KRBL MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM
NSE: KRBLBSE: 530813Agricultural Food & other ProductsSmall Cap
Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹354.90.
- Market capMarket capitalisation. Share price times the number of shares: what the whole company is worth at the day's price. The rank is by average market value over the six months to Jun 2026, among listed companies.
- ₹7,996 Cr629th largest listed
- P/EPrice to earnings, trailing. Market cap divided by the profit of the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, after the share of the other owners of its subsidiaries: what investors pay for each rupee of a year's profit. The filing of 13 Aug 2026
- 10.5
- P/BPrice to book. Market cap divided by the net worth that belongs to the company's own shareholders, its assets less everything it owes and less the other owners' share of its subsidiaries, on its latest balance sheet. The filing of 27 May 2026
- 1.4
- Dividend yieldDividend yield. Dividends paid per share in the twelve months to the day, as a percentage of the day's share price.
- 1.29%
- ROEReturn on equity. Profit over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly) that belongs to the company's own shareholders, as a percentage of their net worth, the money they have in the business. Net worth is the average of the latest balance sheet and the one a year before it. The filing of 13 Aug 2026
- 13.7%
- ROCEReturn on capital employed. Operating profit after depreciation (revenue less operating expenses and depreciation, without other income and one-off items) as a percentage of all the money the business runs on: the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included, plus borrowings. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. The profit is over the last twelve months (the latest four quarters, or two half years for a company that reports half-yearly); net worth and borrowings are on the latest balance sheet. The filing of 13 Aug 2026
- 15.0%
- Debt to equityDebt to equity. Borrowings divided by the whole group's net worth, the other owners of its subsidiaries included: rupees borrowed for each rupee of equity in the business. Lease liabilities are not counted: the results filings do not state them. From the balance sheet at the end of Mar 2026. The filing of 27 May 2026
- 0.03
- Volume, NSEVolume. Shares traded on the last trading day; delivery is the part buyers kept rather than sold again the same day.
- 5,07,14437.8% delivered
KRBL board of directors
At the end of the quarter to Sep 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares
- Chairperson and managing directorAnil Kumar MittalRelated to the promoter
- Managing directorArun Kumar Gupta
- Managing directorAnoop Kumar Gupta
- Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerShubham Kandhway
8 directors4 independent4 executive
- Anil Kumar Mittal · Chairperson and managing directorExecutive · joined Mar 1993 · reappointed Dec 2024 · 1 listed board
- Arun Kumar Gupta · Managing directorExecutive · joined Mar 1993 · reappointed Dec 2024 · 1 listed board
- Anoop Kumar Gupta · Managing directorExecutive · joined Mar 1993 · reappointed Dec 2024 · 1 listed board · 1 committee seat
- Priyanka MittalExecutive · joined Nov 2000 · reappointed Sep 2022 · 1 listed board
- Priyanka SardanaIndependent · joined Sep 2019 · reappointed Sep 2024 · 84 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent
- Surinder SinghIndependent · joined Aug 2023 · reappointed Aug 2023 · 37 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
- Desh Raj DograIndependent · joined Jul 2025 · reappointed Jul 2025 · 14 months as independent · 4 listed boards · 4 as independent · 7 committee seats, 2 as chair
- Sudhir GargIndependent · joined Dec 2025 · reappointed Dec 2025 · 9 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 2 committee seats, 1 as chair
An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.
2 directors who left
- Anil Kumar Chaudhary, left 8 Sep 2025: Others
- Ashok Pai, left 8 Apr 2025: Others
Committees and meetings
Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes
Board
- 13 Aug 20267 of 8 present4 independent · 90 days in between
- 14 May 20268 of 8 present4 independent
Audit Committee
Chair Surinder Singh
Anoop Kumar Gupta, Desh Raj Dogra, Sudhir Garg
- 13 Aug 20264 of 4 present3 independent · 90 days in between
- 14 May 20264 of 4 present3 independent
Nomination and remuneration committee
Chair Desh Raj Dogra
Surinder Singh, Priyanka Sardana
- 14 May 20263 of 3 present3 independent
Stakeholders Relationship Committee
Chair Sudhir Garg
Surinder Singh, Desh Raj Dogra
No meeting listed in the filing.
Risk Management Committee
Chair Priyanka Sardana
Anoop Kumar Gupta, Arun Kumar Gupta, Ashish Jain
- 13 Aug 20262 of 3 present1 independent · 90 days in between
- 14 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee
Chair Anoop Kumar Gupta
Anil Kumar Mittal, Priyanka Sardana
- 13 Aug 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 90 days in between
- 14 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent
Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.
Statutory auditor
Named in the results for the quarter to Mar 2026.
- Walker Chandiok & Co LLPPeer-review certificate valid to May 2026
A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.
