Dilip Buildcon logo

Dilip Buildcon CEO, MD, chairman, board of directors and AGM

NSE: DBLBSE: 540047ConstructionSmall Cap

Last close ₹360.45down ₹20.10 (5.28%)BSE ₹358.95

Share price at the NSE close on 23 Oct 2026. Previous close ₹380.55.

52-week range of traded prices to 23 Oct 2026
₹352.80Low, 23 Oct 2026₹528.25High, 4 Nov 2025
Market cap
₹5,855 Cr662nd largest listed
P/E
Owners' profit not stated
P/B
0.9
Dividend yield
0.28%
ROCE
9.2%
Debt to equity
1.16
Volume, NSE
2,02,58554.1% delivered

Dilip Buildcon board of directors

At the end of the quarter to Jun 2026, as the company filed it; changes since are in its announcements.Their trades in its shares

  • Chairperson and managing directorDilip SuryavanshiRelated to the promoter
  • Managing director and CEODevendra Jain
  • Company Secretary and Compliance OfficerAbhishek Shrivastava

6 directors4 independent2 executive

  • Dilip Suryavanshi · Chairperson and managing directorExecutive · joined Jun 2006 · reappointed Aug 2024 · 1 listed board · 3 committee seats
  • Devendra Jain · Managing director and CEOExecutive · joined Jun 2006 · reappointed Aug 2024 · 1 listed board · 2 committee seats
  • Vijay ChhibberIndependent · joined Feb 2017 · reappointed Feb 2022 · 112 months as independent · 2 listed boards · 2 as independent · 3 committee seats, 1 as chair
  • Malay MukherjeeIndependent · joined Feb 2018 · reappointed Feb 2023 · 100 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent · 1 committee seat
  • Ratna D ViswanathanIndependent · joined Mar 2019 · reappointed Mar 2024 · 87 months as independent · 3 listed boards · 3 as independent · 3 committee seats, 2 as chair
  • Alok VermaIndependent · joined Jan 2025 · reappointed Jan 2025 · 17 months as independent · 1 listed board · 1 as independent

An independent director has no business or family tie to the company, its promoters or its managers beyond the seat. Listed boards counts the boards of listed companies the director sits on, this one included, and "as independent" how many of those seats are independent ones. Committee seats are audit and stakeholder committee seats across those companies. Months as independent is filed for independent directors only, whose terms the rules cap. Disqualified is the company's own mark that a director may not serve under company law.

1 director who left
  • Satish Chandra Pandey, left 22 Jan 2025: Tenure Completion

Committees and meetings

Who sits on each, and how often they met.Board meeting notices and outcomes

  • Board

    • 14 May 20266 of 6 present4 independent · 92 days in between
    • 10 Feb 20266 of 6 present4 independent
  • Audit Committee

    Chair Ratna D Viswanathan

    Devendra Jain, Vijay Chhibber

    • 13 May 20263 of 3 present2 independent · 92 days in between
    • 9 Feb 20263 of 3 present2 independent
  • Nomination and remuneration committee

    Chair Malay Mukherjee

    Ratna D Viswanathan, Vijay Chhibber

    • 13 May 20263 of 3 present3 independent
  • Stakeholders Relationship Committee

    Chair Vijay Chhibber

    Dilip Suryavanshi, Devendra Jain

    • 13 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent
  • Risk Management Committee

    Chair Dilip Suryavanshi

    Devendra Jain, Malay Mukherjee

    • 14 May 20263 of 3 present1 independent · 93 days in between
    • 9 Feb 20263 of 3 present1 independent
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Committee

    Chair Vijay Chhibber

    Dilip Suryavanshi, Devendra Jain, Ratna D Viswanathan

    • 13 May 20264 of 4 present2 independent
  • Group Governance Committee

    Chair Devendra Jain

    Vijay Chhibber, Malay Mukherjee

    No meeting listed in the filing.

Meetings in the quarter filed and the one before it. The days in between are as the company files them, neither meeting's day counted; the rules allow at most 120. A quorum is the least number of members who must attend for the meeting to decide anything.

Statutory auditor

Named in the results for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • M.K. DANDEKER & CO LLPPeer-review certificate valid to Apr 2027

A statutory auditor checks the company's accounts and signs its results. Peer review is the accountants' institute's check of an audit firm's own work, which a listed company's auditor must hold a valid certificate of.

