Mirae Asset Mutual Fund logo

Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund Direct IDCW NAV history

AMFI: 140770ISIN: INF769K01DS6MUTF_IN: MIRA_ASSE_DYNA_1MUVXIAMirae Asset Mutual FundDynamic Bond funds

Formerly Mirae Asset Dynamic Bond Fund
NAV ₹18.4474

NAV for 23 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹114 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
0.17%21 Oct 2026
Exit load
None
Yield to maturity
7.74%30 Sep 2026
Risk level
Low to ModerateAug 2026
Holdings
1030 Sep 2026
Launched
24 Mar 2017

Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 27 Mar 2017

NAV, ₹ per unit, Direct IDCW

Highest NAV ₹18.9379 on 14 Aug 2026Lowest NAV ₹10.0454 on 29 Mar 2017The benchmark, CRISIL Dynamic Bond A-III Index, is not set against an IDCW plan: its NAV falls by every payout.

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. An IDCW plan's NAV falls by each payout, so no year's return is shown

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowest
2026so far₹18.2134₹18.4474₹18.9379₹18.2134
2025₹16.8827₹18.2109₹18.2109₹16.8817
2024₹15.6242₹16.8760₹16.8760₹15.6242
2023₹14.6395₹15.6239₹15.6239₹14.6395
2022₹14.3009₹14.6361₹14.6361₹13.9628
2021₹13.8317₹14.3021₹14.3458₹13.7216
2020₹12.5016₹13.8296₹13.8296₹12.4588
2019₹11.0816₹12.4822₹12.4934₹11.0712
2018₹10.4513₹11.1023₹11.1305₹10.3872
2017₹10.0486₹10.4453₹10.4836₹10.0454

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.