KRBL AGM and shareholder votes
Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.KRBL dividend history
Annual general meeting, 24 Sep 2026
85,193 shareholders on the register on 18 Sep 2026; present: 15 promoters and 88 others; votes counted by Deepak Kukreja / DMK Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2026 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereonMoreLess
Ordinary92.26% for7.74% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 94.32% · other public 0.07%
Turnout: all 67.85% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 32.82% · other public 9.25%
- To declare a Final Dividend of ₹4.50/- (Rupees Four and Paisa Fifty only) (450%) per equity share of face value of ₹1/- each, on 22,88,89,892 equity shares for the financial year ended 31 March 2026.Ordinary99.87% for0.13% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.57% · other public 0.06%
Turnout: all 67.86% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 32.87% · other public 9.25%
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anoop Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030160), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.Ordinary96.75% for3.25% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 39.35% · other public 0.51%
Turnout: all 67.86% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 32.87% · other public 9.25%
- Ratification of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year ending 31 March 2027.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.07%
Turnout: all 67.86% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 32.87% · other public 9.25%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Postal ballot, 12 Jan 2026, 1 resolution
88,466 shareholders on the register on 5 Dec 2025; votes counted by DEEPAK KUKREJA / DMK ASSOCIATES.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
- APPOINTMENT OF SUDHIR GARG (DIN: 01585908) AS A NON EXECUTIVE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANYSpecial99.98% for0.02% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.17% · other public 0.20%
Turnout: all 67.78% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 42.43% · other public 5.88%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 24 Sep 2025, 7 resolutions
95,835 shareholders on the register on 17 Sep 2025; present: 15 promoters and 105 others; votes counted by Deepak Kukreja / DMK Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the Financial Year 2024-25 including Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2025, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the Financial Year ended on that date together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Ordinary99.47% for0.53% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 7.67% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 72.19% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.83% · other public 26.77%
- To declare a final dividend of ₹3.50/- per equity share of face value of ₹1/- each, on 22,88,89,892 equity shares for the Financial Year 2024-25.Ordinary99.82% for0.18% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.39% · other public 0.14%
Turnout: all 72.20% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.90% · other public 26.77%
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta (DIN:00030127), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.64% for0.36% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.96% · other public 0.16%
Turnout: all 72.20% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.90% · other public 26.77%
- Ratification of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the Financial Year 2025-26Ordinary99.99% for0.01% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.15%
Turnout: all 72.20% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.90% · other public 26.77%
- Appointment of Mr. Desh Raj Dogra (DIN: 00226775) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the CompanySpecial92.91% for7.09% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 10.05% · other public 65.61%
Turnout: all 72.20% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.90% · other public 26.77%
- Appointment of M/s. DMK Associates, Company Secretaries (Firm Registration Number: PE2006DE003100) as Secretarial Auditors of the Company.Ordinary99.82% for0.18% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.39% · other public 0.16%
Turnout: all 72.20% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.90% · other public 26.77%
- Approval for Alteration of Memorandum of Association of the Company.Special99.82% for0.18% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.39% · other public 0.19%
Turnout: all 72.20% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 36.90% · other public 26.77%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 13 Sep 2024, 15 resolutions
Present: 15 promoters and 93 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the Financial Year 2023-24 including Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2024, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the Financial Year ended on that date together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Ordinary99.78% for0.22% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.74% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 69.66% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.12% · other public 24.19%
- To declare a final dividend of ¿4/- per equity share of face value of ¿1/- each, on 22,88,89,892 equity shares for the Financial Year 2023-24.Ordinary99.95% for0.05% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.97% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anil Kumar Mittal (DIN:00030100), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.88% for0.12% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.64% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Ratification of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the Financial Year 2024-25.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Appointment of Mr. Ashok Pai (DIN: 06874699) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.Special100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Appointment of Mr. Anil Kumar Chaudhary (DIN:03256818) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.Special100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Re-appointment of Ms. Priyanka Sardana (DIN: 00049811) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.Special93.63% for6.37% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.84% · other public 72.35%
Turnout: all 69.47% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 23.39%
- Re-appointment of Mr. Anil Kumar Mittal (DIN: 00030100) as Whole Time Executive Director (Chairperson and Managing Director) of the Company and Approval of revision in remuneration structure.SpecialPromoters have an interest in it99.85% for0.15% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 3.27% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Re-appointment of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030127) as Whole Time Executive Director (Joint Managing Director) of the Company and approval of revision in remuneration structure.SpecialPromoters have an interest in it99.92% for0.08% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.64% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Re-appointment of Mr. Anoop Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030160) as Whole Time Executive Director (Joint Managing Director) of the Company and approval of revision in remuneration structure.SpecialPromoters have an interest in it95.68% for4.32% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 93.67% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479), Whole Time Executive Director of the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.93% for0.07% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.45% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 69.67% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Mr. Ashish Mittal, holding office or place of profit in the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it94.79% for5.21% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 80.29% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 49.62% · promoters 66.67% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Mr. Kunal Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it94.79% for5.21% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 80.29% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 49.62% · promoters 66.67% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Approval for Revision in Remuneration Structure of Mr. Akshay Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it94.79% for5.21% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 80.29% · other public 0.06%
Turnout: all 49.62% · promoters 66.66% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
- Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Mr. Ayush Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it94.79% for5.21% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 80.29% · other public 0.06%
Turnout: all 49.62% · promoters 66.66% · institutions 23.25% · other public 24.19%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 28 Sep 2023, 11 resolutions
Present: 16 promoters and 86 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March, 2023 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereonMoreLess
Ordinary99.96% for0.04% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.01% · other public 0.00%
Turnout: all 63.09% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 11.84% · other public 1.87%
- To declare a final dividend of ₹1/- (100%) per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of ₹1/- each for the financial year 2022-23.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.01%
Turnout: all 63.11% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.87%
- To appoint a Director in place of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers herself for re-appointment.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it98.34% for1.66% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 35.66% · other public 35.87%