Dilip Buildcon AGM and shareholder votes

Each resolution, how the votes went, and how institutions voted apart from the promoters. A postal ballot is a vote by post or online, held without a meeting.Dilip Buildcon dividend history

Annual general meeting, 22 Sep 2026

62,422 shareholders on the register on 15 Sep 2026; present: 10 promoters and 45 others; votes counted by Piyush Bindal / Piyush Bindal & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. a. Adoption of the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon b. Adoption of the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Auditors thereonMoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.74% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.43% · other public 33.34%

  2. Approval of the final dividend of Re. 1/- per equity share of Rs. 10/- each for the financial year ended March 31, 2026
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  3. Re-appointment of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610) liable to retire by rotation, as a Director of the Company
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.63% for0.37% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 5.59% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 54.86% · promoters 65.33% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  4. Ratification of the remuneration of M/s Yogesh Chourasia & Associates, as a cost auditor of the Company for FY 2026-27
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  5. Approval of the increase in remuneration of Ms. Tarishi Jain, Financial Analyst, holding an office or place of profit in the Company
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    97.04% for2.96% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 44.91% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 54.86% · promoters 65.33% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  6. Approval of the material related Party transactions with DBL Neemuch Renewable Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  7. Approval of the material related Party transactions with DBL Shajapur Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  8. Approval of the material related Party transactions with Mekhali Power Transmission Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  9. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Bhopal Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  10. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Dhar Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  11. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Guna Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  12. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Mandsaur Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  13. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Mandvi Ratlam Renewable Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  14. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Rajgarh Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  15. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Sukheda Ratlam Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  16. Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Vidisha Solar Limited
    Ordinary
    99.87% for0.13% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  17. Approval of the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures on private placement basis up to Rs. 1000.00 Cr
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  18. Approval of the issuance of Commercial Paper on private placement basis up to Rs. 1000.00 Cr
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 76.75% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

  19. Approval of the continuation of holding the office of Chairman and Managing Director of the Company by Mr. Dilip Suryavanshi
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    99.77% for0.23% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.67% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 42.83% · promoters 46.27% · institutions 52.62% · other public 33.34%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 1 May 2026, 13 resolutions

61,955 shareholders on the register on 27 Mar 2026; votes counted by CS Piyush Bindal / Piyush Bindal & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with KARIMNAGAR-WARANGAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    97.50% for2.50% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 44.90% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  2. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL BHOPAL SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  3. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL DHAR SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  4. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL GUNA SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  5. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL MANDSAUR SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  6. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL Mandvi Ratlam Renewable Limited under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    97.50% for2.50% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 44.90% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  7. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL RAJGARH SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  8. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL SUKHEDA RATLAM SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  9. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL VIDISHA SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  10. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL POWER TRANSMISSION PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  11. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL RENEWABLE PRIVATE LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  12. To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL ERCP BANDH BARETHA PRIVATE LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Ordinary
    99.83% for0.17% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.96% · other public 1.28%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

  13. To consider and approve the limit of Rs. 3785.50 Crores under Section 185 of Companies Act, 2013 for providing any loans for the Financial Year 2026-27
    Special
    94.64% for5.36% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 96.28% · other public 1.94%

    Turnout: all 67.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 46.22% · other public 0.67%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Postal ballot, 17 Jan 2026, 1 resolution

63,164 shareholders on the register on 12 Dec 2025; votes counted by Piyush Bindal / Piyush Bindal & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. The approval of the members be and is hereby accorded for Material Related Party Transactions under Regulation 23 Of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015 between the Company and DBL ERCP Bandh Baretha Private Limited (a subsidiary of the Company)MoreLess
    Ordinary
    97.35% for2.65% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 47.75% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 77.45% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 54.93% · other public 34.48%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 16 Sep 2025, 10 resolutions

64,800 shareholders on the register on 9 Sep 2025; present: 10 promoters and 48 others; votes counted by Piyush Bindal / Piyush Bindal & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. a) To review, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon. b) To review, consider and adopt the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025 together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 68.03% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.06% · other public 0.06%

  2. To declare final dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2025
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  3. To appoint a director in place of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610), who is liable to retire by rotation, being eligible and offers himself for re-appointment.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.21% for0.79% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 7.45% · other public 0.03%

