Nippon India Mutual Fund logo

Nippon India Aggressive Hybrid Fund Regular Growth NAV history

AMFI: 112936ISIN: INF204K01FW1MUTF_IN: NIPP_INDI_AGRS_15LJOERNippon India Mutual FundAggressive Hybrid funds

Formerly Nippon India Equity Hybrid Fund, Reliance Equity Hybrid Fund, Reliance Regular Savings Fund - Balanced
NAV ₹99.9479down ₹1.00 (0.99%)

NAV for 23 Oct 2026, against 22 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹3,857 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
1.97%19 Oct 2026
P/E
24.630 Sep 2026
Risk level
Very HighAug 2026
Holdings
12630 Sep 2026
Launched
8 Jun 2005

Nippon India Aggressive Hybrid Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 21 May 2010

NAV, ₹ per unit, Regular Growth

Highest NAV ₹108.9566 on 10 Aug 2026Lowest NAV ₹18.8228 on 20 Dec 2011

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. A year's return is the NAV on its last day against the year before's

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowestBenchmark
2026so far₹107.7564₹99.9479₹108.9566₹97.4319––
2025₹101.6509₹107.3981₹108.3639₹92.7457+6.14%–
2024₹87.2206₹101.1841₹106.8195₹86.5717+16.13%–
2023₹70.5760₹87.1307₹87.1307₹67.2168+24.07%–
2022₹66.6546₹70.2283₹72.2613₹60.1707+6.59%–
2021₹51.7796₹65.8872₹68.3232₹51.4818+27.79%–
2020₹54.5610₹51.5588₹55.3755₹32.5091−5.29%–
2019₹53.0627₹54.4369₹55.5624₹49.1219+2.99%–
2018₹55.2668₹52.8572₹57.2949₹50.0273−4.88%–
2017₹43.0353₹55.5705₹55.6089₹43.0353+29.53%–
2016₹41.2956₹42.9026₹45.4365₹36.0893+4.20%–
2015₹38.0304₹41.1732₹41.5822₹37.5350+8.73%–
2014₹26.4989₹37.8665₹38.5719₹25.3568+43.20%–
2013₹25.7865₹26.4427₹26.4427₹21.9151+3.52%–
2012₹19.0986₹25.5446₹25.5446₹19.0986+33.86%–
2011₹23.7063₹19.0836₹23.7071₹18.8228−19.27%–
2010₹20.1374₹23.6381₹25.0866₹19.8304––

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.