ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund logo

ICICI Prudential ESG Exclusionary Strategy Fund Direct IDCW NAV history

AMFI: 148515ISIN: INF109KC1O25MUTF_IN: ICIC_PRU_ESG_1RXQXBPICICI Prudential Mutual FundSectoral / Thematic funds

Formerly ICICI Prudential ESG Fund
NAV ₹14.7200

NAV for 23 Oct 2026. Declared once a day.

Fund size
₹1,275 CrSep 2026
Expense ratio
1.33%15 Oct 2026
P/E
24.030 Sep 2026
Risk level
Very HighAug 2026
Holdings
5230 Sep 2026
Launched
9 Oct 2020

ICICI Prudential ESG Exclusionary Strategy Fund NAV since launch

Every day's NAV since 12 Oct 2020

NAV, ₹ per unit, Direct IDCW

Highest NAV ₹20.6900 on 26 Sep 2024Lowest NAV ₹9.9400 on 15 Oct 2020The benchmark, Nifty 100 ESG TRI, is not set against an IDCW plan: its NAV falls by every payout.

NAV by year, month end and day

₹ a unit. An IDCW plan's NAV falls by each payout, so no year's return is shown

Each calendar year

First NAVLast NAVHighestLowest
2026so far₹18.6200₹14.7200₹18.8000₹14.4100
2025₹19.0300₹18.5900₹19.2600₹15.9200
2024₹16.8700₹18.9000₹20.6900₹15.7100
2023₹12.6200₹16.8000₹16.8000₹12.1400
2022₹14.2200₹12.5800₹14.3200₹10.7700
2021₹11.3700₹14.1000₹14.6000₹11.1200
2020₹10.0000₹11.3300₹11.3500₹9.9400

About the NAV

What is NAV?

Net asset value: what one unit of the fund is worth, the value of everything the fund holds less what it owes, divided by the units in issue. The fund house works it out after every business day, and buying or selling units is done at the NAV of the day.

Why do the direct and regular plans have different NAVs?

Both own the same portfolio, but the regular plan pays a commission to the distributor who sold it, out of its expense ratio, and the direct plan does not. The extra cost is taken from the regular plan's assets every day, so its NAV grows a little slower.

Why does an IDCW plan's NAV fall on some days?

An IDCW plan pays out part of its value to unit holders from time to time, and its NAV falls by the amount paid. The growth plan keeps that money invested, so the two plans' NAVs drift apart and the IDCW plan has no year's return here.

Why are some years missing their highest and lowest NAV?

In those years the NAV changed level once without the market moving it, as when units are split, so a high before the change and a low after it would compare two different scales.