    Turnout: all 46.18% · promoters 65.33% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  4. To ratify the remuneration payable to M/s M.K. Dandeker & CO LLP., Chartered Accountants, Statutory Auditor of the Company.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  5. To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditor for the financial year 2025-26.
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  6. To appoint M/s Piyush Bindal & Associates, Practicing Company Secretary as Secretarial Auditor of the Company for a first term of five years.
    Ordinary
    99.86% for0.14% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.93% · other public 0.02%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  7. To consider and approve the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures
    Special
    99.82% for0.18% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.51% · other public 0.21%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  8. To consider and approve the issuance of Commercial Paper
    Special
    99.81% for0.19% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 2.51% · other public 51.06%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  9. To approve the modification of limit under section 185 & 186 of Companies Act, 2013 making investments, providing any loans/guarantee/securities to DBL Pachhwara Coal Mine Private Limited (Subsidiaryies Company) for the financial year 2025-26.MoreLess
    Special
    99.68% for0.32% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 4.44% · other public 0.21%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

  10. To approve the commission payable to non-executive directors of the Company in case of loss or inadequate profit incurred by the Company.
    Special
    99.99% for0.01% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 51.33%

    Turnout: all 68.07% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 57.45% · other public 0.06%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Extraordinary general meeting, 20 Mar 2025, 4 resolutions

69,571 shareholders on the register on 14 Mar 2025; present: 10 promoters and 34 others; votes counted by Piyush Bindal / Piyush Bindal & Associates.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF MR. ALOK VERMA (DIN: 10915677) AS A NON-EXECUTIVE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR FOR A TERM OF 5 CONSECUTIVE YEARS
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 0.20%

    Turnout: all 75.64% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 56.45% · other public 0.03%

  2. TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE LIMIT OF RS. 4825 CRORES UNDER SECTION 185, 186 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 FOR MAKING INVESTMENTS, PROVIDING LOANS / GUARANTEE / SECURITIES TO THE SUBSIDIARIES COMPANIES / ASSOCIATES COMPANIES / PRIVATE COMPANIES / JVS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2025-26MoreLess
    Special
    93.23% for6.77% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 93.28% · other public 0.74%

    Turnout: all 75.64% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 56.45% · other public 0.03%

  3. TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE INCREASE OF REMUNERATION PAYABLE TO MR. ROHAN SURYAVANSHI, HEAD - STRATEGY & PLANNING OF THE COMPANY
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    92.69% for7.31% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 39.74% · other public 3.21%

    Turnout: all 29.81% · promoters 34.67% · institutions 56.45% · other public 0.02%

  4. TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE INCREASE OF REMUNERATION PAYABLE TO MR. KARAN SURYAVANSHI, HEAD - BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    92.69% for7.31% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 39.74% · other public 3.21%

    Turnout: all 29.81% · promoters 34.67% · institutions 56.45% · other public 0.02%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 24 Sep 2024, 9 resolutions

Present: 10 promoters and 35 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. 1. a) To review consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.nnb) To consider and adopt the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024 together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    99.92% for0.08% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.76% · other public 17.82%

    Turnout: all 78.46% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 65.75% · other public 0.06%

  2. 2 - To declare final dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2024;
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 17.82%

    Turnout: all 78.47% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  3. 3. To appoint a director in place of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610), who is liable to retire by rotation, being eligible and offers himself for re-appointment.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.05% for0.95% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 6.15% · other public 18.27%

    Turnout: all 54.15% · promoters 65.33% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  4. 4. To consider and ratify the remuneration of the CostnAuditor for the financial year 2024-25
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 18.71%

    Turnout: all 78.47% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  5. 5. To consider and approve the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures
    Special
    99.84% for0.16% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.50% · other public 18.27%

    Turnout: all 78.47% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  6. 6. To consider and approve the issuance of Commercial Paper
    Special
    99.84% for0.16% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 1.50% · other public 18.27%

    Turnout: all 78.47% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  7. 7. To consider and approve the limit of Rs. 7116 crores under section 185 & 186 of Companies Act, 2013 for providing loans/guarantee/securities to the Subsidiary Companies/Associate Companies/any other Companies/JVs/Trust/Body CorporatesnMoreLess
    Special
    89.50% for10.50% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 99.13% · other public 18.93%

    Turnout: all 78.47% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  8. 8. To re-appoint for term of three years and fixation of the remuneration of Mr. Dilip Suryavanshi (DIN: 00039944) as the Managing Director of the company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    94.62% for5.38% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 26.38% · other public 19.09%

    Turnout: all 40.78% · promoters 46.27% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

  9. 9. To re-appoint for term of three years and fixation of the remuneration Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610) as the Managing Director of the company
    SpecialPromoters have an interest in it
    95.94% for4.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 26.40% · other public 18.27%

    Turnout: all 54.15% · promoters 65.33% · institutions 65.86% · other public 0.06%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Extraordinary general meeting, 30 Nov 2023, 2 resolutions

