Nippon India Mutual Fund logo

Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term Fund Direct IDCW NAV history

AMFI: 143701ISIN: INF204KB1YX7MUTF_IN: NIPP_INDI_NVSH_1V7CJF0Nippon India Mutual FundLong Duration funds

Formerly Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Fund, Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Duration Fund, Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term Fund Long Duration, Reliance Nivesh Lakshya Fund
NAV ₹11.7391

NAV for 23 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹5,839 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
0.33%19 Oct 2026
Exit load
None
Yield to maturity
7.78%30 Sep 2026
Risk level
ModerateAug 2026
Holdings
1630 Sep 2026
Launched
6 Jul 2018

Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 9 Jul 2018

NAV, ₹ per unit, Direct IDCW

Highest NAV ₹12.7123 on 14 Aug 2026Lowest NAV ₹9.8202 on 11 Sep 2018

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. An IDCW plan's NAV falls by each payout, so no year's return is shown

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowest
2026so far₹12.3335₹11.7391₹12.7123₹11.7391
2025₹12.1558₹12.3291₹12.6724₹12.0976
2024₹12.0776₹12.1721₹12.7018₹11.8925
2023₹11.9648₹12.0990₹12.5055₹11.7648
2022₹11.8429₹11.9525₹12.1271₹11.2830
2021₹12.0041₹11.8469₹12.0938₹11.5705
2020₹11.4112₹12.0098₹12.2872₹11.2377
2019₹10.9209₹11.3879₹12.0457₹10.4620
2018₹9.9604₹10.9388₹10.9778₹9.8202

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.