Turnout: all 63.11% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- To re-appoint M/s. Walker Chandiok & Co LLP as Statutory Auditors of the company for a further term of five yearsOrdinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.15%
Turnout: all 63.11% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2023-24.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.15%
Turnout: all 63.11% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Appointment of Mr. Surinder Singh (DIN: 08200756) as an Independent Non - Executive Director of the Company.Special99.99% for0.01% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 2.56%
Turnout: all 63.11% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Approval for revision in remuneration of Ms. Priyanka Mittal, Whole Time Director of the CompanySpecialPromoters have an interest in it68.39% for31.61% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 74.64% · other public 36.68%
Turnout: all 6.54% · promoters 5.99% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ashish Mittal, holding office or place of profit in the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it32.67% for67.33% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 75.51% · other public 3.88%
Turnout: all 2.94% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Kunal Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it32.67% for67.33% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 75.51% · other public 3.89%
Turnout: all 2.94% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Akshay Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the CompanyOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it32.67% for67.33% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 75.51% · other public 3.89%
Turnout: all 2.94% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
- Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ayush Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the CompanyOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it32.67% for67.33% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 75.51% · other public 3.89%
Turnout: all 2.94% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 11.94% · other public 1.86%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 26 Sep 2022, 5 resolutions
Present: 15 promoters and 67 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2022, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.nMoreLess
Ordinary99.97% for0.03% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.18% · other public 0.02%
Turnout: all 73.36% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.02% · other public 1.91%
- To declare a final dividend of Rs. 3.50 (350%) per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of Rs. 1/- each for the financial year 2021-22.nOrdinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 73.39% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.16% · other public 1.91%
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anoop Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030160), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it95.50% for4.50% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 25.32% · other public 0.19%
Turnout: all 73.39% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.16% · other public 1.91%
- Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2022-23.Ordinary99.97% for0.03% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.13% · other public 0.30%
Turnout: all 73.39% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.16% · other public 1.91%
- Re-appointment of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479) as Whole Time Director of the Company and Revision in RemunerationOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.12% for0.88% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.96% · other public 0.52%
Turnout: all 73.39% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.16% · other public 1.91%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 30 Sep 2021, 4 resolutions
Present: 17 promoters and 67 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2021, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Ordinary99.77% for0.23% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.38% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 73.34% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.91% · other public 9.48%
- To declare a final dividend of Rs. 3.50 (350%) per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of Rs. 1/- each for the financial year ended 31 March 2021.Ordinary99.93% for0.07% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 2.86%
Turnout: all 73.35% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.97% · other public 9.48%
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030127), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.29% for0.71% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.30% · other public 0.09%
Turnout: all 73.35% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.97% · other public 9.48%
- Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2021-22.Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.03%
Turnout: all 73.35% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.97% · other public 9.48%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
Annual general meeting, 30 Sep 2020, 10 resolutions
Present: 6 promoters and 69 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)
To consider and adopt the Standalone and Consolidated Audited Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2020, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereonMoreLess
Ordinary100.00% for0.00% againstAgainst: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%
Turnout: all 72.92% · promoters 94.78% · institutions 65.57% · other public 11.34%
- To confirm payment of Interim Dividend of Rs. 2.80 per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of Re. 1 each for the financial year ended 31 March 2020Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%
Turnout: all 72.92% · promoters 94.78% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anil Kumar Mittal (DIN: 00030100), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointmentOrdinary99.65% for0.35% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.75% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 72.92% · promoters 94.78% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2020-21Ordinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.04%
Turnout: all 72.92% · promoters 94.78% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Appointment of Ms. Priyanka Sardana (DIN: 00049811) as an Independent Non-Executive Director who was appointed as an Additional DirectorOrdinary99.83% for0.17% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.84% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 72.92% · promoters 94.78% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Revision in remuneration of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479), Whole Time Director of the CompanyOrdinary100.00% for0.00% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 72.92% · promoters 94.78% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ashish Mittal, holding office or place of profit in the CompanyOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.99% for0.01% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 16.57% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Kunal Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the CompanyOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.99% for0.01% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 16.57% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Akshay Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the CompanyOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.99% for0.01% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 16.57% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ayush Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the CompanyOrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it99.99% for0.01% against
Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.05%
Turnout: all 16.57% · promoters 0.00% · institutions 65.60% · other public 11.34%
For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.
How mutual funds voted
Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 24 Sep 2026, 1 fund house so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2026 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereonMoreLess
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency Concern: The Board / Management has not adequately discussed/addressed the qualification raised by the statutory auditors. Although, an Independent Professional firm was appointed to review the relevant matters, however, information disclosed by the Company and basis the findings of IP firm, shareholders do not have material information to take adequate decision.
0 for1 against- To declare a Final Dividend of ₹4.50/- (Rupees Four and Paisa Fifty only) (450%) per equity share of face value of ₹1/- each, on 22,88,89,892 equity shares for the financial year ended 31 March 2026.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency Concerns are raised in adoption of financial statements of the Company under resolution #1, final dividend being appropriation post approval of accounts, cannot be paid if accounts are not voted FOR. .
0 for1 against - To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anoop Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030160), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: Given the ongoing Executive Director investigation, the statutory auditors’ qualified opinion, and the resignation of an Independent Director citing governance lapses raises serious governance concerns on the overall business operations and financials of the Company, hence, Managing Director should be held accountable. Further, the matter remains sub judice, and the Company has not adequately disclosed the details of the case in the Notice or the Annual Report, including findings of the review report by IP firm are not adequately disclosed.
