Lloyds Enterprises MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM
NSE: LLOYDSENTBSE: 512463Metals & Minerals TradingSmall Cap
Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹63.74.
- Market capMarket capitalisation. Share price times the number of shares: what the whole company is worth at the day's price. The rank is by average market value over the six months to Jun 2026, among listed companies.
- ₹9,520 Cr597th largest listed
- P/EPrice to earnings, trailing. Market cap divided by the profit of the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, after the share of the other owners of its subsidiaries: what investors pay for each rupee of a year's profit.
- Earlier quarters restated in the year
- P/BPrice to book. Market cap divided by the net worth that belongs to the company's own shareholders, its assets less everything it owes and less the other owners' share of its subsidiaries, on its latest balance sheet. The filing of 8 May 2026
- 2.3
- Dividend yieldDividend yield. Dividends paid per share in the twelve months to the day, as a percentage of the day's share price.
- 0.08%
- ROCEReturn on capital employed. Operating profit after depreciation (revenue less operating expenses and depreciation, without other income and one-off items) as a percentage of all the money the business runs on: the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included, plus borrowings. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. The profit is over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly); net worth and borrowings are on the latest balance sheet. The filing of 11 Aug 2026
- 2.5%
- Debt to equityDebt to equity. Borrowings divided by the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included: rupees borrowed for each rupee of equity in the business. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. From the balance sheet at the end of Mar 2026. The filing of 8 May 2026
- 0.13
- Volume, NSEVolume. Shares traded on the last trading day; delivery is the part buyers kept rather than sold again the same day.
- 36,14,92847.0% delivered
Lloyds Enterprises board of directors
At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares
- Chairperson and managing directorBabulal AgarwalRelated to the promoter
- Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerPranjal Mahapure
8 directors5 independent2 executive1 non-executive
- Babulal Agarwal · Chairperson and managing directorExecutive · joined Aug 2023 · 2 listed boards
- Rajesh R GuptaExecutive · joined Aug 2023 · 2 listed boards · 2 committee seats
- Manesh Varkey CherianNon-executive · joined Mar 2020 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
- Vikram ShahIndependent · joined Feb 2020 · reappointed Feb 2025 · 76 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
- Sandeep Suhas AoleIndependent · joined May 2022 · reappointed May 2022 · 49 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat
- J P DangeIndependent · joined Oct 2024 · reappointed Oct 2024 · 20 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
- Satish Kumar GuptaIndependent · joined Dec 2024 · reappointed Dec 2024 · 18 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
- Mohinder AnandIndependent · joined Jun 2018 · reappointed Jun 2023 · 96 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.
1 director who left
- Mohan Krishnamoorthy, left 13 Jan 2025: Tenure Completion
Committees and meetings
Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes
Board
- 18 Jun 20267 of 8 present4 independent · 20 days in between
- 28 May 20268 of 8 present5 independent · 19 days in between
- 8 May 20268 of 8 present5 independent · 23 days in between
- 14 Apr 20268 of 8 present5 independent · 63 days in between
1 earlier meeting
- 9 Feb 20267 of 8 present4 independent
Audit Committee
Chair Vikram Shah
Rajesh R Gupta, J P Dange, Sandeep Suhas Aole
- 18 Jun 20263 of 4 present2 independent · 20 days in between
- 28 May 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 19 days in between
- 8 May 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 23 days in between
- 14 Apr 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 63 days in between
1 earlier meeting
- 9 Feb 20264 of 4 present3 independent
Nomination and remuneration committee
Chair Vikram Shah
Manesh Varkey Cherian, J P Dange
- 8 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent
Stakeholders Relationship Committee
Chair J P Dange
Manesh Varkey Cherian, Vikram Shah
- 9 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
Risk Management Committee
Chair Rajesh R Gupta
Manesh Varkey Cherian, Sandeep Suhas Aole
- 9 Feb 20263 of 3 present1 independent
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee
Chair Vikram Shah
Manesh Varkey Cherian, Sandeep Suhas Aole
- 8 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 87 days in between
Rights Issue Committee
- 23 Jun 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 47 days in between
- 6 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 20 days in between
- 15 Apr 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 36 days in between
- 9 Mar 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 15 days in between
2 earlier meetings
- 21 Feb 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 43 days in between
- 8 Jan 20263 of 3 present1 independent
Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.