Present: 10 promoters and 42 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. ALTERATION OF THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY
    Special
    98.03% for1.97% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 19.78% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 77.94% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.97% · other public 0.07%

  2. ISSUE OF CONVERTIBLE WARRANTS ON PREFERENTIAL BASIS TO THE CERTAIN NON-QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS UNDER NON-PROMOTER CATEGORY FOR CASH
    Special
    99.96% for0.04% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.42% · other public 0.00%

    Turnout: all 77.94% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 61.97% · other public 0.07%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

Annual general meeting, 18 Sep 2023, 11 resolutions

Present: 9 promoters and 49 others.The company's voting result (opens in a new tab)

  1. To receive, consider and adopt the audited financial statements including the balance sheet and statement for change in the equity, profit and loss and cash flow of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2023 together with the reports of the board of directors and auditors thereon; and the audited consolidated financial statements including the balance sheet and statement for change in the equity, profit and loss and cash flow of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2023 together with the report of the auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 13.75%

    Turnout: all 77.86% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.68% · other public 0.13%

  2. To declare final dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2023
    Ordinary
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 13.69%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  3. To appoint a director in place of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610), who is liable to retire by rotation, being eligible and offers himself for re-appointment.
    OrdinaryPromoters have an interest in it
    99.91% for0.09% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.55% · other public 13.94%

    Turnout: all 53.56% · promoters 65.33% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  4. To consider and approve the re-appointment of Ms. Ratna Dharashree Vishwanathan (DIN: 07278291) for a second consecutive term of 5 (five) years w.e.f. March 30, 2024 to March 29, 2029.
    Special
    100.00% for0.00% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 13.93%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  5. To consider and ratify the remuneration of the Cost Auditor for the financial year 2023-24.
    Ordinary
    99.98% for0.02% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.00% · other public 50.08%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  6. To consider and approve the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures.
    Special
    99.95% for0.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.40% · other public 49.19%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  7. To consider and approve the issuance of Commercial Paper.
    Special
    99.95% for0.05% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 0.40% · other public 49.19%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  8. To consider and approve the limit of Rs. 7605.50 crores under section 185 of Companies Act, 2013 for providing loans/ guarantee/securities to the Subsidiaries Companies/ Associates Companies/any other Companies/JVs/Trust/ Body Corporates.MoreLess
    Special
    90.14% for9.86% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 99.52% · other public 49.55%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  9. To consider and approve the authorization to the Board for issuance and allotment of equity shares.
    Special
    97.91% for2.09% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 20.93% · other public 49.19%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  10. To authorise the board of directors of the company for creation of mortgage/charge on all or any of the movable or immovable properties of the company.
    Special
    97.97% for2.03% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 20.38% · other public 49.27%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

  11. To authorise board of directors of the company to borrow money in excess of the paid–up capital and free reserves of the company.
    Special
    90.16% for9.84% against

    Against: promoters 0.00% · institutions 99.31% · other public 49.51%

    Turnout: all 77.88% · promoters 100.00% · institutions 66.82% · other public 0.13%

For and against are per cent of the votes cast. Turnout is the votes cast as a per cent of the shares each group holds. Institutions are funds, insurers, banks and foreign investors. An ordinary resolution passes with more than half the votes cast, a special one with at least three quarters.

How mutual funds voted

Fund houses must disclose how they vote at every meeting of a company they hold.

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 22 Sep 2026, 1 fund house so far (houses' deadline to file 15 Oct 2026)