0 for1 against - Ratification of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year ending 31 March 2027.1 for0 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 12 Jan 2026, 7 fund houses
- APPOINTMENT OF SUDHIR GARG (DIN: 01585908) AS A NON EXECUTIVE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY7 for0 against
6 earlier meetings
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 24 Sep 2025, 6 fund houses
To consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the Financial Year 2024-25 including Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2025, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the Financial Year ended on that date together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundQualified financial statements; No adequate discussion by the management on the qualification raised by the statutory auditors. Further, governance concerns raised by independent director, who was an audit committee member
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundQualified financial statements. Compliant with Indian Accounting standards. Governance and Transparency concern: The Management has not adequately discussed/addressed the qualification raised by the statutory auditors. Further, there are certain governance concerns impacting the accounts raised by an Independent director of the Company.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
1 for5 against- To declare a final dividend of ₹3.50/- per equity share of face value of ₹1/- each, on 22,88,89,892 equity shares for the Financial Year 2024-25.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundQualified opinion on financial statements.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Qualified opinion on financial statements. Interlinked with resolution #1.
2 for4 against - To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta (DIN:00030127), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundGiven the ongoing ED investigation, the statutory auditors’ qualified opinion, and the recent resignation of an Independent Director citing governance lapses. When combined together, it appears that there might be potential governance lapses.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Given the ongoing ED investigation, the statutory auditors’ qualified opinion, and the recent resignation of an Independent Director citing governance lapses. When combined together, it appears that there might be potential governance lapses.
2 for4 against - Ratification of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the Financial Year 2025-266 for0 against
- Appointment of Mr. Desh Raj Dogra (DIN: 00226775) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company6 for0 against
- Appointment of M/s. DMK Associates, Company Secretaries (Firm Registration Number: PE2006DE003100) as Secretarial Auditors of the Company.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundFailure to highlight previous non-compliance by the Company in the Secretarial Audit Report or Annual Secretarial Compliance Report.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Failure to highlight previous non-compliance by the Company in the Secretarial Audit Report or Annual Secretarial Compliance Report.
2 for4 against - Approval for Alteration of Memorandum of Association of the Company.
Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Angel One Mutual FundInadequate justification for the proposed alteration.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance and Transparency Concern: Inadequate justification for the proposed alteration.
2 for4 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 13 Sep 2024, 11 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
To consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the Financial Year 2023-24 including Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2024, the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the Financial Year ended on that date together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundWe have relied upon the auditors' report that has a qualified opinion on the financial statements. The auditors are unable to estimate the potential impact of an alleged money laundering case on the financial statements of the company as the proceedings are still ongoing. Anoop Kumar Gupta, Joint Managing Director and part of the promoter group, was detained and released on bail by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to a money laundering investigation for alleged involvement in AgustaWestland case. Pending the completion of ongoing investigation of the above matter by regulatory authorities, the auditors are unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements relevant to prevention and timely detection of management override of controls were established and maintained, and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects. The auditors have also raised an emphasis of matter with respect to portion of land parcels and building, situated at Dhuri, Punjab which was attached by the Directorate of Enforcement ('ED' and the case is pending with regulatory authorities. The auditor notes that the company has used accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software except that, audit trail feature was not enabled at database level for accounting software used for maintaining books of accounts. Further, the auditor did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with in respect of the accounting software. Since the auditor's opinion is qualified, we do not support the resolution.
- Bandhan Mutual FundWe have relied upon the auditors’ report that has a qualified opinion on the financial statements. The auditors are unable to estimate the potential impact of an alleged money laundering case on the financial statements of the company as the proceedings are still ongoing. Anoop Kumar Gupta, Joint Managing Director and part of the promoter group, was detained and released on bail by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to a money laundering investigation for alleged involvement in AgustaWestland case. Pending the completion of ongoing investigation of the above matter by regulatory authorities, the auditors are unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements relevant to prevention and timely detection of management override of controls were established and maintained, and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects. The auditors have also raised an emphasis of matter with respect to portion of land parcels and building, situated at Dhuri, Punjab which was attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (‘ED’ and the case is pending with regulatory authorities. The auditor notes that the company has used accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software except that, audit trail feature was not enabled at database level for accounting software used for maintaining books of accounts. Further, the auditor did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with in respect of the accounting software. Since the auditor’s opinion is qualified, we do not support the resolution.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- Nippon India Mutual FundQualified opinion on Standalone and Consolidated financial statements. Shareholders may seek clarification from the Company and vote accordingly.
6 for4 against- To declare a final dividend of ¿4/- per equity share of face value of ¿1/- each, on 22,88,89,892 equity shares for the Financial Year 2023-24.
Against Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Edelweiss Mutual FundBetter to avoid dividends till ED case is solved.
- Nippon India Mutual FundQualified opinion on Standalone financial statements. Shareholders may seek clarification from the Company.
8 for2 against - To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anil Kumar Mittal (DIN:00030100), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern of merit of appointee. Governance concern: Chairman & MD of the Company.