Statutory auditor
Named in the results for the quarter to Jun 2026.
- V K Beswal & Associates, Chartered AccountantsPeer-review certificate valid to Jul 2027
1 earlier auditor
- Todarwal & Todarwal LLP, Chartered AccountantsNamed in filings from Mar 2025 to Mar 2026
A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.
Lloyds Enterprises AGM and shareholder votes
Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Lloyds Enterprises dividend history
Annual general meeting, 9 Jul 2026
71,329 shareholders on the register on 2 Jul 2026; present: 8 promoters and 69 others; votes counted by Mitesh Shah / Mitesh Shah & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To receive, consider and adopt the audited standalone financial statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2026, together with the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Ordinary100.00% for0.00% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 74.21% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 16.74% · other public 29.22%
- To receive, consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026, together with the report of the Auditors thereon.Ordinary99.86% for0.14% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 75.79% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 74.21% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 16.74% · other public 29.22%
- To appoint Mr. Babulal Agarwal (DIN: 00029389) as a Managing Director liable to retire by rotation.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- Declaration of Final Dividend for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2026.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 74.21% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To appoint M/s. V. K. Beswal & Associates, Chartered Accountants (Firm Registration No. 101083W) as the Statutory Auditors of the Company.Ordinary99.86% for0.14% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 73.57% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 74.21% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- Re-appointment of Mr. Sandeep Suhas Aole (DIN: 01786387) as a Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company.Special100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.92% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 74.21% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve revision of Remuneration of Mr. Babulal Agarwal (DIN: 00029389), Chairman & Managing Director of The Company.SpecialPromoters have an interest in it100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Engineering Works Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.76% for1.24% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.92% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Metals and Energy Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.76% for1.24% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.99% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Realty Developers Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.76% for1.24% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.99% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Indrajit Properties Private Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.04% for0.96% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 73.64% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Infrastructure & Construction Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.76% for1.24% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.99% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Realty Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.76% for1.24% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.99% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Simon Developers & Infrastructure Private Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.76% for1.24% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.99% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 10.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 17.25% · other public 29.22%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Postal ballot, 16 May 2026, 4 resolutions
70,854 shareholders on the register on 10 Apr 2026; votes counted by Mitesh Shah / Mitesh Shah & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 186 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 INTERALIA TO GIVE LOANS, INTER CORPORATE DEPOSITS, GIVE GUARANTEES IN CONNECTION WITH LOANS MADE BY ANY PERSON OR BODY CORPORATE AND ACQUIRE BY WAY OF SUBSCRIPTION, PURCHASE OR OTHERWISE THE SECURITIES OF ANY OTHER BODY CORPORATE IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITS PRESCRIBED.MoreLess
Special99.85% for0.15% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 85.90% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 76.60% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 24.96% · other public 34.98%
- APPROVAL FOR OVERALL BORROWING LIMITS UNDER SECTION 180(1)(C) OF THE COMPANIES ACT,2013.Special99.86% for0.14% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 81.03% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 76.60% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 24.96% · other public 34.98%
- APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 180(1)(A) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 INTER ALIA FOR CREATION OF MORTGAGE OR CHARGE ON THE ASSETS, PROPERTIES OR UNDERTAKING(S) OF THE COMPANY.Special99.86% for0.14% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 80.96% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 76.60% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 24.96% · other public 34.98%
- TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH GEOMYSORE SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.94% for1.06% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 100.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 12.51% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 24.96% · other public 34.98%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Postal ballot, 9 Jan 2026, 5 resolutions
81,217 shareholders on the register on 5 Dec 2025; votes counted by Mitesh Shah / Mitesh Shah & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
- 1. (a) TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH CROSSLINK FOOD AND FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it96.08% for3.93% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.13% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 8.64% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 52.24% · other public 26.27%
- 1. (b) TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH GEOMYSORE SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it96.08% for3.92% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.13% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 8.64% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 52.24% · other public 26.27%
- 1. (c) TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH PRAKAR ESTATES AND PROMOTERS LLP.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it96.08% for3.92% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.13% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 8.64% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 52.24% · other public 26.27%
- 2. TO ADVANCE ANY LOAN GIVE GUARANTEE PROVIDE SECURITY UNDER SECTION 185 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.SpecialPromoters have an interest in it96.08% for3.92% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 91.13% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 8.64% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 52.24% · other public 26.27%
