on the board of Jio Platforms Limited, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), since July 2020. We will consider his overall association with the RIL group while computing his tenure. Haigreve Khaitan has represented and advised RIL on internal restructuring and multiple large acquisitions. RIL engages with Khaitan & Co, among various Indian and international law firms, depending upon subject matter and expertise of the law firm. While the company has stated that fees paid to Khaitan & Co by RIL and its subsidiaries form a very small part of the revenue of Khaitan & Co, given the conflict of interest caused by existing business relationships, we do not support the resolution. Further, Haigreve Khaitan serves as Independent Director on the boards of seven listed companies (including RIL). Given their full-time responsibilities, regulations allow whole-time directors of listed companies to be independent directors in a maximum of three listed companies. We believe that as Senior Partner of Khaitan & Co., his responsibilities are equivalent to a whole-time directorship. Therefore, his high number of directorships on listed companies is not in keeping with the spirit of the regulation.
    0 for1 against
  • Item 3, as a fund house numbered it
    Against Taurus Mutual Fund
    • Taurus Mutual FundP.M.S Prasad, 72, is Whole-time Director of Reliance Industries Limited and is responsible for the Exploration & Production (E&P) and Refining & Marketing (R&M) businesses. He is 72 years old, hence the company is seeking approval through a special resolution. While we support P.M.S. Prasad’s reappointment as Whole-time Director, we do not support the resolution because the terms of his proposed remuneration are unclear. We are unable to estimate the level of his proposed remuneration because there is no clarity on variable pay and the stock option grants that he is likely to receive during the proposed terms. We expect companies to disclose a maximum cap on the proposed remuneration, which would enable us to make a more informed decision with respect to PMS Prasad’s proposed remuneration. Further, the remuneration structure allows for personal expenses to be borne by the company, a practice that we do not support. As a good practice, we recommend companies build malus and clawback clauses into remuneration agreements for executive directors.
    0 for1 against
  • Item 4, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 5, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Approval of Material Related Party Transactions between Reliance Retail Limited and Sanmina-SCI India Private Limited.
    1 for0 against
  • Approval of Material Related Party Transactions with Reliance International Leasing IFSC Limited.
    1 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 26 Oct 2023, 30 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • Appointment of Ms. Isha M. Ambani (DIN: 06984175) as a Non-Executive Director of the Company
    29 for0 against
  • Appointment of Shri Akash M. Ambani (DIN: 06984194) as a Non-Executive Director of the Company
    29 for0 against
  • Appointment of Shri Anant M. Ambani (DIN: 07945702) as a Non-Executive Director of the Company
    Against Bank of India Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund
    • Bank of India Mutual Fund, Sundaram Mutual Fund, WhiteOak Capital Mutual FundAnant Ambani, 28, is the son of Mukesh Ambani- promoter and CMD. He is driving the expansion of energy and materials businesses of Reliance Industries and its global operations in renewable and green energy. Under his leadership, Reliance aims to become a Net Carbon Zero company by 2035 by building world-scale capabilities in the production of clean fuels and materials of the future, developing next generation carbon capture and storage technologies, creating holistic and circular materials businesses, and maximising crude to chemicals conversion. The company has clarified that Anant Ambani’s appointment is expected to be effective before 31 December 2023. At 28 years of age, his appointment as a Non-Executive Non-Independent Director does not align with our voting guidelines.
    26 for3 against
3 proposals not matched to one resolution
  • Item 1, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 2, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against
  • Item 3, as a fund house numbered it
    1 for0 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Fines

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Fine or penaltyAssistant Commissioner of Customs, Nhava ShevaSince 2 Apr 2026

    Penalty of Rs. 5,000 and redemption fine of Rs. 5,000 under applicable provisions of the Customs Act, 1962.

    The Order has been passed alleging that the impugned goods have been imported due to the SIMS registration was not completed within the mandated timeline.
  • Fine or penaltyAssistant Commissioners, CGST Audit Circle, MohaliSince 29 May 2026

    Penalty of Rs. 16,812 under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

    The Order has been passed alleging incorrect availment of input tax credit by the Company.
  • Fine or penaltyAssistant Commissioner of Customs, Chennai - VIISince 22 Jun 2026

    Penalty of Rs. 11,351 and redemption fine of Rs. 1,00,000 under applicable provisions of the Customs Act, 1962.

    The Order has been passed alleging that the Company has discharged a lesser custom duty by incorrect classification of imported goods in the Bill of Entry.
  • Fine or penaltyRegional PF Commissioner I (PD), MumbaiSince 30 Apr 2026

    Penalty of Rs. 7,734 under applicable provisions of the Employee's Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

    The Order has been passed alleging that the Company has defaulted in the payment of any contribution to the Provident Fund, the Pension Fund or the Insurance Fund for period January 2018 to July 2024.
  • Fine or penaltyFood Safety and Standards Authority of IndiaSince 11 Jun 2026

    Penalty of Rs. 37,500 under applicable provisions of the Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Business) Regulation, 2011.

    Late fee is paid for delayed submission of Annual Return in terms of provisions of the Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Business) Regulation, 2011.

In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
Yes
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
Yes
The filing has a part on tax disputes
No
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.