Mirae Asset Mutual Fund logo

Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct Growth NAV history

AMFI: 134813ISIN: INF769K01DH9MUTF_IN: MIRA_ASSE_AGGR_1E0LE3YMirae Asset Mutual FundAggressive Hybrid funds

Formerly Mirae Asset Hybrid-Equity Fund
NAV ₹37.4250down ₹0.36 (0.96%)

NAV for 23 Oct 2026, against 22 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹9,239 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
0.63%21 Oct 2026
P/E
22.930 Sep 2026
Risk level
Very HighAug 2026
Holdings
15130 Sep 2026
Launched
29 Jul 2015

Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 30 Jul 2015

NAV, ₹ per unit, Direct Growth

Highest NAV ₹39.9800 on 3 Aug 2026Lowest NAV ₹8.9980 on 25 Feb 2016

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. A year's return is the NAV on its last day against the year before's

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowestBenchmark
2026so far₹39.4080₹37.4250₹39.9800₹35.7080––
2025₹35.4930₹39.3360₹39.3360₹32.7300+11.20%–
2024₹30.7660₹35.3740₹37.6590₹30.4280+15.14%–
2023₹25.5800₹30.7220₹30.7220₹24.2620+20.66%–
2022₹24.8450₹25.4610₹26.0180₹22.0220+3.78%–
2021₹19.6050₹24.5330₹25.3400₹19.4120+25.56%–
2020₹16.9620₹19.5390₹19.5390₹12.1990+15.35%–
2019₹14.9020₹16.9390₹16.9870₹14.4810+13.83%–
2018₹14.3850₹14.8810₹15.2930₹13.6630+2.80%–
2017₹11.1320₹14.4750₹14.4750₹11.1320+30.26%–
2016₹10.0630₹11.1120₹11.6410₹8.9980+10.72%–
2015₹10.0100₹10.0360₹10.1870₹9.3770––

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.