- 3. TO ADOPT NEW SET OF ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.Special99.89% for0.11% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 22.25% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 76.45% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.24% · other public 26.27%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 29 Aug 2025, 7 resolutions
67,040 shareholders on the register on 22 Aug 2025; present: 8 promoters and 65 others; votes counted by Mitesh J. Shah / Mitesh Shah & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
- To receive, consider and adopt the audited standalone financial statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2025 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
- To receive consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2025 and the report of Auditors thereonOrdinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
- To appoint Mr. Rajesh Gupta (DIN: 00028379) as a director liable to retire by rotationOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.46% for1.54% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.49% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 5.89% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
- Declaration of dividend for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2025Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
- Appointment of M/s. Mitesh Shah & Co., Company Secretaries as the Secretarial Auditor of the Company for term of five (5) Consecutive Years and Fixation of RemunerationOrdinary99.89% for0.11% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.49% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
Continuation of directorship of Mr. Jagannath P. Dange (DIN: 01569430), Director in terms of Regulation 17(1A) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.MoreLess
Special99.89% for0.11% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.49% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.80% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
- Approval for revision of Remuneration of Managing Director of the CompanySpecialPromoters have an interest in it98.42% for1.58% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 83.49% · other public 0.04%
Turnout: all 5.89% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 14.57% · other public 22.81%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Postal ballot, 6 Jul 2025, 10 resolutions
56,512 shareholders on the register on 30 May 2025; votes counted by Mitesh Shah / Mitesh Shah & Co..The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
- Approval for Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025Special99.89% for0.11% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 82.11% · other public 0.04%
Turnout: all 79.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval of grant of options to the employees of subsidiary company, in India or outside India under Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025Special99.89% for0.11% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 82.11% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 79.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval of grant of options to the employees of associate company, in India or outside India under Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025Special99.89% for0.11% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 82.11% · other public 0.04%
Turnout: all 79.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
Approval for the provision of loan by the company for the purchase of its own shares by the trust / trustees for the benefit of employees under Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025MoreLess
Special99.89% for0.11% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 82.11% · other public 0.04%
Turnout: all 79.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (formerly known as Lloyds Steels Industries Limited).OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.24% for1.76% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 100.00% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 5.76% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Metals and Energy Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.24% for1.76% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 100.00% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 5.76% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Realty Developers Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.24% for1.76% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 100.00% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 5.76% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval for material related party transaction with Indrajit Properties Private Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.50% for1.50% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 82.11% · other public 0.08%
Turnout: all 5.76% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Infrastructure & Construction Limited.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.55% for1.45% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 82.11% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 5.76% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
- Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Metals & Minerals Trading LLP.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.24% for1.76% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 100.00% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 5.76% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 38.45% · other public 21.91%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Postal ballot, 19 Jan 2025, 3 resolutions
56,868 shareholders on the register on 13 Dec 2024; votes counted by Mr. Hemant Maheshwari / M/s. H Maheshwari & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
- Appointment of Mr. Jagannath Pandharinath Dange (DIN: 01569430) as an Independent Director of the CompanySpecial100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.25% · promoters 98.94% · institutions 7.48% · other public 23.63%
- Reappointment of Mr. Vikram Chandrakant Shah (DIN: 00824376) as an Independent Director of the CompanySpecial100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.25% · promoters 98.94% · institutions 7.48% · other public 23.63%
- Appointment of Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta (DIN: 02914009) as an Independent Director of the CompanySpecial100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 79.25% · promoters 98.94% · institutions 7.48% · other public 23.63%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
How mutual funds voted
Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 9 Jul 2026, 1 fund house so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)
To receive, consider and adopt the audited standalone financial statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2026, together with the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
1 for0 against- To receive, consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2026, together with the report of the Auditors thereon.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of the audited financial statements of all Subsidiaries on the website of the Company.