5 for5 against - Ratification of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the Financial Year 2024-25.10 for0 against
- Appointment of Mr. Ashok Pai (DIN: 06874699) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.10 for0 against
- Appointment of Mr. Anil Kumar Chaudhary (DIN:03256818) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.10 for0 against
- Re-appointment of Ms. Priyanka Sardana (DIN: 00049811) as an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.10 for0 against
- Re-appointment of Mr. Anil Kumar Mittal (DIN: 00030100) as Whole Time Executive Director (Chairperson and Managing Director) of the Company and Approval of revision in remuneration structure.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundAnil Kumar Mittal, 73, is promoter, Chairperson and Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has 48 years of experience in the rice and food processing industry. Anil Kumar Mittal was paid Rs. 28.0 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 42.9 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern of merit of appointee. Governance concern: Chairman & MD of the Company.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
3 for7 against - Re-appointment of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030127) as Whole Time Executive Director (Joint Managing Director) of the Company and approval of revision in remuneration structure.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundArun Kumar Gupta, 67, is promoter and Joint Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has attended 75% (3 out of 4) of board meetings held in FY24. He has over 42 years of experience in the rice industry. He has expertise in Basmati Paddy supply chain management and paddy milling technology. Arun Kumar Gupta was paid Rs. 31.4 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 48.4 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
8 for2 against - Re-appointment of Mr. Anoop Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030160) as Whole Time Executive Director (Joint Managing Director) of the Company and approval of revision in remuneration structure.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundAnoop Kumar Gupta, 65, is part of the promoter group and Joint Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has attended all four board meetings held in FY24. He has more than 38 years of experience in strategy and financial operations. We raise concerns on the allegations levelled against him and KRBL Limited by the Enforcement Directorate with respect to a money laundering case while he was Joint Managing Director. The impact of the charges/outcome of the case on his role as Joint Managing Director or time commitment needed in defending himself, is unclear. Anoop Kumar Gupta was paid Rs. 28.0 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 42.9 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- SBI Mutual FundAnoop Kumar Gupta, 65, is part of the promoter group and Joint Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has attended all four board meetings held in FY24. He has more than 38 years of experience in strategy and financial operations. We raise concerns on the allegations levelled against him and KRBL Limited by the Enforcement Directorate with respect to a money laundering case while he was Joint Managing Director. The impact of the charges/outcome of the case on his role as Joint Managing Director or time commitment needed in defending himself, is unclear. Anoop Kumar Gupta was paid Rs. 28.0 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 42.9 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well. We do not support the resolution.
7 for3 against - Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479), Whole Time Executive Director of the Company.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundMs. Priyanka Mittal, 46, is part of the promoter group and leads the development of the flagship brand, India Gate basmati rice globally. Ms. Priyanka Mittal was paid Rs. 21.6 mn in FY24 and based on the revised terms we estimate her FY25 remuneration at Rs. 33.6 mn. While her remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
8 for2 against - Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Mr. Ashish Mittal, holding office or place of profit in the Company.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundAshish Mittal is the son of CMD, Anil Kumar Mittal. He has over 15 years of experience in the rice industry and is currently involved in material handling support and improvement in quality of product, paddy cultivation. He also looks after all factory operations including seed development, procurement and production at the Gautam Budh Nagar facility. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders' approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four members of the promoter family, including Ashish Mittal in office of profit, which is disproportionate to the size of business: it may limit the company's ability to attract the right professional talent. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ashish Mittal's experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundNon-compliance with Companies Act, 2013: Prior approval not sought.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- SBI Mutual FundAshish Mittal is the son of CMD, Anil Kumar Mittal. He has over 15 years of experience in the rice industry and is currently involved in material handling support and improvement in quality of product, paddy cultivation. He also looks after all factory operations including seed development, procurement and production at the Gautam Budh Nagar facility. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four members of the promoter family, including Ashish Mittal in office of profit, which is disproportionate to the size of business: it may limit the company’s ability to attract the right professional talent. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ashish Mittal’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. We do not support the resolution.
2 for8 against - Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Mr. Kunal Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundKunal Gupta has around 11 years of experience. He is the son of Joint Managing Director, Arun Kumar Gupta. He started working in KRBL by managing the Basmati Paddy supply chain. He is involved in the Procurement Department and leads the operations at Dhuri plant. He is responsible for the expansion and establishment of new plants. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed, and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders' approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four members of the promoter family in an executive capacity on the board and four promoters, including Kunal Gupta in office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Kunal Gupta's experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundNon-compliance with Companies Act, 2013: Prior approval not sought.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- SBI Mutual FundKunal Gupta has around 11 years of experience. He is the son of Joint Managing Director, Arun Kumar Gupta. He started working in KRBL by managing the Basmati Paddy supply chain. He is involved in the Procurement Department and leads the operations at Dhuri plant. He is responsible for the expansion and establishment of new plants. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed, and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four members of the promoter family in an executive capacity on the board and four promoters, including Kunal Gupta in office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Kunal Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. We do not support the resolution.
2 for8 against - Approval for Revision in Remuneration Structure of Mr. Akshay Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundAkshay Gupta was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in the office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director. He has worked in the rice industry for over eleven years. He is responsible for developing new markets for the company's products. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fixed remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders' approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four promoters, including Akshay Gupta in office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Akshay Gupta's experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundNon-compliance with Companies Act, 2013: Prior approval not sought.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- SBI Mutual FundAkshay Gupta was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in the office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director. He has worked in the rice industry for over eleven years. He is responsible for developing new markets for the company’s products. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fixed remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four promoters, including Akshay Gupta in office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Akshay Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. We do not support the resolution.
2 for8 against - Approval for revision in remuneration structure of Mr. Ayush Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.