  • a. Adoption of the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon b. Adoption of the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, together with the Report of the Auditors thereonMoreLess
    1 for0 against
  • Approval of the final dividend of Re. 1/- per equity share of Rs. 10/- each for the financial year ended March 31, 2026
    1 for0 against
  • Re-appointment of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610) liable to retire by rotation, as a Director of the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The remuneration paid to promoter Executive Director appears to be excessive and no adequate justification has been provided for payment of such excessive remuneration.
    0 for1 against
  • Ratification of the remuneration of M/s Yogesh Chourasia & Associates, as a cost auditor of the Company for FY 2026-27
    1 for0 against
  • Approval of the increase in remuneration of Ms. Tarishi Jain, Financial Analyst, holding an office or place of profit in the Company
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance and Transparency Concern: The Company has not disclosed the basis of arriving at remuneration,hence, fairness of the proposed remuneration cannot be ascertained.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the material related Party transactions with DBL Neemuch Renewable Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundCompliance concern identified for inadequate disclosure of justification for entering into the proposed transactions, basis of determination of price of certain transactions, which is mandatory under ISF Related Party transaction Industry Standards. Further, governance and transparency concern identified as the Company is seeking blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of transactions, justification for proposed transactions, pricing terms and other disclosures mandated by ISF Related Party transaction Standards. Moreover, the Company has indicated that shareholding structure of related parties (presently, 100% subsidiaries) may change. However, the Company has not clarified the future extent of its shareholding or whether new investors will proportionately contribute to financial support.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the material related Party transactions with DBL Shajapur Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundCompliance concern identified for inadequate disclosure of justification for entering into the proposed transactions, basis of determination of price of certain transactions, which is mandatory under ISF Related Party transaction Industry Standards. Further, governance and transparency concern identified as the Company is seeking blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of transactions, justification for proposed transactions, pricing terms and other disclosures mandated by ISF Related Party transaction Standards. Moreover, the Company has indicated that shareholding structure of related parties (presently, 100% subsidiaries) may change. However, the Company has not clarified the future extent of its shareholding or whether new investors will proportionately contribute to financial support.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the material related Party transactions with Mekhali Power Transmission Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundCompliance concern identified for inadequate disclosure of basis of determination of price of certain transactions, which is mandatory under ISF Related Party transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Further, governance and transparency concern identified as the Company is seeking blanket approval without adequate disclosure on nature of transactions, pricing terms and other disclosures mandated by ISF Related Party transaction Standards. Moreover, the Company has indicated that the shareholding structure of related party (presently,100% subsidiary) may change in the future. However, the Company has not clarified the future extent of its shareholding or whether new investors will proportionately contribute to financial support.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Bhopal Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Dhar Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Guna Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Mandsaur Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transaction, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding basis of determination of pricing, which is mandatory per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and, No clarity on future status of subsidiary i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Mandvi Ratlam Renewable Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Rajgarh Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Sukheda Ratlam Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the enhancement of the existing Material Related Party Transaction limits with DBL Vidisha Solar Limited
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundConcerns identified at the time of original approval of material Related Party Transactions, through PB in May 2026, have not been addressed by the Company.Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Blanket approval sought, without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; Inadequate justification for proposed enhancement of Related Party Transaction limits.
    0 for1 against
  • Approval of the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures on private placement basis up to Rs. 1000.00 Cr
    1 for0 against
  • Approval of the issuance of Commercial Paper on private placement basis up to Rs. 1000.00 Cr
    1 for0 against
  • Approval of the continuation of holding the office of Chairman and Managing Director of the Company by Mr. Dilip Suryavanshi
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance Concern: The remuneration paid to promoter Executive Director appears to be excessive and no adequate justification has been provided for payment of such excessive remuneration. The proposed director holds combined position of Chairman and Managing Director, which may lead to concentration of powers in the hands of single individual, particularly in the context of decisions pertaining to Executive Remuneration.
    0 for1 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 1 May 2026, 6 fund houses