0 for1 against - To appoint Mr. Babulal Agarwal (DIN: 00029389) as a Managing Director liable to retire by rotation.1 for0 against
- Declaration of Final Dividend for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2026.1 for0 against
- To appoint M/s. V. K. Beswal & Associates, Chartered Accountants (Firm Registration No. 101083W) as the Statutory Auditors of the Company.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency Concern: Proposed audit remuneration is minimal in nature and does not appear to be commensurate with the size of operations i.e. Revenue & Market Cap of the Company. Further, no justification / rationale has been provided by the Company for such low audit remuneration proposed.
0 for1 against - Re-appointment of Mr. Sandeep Suhas Aole (DIN: 01786387) as a Non-Executive Independent Director of the Company.1 for0 against
- To Approve revision of Remuneration of Mr. Babulal Agarwal (DIN: 00029389), Chairman & Managing Director of The Company.1 for0 against
- To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Engineering Works Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information ( Related Party Transaction details in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity with regards to. how these transactions are classified as OCOB.
0 for1 against - To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Metals and Energy Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information (Related Party Transaction details in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party TransactionIndustry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed Related Party Transactions benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity with regards to. how these transactions are classified as OCOB. The Company is extending financial support to related party, however, it is unclear if remaining shareholders are extending proportionate support and if not, adequate reasoning should be provided.
0 for1 against - To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Realty Developers Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information (Related Party Transaction details in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party TransactionIndustry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed Related Party Transactions benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity with regards to. how these transactions are classified as OCOB. The Company is extending financial support to related party, however, it is unclear if remaining shareholders are extending proportionate support and if not, adequate reasoning should be provided.
0 for1 against - To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Indrajit Properties Private Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information (Related Party Transactiondetails in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. There is a significant shift in proposed Related Party Transaction limit without adequate utilization of previously approved limit and no justification for the same. Transparency Concern: The Company is extending financial support to related party, however, it is unclear if remaining shareholders are extending proportionate support and if not, adequate reasoning should be provided.
0 for1 against - To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Infrastructure & Construction Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information (Related Party Transaction details in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed Related Party Transactions benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: The Company is extending financial support to related party, however, it is unclear if remaining shareholders are extending proportionate support and if not, adequate reasoning should be provided.
0 for1 against - To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Lloyds Realty Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information ( Related Party Transactions details in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party Transactions Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity with regards to. how these transactions are classified as OCOB.
0 for1 against - To Approve Material Related Party Transactions with Simon Developers & Infrastructure Private Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-disclosure of required information (Related Party Transaction details in the preceding quarter data) as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance Concern: No clarity with regards to. the basis of arm’s length pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed Related Party Transactions benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: The Company is extending financial support to related party, however, it is unclear if remaining shareholders are extending proportionate support and if not, adequate reasoning should be provided.
0 for1 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 16 May 2026, 5 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 186 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 INTERALIA TO GIVE LOANS, INTER CORPORATE DEPOSITS, GIVE GUARANTEES IN CONNECTION WITH LOANS MADE BY ANY PERSON OR BODY CORPORATE AND ACQUIRE BY WAY OF SUBSCRIPTION, PURCHASE OR OTHERWISE THE SECURITIES OF ANY OTHER BODY CORPORATE IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITS PRESCRIBED.MoreLess
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency Concern: Lack of adequate justifications & disclosure as Company has not provided details of recipients. Umbrella approval to cover any person/entity in the proposed limit.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundCompliant with the law. Governance & Transparency Concern: Lack of adequate justifications & disclosure as Company has not provided details of recipients. Umbrella approval to cover any person/entity in the proposed limit.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInadequate justifications & disclosures; Umbrella approval being sought.