Against Axis Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
- Axis Mutual FundAyush Gupta was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in the office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director and the brother of Akshay Gupta. He has been with the business for more than eleven years and has helped penetrate new distribution channels and e-commerce expantion. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed, and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders' approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four members of the promoter family, including Ayush Gupta in the office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ayush Gupta's experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
- Bandhan Mutual Fund, Edelweiss Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual FundNon-compliance with Companies Act, 2013: Prior approval not sought.
- Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
- SBI Mutual FundAyush Gupta was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in the office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director and the brother of Akshay Gupta. He has been with the business for more than eleven years and has helped penetrate new distribution channels and e-commerce expantion. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed, and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four members of the promoter family, including Ayush Gupta in the office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ayush Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. We do not support the resolution.
2 for8 against
15 proposals not matched to one resolution
- Item 1, as a fund house numbered it1 for0 against
- Item 2, as a fund house numbered it1 for0 against
- Item 3, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundAnil Kumar Mittal, 73, is promoter, Chairperson and Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has 48 years of experience in the rice and food processing industry. Anil Kumar Mittal was paid Rs. 28.0 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 42.9 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
0 for1 against - Item 4, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundArun Kumar Gupta, 67, is promoter and Joint Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has attended 75% (3 out of 4) of board meetings held in FY24. He has over 42 years of experience in the rice industry. He has expertise in Basmati Paddy supply chain management and paddy milling technology. Arun Kumar Gupta was paid Rs. 31.4 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 48.4 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
0 for1 against - Item 5, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundAnoop Kumar Gupta, 65, is part of the promoter group and Joint Managing Director of the company. He has been associated with the company since inception. He has attended all four board meetings held in FY24. He has more than 38 years of experience in strategy and financial operations. We raise concerns on the allegations levelled against him and KRBL Limited by the Enforcement Directorate with respect to a money laundering case while he was Joint Managing Director. The impact of the charges/outcome of the case on his role as Joint Managing Director or time commitment needed in defending himself, is unclear. Anoop Kumar Gupta was paid Rs. 28.0 mn in FY24 and based on the proposed terms we estimate his annual remuneration at Rs. 42.9 mn. While his remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
0 for1 against - Item 6, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundAyush Gupta was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in the office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director and the brother of Akshay Gupta. He has been with the business for more than eleven years and has helped penetrate new distribution channels and e-commerce expantion. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed, and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four members of the promoter family, including Ayush Gupta in the office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ayush Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
0 for1 against - Item 7, as a fund house numbered it1 for0 against
- Item 8, as a fund house numbered it1 for0 against
- Item 9, as a fund house numbered it1 for0 against
- Item 10, as a fund house numbered it1 for0 against
- Item 11, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundKunal Gupta has around 11 years of experience. He is the son of Joint Managing Director, Arun Kumar Gupta. He started working in KRBL by managing the Basmati Paddy supply chain. He is involved in the Procurement Department and leads the operations at Dhuri plant. He is responsible for the expansion and establishment of new plants. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed, and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four members of the promoter family in an executive capacity on the board and four promoters, including Kunal Gupta in office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Kunal Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
0 for1 against - Item 12, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundWe have relied upon the auditors’ report that has a qualified opinion on the financial statements. The auditors are unable to estimate the potential impact of an alleged money laundering case on the financial statements of the company as the proceedings are still ongoing. Anoop Kumar Gupta, Joint Managing Director and part of the promoter group, was detained and released on bail by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to a money laundering investigation for alleged involvement in AgustaWestland case. Pending the completion of ongoing investigation of the above matter by regulatory authorities, the auditors are unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements relevant to prevention and timely detection of management override of controls were established and maintained, and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects. The auditors have also raised an emphasis of matter with respect to portion of land parcels and building, situated at Dhuri, Punjab which was attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (‘ED’ and the case is pending with regulatory authorities. The auditor notes that the company has used accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of recording audit trail (edit log) facility and the same has operated throughout the year for all relevant transactions recorded in the software except that, audit trail feature was not enabled at database level for accounting software used for maintaining books of accounts. Further, the auditor did not come across any instance of audit trail feature being tampered with in respect of the accounting software. Since the auditor’s opinion is qualified, we do not support the resolution.
0 for1 against - Item 13, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundAkshay Gupta was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in the office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director. He has worked in the rice industry for over eleven years. He is responsible for developing new markets for the company’s products. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fixed remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four promoters, including Akshay Gupta in office of profit, which is disproportionate for the size of the company. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Akshay Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
0 for1 against - Item 14, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundMs. Priyanka Mittal, 46, is part of the promoter group and leads the development of the flagship brand, India Gate basmati rice globally. Ms. Priyanka Mittal was paid Rs. 21.6 mn in FY24 and based on the revised terms we estimate her FY25 remuneration at Rs. 33.6 mn. While her remuneration is reasonable and commensurate with the size of business, we raise concerns that there are four promoters in executive capacity on the board and four promoters in office of profit position which is disproportionate for the size of the company. Further, the remuneration structure allows for reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe medical expenses for entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. Further, it is unclear whether the reimbursement of travel and stay which is a part of the remuneration includes personal travel as well.
