Mirae Asset Mutual Fund logo

Mirae Asset Banking and Financial Services Fund Regular IDCW NAV history

AMFI: 148622ISIN: INF769K01GT7MUTF_IN: MIRA_ASSE_BANK_Q43SGNMirae Asset Mutual FundSectoral / Thematic funds

NAV ₹19.8720

NAV for 23 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹2,196 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
2.15%21 Oct 2026
P/E
18.130 Sep 2026
Risk level
Very HighAug 2026
Holdings
3030 Sep 2026
Launched
11 Dec 2020

Mirae Asset Banking and Financial Services Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 14 Dec 2020

NAV, ₹ per unit, Regular IDCW

Highest NAV ₹22.6650 on 18 Feb 2026Lowest NAV ₹9.7780 on 21 Dec 2020The benchmark, Nifty Financial Services TRI, is not set against an IDCW plan: its NAV falls by every payout.

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. An IDCW plan's NAV falls by each payout, so no year's return is shown

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowest
2026so far₹22.0530₹19.8720₹22.6650₹19.0620
2025₹18.5560₹22.0140₹22.1540₹17.1450
2024₹16.5490₹18.4590₹19.7210₹15.9140
2023₹13.7420₹16.5340₹16.6730₹12.5290
2022₹12.3850₹13.6690₹13.9730₹10.6650
2021₹10.3170₹12.0810₹13.6310₹10.0830
2020₹10.0290₹10.3140₹10.3140₹9.7780

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.