0 for5 against- APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 180(1)(A) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 INTER ALIA FOR CREATION OF MORTGAGE OR CHARGE ON THE ASSETS, PROPERTIES OR UNDERTAKING(S) OF THE COMPANY.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency concern: Majority of the Existing Borrowing Limit is unutilized, and no specific reason/justification provided for the proposed increase.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance & Transparency concern: Interlinked with resolution #2.
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInterlinked with resolution #2.
1 for4 against - TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH GEOMYSORE SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The Company has not adequately disclosed the basis for arm’s length pricing, in absence of which shareholders cannot make informed decisions regarding the proposed Related Party Transactions. Transparency Concern: The Company is extending support to the proposed entities however it is unclear if the other shareholders are extending similar support or if the Company is being compensated for the additional risk it is taking; The Company has not provided any disclosure with regards to to the operational and execution capability of the Counterparty for which obligation will be undertaken by the Company.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: The Company has not adequately disclosed the basis for arm’s length pricing, in absence of which shareholders cannot make informed decisions regarding the proposed RPTs. Transparency Concern: The Company is extending support to the proposed entities however it is unclear if the other shareholders are extending similar support or if the Company is being compensated for the additional risk it is taking; The Company has not provided any disclosure w.r.t. to the operational and execution capability of the Counterparty for which obligation will be undertaken by the Company.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInadequate disclosure w.r.t. Basis of arm’s length pricing. No details regarding the contribution being made by other shareholders; Unclear whether counter-party has execution capability
0 for5 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
To borrow, from time to time, by way of loans, credit facilities, debt instruments or in any other forms, any such sum or sums of money (either Indian or foreign currency) from banks, financial institutions, bodies corporate, companies, firms or any one or more persons and with or without security as the Board may think fit, for the purpose of business of the Company, any sum or sums of monies which together with the monies already borrowed by the Company (apart from temporary loans obtained or to be obtained from the Company’s bankers in the ordinary course of business), which may exceed the aggregate of the paid up capital of the Company, its free reserves and securities premium, provided that the total amount so borrowed by the Board shall not at any time exceed the aggregate of the paid up capital, free reserves and securities premium of the Company or Rs. 3,000 Crore, whichever is higher.MoreLess
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance & Transparency concern: Majority of the Existing Borrowing Limit is unutilized, and no specific reason/justification provided for the proposed increase.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance & Transparency concern: Majority of the Existing Borrowing Limit is unutilized, and no specific reason/justification provided for the proposed increase.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundMajority of the Existing Borrowing Limit is unutilized, and no specific reason/justification provided for the proposed increase.
0 for5 against
3 earlier meetings
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 9 Jan 2026, 5 fund houses
- 1. (a) TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH CROSSLINK FOOD AND FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundTransparency Concern: Inconsistent Transactions – The Company is proposing to avail borrowings from its Promoter Entity, while also providing financial guarantees to the same Entity. It appears contradictory as the Explanatory Statement has expressed that the Company shall require borrowings and advances from the Promoter Entity, while at the same time, the Company is seeking approval to extend guarantees to the same Entity. Enabling Approval, & Inadequate Disclosures with regards to Particulars of the loans / guarantees /investments. Two or more transactions have been clubbed against the same transaction amount. Inadequate description of nature of transactions. Specific Approval is being sought without providing adequate details with regards to the proposed transactions. The transaction is proposed for 3-years; no year-wise break-down (estimate) has been provided in the Notice .Governance Concern: Inadequate Justification as to how the transactions are in the best interest of the Listed Entity. Fairness of the transaction cannot be ascertained due to the non-disclosure of Basis of Arm’s Length Pricing. It is not clear if the proposed Entities are having the financial viability to undertake the proposed Related Party Transactions Quantum.