0 for1 against - Item 15, as a fund house numbered it
Against Taurus Mutual Fund
- Taurus Mutual FundAshish Mittal is the son of CMD, Anil Kumar Mittal. He has over 15 years of experience in the rice industry and is currently involved in material handling support and improvement in quality of product, paddy cultivation. He also looks after all factory operations including seed development, procurement and production at the Gautam Budh Nagar facility. His FY24 remuneration was Rs. 6.0 mn which was entirely fixed and we estimate his FY25 remuneration at Rs. 10.2 mn. Through this resolution, the company proposes to revise its fix remuneration and introduce a variable component at 15% of fixed pay. As per the resolution his fixed pay can increase upto 15% each year from FY26 onwards. Thus, the resolution lacks a cap on total remuneration and does not specify a tenure, allowing for potential increases in fixed and variable pay each year from FY26, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. We do not support perpetual resolutions and expect companies to seek shareholders’ approval on a periodic basis. We also raise concern that there are four promoters in an executive capacity on the board and four members of the promoter family, including Ashish Mittal in office of profit, which is disproportionate to the size of business: it may limit the company’s ability to attract the right professional talent. The remuneration structure allows reimbursement of medical expenses for self and family at actuals as per company policy. We believe that medical expenses for the entire family should be borne by the employee and not the company as the expenses are personal in nature. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ashish Mittal’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre.
0 for1 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 28 Sep 2023, 6 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March, 2023 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereonMoreLess
Against Nippon India Mutual Fund, SBI Mutual Fund
- Nippon India Mutual FundQualified opinion on financial statements
- SBI Mutual FundWe have relied upon the auditors’ report, which has a qualified opinion on the standalone and consolidated financial statements. The auditors are unable to estimate the potential impact of an alleged money laundering case on the financial statements of the company as the proceedings are still ongoing. Anoop Kumar Gupta, Joint Managing Director had been detained and released on bail by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to a money laundering investigation for alleged involvement in AgustaWestland case. The ED has alleged certain allegations against KRBL, KRBL DMCC, a subsidiary and Anoop Kumar Gupta. This is why we do not support the resolution.
4 for2 against- To declare a final dividend of ₹1/- (100%) per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of ₹1/- each for the financial year 2022-23.6 for0 against
- To appoint a Director in place of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers herself for re-appointment.6 for0 against
- To re-appoint M/s. Walker Chandiok & Co LLP as Statutory Auditors of the company for a further term of five years6 for0 against
- Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2023-24.5 for0 against
- Appointment of Mr. Surinder Singh (DIN: 08200756) as an Independent Non - Executive Director of the Company.6 for0 against
- Approval for revision in remuneration of Ms. Priyanka Mittal, Whole Time Director of the Company
Against Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Proposed revision in remuneration is excessive.
5 for1 against - Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ashish Mittal, holding office or place of profit in the Company.
Against ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- ICICI Prudential Mutual FundMr. Ashish Mittal is the son of the Chairperson and Managing Director: Anil Kumar Mittal. He has over 15 years of experience in the rice industry and has played a pivotal role in the development of resilient and high yielding seeds and in the expansion of contact farming model. He is currently involved in material handling and storage, supporting good agri-practices, improvement in quality of product, paddy cultivation devoid of pesticide. He also looks after all factory operations including seed development, procurement and production at the Gautam Budh Nagar facility. He was appointed to the office of profit in September 2008. He completed a Bachelors in Business administration from University of Northridge California in 2004. The company proposes to revise His remuneration upto Rs. 12.0 million per annum. His FY2023 remuneration was Rs. 5.2 million and FY2022 remuneration was Rs. 4.4 million. The resolution does not specify a time-period, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ashish Mittal’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Proposed remuneration is excessive
- Nippon India Mutual FundRemuneration is high
3 for3 against - Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Kunal Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company.
Against ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- ICICI Prudential Mutual FundMr. Kunal Gupta, Head-Rice Procurement and Dhuri unit was appointed in office of profit in the AGM held on 25 September 2012. He is the son of Joint Managing Director: Arun Kumar Gupta. He started working in KRBL by Managing the Basmati Paddy supply chain. He is involved in the Procurement Department and leads the operations at Dhuri plant. He is responsible for the expansion and establishment of new plants. He has completed his BBA in Business Management from the Cox School of business Southern Methodis University in Texas. The company proposes to revise his remuneration upto Rs. 12.0 million per annum. His FY2023 remuneration was Rs. 5.2 million and FY2022 remuneration was Rs. 4.4 million. The resolution does not specify a time-period, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Kunal Gutpa’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Proposed remuneration is excessive.