  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with KARIMNAGAR-WARANGAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and the basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transactions Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on whether other shareholders are contributing in a proportionate manner to their shareholding; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company and the related party, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions despite the identified gap between project value and financial strength; Significant Shift between quantum of previous year RPTs and proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and the basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on whether other shareholders are contributing in a proportionate manner to their shareholding; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company and the related party, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs despite the identified gap between project value and financial strength; Significant Shift between quantum of previous year RPTs and proposed limit, however, no specific justification for the same; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    1 for5 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL BHOPAL SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL DHAR SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL GUNA SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL MANDSAUR SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL Mandvi Ratlam Renewable Limited under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    1 for5 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL RAJGARH SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL SUKHEDA RATLAM SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL VIDISHA SOLAR LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL POWER TRANSMISSION PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL RENEWABLE PRIVATE LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e.extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed Related Party Transaction limits appear to be significant with regards to the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed Related Party Transactions; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding Justification as to why the proposed transaction is in the interest of the Company and basis of determination of pricing; the Company has failed to disclose required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: The Company has sought blanket approval without adequate disclosure on purpose of incorporating the entities, nature of operations & business of the related parties, nature of transactions and justification for proposed transactions; No clarity on future status of subsidiaries i.e. extent of the Company’s shareholding in related parties; The proposed RPT limits appear to be significant w.r.t. the financial standing of the Company, hence the Company should explain as to how the parties plan to sustain the proposed RPTs; Inadequate disclosures.
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundDisclosures not in terms of ISF Industry Standards; Blanket approval; Inadequate disclosures
    2 for4 against
  • To Consider and approve Material Related Party Transactions with DBL ERCP BANDH BARETHA PRIVATE LIMITED under Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosure regarding basis of determination of pricing; the Company has not disclosed required information as per the Related Party Transaction Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Inadequate rationale for revision in Related Party Transaction limit and entering into new transactions with the related party and no clarity as to what changed since last shareholders’ approval taken in January 2026; Inadequate disclosure on nature of transactions proposed to be entered.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with RPT Industry Standards: Inadequate disclosure regarding basis of determination of pricing; the Company has not disclosed required information as per the RPT Industry Standards mandated by SEBI. Governance & transparency concern: Inadequate rationale for revision in RPT limit and entering into new transactions with the related party and no clarity as to what changed since last shareholders’ approval taken in January 2026; Inadequate disclosure on nature of transactions proposed to be entered
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundBasis for determining the pricing inadequately disclosed; Inadequate rationale for revised limit; Inadequate disclosure on nature of transactions.
    2 for4 against
  • To consider and approve the limit of Rs. 3785.50 Crores under Section 185 of Companies Act, 2013 for providing any loans for the Financial Year 2026-27
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, HDFC Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundInadequate disclosures with regards to the particulars mandated u/s 185 of the Companies Act, 2013. Governance Concern: Enabling Approval with inadequate disclosures; material terms and conditions loans to be granted are not disclosed.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual FundNon-Compliant with Section 185 of the Companies Act: Inadequate disclosures w.r.t. the particulars mandated u/s 185 of the Companies Act, 2013. Governance Concern: Enabling Approval with inadequate disclosures; material terms and conditions loans to be granted are not disclosed.
    • HDFC Mutual FundThere is no clarity on how the terms of such financial assistance will be benchmarked. Further, it may be extended to promoter-group entities as well as to other unidentified entities in which directors may have an interest. We do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundInadequate disclosures as per u/s 185 of the Companies Act, 2013.
    0 for6 against
6 earlier meetings

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 17 Jan 2026, 6 fund houses

  • The approval of the members be and is hereby accorded for Material Related Party Transactions under Regulation 23 Of SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015 between the Company and DBL ERCP Bandh Baretha Private Limited (a subsidiary of the Company)MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundOmnibus approval sought for a duration of more than one year; Governance and Transparency concern: Basis for Arm’s Length pricing is not disclosed.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundNon-Compliant with SEBI Circular: Omnibus approval sought for a duration of more than one year; Disclosures not as per RPT Industry Standards. Governance and Transparency concern: Basis for Arm’s Length pricing is not disclosed.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    1 for5 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 16 Sep 2025, 6 fund houses

  • a) To review, consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon. b) To review, consider and adopt the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2025 together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    6 for0 against
  • To declare final dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2025
    6 for0 against
  • To appoint a director in place of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610), who is liable to retire by rotation, being eligible and offers himself for re-appointment.
    6 for0 against
  • To ratify the remuneration payable to M/s M.K. Dandeker & CO LLP., Chartered Accountants, Statutory Auditor of the Company.
    6 for0 against
  • To ratify the remuneration payable to the Cost Auditor for the financial year 2025-26.
    6 for0 against
  • To appoint M/s Piyush Bindal & Associates, Practicing Company Secretary as Secretarial Auditor of the Company for a first term of five years.
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency concern: The audit fee paid to the outgoing auditors for FY 2024–25 has not been disclosed; hence, any material change in comparison with the proposed audit fee cannot be determined.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. No concern on the merits of proposed Auditors. Transparency concern: The audit fee paid to the outgoing auditors for FY 2024–25 has not been disclosed; hence, any material change in comparison with the proposed audit fee cannot be determined
    2 for4 against
  • To consider and approve the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures
    6 for0 against
  • To consider and approve the issuance of Commercial Paper
    6 for0 against
  • To approve the modification of limit under section 185 & 186 of Companies Act, 2013 making investments, providing any loans/guarantee/securities to DBL Pachhwara Coal Mine Private Limited (Subsidiaryies Company) for the financial year 2025-26.MoreLess
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundTransparency concern: No clarity whether the Company will undertake guarantee/charge obligations in proportion with ownership rights.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Transparency concern: No clarity whether the Company will undertake guarantee/charge obligations in proportion with ownership rights.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (Passive holding)
    1 for5 against
  • To approve the commission payable to non-executive directors of the Company in case of loss or inadequate profit incurred by the Company.
    6 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 20 Mar 2025, 6 fund houses

  • TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF MR. ALOK VERMA (DIN: 10915677) AS A NON-EXECUTIVE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR FOR A TERM OF 5 CONSECUTIVE YEARS
    6 for0 against
  • TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE LIMIT OF RS. 4825 CRORES UNDER SECTION 185, 186 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 FOR MAKING INVESTMENTS, PROVIDING LOANS / GUARANTEE / SECURITIES TO THE SUBSIDIARIES COMPANIES / ASSOCIATES COMPANIES / PRIVATE COMPANIES / JVS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2025-26MoreLess
    Against HDFC Mutual Fund, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund
    • HDFC Mutual FundThere is lack of clarity on whether loans/guarantees provided will be to the extent of the company’s shareholding in the entities. The rates at which the loans are being extended are linked to government securities rather than the credit risk of the borrower. Further, loans / guarantees are also proposed to be extended to certain entities of the promoter group and to other entities which have not been identified and in which directors may be interested. We do not support the resolution.
    • Mirae Asset Mutual FundAs per advisory recommendation (passive holding)
    4 for2 against
  • TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE INCREASE OF REMUNERATION PAYABLE TO MR. ROHAN SURYAVANSHI, HEAD - STRATEGY & PLANNING OF THE COMPANY
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Exact same pay to both appointees. Excessive Remuneration. Transparency concern: Basis of increase not disclosed; fairness cannot be ascertained.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Exact same pay to both appointees. Excessive Remuneration. Transparency concern: Basis of increase not disclosed; fairness cannot be ascertained.
    2 for4 against
  • TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE INCREASE OF REMUNERATION PAYABLE TO MR. KARAN SURYAVANSHI, HEAD - BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
    Against Angel One Mutual Fund, Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Angel One Mutual FundGovernance concern: Exact same pay to both appointees. Excessive Remuneration. Transparency concern: Basis of increase not disclosed; fairness cannot be ascertained.
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Exact same pay to both appointees. Excessive Remuneration. Transparency concern: Basis of increase not disclosed; fairness cannot be ascertained.
    2 for4 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 24 Sep 2024, 4 fund houses

Each resolution counts the houses whose vote was matched to it; the rest are listed last.

  • 1. a) To review consider and adopt the Audited Standalone Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024 together with the Reports of the Board of Directors and Auditors thereon.nnb) To consider and adopt the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the financial year ended 31st March, 2024 together with the Report of the Auditors thereon.MoreLess
    Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundUnqualified financial statements. Compliant with Indian Accounting Standards. Non-Compliant with Companies Act, 2013 & SEBI LODR Regulations: The Company has not disclosed financials of its subsidiaries for FY 2023-24 on its website. Transparency Concern: No clarity on whether Undisputed Statutory Dues have remained unpaid for more than 2 years.
    1 for3 against
  • 2 - To declare final dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2024;
    4 for0 against
  • 3. To appoint a director in place of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610), who is liable to retire by rotation, being eligible and offers himself for re-appointment.
    Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Remuneration paid and proposed is Excessive compared to peers as also compared to benchmark; No absolute cap on variable pay.
    1 for3 against
  • 5. To consider and approve the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures
    4 for0 against
  • 6. To consider and approve the issuance of Commercial Paper
    4 for0 against
  • 7. To consider and approve the limit of Rs. 7116 crores under section 185 & 186 of Companies Act, 2013 for providing loans/guarantee/securities to the Subsidiary Companies/Associate Companies/any other Companies/JVs/Trust/Body CorporatesnMoreLess
    Against HDFC Mutual Fund
    • HDFC Mutual FundLack of clarity with regard to rationale for extending financial support to these entities
    3 for1 against
  • 8. To re-appoint for term of three years and fixation of the remuneration of Mr. Dilip Suryavanshi (DIN: 00039944) as the Managing Director of the company
    Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Holds CMD position, Unfair remuneration practice; No absolute cap on variable pay.
    1 for3 against
  • 9. To re-appoint for term of three years and fixation of the remuneration Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610) as the Managing Director of the company
    Against Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Bandhan Mutual Fund, Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance Concern: Remuneration paid and proposed is Excessive compared to peers as also compared to benchmark; No absolute cap on variable pay.
    1 for3 against
1 proposal not matched to one resolution
  • Ratification of remuneration of Rs. 50,000/- plus applicable taxes and reimbursement of out - of - pocket expenses at actuals for travelling and boarding/ lodging payable to M/s. Yogesh Chourasia and Associates, Cost Accountants, Bhopal (ICWAI Firm Registration No. 000271) appointed by the Board of Directors as the Cost Auditor to conduct the audit of the cost records maintained by the Company for the financial year 2024 - 25.MoreLess
    4 for0 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 30 Nov 2023, 3 fund houses