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundTransparency Concern: Inconsistent Transactions – The Company is proposing to avail borrowings from its Promoter Entity, while also providing financial guarantees to the same Entity. It appears contradictory as the Explanatory Statement has expressed that the Company shall require borrowings and advances from the Promoter Entity, while at the same time, the Company is seeking approval to extend guarantees to the same Entity. Non-Compliant as per SEBI Guidelines: Enabling Approval, & Inadequate Disclosures w.r.t Particulars of the loans / guarantees / investments. Two or more transactions have been clubbed against the same transaction amount. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions as required under the ISF Format. Specific Approval is being sought without providing adequate details w.r.t. the proposed transactions. The transaction is proposed for 3-years; no year-wise break-down (estimate) has been provided in the Notice. Governance Concern: Inadequate Justification as to how the transactions are in the best interest of the Listed Entity. Fairness of the transaction cannot be ascertained due to the non-disclosure of Basis of Arm’s Length Pricing. Transparency Concern: It is not clear if the proposed Entities are having the financial viability to undertake the proposed RPT Quantum. It is not clear if the Company is proposing three separate RPTs under Resolution #1, or if the Voting shall be allowed separately for each transaction.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - 1. (b) TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH GEOMYSORE SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundEnabling Approval, & Inadequate Disclosures with regards to Particulars of the loans / guarantees /investments. Two or more transactions have been clubbed against the same transaction amount. Inadequate description of nature of transactions. Specific Approval is being sought without providing adequate details with regards to the proposed transactions. The transaction is proposed for 3-years; no year-wise break-down (estimate) has been provided in the Notice .Governance Concern: Inadequate Justification as to how the transactions are in the best interest of the Listed Entity. Fairness of the transaction cannot be ascertained due to the non-disclosure of Basis of Arm’s Length Pricing. It is not clear if the proposed Entities are having the financial viability to undertake the proposed Related Party Transactions Quantum. It is not clear if the Company is proposing three separate RPTs under Resolution #1, or if the Voting shall be allowed separately for each transaction.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliant as per SEBI Guidelines: Enabling Approval, & Inadequate Disclosures w.r.t Particulars of the loans / guarantees / investments. Two or more transactions have been clubbed against the same transaction amount. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions as required under the ISF Format. Specific Approval is being sought without providing adequate details w.r.t. the proposed transactions. The transaction is proposed for 3-years; no year-wise break-down (estimate) has been provided in the Notice. Governance Concern: Inadequate Justification as to how the transactions are in the best interest of the Listed Entity. Fairness of the transaction cannot be ascertained due to the non-disclosure of Basis of Arm’s Length Pricing. Transparency Concern: It is not clear if the proposed Entities are having the financial viability to undertake the proposed RPT Quantum. It is not clear if the Company is proposing three separate RPTs under Resolution #1, or if the Voting shall be allowed separately for each transaction.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - 1. (c) TO APPROVE MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS WITH PRAKAR ESTATES AND PROMOTERS LLP.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundEnabling Approval, & Inadequate Disclosures with regards to Particulars of the loans / guarantees /investments. Two or more transactions have been clubbed against the same transaction amount. Inadequate description of nature of transactions. Specific Approval is being sought without providing adequate details with regards to the proposed transactions. The transaction is proposed for 3-years; no year-wise break-down (estimate) has been provided in the Notice .Governance Concern: Inadequate Justification as to how the transactions are in the best interest of the Listed Entity. Fairness of the transaction cannot be ascertained due to the non-disclosure of Basis of Arm’s Length Pricing. It is not clear if the proposed Entities are having the financial viability to undertake the proposed Related Party Transactions Quantum. It is not clear if the Company is proposing three separate RPTs under Resolution #1, or if the Voting shall be allowed separately for each transaction.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliant as per SEBI Guidelines: Enabling Approval, & Inadequate Disclosures w.r.t Particulars of the loans / guarantees / investments. Two or more transactions have been clubbed against the same transaction amount. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions as required under the ISF Format. Specific Approval is being sought without providing adequate details w.r.t. the proposed transactions. The transaction is proposed for 3-years; no year-wise break-down (estimate) has been provided in the Notice. Governance Concern: Inadequate Justification as to how the transactions are in the best interest of the Listed Entity. Fairness of the transaction cannot be ascertained due to the non-disclosure of Basis of Arm’s Length Pricing. Transparency Concern: It is not clear if the proposed Entities are having the financial viability to undertake the proposed RPT Quantum. It is not clear if the Company is proposing three separate RPTs under Resolution #1, or if the Voting shall be allowed separately for each transaction.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - 2. TO ADVANCE ANY LOAN GIVE GUARANTEE PROVIDE SECURITY UNDER SECTION 185 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosures. Generic justification and non-disclosure of the recipient(s) of the investments, loans, guarantees and security.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Section 185 of the Companies Act: Inadequate disclosures w.r.t. the particulars mandated u/s 185 of Companies Act, 2013. Governance Concern: Enabling Approval with Inadequate disclosures – Generic justification and non-disclosure of the recipient(s) of the investments, loans, guarantees and security.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - 3. TO ADOPT NEW SET OF ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundProposed Articles of Association contains a clause for the appointment of Alternate Directors for Independent Directors.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliant with SEBI (LODR) Regulations: Proposed AoA contains a clause for the appointment of Alternate Directors for IDs; the same was debarred w.e.f. 1st October, 2018 under Regulation 25 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations.
1 for4 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 29 Aug 2025, 5 fund houses
- To receive, consider and adopt the audited standalone financial statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2025 and the reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.5 for0 against
- To receive consider and adopt the audited consolidated financial statement of the Company for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 2025 and the report of Auditors thereon5 for0 against
- To appoint Mr. Rajesh Gupta (DIN: 00028379) as a director liable to retire by rotation
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundTransparency Concern: Ambiguity With regards to two Full-Time Positions held by the Director.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNo concern on the merits of the Appointee. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity w.r.t. two Full-Time Positions held by the Director.
1 for4 against - Declaration of dividend for the Financial Year ended 31st March, 20255 for0 against
- Appointment of M/s. Mitesh Shah & Co., Company Secretaries as the Secretarial Auditor of the Company for term of five (5) Consecutive Years and Fixation of Remuneration
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundTransparency Concern: Previous Auditor’s remuneration has not been disclosed; the Company has not addressed if there is any Material Change in the Audit Fee.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency Concern: Previous Auditor’s remuneration has not been disclosed; the Company has not addressed if there is any Material Change in the Audit Fee.
1 for4 against Continuation of directorship of Mr. Jagannath P. Dange (DIN: 01569430), Director in terms of Regulation 17(1A) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.MoreLess
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Prolonged association with the Group: Proposed continuation will lead to more than 10 years’ association with the Group, which may compromise the independence of the Director.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Prolonged association with the Group: Proposed continuation will lead to more than 10 years’ association with the Group, which may compromise the independence of the Director.
1 for4 against- Approval for revision of Remuneration of Managing Director of the Company
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: No cap has been placed on Variable Pay; there may arise a case of excessive remuneration,as the Board has the discretion to determine the Variable Pay. Combined Position of Board Chairperson & Managing Director; it may lead to concentration of powers in a single Director.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: No cap has been placed on Variable Pay; there may arise a case of excessive remuneration, as the Board has the discretion to determine the Variable Pay. Combined Position of Board Chairperson & Managing Director; it may lead to concentration of powers in a single Director.
1 for4 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 6 Jul 2025, 5 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
- Approval for Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-Disclosure of Exercise Price / Pricing Formula; Absolute Discretion to NRC to determine Exercise Price. Governance Concern: Potential Significant Benefit arising to a single Employee.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliant with SEBI (SBEB & SE) Regulations: Non-Disclosure of Exercise Price / Pricing Formula; Absolute Discretion to NRC to determine Exercise Price. Governance Concern: Potential Significant Benefit arising to a single Employee.