- Nippon India Mutual FundRemuneration is high
3 for3 against - Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Akshay Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company
Against ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- ICICI Prudential Mutual FundMr. Akshay Gupta, Head-Bult Exports, was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director. He has worked in the rice industry for over ten years, and is well versed in forming strategic alliances, managing clients, mitigating risk, shipping logistics and sales. Akshay Gupta has completed his Management Studies in Finance and Operations Management from Kelley School of Business Indiana university. The company proposes to revise His remuneration upto Rs. 12.0 million per annum. His F20Y23 remuneration was Rs. 5.2 million and FY2022 remuneration was Rs. 4.4 million. The resolution does not specify a time-period, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Akshay Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Proposed remuneration is excessive
- Nippon India Mutual FundRemuneration is high
3 for3 against - Approval for Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ayush Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company
Against ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- ICICI Prudential Mutual FundMr. Ayush Gupta, Head – Domestic Division, was appointed at the AGM held on 25 September 2012 in office of profit. He is the son of Anoop Gupta: Joint Managing Director and the brother of Akshay Gupta. He has been with the business for over ten years and has helped penetrate new distribution channels and was involved in driving sales and marketing. He also expanded into e-commerce. He has completed B.Sc in Marketing and operations Management from Kelley School of Business from Indiana University. The company proposes to revise His remuneration upto Rs. 12.0 million per annum. His FY2023 remuneration was Rs. 5.2 million and FY2022 remuneration was Rs. 4.4 million. The resolution does not specify a time-period, effectively seeking approval in perpetuity. The company has not disclosed how the proposed remuneration benchmarks internally and whether Ayush Gupta’s experience and education is comparable to others within the same cadre. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
- Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Proposed remuneration is excessive
- Nippon India Mutual FundRemuneration is high
3 for3 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
- 5) Ratify remuneration of Rs. 70,000 for HMVN & Associates as cost auditors for FY24 to conduct the audit of the power segment.1 for0 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 26 Sep 2022, 3 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2022, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.nMoreLess
Against Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Nippon India Mutual FundQualified opinion on standalone and consolidated financial statements
2 for1 against- To declare a final dividend of Rs. 3.50 (350%) per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of Rs. 1/- each for the financial year 2021-22.n3 for0 against
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anoop Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030160), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
Against ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Nippon India Mutual Fund
- ICICI Prudential Mutual FundMr. Anoop Kumar Gupta is the Managing Director and has been on the board since March 1993. He attended all five board meetings held in FY2022 and retires by rotation. Enforcement Directorate has raised allegations against him and KRBL Ltd with respect to a money laundering case while he was the Joint Managing Director. The impact of the charges/outcome of the case on his role as Joint Managing Director or time commitment needed in defending himself, is unclear. Hence, the AMC has voted against the resolution.
- Nippon India Mutual FundInsufficient information
1 for2 against - Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2022-23.
Against Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Nippon India Mutual FundLow audit fees
1 for1 against - Re-appointment of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479) as Whole Time Director of the Company and Revision in Remuneration3 for0 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
To ratify the remuneration payable to M/s. HMVN & Associates, Cost Accountants (Firm Registration No. 000290), as Cost Auditors to conduct the Audit of the relevant Cost Records of the Company , for the financial year ending 31 March 2023MoreLess
1 for0 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 30 Sep 2021, 3 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
To receive, consider and adopt the Audited Financial Statements (Standalone and Consolidated) of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2021, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.MoreLess
Against Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Nippon India Mutual FundQualified financial statement - Auditors were unable to estimate potential impact of alleged money laundering case
2 for1 against- To declare a final dividend of Rs. 3.50 (350%) per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of Rs. 1/- each for the financial year ended 31 March 2021.3 for0 against
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta (DIN: 00030127), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment.
Against Nippon India Mutual Fund
- Nippon India Mutual FundAlleged allegations on KRBL Limited and its subsidiary with respect to money laundering case when he was joint Managing Director
2 for1 against - Ratification and confirmation of remuneration of Cost Auditors for the financial year 2021-22.2 for0 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
To ratify the remuneration payable to M/s. HMVN & Associates, Cost Accountants (Firm Registration No. 000290) appointed as Cost Auditors to conduct the Audit of the relevant Cost Records of the Company pertaining to power segment, as prescribed under the Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014, as amended from time to time, for the financial year ending 31 March 2022MoreLess
1 for0 against
Mutual fund votes, meeting of 30 Sep 2020, 4 fund houses
Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.
To consider and adopt the Standalone and Consolidated Audited Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31 March 2020, together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereonMoreLess
2 for0 against2 abstained
- To confirm payment of Interim Dividend of Rs. 2.80 per equity share on 23,53,89,892 equity shares of Re. 1 each for the financial year ended 31 March 20202 for0 against
2 abstained
- To appoint a Director in place of Mr. Anil Kumar Mittal (DIN: 00030100), who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment2 for0 against
2 abstained
- Appointment of Ms. Priyanka Sardana (DIN: 00049811) as an Independent Non-Executive Director who was appointed as an Additional Director2 for0 against
2 abstained
- Revision in remuneration of Ms. Priyanka Mittal (DIN: 00030479), Whole Time Director of the Company2 for0 against
2 abstained
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ashish Mittal, holding office or place of profit in the Company2 for0 against
2 abstained
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Kunal Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company2 for0 against
2 abstained
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Akshay Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company2 for0 against
2 abstained
- Revision in remuneration of Mr. Ayush Gupta, holding office or place of profit in the Company2 for0 against
2 abstained
2 proposals not matched to one resolution
- Remuneration payable to M/s. HMVN & Associates, Cost Accountants (Firm Registration No. 000290) as Cost Auditors2 for0 against
1 abstained
- To approve Remuneration payable to M/s. HMVN & Associates, Cost Accountants (Firm Registration No. 000290) as Cost Auditors to conduct the Audit of the relevant Cost Records of the Company0 for0 against
1 abstained
Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.
Fines
Reported in the filing for the quarter to Sep 2026.
- Fine or penaltySenior Inspector, Legal Metrology DepartmentSince 7 Jul 2026₹50,000
Penalty of ₹50,000
Offence in accordance with Sections 48 and 49 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009
In the company's own words, from its latest governance filing.
Investor complaints and compliance
Quarter by quarter.
Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count
- Received
- Resolved
Open at the quarter's end
- The board is made up as the listing rules require
- Yes
- The board has a regular chairperson
- Yes
- The company has a risk management committee
- Yes
- The chair is related to the managing director
- Yes
- The filing has a part on fines and penalties
- Yes
- The filing has a part on tax disputes
- No
- There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
- No
The company's own answers in its filing.