  • ALTERATION OF THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY
    3 for0 against
  • ISSUE OF CONVERTIBLE WARRANTS ON PREFERENTIAL BASIS TO THE CERTAIN NON-QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS UNDER NON-PROMOTER CATEGORY FOR CASH
    Against Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Groww Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Warrants priced at par with equity shares.
    1 for2 against

Mutual fund votes, meeting of 18 Sep 2023, 2 fund houses

  • To receive, consider and adopt the audited financial statements including the balance sheet and statement for change in the equity, profit and loss and cash flow of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2023 together with the reports of the board of directors and auditors thereon; and the audited consolidated financial statements including the balance sheet and statement for change in the equity, profit and loss and cash flow of the Company for the financial year ended March 31, 2023 together with the report of the auditors thereon.MoreLess
    2 for0 against
  • To declare final dividend on equity shares for the financial year ended March 31, 2023
    2 for0 against
  • To appoint a director in place of Mr. Devendra Jain (DIN: 02374610), who is liable to retire by rotation, being eligible and offers himself for re-appointment.
    2 for0 against
  • To consider and approve the re-appointment of Ms. Ratna Dharashree Vishwanathan (DIN: 07278291) for a second consecutive term of 5 (five) years w.e.f. March 30, 2024 to March 29, 2029.
    2 for0 against
  • To consider and ratify the remuneration of the Cost Auditor for the financial year 2023-24.
    2 for0 against
  • To consider and approve the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures.
    2 for0 against
  • To consider and approve the issuance of Commercial Paper.
    2 for0 against
  • To consider and approve the limit of Rs. 7605.50 crores under section 185 of Companies Act, 2013 for providing loans/ guarantee/securities to the Subsidiaries Companies/ Associates Companies/any other Companies/JVs/Trust/ Body Corporates.MoreLess
    Against HDFC Mutual Fund
    • HDFC Mutual FundAs the resolution is open ended there could be a possibility that the support could be extended to other companies directly/indirectly controlled by the promoters
    1 for1 against
  • To consider and approve the authorization to the Board for issuance and allotment of equity shares.
    Against Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual FundCompliant with law. Governance concern: Excessive dilution, Inadequate justification.
    1 for1 against
  • To authorise the board of directors of the company for creation of mortgage/charge on all or any of the movable or immovable properties of the company.
    Against Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund"Compliant with law. Governance Concern: Majority of the borrowing limit unutilized and absence of specific reasons for the proposed increase"
    1 for1 against
  • To authorise board of directors of the company to borrow money in excess of the paid–up capital and free reserves of the company.
    Against HDFC Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund
    • HDFC Mutual FundGiven these are rolling limits linked to networth, shareholders will not get a chance to periodic review th e borrowing limits
    • Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund"Compliant with law. Governance Concern: Majority of the borrowing limit unutilized and absence of specific reasons for the proposed increase"
    0 for2 against

Each fund house counted once, from its own disclosure; the reasons are its own words.

Stakes in unlisted companies

Reported in the filing for the quarter to Jun 2026.

  • Unlisted stake boughtMEKHALI POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITEDSince 30 May 2026

    100.00% bought in the quarter; holding 100.00%, from 0.00%

Investor complaints and compliance

Quarter by quarter.

Investor complaints received and resolved, the company's own count

  • Received
  • Resolved

Open at the quarter's end

None open at any quarter's end.
The board is made up as the listing rules require
Yes
The board has a regular chairperson
Yes
The company has a risk management committee
Yes
The chair is related to the managing director
No
The filing has a part on fines and penalties
No
The filing has a part on tax disputes
No
There was a cyber security incident in the quarter
No

The company's own answers in its filing.

How money raised was used

Reported for the quarter to Mar 2025. The company's results filing for the quarter to Jun 2026 says no statement of how money raised was used applies to it. A statement's amounts are left out where the raise it states and its own uses differ by fifty times or more, a figure typed at the wrong scale.

RaisedAmount raisedForSet asideSpentSpent elsewhere
Public IssuesDec 2023, checked by CRISIL RATINGS LIMITED–WORKING CAPITAL––No
Public IssuesDec 2023, checked by CRISIL RATINGS LIMITED–GENERAL CORPORATE PURPOSE––No
₹ crore. Checked by is the agency appointed to monitor how the money is used. The reason and the comments are the company's, its audit committee's and its auditors' own words.