0 for4 against - Approval of grant of options to the employees of subsidiary company, in India or outside India under Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-Disclosure of Exercise Price / Pricing Formula; Absolute Discretion to NRC to determine Exercise Price. Governance Concern: Potential Significant Benefit arising to a single Employee.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInter-linked with Resolution #1.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - Approval of grant of options to the employees of associate company, in India or outside India under Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Scheme benefit extended to Associate Companies without affirmation on cost reimbursement provision.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInter-linked with Resolution #1. Governance Concern: Scheme benefit extended to Associate Companies without affirmation on cost reimbursement provision.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against Approval for the provision of loan by the company for the purchase of its own shares by the trust / trustees for the benefit of employees under Lloyds Enterprises Limited Employee Stock Option Plan – 2025MoreLess
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundNon-Disclosure of Exercise Price / Pricing Formula; Absolute Discretion to NRC to determine Exercise Price. Governance Concern: Potential Significant Benefit arising to a single Employee.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInter-linked with Resolution #1.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against- Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (formerly known as Lloyds Steels Industries Limited).
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus Approval being sought for more than one year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Ambiguity with regard to how these transactions are classified as ordinary course of business. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliance: Omnibus Approval being sought for more than 1-year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Ambiguity w.r.t. how these transactions are classified as OCOB. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Metals and Energy Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus Approval being sought for more than one year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Ambiguity with regard to how these transactions are classified as ordinary course of business. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliance: Omnibus Approval being sought for more than 1-year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Ambiguity w.r.t. how these transactions are classified as OCOB. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Realty Developers Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus Approval being sought for more than one year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Ambiguity with regard to how these transactions are classified as ordinary course of business. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliance: Omnibus Approval being sought for more than 1-year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Ambiguity w.r.t. how these transactions are classified as OCOB. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - Approval for material related party transaction with Indrajit Properties Private Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus Approval being sought for more than one year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity with regard to prior approval and how these transactions are classified as ordinary course of business. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliance: Omnibus Approval being sought for more than 1-year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity w.r.t. prior approval and how these transactions are classified as OCOB. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Infrastructure & Construction Limited.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus Approval being sought for more than one year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing.Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliance: Omnibus Approval being sought for more than 1-year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity regarding prior approval. Inadequate Description of Nature of Transactions. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against - Approval for material related party transaction with Lloyds Metals & Minerals Trading LLP.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus Approval being sought for more than one year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity with regard to prior approval and how these transactions are classified as ordinary course of business. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliance: Omnibus Approval being sought for more than 1-year. Governance Concern: Non-Disclosure of Basis of Pricing. Inadequate Justification as to how the proposed RPTs benefit the Company. Transparency Concern: Ambiguity w.r.t. prior approval and how these transactions are classified as OCOB. Inadequate disclosures on past transactions with related parties.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for5 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
Scheme of Arrangement amongst the Company, Piramal Finance Limited (formerly known as Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited) (PFL or Transferee Company) and their respective shareholders and creditors under Sections 230 to 232 of the Act read with SMoreLess
Against Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
0 for1 against
Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.
Investor complaints and compliance
Quarter by quarter.
Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count
- Received
- Resolved
Open at the quarter's end
- The board is made up as the listing rules require
- Yes
- The board has a regular chairperson
- Yes
- The company has a risk management committee
- Yes
- The chair is related to the managing director
- Yes
- The filing has a part on fines and penalties
- No
- The filing has a part on tax disputes
- No
- There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
- No
The company's own answers in its filing.
How money raised was used
Reported for the quarter to Jun 2026. A warrant or partly paid issue plans the whole issue while the money comes in over time, so the amount set aside can be more than raised so far.
| Raised | Amount raised | For | Set aside | Spent | Spent elsewhere |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rights IssuesSep 2025, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited | 992.26 | Subscription to Secured Non-Convertible Debentures ("NCD") of our Subsidiary Lloyds Realty Developers Limited | 700.00 | 185.71 | No |
| Rights IssuesSep 2025, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited | 992.26 | General Corporate Purpose | 247.50 | 244.37 | No |
| Rights IssuesSep 2025, checked by India Ratings and Research Private Limited | 992.26 | Issue related Expenses | 44.76 | 46.41 | No |