Nippon India Mutual Fund logo

Nippon India Japan Equity Fund Regular IDCW NAV history

AMFI: 130859ISIN: INF204KA1SL5MUTF_IN: NIPP_INDI_JAPA_LXEFS0Nippon India Mutual FundSectoral / Thematic funds

Formerly Nippon India Japan Equity Fund- Growth Plan, Reliance Japan Equity Fund
NAV ₹27.3587

NAV for 23 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹358 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
2.50%19 Oct 2026
Exit load
1%if sold within 1 year
Risk level
Very HighAug 2026
Holdings
3030 Sep 2026
Launched
26 Aug 2014

Nippon India Japan Equity Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 27 Aug 2014

NAV, ₹ per unit, Regular IDCW

Highest NAV ₹28.8845 on 6 Oct 2026Lowest NAV ₹9.0769 on 17 Oct 2014

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. An IDCW plan's NAV falls by each payout, so no year's return is shown

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowest
2026so far₹22.8164₹27.3587₹28.8845₹22.8047
2025₹18.7093₹22.5250₹23.0784₹16.7916
2024₹16.8899₹18.8085₹20.0490₹16.4418
2023₹14.5693₹17.2067₹17.2284₹14.2166
2022₹17.3858₹14.4905₹17.4272₹12.8875
2021₹16.0582₹17.1150₹18.6569₹15.9783
2020₹14.3965₹16.1941₹16.2823₹10.7949
2019₹11.6343₹14.3072₹14.4325₹11.6343
2018₹12.0342₹11.6219₹13.8893₹11.2640
2017₹10.6479₹12.0745₹12.2693₹10.4018
2016₹10.7505₹10.4936₹10.8620₹9.2472
2015₹9.7716₹10.8776₹11.5570₹9.3671
2014₹9.9306₹9.7755₹9.9533₹9.0769

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.